That’s the appetiser done, now for the main course
By Brett McKay, 1 Jun 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- bulls stormers, England, Fiji, Ireland, Rugby Union, springboxs, Super Rugby, Test rugby, wallabies
107 Have your say
As far as appetisers go, the last ever Super 14 final was a beauty. The Bulls and Stormers went at it in a good old-fashioned battle of attrition that just happened to be one of the best games of rugby of the season.
Such was the pace of the game, that the kettle boiled pre-game in my kitchen didn’t produce the intended cup of tea until the 26-minute mark. At which point Murphy’s Law took over and I missed the first try of the game to Bulls winger Francois Hougaard.
The noise of the nomadic Pretoria-to-Soweto crowd at Orlando Stadium was unbelievable. The din of who-knows-how-many thousand plastic bugles was as constant as it was deafening, with the buglers only seeming to take a breath whenever Bulls superboot Morne Steyn was lining up a kick at goal. When Stormers flyhalf Peter Grant lined his kicks up, the volume increased to such an extent that I think I could hear it outside my lounge room.
Just as I predicted last week, Bulls scrumhalf Fourie du Preez turned on a master class in game management. From the early exchanges, du Preez was in everything, controlling where the Bulls played their game, and unleashing his backs when the time was right. Between his own pinpoint kicking from behind the ruck, and Steyn’s unwavering accuracy, du Preez controlled the game like a maestro, and you just knew it was a matter of time until he produced the big play.
And so he did from just inside the Stormers half, where du Preez drifted to his right with quick ruck ball and superbly put the flying Hougaard through a yawning gap. Stormers fullback Joe Pietersen was no match in the last line, and before he knew it, Hougaard was launching himself under the posts. The Bulls were looking ominous as they went into the break with a 16-3 lead.
To the Stormers great credit, they fought back in the second half with yet another intercept try to winger Bryan Habana. It was a calculated risk from Habana, with three unmarked Bulls outside him, and it could well have been a 14-point turnaround had the pass found its intended mark.
At 16-10, and with a little over twenty minutes left, the title was there for the taking. Despite the best efforts of Grant and Springboks outside centre Jaque Fourie though, the Stormers just couldn’t make the big play when it was required. All the while, the Bulls played the percentages as they waited for the Stormers to err within Steyn’s prodigious kicking range.
Sure enough, giant Stormers lock Andries Bekker provided the necessary brain-explosion by attempting a rather crude ruck cleanout, gifting Steyn three more points. Two more penalty goals in the last ten minutes gave Steyn 20 points for the match, and a third Super Rugby title to the Bulls. Ricky Januarie’s 78th minute consolation try for the Stormers only briefly delayed the Bulls’ celebrations.
As I snuck back to bed at a touch before 3am, I couldn’t help but wonder what this might mean for the Springboks, as the southern hemisphere season now looks toward the main course: the Internationals.
Like those curious progressive dinners, the main course is broken into two segments, with the European nations first heading this way in June, before the SANZAR partners retreat back into their national guises, returning in July to belt seven shades out of each other during the Tri-Nations.
The June tours will see South Africa head to Cardiff firstly to take on Wales, before returning to the Republic to take on France and Italy. The home Tests shouldn’t pose much problem for the Springboks, but the trip to Wales could be a real danger game for them so soon after the Super 14 Final and more so given they’re resting several of their big names from this quick trip in favour of a handful of European-based fill-ins.
New Zealand host Ireland and then two Tests against Wales, and you’d expect the All Blacks to come out and prove all the current criticisms and concerns about depth are unfounded.
Australia host England for a two-Test Cook Cup series, followed by Ireland, of which I’d like to see three wins, but recognise that playing England in Perth might bring the same dangers as playing South Africa over in the west. Before these though, the Wallabies take on Fiji, in one of the cruellest pieces of rugby scheduling I can think of.
