Wallabies to keep ball in hand and win by twelve
By Andrew Logan, 28 Oct 2010 Andrew Logan is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, bledlisloe cup, Rugby Union, wallabies
It’s tempting to get sucked into the vortex of pessimism surrounding the Wallabies at the moment, particularly when all anyone can talk about seems to be their ten match losing streak to the All Blacks.
I have to admit, I was there too for a while.
During the most recent Test match at Homebush, as the Wallabies hit their peak lead of 22-9, I turned to former Wallaby lock David Giffin who was sitting nearby and said, “What do you reckon … can we get excited now?”
Showing all the experience of his 50 Tests, Giff shook his head slowly and said, “Mate, not against the All Blacks”.
As it turned out, he was right, and the Wallabies went down by an agonising solitary point.
On the boat back into town, there were plenty of long faces too. People got mighty hung up on the fact of the loss, instead of the manner of it.
Let’s look at those facts, which (let’s face it) are damning.
The fact of the Wallabies’ season is that they have now lost ten matches in succession to the All Blacks. The facts say that they blew a winning lead against South Africa at altitude and lost, and the fact is that they only got out of jail the following week because of a freakish penalty by a part-time kicker who doesn’t even kick for his province.
The facts say that the Wallabies also lost at home to England because their kicker missed too many penalties, and that fact is also that the coach has the worst winning record of any of about the last 5 Wallaby coaches.
Look at the facts, and you’ll find plenty to get down about. It doesn’t make for pretty reading.
But once you look past the numbers and the fulltime results and the goalkicking stats, you’ll see something wonderful is happening with this Wallaby team.
Those who remember the Grand Slam of 1984 will remember the magnificent balance of the Eighth Wallabies – an awesomely strong pack of forwards, balanced by a magical set of backs with the ball on a string. This was Australian rugby at its finest, the type of running rugby for which Australian teams have always been known.
Who could forget Mark Ella setting sail for the English line after splitting the English backs with a “leaguie” move borrowed from the mighty St George Dragons?
Indeed, such running rugby was endemic as far back as the most-recent-but-one Wallaby team to win at altitude, the 1963 Wallabies, whose crisis meeting in a godforsaken Potchefstroom hotel led to one of the great Test series of all time.
Chain-smoking 1936 Wallaby centre, turned manager of the 1963 team, Bill McLaughlin, growled “I’m sick of this ball to the flyhalf and kicking for touch. Australian teams have always been known for running the ball, and that’s what we’ll do from now on”. Cue a famous altitude victory against the Springboks.
Almost all the great matches in Australian rugby history have involved the Wallabies on attack with ball in hand. That’s what we’re known for throughout the world.
So much so that on last year’s Spring Tour, Scotland great Gavin Hastings made the point that while “playing New Zealand was always like some sort of massive physical challenge.
You really had to front up up-front and take them on that way if you were to have any chance” his view was that “playing Australia was different, you know. They always had so many talented backs – Lynagh, Campese, Horan, Little – all these guys who were just so fantastic with the ball in hand, that you just knew that you were up for a game of rugby. Against Australia, there was always the opportunity for an open game and it was very enjoyable rugby in that way”.
The present day Wallabies are a side put together the hard way.
Young players blooded before they were ready, but blooded because they represented the future of rugby in this country. The coach who took the step has been lauded, and then gradually pilloried as the losses mounted up, but never once lost his faith.
That young team has returned the faith and has learnt the trade of Test rugby – that there’s a time for risk and a time for caution; and that faith in your ability pays dividends.
At times, they showed that they had learned the lessons of their Wallaby forebears, but like the raw young men that they mostly are, occasionally retreated into their shells. Sooner or later though, the tipping point is reached, and a new equilibrium erupts out of the ashes of the past.
This Wallaby team is on the cusp of the trust and faith in their own ability that all good teams have. They are now equipped to take the risks and keep the faith.
And so we come to Hong Kong, where the Wallabies get yet another chance to square up against the All Blacks – the apex predator of the rugby world – who have ten wins in a row against the Wallabies, and who are undefeated against all opposition in their last 15 Tests.
Can the Wallabies break the hoodoo? Well it’s an imposing record, but also a funny time of year and a funny venue.
