Inglis has nobody to blame but himself
By Danny_Mac, 9 Nov 2010 Danny_Mac is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Brisbane Broncos, Greg Inglis, Melbourne Storm, Melbourne Storm Salary cap, NRL, Rugby League
Related coverage

Queensland player Greg Inglis (right) in action during Queensland's defeat over New South Wales in the 2nd State of Origin match between against New South Wales at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane, Wednesday, June 16, 2010. (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)
Greg Inglis is doing himself no favours. He is either naïve and stupid, incredibly greedy and ill advised, or both. History will not be kind to him.
The Melbourne Storm made him who he is, bent over backwards to accommodate him (much to their own detriment), and stood by him in his hour of need.
The same way that anybody would expect their club to stand by their golden child.
Furthermore, when the Storm salary cap scandal broke, they were derided by all and sundry for allowing a great number of fringe (and some not so fringe) players to leave to ensure they held on to “the Big Four”, the jewels in the crown. According to CEO Ron Gauci, this is something that the club achieved.
Now given all this, what would make you want to leave that environment? It is quite admirable – nay remarkable – that the club released him at all. They could have just as easily turned around and said, “Why don’t you use some of your $600k salary to fly her back down to Melbourne for the weekends?” The club however did the admirable thing and released him. Love conquers all…
However, in the Storm’s claim that they were under the cap for 2011, the implication is that his $120k legal bill was covered. While the Storm paid the bill, the money is attached to Inglis as a salary cap liability. It is a payment in kind, a substitution of a good or service for your regular salary. The Storm effectively gave Inglis a $120k pay rise for 2011.
Inglis (and his advisors) need to be aware of the fact that if they walk away from the deal they have at the Storm, they simply can’t get the same kind of deal elsewhere. After all, it was these kinds of deals that got the Storm into trouble in the first place! If you want out, then there is a $120k salary cap liability going to follow you.
As club didn’t choose to let him go, and that he put in a request to be released, the Storm are right to dig their heels in. Furthermore, no club in this situation should be liable under the salary cap. Players need to learn that they are responsible for their own actions, both on and off the field, financially and otherwise.
For Anthony Mundine to suggest that “a brother has been dudded” is frankly disgusting. Inglis has been afforded the best legal representation money can buy, given lucrative long term contracts and had external third party deals sourced for him. Given that it was he who requested his release, who has really been dudded in all of this?
He has walked away from the club that found him, turned him into one of the game’s superstars, and stood by him in his hour of need. He has reneged on a lucrative deal with the Broncos, when it was a “more than money” decision to move there in the first place.
Inglis has been far from dudded, it is he who has been doing the dudding.
Life will be very different for Inglis away from the relative anonymity that he enjoyed in Melbourne, and perhaps only now are we are getting a glimpse of the real Greg Inglis.
Maybe he is more trouble than he is worth.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- How rugby league should expand (132)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (106)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Manly coach slams NRL rule changes (12)
- Taylor’s Origin bid up to NRL judiciary (2)
- Storm get new owners as News Limited sell out (13)
- Desperate Tigers recall Marshall into NRL
- Manly call for NRL extra-time rethink (2)
- NRL fans: the English are coming (14)
- Daly Cherry-Evans the highlight of a bumper NRL weekend (30)
- NRL fans: the English are coming (14)
- Wind down the whining rugby league! (18)
- Time for the NRL to introduce silver point (51)
- A Blues Origin jumper for everyone? Why not (8)
- NRL golden point must get the flick (29)
- Cronulla Sharks fighting a war they can’t win (70)
- Where were you when sport sold its soul? (32)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Brisbane Broncos, Greg Inglis, Melbourne Storm, Melbourne Storm Salary cap, NRL, Rugby League

November 9th 2010 @ 6:14am
Gaz said | November 9th 2010 @ 6:14am | Report comment
Russel Crowe and his Souths officials are also stake holders in this sordid mess. Their morals, or apparent lack of them are questionable at best.