You see, the Fiji Test represents a return to Canberra Stadium, following last year’s successful hosting of Italy in the nation’s Capital. But Canberra in June can be a bit well, fresh, to put it mildly. The corresponding match last year saw the Italians having to deal with temperatures as low as -4. Don’t get me wrong, it’s great that we’ve got another Test in town, but Fiji, in Canberra, in June? It just doesn’t seem very sporting to me.
Come July, the Tri-Nations begins and The Roar has already been abuzz with South Africans, New Zealanders and especially Australians all bullish about their teams’ chances. And fair enough too, Super Rugby form and recent rugby history can create some compelling arguments.
For what it’s worth, South Africa would have to be a big chance, with the draw seeing them finish with three home games up on the Highveld where they’re rarely beaten. Should they manage a win or two away from home first though, they’ll be short-priced favourites by the time they return home.
The All Blacks are always dangerous of course, and will be especially hard to beat at home, as they always are. Only playing one game in South Africa is a big plus too, and playing in Australia has presented few challenges in recent seasons.
The Wallabies, on the other hand, will be buoyed by not having to play New Zealand at Eden Park in Auckland, plus two home Bledisloe Cup Tests. If they can snare one win in South Africa, well you just never know.
However it pans out, we’re easily looking at one of the more evenly contested Tri-Nations tournaments in the last few years.
A tip? Don’t be silly, that’s how arguments start…
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Victory beat Mariners with Kewell winner
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- bulls stormers, England, Fiji, Ireland, Rugby Union, springboxs, Super Rugby, Test rugby, wallabies


pothale said | June 1st 2010 @ 2:54am | Report comment
Brett
Glad to see that the Super 14 final had some fans outside of South Africa, even if it doesn’t bode well for their opponents across the board.
Am curious about a couple of your comments.
“The June tours will see South Africa head to Cardiff firstly to take on Wales, before returning to the Republic to take on France and Italy. The home Tests shouldn’t pose much problem for the Springboks, but the trip to Wales could be a real danger game for them…”
Whilst I agree about the Wales game, whose tails will be up after winning the Challenge Cup and Magners League through the Neath-Swansea Ospreys and Cardiff Blues, I think you dismiss France too easily, even though they’ll be on the Boks’ home turf. Admittedly, the French are mercurial and they’ve had a long season, but having won honours in the 6 Nations Grand Slam and Heineken Cup, they’ll be on a high.
I think this could be one of the best games of the month, and the two nations are all square on their recent meetings home and away, with the French having the bragging rights for the moment.
Ditto Wales who may come away with one of the test scalps on their belt. Although history is on the ABs side.
As for Australia, getting the double on England will prove highly difficult in my view. The Perth match-up should be a god one.
Finally, of the four matches that Ireland has on their tour, I suspect the final one against their Pool C opponents is the one they’ll target. As long as the teams are not too flagged out, this could be the most interesting set of June tests for some time.
Mr Saunders said | June 1st 2010 @ 3:22am | Report comment
Perhaps Brett has forgotten the last few occasions that France turned up in SA?
Mr Saunders said | June 1st 2010 @ 4:30am | Report comment
Excuse me, Brett. That sounds unintentionally sarcastic. You must think I really have it in for you.. you SH pig…
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:50am | Report comment
so, Mr Saunders, this one is INtentionally sarcastic?!? NH pig
Mr Saunders said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:54am | Report comment
You rascal, you.
Here are the recent results between France and SA, Brett:
13 Nov 2009 France 20 – 13 South Africa
24 Jun 2006 South Africa 26 – 36 France
26 Nov 2005 France 26 – 20 South Africa
25 Jun 2005 South Africa 27 – 13 France
18 Jun 2005 South Africa 30 – 30 France
09 Nov 2002 France 30 – 10 South Africa
10 Nov 2001 France 20 – 10 South Africa
23 Jun 2001 South Africa 20 – 15 France
16 Jun 2001 South Africa 23 – 32 France
Pretty impressive overall strike record. Personally, I see the current France side (and France under Laporte) as a slightly more exotic SA: bump and grind style, but with better technical ability in the pack and more dangerous backs. I fancy them to win this summer.
