A few commonsense rule changes for NRL
By M1tch, 26 Oct 2010 M1tch is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- NRL, NRL video referee, Rugby League, rugby league referees, video ref

Braith Anasta dives in for a try: Rugby League, NRL, Week Two of Finals Series, Roosters v Penrith Panthers at SFS, Saturday September 18th, 2010. Digital image by Colin Whelan © nrlphotos.com
It would seem we have to wait until the Independent Commission is in place before any type of changes are made to the NRL – and no doubt they will have a lot on their plate come first day of operation.
But there are some rules that continually bring the game down which need to be changed.
Commonsense rule changes include:
- The torso rule. Okay, under what universe was this considered okay, to allow a try by landing on it with your chest? Simply amazing this rule got through.
Solution: A try must be only awarded if it’s to controlled with your hand.
- Advantage rule. Another rule that it’s hard to believe is still in the rulebook. How many times in 2010 did we see players picking up from ball, running 5-8 meters and losing the ball, but the ref blows the whistle and says, “Back here for a scrum, he didn’t take the advantage.”
In other words, you could take the ball nine meters forward, go from the left wing to the right wing (without gaining one meter), go back to the center of the field (still without going over 10 meters), and if you lose the ball or throw a forward pass the ref will blow the whistle back to the original spot, which by now could be 20 meters across field.
Solution: Simple. If you pick up the ball and go forward/sideways one step, you are taking the advantage.
- Benefit of the doubt. One of the most talked about topics after the end of each weekend of footy.
Solution: It’s been said before and I agree; if after two looks it doesn’t look like a try, then it’s benefit of the doubt: to the defensive team.
- Holding formation of the scrum. When did this one sneak in? If a team, usually when games are close, and nearly the end of a half, they will rush in to form a scrum and the ref will then blow time-off, but the players cannot break the scrum otherwise time is waved back on. It’s a ludicrous rule.
Solution: If a team gets there first and forms a scrum, it’s time-off and they can break the scrum mold (but only players playing in the forwards and form the scrum as this will stop the scene of centers and wingers racing down to form the scrum).
- Video referee. Give them a 50-inch plasma TV so they can get the calls right.
Solution: Note to the Commission: JB Hi Fi has some top quality brands and low prices, go and buy 16 and get a deal!
These are just four rules changes, to which there are many, many more.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- How rugby league should expand (133)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (107)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Select The Roar’s NSW State of Origin I team (4)
- Stop the clock, NRL is running out of time (23)
- Once were Warriors, now are worriers (18)
- Wests Tigers at sixes and sevens for years (14)
- Listen Blues fans, let’s not kid ourselves (6)
- Pre-season draw sacrifices quality for quantity (10)
- Dave Smith’s crowd plan gaining credibility (27)
- Once were Warriors, now are worriers (18)
- Wests Tigers at sixes and sevens for years (14)
- Listen Blues fans, let’s not kid ourselves (6)
- Pre-season draw sacrifices quality for quantity (10)
- Dave Smith’s crowd plan gaining credibility (27)
- How accurate is the NRL ladder? (2)
- Channel Nine’s Broncos love-in continues to frustrate (9)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- NRL, NRL video referee, Rugby League, rugby league referees, video ref

October 26th 2010 @ 6:05am
anopinion said | October 26th 2010 @ 6:05am | Report comment
I bet for each rule change you have asked for new problems shall arise. That is the nature of sport critics. Changing these rules is much like chasing your tail.
Every time I watch a RL game I hear the commentators whining about this and that. Common sense they cry. It seems very few people in the world have common sense, only RL commentators. If they wish to be a guardian of the game, they should get a job for one of the agencies who is responsible for the game. TV stations are not. They may have to take a pay cut however.
October 26th 2010 @ 6:30am
oikee said | October 26th 2010 @ 6:30am | Report comment
Agree with most of what you wrote, already been identified all year. Common sense. We need someone with common sense, and not take 3 years to change the rule. Looking at the international rules, they can pack the scrum and then stand up. Why was this changed for the NRL. Who made that decision.
I think a better rule for the scrum would be, time off, if the other team pack the scrum to their advantage, time back on, so you get rid of time wasting. If both teams dont want to pack, time stays off until they pack.
Just a case of looking for a balance.
The Torso is a joke, advantage rule needs to be one pass play on, and big screen t/v for our blind video refs.
October 26th 2010 @ 6:47am
Willy said | October 26th 2010 @ 6:47am | Report comment
I never cease to be amazed by the ability of the powers-that-be to complicate such a simple, simple game.
Agree with all your suggestions (maybe a bit than one step for advantage though – otherwise you’ll see Wayne Bennett instruct his players to intentionally knock on immediately after the opposition has to ensure maximum advantage).
I would also like to see some more effort in keeping players bound in the scrum until the ball is out. It is a complete farce at the moment when you see a prop break from the scrum in time to make the first tackle! By keeping players in the scrum a second or so longer, we might see a few more scrum moves in the backs.