A player on the open market is fair game but one who has agreed to a contract and been given permission to negotiate that contract on compassionate grounds is morally off limits.
Russel will soon learn, as Arthurson did with the Manly silvertails, you can’t buy a premiership you have to earn one.
I wonder what the old South Sydney players think of this going on.
The sad thing for Greg Inglis is when he runs out at Lang Park in front of the Brisbane crowd the “boo,s” will make him think he is wearing a blue jersey.
Deservably so!
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
November 9th 2010 @ 10:58am
Corey said | November 9th 2010 @ 10:58am | Report comment
I would wonder how the souths could afford him, due to them buying the rest of the Burgess brothers as well (there is another 3 of them – all forwards, but only the younger 2 would be worth it). Souths have the most formidable forward pack in the comp, so they do need a great back, but every1 knows that forwards are more expensive than backs, so how do they afford it? And where would you put the other 2 younger Burgess brothers (they are twins), in the centres (as 2nd rowers usually are good centres)?! Than where would Inglis go, there is just no room for all of them! Along with Ben Lowe and Beau Champion!!!
November 9th 2010 @ 1:05pm
Jay said | November 9th 2010 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
backs are usually more expensive.
the highest paid players should be the likes of Jonathan Thurston, Benji Marshall, Greg Inglis, Michael Jennings etc.
November 9th 2010 @ 9:37pm
berra boy said | November 9th 2010 @ 9:37pm | Report comment
i know where the salary cap auditor should be looking next…
November 9th 2010 @ 11:32pm
Danny_Mac said | November 9th 2010 @ 11:32pm | Report comment
Hmmm makes you wonder… Anybody remember Jason Taylor admitting he was present at a meeting where Souths officials discussed ways of circumventing the cap? The look on this face when he realised he had said too much was priceless!
November 9th 2010 @ 2:56pm
blackstar said | November 9th 2010 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
The day i hear Qld ‘s booing a maroon is the day I’ll walk away for good !.
November 9th 2010 @ 9:38pm
berra boy said | November 9th 2010 @ 9:38pm | Report comment
isn’t he really a new south welshman?
November 9th 2010 @ 10:44pm
blackstar said | November 9th 2010 @ 10:44pm | Report comment
not accoriding to inglis.
November 9th 2010 @ 6:14am
Gaz said | November 9th 2010 @ 6:14am | Report comment
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
November 9th 2010 @ 7:10am
Mikey said | November 9th 2010 @ 7:10am | Report comment
Quote – “Greg Inglis is doing himself no favours. He is either naïve and stupid, incredibly greedy and ill advised, or both.” – you said it, he’s being advised by Mudine – enough said!
November 9th 2010 @ 8:10am
Ian said | November 9th 2010 @ 8:10am | Report comment
Greg Inglis was plastered all over the front of Melbourne Papers as a wife beater (and worse).
The Storm should pick up his bill. He wasn’t put into the media position because he is Greg Inglis, more he was portrayed as an evil product of Rugby League.
Why he should defend himself on his own is beyond me. The case was unfortunately a witch hunt by local Melbourne Media keen to sell stories that League players are evil, while maintaining how wholesome and home grown the local AFL boys are.
To rub salt into the wounds is that the witch hunt was instigated by a News Limited paper, the Herald Sun, who are owners of the Melbourne Storm and half owners of the NRL. News Limited are the same people that are happy to make the defence bill stick yet continue to be hopelessly compromised by the whole saga.
November 9th 2010 @ 3:12pm
Danny_Mac said | November 9th 2010 @ 3:12pm | Report comment
I’m sorry but I can’t agree with you. You don’t end up in court on a whim, you don’t run up a $120k Q.C. bill for no reason.
The normal procedure is that you defend yourself in court, get found innocent, then pursue a libel suit against the newspaper that slandered you.