Rusty said | June 2nd 2010 @ 10:39am | Report comment
even as an ardent Bok supporter I have to agree with you on this one – we both play the same style but the French augment it with better backplay
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:47am | Report comment
morning guys, good to see some early starters, or late finishers, as you guys may be….
Pots, I may well have written France off too easily, and those words could well be the first ever prediction I get wrong*. But that mercurial nature you mention is exactly what I’m thinking of, as is their recent history in one-off Tests when they cross the Equator.
And you’re quite right about England and Ireland, too. I’m with you on the Perth game (wrote as much) for sure, and no doubt Ireland will be a tough game for the reasons you outline. Ireland’s recent history in one-off Tests is a bit like France though too. Realistically, any Test side is going to be tough to overcome. Injuries – for all teams – could well dictate terms..
* may not actually be the first ever prediction I get wrong..
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 9:32am | Report comment
have just read that Harinordoquy has pulled out of the French squad with a rib injury…
Mr Saunders said | June 1st 2010 @ 8:04pm | Report comment
That could be good for France with games against teams like SA and Argentina. Picamoles demolished the SA pack almost single handed, and with Bonnaire taking Harinordoquy’s lineout role he could be free to rove…
Ziggy said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:23am | Report comment
France have the best record of any visiting team in SA – I’d say they could win.
Jerry said | June 1st 2010 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
The All Blacks have the best record of visiting teams to SA (but then they’d have the best visiting record pretty much everywhere except Wales where SA would have a higher winning percentage).
Jimmy said | June 1st 2010 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Check that again.I suspect that Ziggy is right.
Jerry said | June 1st 2010 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
AB’s in SA
All time – Played 43, won 18 (41.9%)
Amateur – Played 22, Won 6 (27.3)
Pro – Played 21, Won 12 (57.1%)
France in SA
All time – Played 20, Won 6 (30%)
Amateur – Played 15, Won 4 (26.7%)
Pro – Played 5, Won (40%).
Whatever way you look at it, the AB’s take it.
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
Depends on how you define it. Pick & Go has the Springboks losing 19 games in the Republic since 1996, and the breakdown of those 19 is:
New Zealand 11
British & Irish Lions 3
Australia 2
France 2
England 1
If you remove time from the equation (which then takes us back to 1891!), the Lions and NZ have both recorded 17 wins, and France still only has 6..
Spencer said | June 1st 2010 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
France have won 35% of matches in South Africa against Boks.
New Zealand have won 55% of matches in South Africa against Boks.
Above info for the period 1994-2010.
LeftArmSpinner said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:38am | Report comment
I suspect that its going to be one of those meals where the first few sips of wine, when the taste buds are working at full capacity and well matched to the aforementioned appetiser dominate the culinary experience and leave the manin course lost in the background. After all, it has been a fantastic Super 14 season.
Now to the Bulls V Stormers game: With lots of talk about the physicality of the Bulls Stormers game, and the need for the Wallabies to match fire with fire, I can only concur. However, another lesson to emerge from the game was Hougaard’s try. It was a back to the future moment. Spies bent the line, Hougaard, moved in-field as the ruck formed, and then apparently lazily and aimlessly tracked Du Preez, as he set up the next phase, BUT at the last moment, and with the defence set up and committed to their individual attackers, Hougaard hit the gas, popped out of DuPreez’s shadow, turned hard left into the hole, took the short pass and went through. Compare this to fullbacks and wingers telegraphing their plans by standing in the back line, even before an attacking scrum has been set!!!!! Guile, cunning, subtlety!!!!! Among other things, thats what the Wallabies need.
The Stormers made Tahs-like mistakes. No team in the world can “spot” the Bulls 16 points at the start of any game!!!!