And that’s even without mentioning the complete stuff up with the scrum at the end of the Tigers v Roosters semi final, where a front rower apaprently didn’t have to be bound to the scrum at all.
October 26th 2010 @ 7:20am
Jedda Baxter said | October 26th 2010 @ 7:20am | Report comment
Rugby has the torso rule too. Don’t think you’re special!
October 26th 2010 @ 8:52am
M1tch said | October 26th 2010 @ 8:52am | Report comment
Thanks for contributing…
October 26th 2010 @ 11:16am
Jedda Baxter said | October 26th 2010 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Huh? I was merely pointing out that seemingly dumb rules are not just in rugby league. Perhaps you can explain why both codes have the same ridiculous rule? It would be nice to know.
October 26th 2010 @ 11:33am
M1tch said | October 26th 2010 @ 11:33am | Report comment
I might have taken your comment as a code war starter, hard to gauge emotion in text
October 26th 2010 @ 7:23am
jmo said | October 26th 2010 @ 7:23am | Report comment
Absolutely agree about the “two looks” rule M1tch except it should work for attacking teams as well – if it looks like a try and two looks doesn’t convince otherwise then benefit of doubt to the try scrorer. Example Jarryd Hayne in SOO1 last year a high speed blurry freeze frame hinted that he might have brushed the inner edge of the sideline with a flourescent boot so 3000 replays later they disallow it. If it wasn’t a try then it wasn’t by a millimetre which is a huge call to disallow a good try in such a huge game when it was by no means decisive.
Will be classic to see the video ref get a 50-inch plasma TV – can picture him up there in a big recliner with his slippies and dressing gown and a coldy, channel surfing X-Factor and Masterchef between plays and Dominos home delivery on the way and his mate Kev on his mobile.. “hang on a minute Kev I just got Badger on the other line”.
October 26th 2010 @ 10:03am
M1tch said | October 26th 2010 @ 10:03am | Report comment
Id agree with BOTD to either defensive or attacking, but it might cause issues with different refs interpretations..
October 26th 2010 @ 9:27am
The Bush said | October 26th 2010 @ 9:27am | Report comment
‘- The torso rule. Okay, under what universe was this considered okay, to allow a try by landing on it with your chest? Simply amazing this rule got through.
Solution: A try must be only awarded if it’s to controlled with your hand.’
As I read this I thought to myself, ‘never has any single notion contained more common sense’.
And then I read this gem;
‘- Benefit of the doubt. One of the most talked about topics after the end of each weekend of footy.
Solution: It’s been said before and I agree; if after two looks it doesn’t look like a try, then it’s benefit of the doubt: to the defensive team’.
Sir you are a genius.
Only in the world of professional sports administrators can ridiculous situations like giving benefit that something happened. Nowhere else in our society to we give the benefit of the doubt in this way? Can you imagine if the criminal justice system worked like that? Or the LBW rule in cricket?
And as for this rubbish that you can score a try without actually having control of the ball with your hands… Well unless you want it to evlove into NFL, then again a no brainer.
Excellent article.
October 26th 2010 @ 10:02am
M1tch said | October 26th 2010 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Thanks mate, much appreciated
October 26th 2010 @ 3:52pm
anopinion said | October 26th 2010 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
The NFL requires perfect control of the ball and it does not need to be placed on the ground. How is this anything like the NFL?
October 26th 2010 @ 11:11am
Strucy said | October 26th 2010 @ 11:11am | Report comment
In this day and age, the video ref doesn’t even need to be at the ground. Why not have the video ref stay at the IC HQ and only watch the replay when called upon.
October 26th 2010 @ 11:19am
Jedda Baxter said | October 26th 2010 @ 11:19am | Report comment
Been down that road. Maybe the IC can revisit it?
New Ref Blunder Busting Bunker
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/new-ref-blunder-busting-bunker/story-e6frexni-1225727650707
NRL bunkers down as critics take pot shots at video-ref plan
http://www.foxsports.com.au/league/nrl-bunkers-down-as-critics-take-pot-shots-at-video-ref-plan/story-e6frf3ou-1225729719915
October 26th 2010 @ 11:42am
Brett McKay said | October 26th 2010 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Mitch, you’re making far too much sense here pal, therefore you’re solutions are unusable.
The NRL thanks you for playing…
October 26th 2010 @ 1:03pm
M1tch said | October 26th 2010 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Haha, hopefully the new brains of the IC are people who do actually watch the footy, because under current admin they cant really be watching if these rules are still in the book
October 26th 2010 @ 12:56pm
Michael Hill said | October 26th 2010 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
They already got rid of the advantage rule
October 26th 2010 @ 1:02pm
M1tch said | October 26th 2010 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
The system works
October 26th 2010 @ 1:37pm
Hanzo said | October 26th 2010 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Mmmmmmm, common sense and the video ref in the same breath, surely your some kind of madman M1tch!!!!!! you might as well ask for world peace or end world hunger or even more fantastical (is that a word?) a competitive NZ cricket side.