Now, The Herald Sun are an independent media source (theoretically), they should be able to report the news. If what the write isn’t true they will be open to libel cases against them. If the HS were supposed to be acting for the greater good of “the company”, they would never have run the story in the first place, hence, if news were worried about an employee from “the footballing department” suing one of its newspapers, they would have pulled the pin on the article long before it ran. Unless it was true, in which case the media is protected by law, the whole freedom of speech thing…
Also, the bill is paid. It is a question of who’s salary cap it is going to come out of. The Storm were happy to bend over backwards to accommodate him when he was staying at the club, but when you are repaid by having a request for a release thrown in your face, why keep accommodating him?
Finally, To suggest that it was the Storm’s fault that a complaint was made against Inglis at a police station by a member of the general public is absolutely absurd. He didn’t do it on club time, the club has nothing to do with it. By implication you are suggesting that players take less responsibility for their actions… My employer isn’t responsible for what I do on the weekend or in my own home, and it is only when you life away from work impacts your work that they care…
November 9th 2010 @ 5:45pm
Ian said | November 9th 2010 @ 5:45pm | Report comment
Are you saying he’s guilty? I’d suggest the media frenzy around NRL players at the time Inglis appeared on the front page of the HS did much to imply guilt even with no evidence. He has not been convicted, yet you go on as if he is.
As Roy Masters says in his Age column this morning.
http://www.theage.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/how-a-30000-quibble-is-sending-ripples-right-through-rugby-league-20101108-17kjm.html
“Why have the News Ltd-owned Broncos gone cold on Inglis?
The headline in the city’s weekend News Ltd monopoly paper said of Inglis, ”Get Lost”.
The club imposed a deadline on him two weeks ago, then moved it.
The Broncos would be reluctant to take action against the NRL – still half-owned by News Ltd – over its salary cap rules.”
November 9th 2010 @ 5:56pm
Jason said | November 9th 2010 @ 5:56pm | Report comment
Guilty? About as guilty as someone who accepts a diversion order, has to attend a behavioural change program and pay $3,000 to a women’s health service can be.
November 9th 2010 @ 9:40pm
berra boy said | November 9th 2010 @ 9:40pm | Report comment
what – roy masters in fairfax questioned the motives of news limited…. wow, that’s never happened before!
November 9th 2010 @ 11:27pm
Danny_Mac said | November 9th 2010 @ 11:27pm | Report comment
I never suggested one way or another as to his guilt or innocence, however it is worth noting that he was not required to enter a plea. His guilt or innocence was not actually determined.
As for the Courier-Mail headline, I wouldn’t read too much into that, sensationalism sells papers, and a story this sensational in a town the lives and breathes the Broncos? The headline is expected, and actually a bit tame and unimaginative. If he was an English footballer, their tabloids would be far less kind!
November 9th 2010 @ 3:30pm
Jason said | November 9th 2010 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
What? Greg Inglis was put into the media position he found himself in as a direct result of his actions. Nothing else. It certainly isn’t the NRLs fault. It’s not the club’s fault and it’s not the fault of an organisation that reports the news.
November 10th 2010 @ 2:12am
Timnaik said | November 10th 2010 @ 2:12am | Report comment
“The case was unfortunately a witch hunt by local Melbourne Media keen to sell stories that League players are evil…”
er… Ian leaguies are evil.
November 10th 2010 @ 3:22pm
Ian said | November 10th 2010 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
Timnaik
You’d be a Herald Sun reader then?
November 10th 2010 @ 3:44pm
Timnaik said | November 10th 2010 @ 3:44pm | Report comment
Yep.
November 9th 2010 @ 8:31am
oikee said | November 9th 2010 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Look, if the game was run by professionals it would not have this mess to deal with, you cant blame Inglis, you have to question why this mess was created in the 1st place, i think its time we stopped blaming the players, they are only jumping through loop-hole after loop-hole, the many tens of thousands created with the game.