At this time of year, because you’re spending a lot less time on the pitch, you’re relying much more heavily on the quality and intensity of your training.
Also when you finally get on the paddock to play, the chances of one side or the other putting together an inconsistent performance are heightened – which means that a good side can come back to the pack, or a lesser side can get a break they’ve been looking for.
As for Hong Kong, well, it’s party central and they only know one brand of rugby – festival rugby. The intensity one might feel at Eden Park or Loftus is notably absent in Honkers, some of the cab drivers don’t even know where the stadium is. So it can be hard to get into that siege mentality that works so well in the Tri-Nations and the Bledisloe proper.
Both factors can work against both sides of course, so it’s not to say that the Wallabies are about to get some sort of unique advantage.
But out of the two sides, the Wallabies play the brand of rugby most suited to the Hong Kong environment. The week in Hong Kong is relaxed. It’s full of fan days and razzle dazzle, and it’s a game that, in the wider Bledisloe context, doesn’t really matter, because the Kiwis already hold the cup.
The environment and the occasion demands carefree rugby and these All Blacks have been extremely successful not because they were carefree, but careful.
The Wallabies, by contrast, know how to be carefree – too carefree sometimes. But in a match like this, late in the season in a party town and with a whole Spring Tour ahead, the Wallabies young guns will be frothing and looking to put some tries on.
They’ve shown they know how to score points, and the likes of Cooper, O’Connor and Genia can unlock the sternest defences.
If their big dogs up front can hold the awesome Black Pack, then who knows?
The Wallabies might just keep the ball in hand and get the win that their heritage and pedigree demands.
Wallabies by 12.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (161)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (158)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- A Kiwi’s advice to Wallaby supporters (7)
- Confessions of a rugby union traitor (2)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (8)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (21)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Explore:
- All Blacks, bledlisloe cup, Rugby Union, wallabies



October 28th 2010 @ 4:55am
Ben said | October 28th 2010 @ 4:55am | Report comment
Great write up……I agree completely…..Whilst they have been frustrating, this year the wallabies have produced some beautiful rugby. Rugby not seen since the days of Ella and hawker etc. They are due for a break out performance, where the 40 mins turns into 60 and they are up by 40. You certainly won’t be taking your eyes off them. I ink the break out could be against the poms……they never should have won that second test, and the poms are now using that victory as some sort of hope guidance…..I think we put 40 on them the week after the abs do and send Johnson back to the drawing board.
October 28th 2010 @ 7:05pm
Ben S said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:05pm | Report comment
‘ I ink the break out could be against the poms……they never should have won that second test,’
Why?
October 28th 2010 @ 5:14am
Nick_KIA said | October 28th 2010 @ 5:14am | Report comment
You had me till ‘something wonderful is happening’.
I think biggest prob for Wallers is that they haven’t been playing much. There are a few in the ABs that will be a bit rusty (eg Carter, Mealamu if they both get on the park) and ABs missing Weepu which will be important, but most have had some gametime in ITM Cup which has been of fairly decent standard this year.
ABs by 10.
October 28th 2010 @ 5:26am
allblackfan said | October 28th 2010 @ 5:26am | Report comment
If you think the Wallabies’ play is full of razzle dazzle and suited to the HK environment, what exactly is the ABs’ style — dour, forward-oriented play? And HK being an ex-British colony means the Wallabies can’t even rely on home crowd support.
October 28th 2010 @ 5:39am
Darwin Stubbie said | October 28th 2010 @ 5:39am | Report comment
“The environment and the occasion demands carefree rugby and these All Blacks have been extremely successful not because they were carefree, but careful” … with such a dumb statement as this I take it you never bothered watched the last AB game against France in France or even the first Bledisloe test in Melbourne
surely the great rugby folk of Oz are going to wake up at some stage and realise that this team is average at best and horribly inconsistent …. they’re certainly not comparable to the class of ’84 … Cooper, Giteau, ACC, O’Connor aren’t even on the same stage as Ella, Horan, Little, Campese …
Further when will the press actually put away the man love for Deans and see that their team is being lead around by someone who is clearly out of his depth and covers it up with meaningless cliches … the latest example is the news that only now Deans has decided it might be a great idea to simulate “should-win” scenarios .. apprarently since they assembled in Sydney “coach Robbie Deans has attempted to address a debilitating tendency – the Wallabies inability to close out tight matches” and “training sessions involve players being challenged to brain storm how they would respond to a particular on-field situation late in a game”
and what was Wayne Smith respone to this news “It’s something we’ve done for years, for them it’s obviously something they’ve identified they need to do to close out games and play in different situations,” he said.
says it all really …. OJ said it right in another blog – boredom will be the biggest mountain for this AB team
October 28th 2010 @ 7:19am
Jiggles said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Did Horan and LIttle play in 1984? wow thats impressive for a bunch of blokes who would of been around 14 at the time!