Unlike you Brett, I was more concerned about the try scorer than anything else. I was one point ahead of two other tippers in our annual tipping comp. We had all chosen the Bookies favourite, The Bulls. Only the “extra point” for the first try scorer could derail me on my way to the first prize and we had all chosen different scorers. So, it was a delight to awake around 3am, check the score and try scorer, smile at my luck at picking Hougaard and promptly return to the land of nod!!!!!
We can only hope that the Boks will run out of steam when those old legs slow up. Meanwhile, lets help them get there by running them ragged as we saw the Reds do so effectively in Brisbane this year.!!!!!! Oh, and a little more guile from supposed our backline generals. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5FaS7JaHjU
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 8:14am | Report comment
Leftie, I can assure you I was concerned about the try when I came back from the kitchen with cuppa in hand!! I’d even sat through three penalties at that stage!! It really was a wonderfully well-worked move, I reckon I’ve watched it ten or a dozen times since on replay, so simple but so effective..
And Ashley-Cooper’s guns? He’s just breathing in, he’s sucked his biceps in too…
LeftArmSpinner said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:45am | Report comment
BTW, what has happened to AAC’s pistols???? The accompanying photo shows a very lean, and in my view, too lean view of AAC in the new kit!!!!!!
Tim Reardon said | June 1st 2010 @ 3:35pm | Report comment
I saw him in Canberra the week before the Brumbies left for Christchurch and I would not worry about him being too small.
He is, as you point out, very lean.
Photon said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:47am | Report comment
Fully expect the boks to live down to your epectations, I mean the Springboks have never been regarded as anything above average by Messrs Saunders and Pothale. Yet somehow they’ve managed a world cup,lions series and tri nations victories inthe last three years, here’s hoping we find a way to garner some more luck and a few more tophies along the way.
pothale said | June 1st 2010 @ 7:31am | Report comment
Oh phooey Photon. Don’t talk nonsense. When did I ever say that the Boks were never more than average?
They won the World Cup three years ago. No one disputes that.
Lions series? Yep they won it. Just. In two tight matches, particularly the second. But they won it.
And they won the Tri Nations handsomely last year.
Everyone regards them as the team to beat currently. Particularly after their S14 performance.
Meanwhile, a couple of us have pointed out France’s record against SA as proof that they shouldn’t be easily dismissed against the Boks, and suddenly you’re crying in your soup, feeling put upon.
Get over yourself. Champions shouldn’t pout.
Mr Saunders said | June 2nd 2010 @ 9:50pm | Report comment
‘Fully expect the boks to live down to your epectations, I mean the Springboks have never been regarded as anything above average by Messrs Saunders and Pothale. Yet somehow they’ve managed a world cup,lions series and tri nations victories inthe last three years, here’s hoping we find a way to garner some more luck and a few more tophies along the way.’
Yawn. Your pantomine ire might be reasonable were SA to actually have a good record against France, the team in discussion. Grow up.
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:59am | Report comment
BTW, if any of you NH guys win the Wallabies jumper, I take a Medium…
Great competition Eds, get involved Aussies!!
Willy said | June 1st 2010 @ 8:00am | Report comment
My mates in England and Ireland are already claiming the Wallabies should flog both sides. Apparently both countries are sending experimental teams down here.
I don’t know whether that’s true (haven’t really looked at the squads), or just my mates managing expectations… but that’s what they’re telling me.
Harry said | June 1st 2010 @ 9:27am | Report comment
Be wary Willy. The Poms are great at talking themselves down. IF they can dominate the Wallaby forwards (and thats a chance given our injury list) they have an excellent chance in Perth and in my mind will start favourites.
SA strong favourities for the 3N given the draw.
I hope to be proven wrong about Australian forwards – like I was with Queensland this year – but no Palu, Robinson, Moore, TPN, Horwill makes me pessimistic, given the all too often proven habit of Sharpe, Chisolm and Mumm to go missing when the going gets tough, and the lack of size and physicality of Brown and Hoiles. Only Elsom, Alexander and Pocock to do the hard stuff … for benchmarks we have to match see the S14 final, last year’s humiliation in the Wellington Bledisloe, and the constant defeats at altitude in SA (last time Aus won at altitude in SA? 1960′s I think … still, SA have won just one game since 1972 on the East Coast of Australia, just as bad).