Anyone with any sense can no longer blame anyone but the men who have run this game into the ground. They have let the families, the fans, the players, coaches and sponsers down badly. I think its time we stopped kidding ourselves.
What has really changed in 3 years sinse i made my 1st comment about these muppets running the game, tell me, what has changed.
If you answered like me, “Nothing” then you would be right. I said the other day it took Robert Finch to sack himself. Now, show me a competition, a business where this happens. ?
I no longer can defend a code i have lost respect for, the managers, the people in charge, who are these people. Even the reporters get under my skin.
November 9th 2010 @ 9:42pm
berra boy said | November 9th 2010 @ 9:42pm | Report comment
that rant would be okay if it also mentioned player managers…
November 9th 2010 @ 8:34am
Hoy said | November 9th 2010 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Has tarnished the reputation a bit here.
I can’t understand anyone getting mixed up or taken for a ride by Mundine, and his unregistered agent mate. I could be wrong, but he seems so vindictive.
Young players seem to come away from Mundine with a massive chip on their shoulders.
They need to be careful about the advice they get. Being a boxer where your HUGE mouth is a possible benefit, doesn’t translate to other sports that well.
November 9th 2010 @ 9:20am
Dan said | November 9th 2010 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Meh, Inglis decided to play for Qld even though he was from NSW, so I hardly think loyalty is his strong suit… Personally I just hate the bloody broncos though, so I’m loving that they don’t get him now after all their fans were banging on about how awesome their team was going to be next year with him and Hodges.
November 9th 2010 @ 7:04pm
Norm said | November 9th 2010 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
I’m with you Dan, Broncos will just have to cop it.
November 9th 2010 @ 11:29am
Pikelet said | November 9th 2010 @ 11:29am | Report comment
Man, you cockroaches are dirty about getting belted by us in Origin (see Dan’s comment) You guys need to let it go. Just deal with the fact that we are better than you and move on. I personally don’t support the Broncos but I can understand the anger of their fans. I’m sure Ivan had a good idea of the team he was gonna field next year even at this early stage and now he has to scrap all that and start again. They also would have not pursued other free agent players thinking that their roster was full or that position covered. In a competition this tight, that can put you behind the eight ball straight up. One thing is for sure, I would like to be as assured of winning the lottery as I am that GI will get booed off the park next year. Origin will certainly be interesting too.
Ps. Dan, Peter Sterling was born in Toowoomba champ.
November 9th 2010 @ 3:03pm
Ken said | November 9th 2010 @ 3:03pm | Report comment
Hey Pikelet, Origin isn’t based on where you are born it’s where you play your first senior football. For Inglis that would be Newcastle, NSW, for Sterling – Wagga Wagga, NSW. As noted above, loyalty isn’t the bloke’s strong suit – and while I always enjoy watching Mundine play footy and boxing, he does seem to instill an ‘it’s all about me’ attitude in anyone he takes under his wing, which certainly isn’t helping
November 9th 2010 @ 3:08pm
Chris K said | November 9th 2010 @ 3:08pm | Report comment
Peter Sterling was raised and played his junior footy in Wagga Wagga. Inglis was raised in Bowraville and played and played the majority of his junior footy there until moving to Brisbane. Thats the rules of Origin eligibility. But i’m sure you cane toads wouldn’t care
November 9th 2010 @ 4:25pm
Pikelet said | November 9th 2010 @ 4:25pm | Report comment
That’s right Chris K, we are to busy winning shields to worry about that stuff. Besides If he pledged his allegiance to NSW, he would probably still be waiting for an Origin jersey right? (ask Mundine). You know Greg, always looking out for no.1.
Ps. Greg played under 18′s in Bundaberg and his parents told him he should play for QLD. PPs. 6 straight next year!!!