October 28th 2010 @ 7:29am
Darwin Stubbie said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:29am | Report comment
go back and read the article it references both ’84 and the players mentioned ….
October 28th 2010 @ 7:39am
jiggles said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:39am | Report comment
The way that sentence is structured it implies horan and little played in the ’84 side. Regardless you are correct, none of them are in horan or littles league. In fact no centre (or 1st 5 as they say in nz) playing in rugby right now is in the same league as horanhoran
October 28th 2010 @ 8:08am
Darwin Stubbie said | October 28th 2010 @ 8:08am | Report comment
think you mean 2nd 5 – and true
October 28th 2010 @ 8:13am
katzilla said | October 28th 2010 @ 8:13am | Report comment
2nd 5*
And i agree. There isn’t anyone of Horans callibre at 2nd five in the world right now.
October 28th 2010 @ 9:24am
Jiggles said | October 28th 2010 @ 9:24am | Report comment
yep sorry 2nd five
October 28th 2010 @ 5:47am
Frank O'Keeffe said | October 28th 2010 @ 5:47am | Report comment
That the Wallabies have lost their last 10 Tests to New Zealand is a disgrace. Especially when you consider they’ve had the lead at crucial times in those games, and haven’t finished the games off. So they need to win.
That said I just can’t get motivated for the Test this weekend. I can’t stand the neutral arena, as there’s no atmosphere, no sense of Bledisloe importance. I also hate how Henry picks a make-shift side for these games. I think it was in 2008 when he played Stephen Donald in Tokyo, and he was terrible, and just decided to bring Carter on later.
These neutral arena Tests are pointless, and few people get excited about them.
October 28th 2010 @ 10:00am
Nick_KIA said | October 28th 2010 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Well ABs team is out – it’s ‘full strength’ so you’ll be happy Frank:
Starting XV:
1. Tony Woodcock (69)
2. Keven Mealamu (80)
3. Owen Franks (17)
4. Brad Thorn (46)
5. Tom Donnelly (13)
6. Jerome Kaino (33)
7. Richie McCaw – captain (89)
8. Kieran Read (25)
9. Jimmy Cowan (41)
10. Daniel Carter (74)
11. Josevata Rokocoko (66)
12. Ma’a Nonu (52)
13. Conrad Smith (41)
14. Cory Jane (21)
15. Mils Muliaina (89)
Reserves:
16. Hikawera Elliot (uncapped)
17. John Afoa (25)
18. Samuel Whitelock (8)
19. Daniel Braid (4)
20. Alby Mathewson (1)
21. Stephen Donald (19)
22. Isaia Toeava (26)
October 28th 2010 @ 10:06am
Jiggles said | October 28th 2010 @ 10:06am | Report comment
yep thats about as full strength as it gets. bring on saturday!
October 28th 2010 @ 12:12pm
ohtani's jacket said | October 28th 2010 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
A lot of silliness over the naming of the side this week only for them to choose the most predictable line-up we have
October 28th 2010 @ 1:24pm
TembaVJ said | October 28th 2010 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
WHAT?!! no SBW?
No spot for the rugby god, you cannot call that a full strength team without him!
I was expecting him to carve up the wallaby back line with ease and precision off loads JUST LIKE HE ITM GAMES.
October 28th 2010 @ 5:47am
Huigo said | October 28th 2010 @ 5:47am | Report comment
Good post, Andrew. I was at Twickers in ’84, and watched a so-so England team hold us scoreless through the first half and shut down Campo in both halves. Billy Beaumont, doing colour for the broadcast, thought Ella’s try illegal. That was the game that saw Mark make a fabulous pickup off his boot laces. The crowd oohed and aahed. No 5/8 ever had better hands.