Willy said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:28am | Report comment
All good points, Harry.
We tend to run these Nth Hemisphere sides ragged during the June Tests though – they’re at the end of a long season by the time they get down here.
Colin N said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:58am | Report comment
“Apparently both countries are sending experimental teams down here.”
No, both have picked their best available squads. England have picked a big squad of 44, including some younger players who will get game time in the midweek team and hopefully, if they do well, could have an outside bet of test place. Apparently Attwood have a great game for England and with Borthwick out and Deacon not selected, that position is up for grabs.
Tutu said | June 1st 2010 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
44 players in the squad is there anyone left at home?
pothale said | June 1st 2010 @ 11:09pm | Report comment
“My mates in England and Ireland are already claiming the Wallabies should flog both sides. Apparently both countries are sending experimental teams down here. I don’t know whether that’s true (haven’t really looked at the squads)…”
Maybe you should look at the squads and see for yourself, instead of relying on ‘mates’.
No one has been claiming these are experimental squads. In Ireland’s case, they’re a squad of necessity due to injuries to some key players, but that’s it. They’re still planning to come down and spank the Aussies ar*ses before they play in the Tri-Nations Tiddlywinks Tournament.
Maybe your mates meant they were planning to flog the Wallabies – it’s easy to misunderstand these things…….
Go_the_Wannabe's said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:00am | Report comment
“but recognise that playing England in Perth might bring the same dangers as playing South Africa over in the west”.
Brett, any stats on that claim? As Harry points out above, have the Saffers only won once on the east coast since 72?
How many times have they won in Perth? I’ve been to one loss and one win in the last 2 years…….
The Wannabe’s backline should hold it’s own, but I really fear for the forwards. Too many injuries to key players, too small, too timid.
I think the current selection of forwards will get a pasting unless they play a smart game a la the Reds vs Bulls. If they revert to type (see Tahs vs Stormers) then it’s over before it’s begun.
They are not going to dominate the Saffer’s forward pack and lucky to break even against the Enzedders.
Run them off their feet – play smarter not harder!
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:16am | Report comment
GtWs, my point about Perth was just about playing a touring team in front of a large ex-pat crowd more than anything. Just as there’s a large South African community in Perth, there’s also a lot of English transplants, that’s all…
But, a quick look on Pick & Go tells me the Wallabies-Boks tally in Perth (in TNs, so since 1998) is 3 wins each and a draw. Their last win in Perth? 32-25 just last year… (http://www.pickandgo.info/)
And I agree wholeheartedly, for the Wallabies to beat the Boks, it needs to more closely resemble the Reds..
Go_the_Wannabe's said | June 1st 2010 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
Brett, point taken but there’s probably more Poms and Saffer’s in Sydney…….anyway.
BTW Larkham was once famously asked why he liked running the ball back so much. His reply…..”Cos I can’t kick mate!”.
Man, we need a Larkham back in the side……though AAC and Beale can’t really kick either. It’s just that they think they can. They should take some Larkham advice. Problem Solvered.
Also, they should bring in a rule that only the no. 10 can kick…….or it’s an immediate penalty. I’d like to see that game!
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
GtWs, best not to start me on the Larkham appreciation stakes, I’ll blow all commenting records on The Roar on my own. Fair to say I completely agree with you!!
mudskipper said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Finally next year we’ll have an extended Super Rugby comp… Bring it on…
Rickety Knees said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
G’day Mate – the Boks are going to be real hard to beat upfront. I just hope that Deans has a plan B if they dominate us in the forwards unlike the Tahs – still can’t believe that their only plan was take them on up front and when that failed – well just try more of the same …. if the Wallabies do that they will lose and I will be booing them.