November 9th 2010 @ 12:28pm
Fizza Hill said | November 9th 2010 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
What are you talking about Ingliss is looking after Inglis. The Broncos are looking after thier shareholders. Its not like the Broncos represent Qld or Brisbane, they are a company that plays football. Inglis should do what ever he want and play where he wants.
November 9th 2010 @ 12:35pm
sledgeross said | November 9th 2010 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Pikelet.
Sterlo was indeed born in Toowooma, but moved to Wagga as a young child. Inglis merely played for a Storm feeder club when he was 17 based in Qld.
Bit of a difference mate.
November 9th 2010 @ 12:54pm
macavity said | November 9th 2010 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
After having played his first senior game of footy for Hunter Sports High in Newcastle.
There is no freaking way he is even remotely a QLDer.
November 9th 2010 @ 2:25pm
Pikelet said | November 9th 2010 @ 2:25pm | Report comment
Thems the rules sledgeross. We’re still trying to make up for the wrongs of pre 1980 mate. Forgive me if I’m wrong, but I seem to remember a few high profile NSW former greats (notice I didn’t use FOG’s. That’s ours) trying to bend the rules so Sonny Bill could play for NSW a coupe of years ago? Not to mention Akila Uate. So much for rules hey? Look, I’m the first to admit the rules are a bit of a joke, but to be crying about Queensland pinching a player or two is a bit rich, considering NSW made their name of the back of Queensland players like Beetson and co. Besides QLD kids today wouldn’t play for NSW if you were holding there families hostage.
November 9th 2010 @ 3:05pm
Ken said | November 9th 2010 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
The thing is, thems not the rules. Folau was a genuine anomaly of the rules, born and raised in NSW but qualifying for QLD due to his first senior football being in QLD (just). Inglis was just QLD ignoring the rules
November 9th 2010 @ 8:16pm
John said | November 9th 2010 @ 8:16pm | Report comment
What about Karmichael ‘kiwi’ Hunt, he is about Australian as the haka. No one in their right mind can say that that guy was a Queenslander but then again neither was Toni Carroll, Brad Thorn, Ben Teo certainly isnt and they’ve earmarked him as well.
Qld only serve their own interests even if it means blatantly breaking the rules or going back on their own words, you only have to look at the folau situation to see that
November 9th 2010 @ 9:16pm
T. Ortiz said | November 9th 2010 @ 9:16pm | Report comment
You can’t go down that road John. Sterling spent about as much time in QLD as Hunt did in NZ. There’s also Ken Nagas, who was born and raised in QLD, but represented NSW. James MCManus the Newcastle winger was originally from Scotland, but played for the Blues too. You blokes also seem to forget you have 5 times the amount of players to choose from in the first place!
November 10th 2010 @ 11:34am
AdamD said | November 10th 2010 @ 11:34am | Report comment
Ken.. Folau moved to Queensland as a young lad much like Sterlo moved from QLD to NSW as a young lad. Folau grew up in a place called Logan in Queensland ( just south of Brisbane) and attended school at Marsden State High in the Logan area!! he is a Queenslander! get over it!
November 10th 2010 @ 1:24pm
Ken said | November 10th 2010 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
I think you misunderstood what I said, I agreed Folau was within the rules. Although in almost any definition he is a NSWelshman, he did move to QLD as a teenager and played his first senior footy there (before moving to Melbourne a couple of years later) and that satisfies the rules of Origin. Don’t tell the AFL that he is a QLDer though, they have painted a tale of him coming back to Western Sydney because he was homesick after spending 2 years in QLD…
Anyway, it was Inglis that I was pointing out as an example of just ignoring the rules, he was born, raised and played his first senior football in NSW.
I never really had a problem with Hunt, Civoniceva, Lam, Mason etc who were born elsewhere but grew up here. It probably would have been better for the international comp if Hunt had claimed his NZ heritage but he was here early enough to have loyalties on both sides and played his first senior football in QLD so qualified accordingly. Uate falls into this category too having been here since he was in his early teens.