Re. HK, where ticket sales are slow, I fear a 12 point victory is at least six points too hopeful. Maybe nine points too hopeful. As I see it, you have a settled team playing one that’s still mixing and matching due to injuries and a coach who’s doing a lot of tweaking. If Graham Henry was coaching the Wallabies I don’t think he’d start Giteau. Less than stella at 10, he’s now less than stella at 12. His grubbers and line kicks are iffy, and we have three other place kickers in the team anyway. I think GH might use him as a 2nd half utility man, and start a 12 who can run the crash ball as well as tackle hard.
This tour is a great chance for the new faces to show their stuff. It’s also a last chance for some old faces, like Gits, to show that they deserve their premier spot.
October 28th 2010 @ 6:15am
Huigo said | October 28th 2010 @ 6:15am | Report comment
Frank O’Keefe – everybody agrees that neutral territory games shortchange the real fans. The ABs are becoming a junior version of Manchester United in their ability to spin money wherever they play, usually for other entities. To a lesser degree, the Boks and the Ws are big draws, too. Each Twickenham international against a major southern hemisphere nation will gross in the region of £10m from ticket income, sponsorship, television rights and corporate hospitality. England’s quartet of November games will generate total revenues of £35m. That’s close on AUD 57 million. Do you see it up on your TV screen? Apart from a few more cameras and angles, it’s the same old coverage. Still no jumbo screen to tell the crowd, and the TV viewers, exactly why the (all too often) incompetent ref blew his whistle, and no time clock counting down. Amateurs are running what has become a big-money sport, and to hell with the fans and the weary players.
October 28th 2010 @ 7:11am
ohtani's jacket said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:11am | Report comment
Nice to see you back, Andrew. I remember your 19 point prediction in 2008, so I won’t knock this one!
October 28th 2010 @ 7:23am
Brett McKay said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:23am | Report comment
great stuff Loges, there’s no better time to break the drought than this weekend. And it’ll be great to watch the rugby again too; absence makes the heart grow fonder, and all that jazz..
As for Wallabies by 12, well, let’s not go crazy. Even just one will be fine…..
October 28th 2010 @ 7:36am
sheek said | October 28th 2010 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Gidday Andrew,
The crazy thing is the Wallabies are improving at a rapid rate. Even if they were to lose this Saturday, there’s no denying their rate of improvement is unsettling the ABs management & players.
The Kiwis are feeling the hot breath of the Aussies on the back of their necks, & the images of past failures at the final hurdle is beginning to play tricks on their minds. Pressure can do funny things to our minds.
If there’s any justice in this world, the ABs will win the 2011 RWC. But gee, they’re going to have to work for it, I reckon.
On another tack, you mention the fabled 1984 Wallabies. Who would you pick out of the 1984 (84 & 86) Wallabies, the 1991 (91-94) Wallabies or the 1999 (98-2001) Wallabies?
They are the best 3 teams/eras in our history. Personally, with Ella & Campese both in the 1984 edition, along with the likes of Poidevin, Rodriguez, Lawton, Cutler, Farr-Jones, Lynagh & Gould, are my pick as our all-time best XV.
October 28th 2010 @ 8:44pm
Andrew Logan said | October 28th 2010 @ 8:44pm | Report comment
OK Sheek…here goes, (1984/1991/1999) and then the pick of the three
15. (Gould, Roebuck, Burke) – Matt Burke(2nd)
14. (Matt Burke(1st), Egerton, Roff) – Roff
13. (Slack, Little, Little) – Little
12. (Lynagh, Horan, Horan) – Horan
11. (Campese, Campese, Tune) – Campese
10. (Ella, Lynagh, Larkham) – Ella
9. (Farr-Jones, Farr-Jones, Gregan) – Gregan
8. (Tuynman, Coker, Kefu) – Kefu
7. (Poidevin, Poidevin, Wilson) – Poidevin
6. (Codey, Miller, Finegan) – Finegan
5. (Cutler, Eales, Eales) – Eales
4. (Williams, McCall, Giffin) – Williams
3. (McIntyre, Daly, Blades) – Blades
2. (Lawton, Kearns, Kearns) – Kearns
1. (Rodriguez, McKenzie, Harry) – Rodriguez