Willy said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
You’re right Rickety.
Hopefully Deans was watching when the Reds ran the Bulls and Stormers off the park in Brisbane…
Brett McKay said | June 1st 2010 @ 10:40am | Report comment
G’day Rickety, you’re spot on there about needing a Plan B. But also, I’d like to think Robbie Deans is smart enough to know that trying to smash through the Boks is not a high point in clear thinking. That said, a lot may also depend on who the midfield combination is by the time the TNs roll around…
inkosi said | June 1st 2010 @ 11:59am | Report comment
If anyone can get it right it’ll be Robbie…
Sam Taulelei said | June 1st 2010 @ 12:17pm | Report comment
Really? Based on what? Previous Wallaby performances in the Tri Nations?
inkosi said | June 1st 2010 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
Based on his Super Rugby performances, look at how the players he picked last year have already improved, you can’t deny the player depth is vastly improved from last year.
Also look at how long it took Woodward to get the RWC, Robbie’s star is on the up and so are the Wallabies..
Jerry said | June 1st 2010 @ 6:21pm | Report comment
A couple of popular sayings come to mind –
1 – Look at the scoreboard
2 – Don’t count your chickens before they’re hatched.
Deans hasn’t done anything of note yet as Wallabies coach. .
nicksa said | June 1st 2010 @ 8:13pm | Report comment
u can be the best coach in the world but if u dont have the players…
Red Rooster said | June 1st 2010 @ 8:41pm | Report comment
Thats crap Nicksa – are we dusting off last years excuses already for the Wallabies. This is his third season and it is his decision to Burgess ahead of Valentine, Maafu ahead of Daley etc etc. He can pick anyone he wants – at what point does a coach become accountable otherwise why do any of them get the sack???
nicksa said | June 2nd 2010 @ 3:06am | Report comment
Red rooster
If u had to pick a first 15 team made out of wallabies and boks, what would it be?
Dont be bias, just go from position to position and choose who u think are the best players.
pothale said | June 2nd 2010 @ 5:10am | Report comment
Ooh – can I have a go?
15. Bryan Habana
14. Digby Ioane
13. Rob Horne
12. Matt Giteau
11. Adam Ashley-Cooper
10. Quade Cooper
9. Will Genia
8. Richard Brown
7. David Pocock
6. Rocky Elsom
5. Nathan Sharpe
4. Dean Mumm
3. Salesi Ma’afu
2. Huia Edmonds
1. Ben Alexander
Replacements: F de Preez, V de Matfield; P de Villiers, B de Botha, other Aussie blokes
nicksa said | June 2nd 2010 @ 6:35am | Report comment
Pothale
then deans is def at fault
Sam Taulelei said | June 1st 2010 @ 9:04pm | Report comment
Didn’t realise that Robbie was playing Super 14 rugby this year or coaching teams. Must have missed that press release.
Like I said in another thread just having more players to pick from doesn’t automatically relate to improvements in depth. There is a vast difference in test quality players and players who have performed well at Super 14 level. Everyone harps on about the Wallabies adopting the Reds gameplan and running the Boks and All Blacks off their feet. But if you measure how much time you spend on attack in a test match compared to a Super 14 game you’ll realise that all out attack is a pipedream if you can’t win setpiece ball and dominate the breakdowns. Your defence also needs to be watertight.
Red Rooster said | June 1st 2010 @ 9:42pm | Report comment
Sam – happy for you to produce the stats that say it has to be different, particulalrly if the laws of the game are the same and encourage attack. Where was it this year that all the australian provinces got smashed week in and week out at set pieces. Tahs did well virtually each week, Reds even won tightheads from the Bulls and won all but one lineout etc etc. The Australian provinces finished in the top three in defence so where exactly are the excuses. Lets take on the Boks at their strengths or maybe we could play to ours and attack intstead of the kick chase shite we watched last year – at least the laws are in favour