Cricket Australia killing the goose that lays golden eggs?
The KFC Big Bash has notched up another successful season with bumper crowds across the country helping to rejuvenate domestic cricket. So why is Cricket Australia relaunching the domestic Twenty20 competition under a new moniker and replacing the state teams with city-based clubs?
Because in the desperate attempt to keep pace with the Indian Premier League and cash in on the success of Twenty20 cricket, Cricket Australia is eagerly expanding the Big Bash concept, with little thought seemingly given to the consequences of the proposed changes.
The Big Bash will become known as the Big Bash League (BBL) next season, with state teams replaced by city clubs. As the press release from Cricket Australia states: “The Big Bash will move from a state team competition to ‘club’ city-based league. There will be eight teams with new team names and colours, which will provide a clear point of difference from state cricket. The two additional teams will be located in New South Wales and Victoria”
The commercial benefits of the change are obvious. Into the game come new investors eager to grab their share of the new franchises, inflating the revenue Cricket Australia can squeeze from Twenty20. New club names and colours allow for a new image for the competition distinct from the rest of state cricket; rivalries will grow between cities and intrastate clubs in New South Wales and Victoria; and, critically, it leaves the door open for possible expansion – Townsville, Gold Coast, Newcastle, wherever.
But, as is so often the case when cricket authorities try and cash in on the proliferation of Twenty20 cricket, Cricket Australia seems to have lost sight of the costs.
The last thing cricket needs is, well, more of everything: more teams, more competitions, more cricket. The calendar is already overcrowded, struggling to fit in domestic and international matches across all three forms of the game.
Particularly costly could be the impact of the city-based clubs on the state teams (although they will still be aligned to one another). The birth of the new clubs will only increase the divide between domestic Twenty20 and domestic one-day and Test competitions, depriving state teams of the exposure generated by the Twenty20 competition.
So while the Southern Redbacks toil away in the Sheffield Shield to a handful of paying customers, their Adelaide Big Bash counterparts (can I suggest Mullets as the nickname?) will be playing in front of bumper crowds, with no brand recognition going back to the Redbacks Shield team.
The problem with the new format is it only creates confusion and division in a game already hard to follow. Cities will suddenly be asked to support two separate teams (more in NSW and Victoria) over three competitions in the one code, at a time when every other Australian code is also expanding and overcrowding each market.
Will the support be transferable between state and city? What of the state teams’ recent Big Bash exploits; will all that momentum be lost with the new clubs forced to start again? And will cricket fans embrace these new clubs as they do the current state teams? Is the pull of a city team really that much more powerful than the state?
As the A-League has shown us, new franchises with Americanised nicknames and without a connection to their communities struggle to sustain a fanbase. And cricket fans will bemoan the loss of the Redbacks and co and the pleasure of seeing locals representing those state teams. Player movement across the city clubs in tandem with the replacement of the state teams will only wear away at the traditions of domestic cricket at a time when the game needs to be protecting and adapting them to the new market, not casting them aside and starting again.
Obviously the change has more to do with opening up the competition to more teams and multiple representatives from the bigger states, but the above questions are still worth asking. Cricket Australia needs to address how the new teams will relate to their state counterparts and not underestimate the challenge in starting afresh (once again, look at the A-League).
The reality is there is nothing wrong with the current Big Bash format with the state teams competing, and Cricket Australia risks diluting and weakening the product with more games spread over a greater stretch of the Australian summer involving plastic teams.
Cricket as a whole risks gorging itself on the riches of Twenty20 because the game was so late to the commercial table. And that theme is repeating in Australia, where Cricket Australia is late to the table, undoing the recent progress made by the KFC Big Bash and the state clubs, trying to rework a recipe that’s already proved tasty.
Crowds have been strong once again this season. Last night 27,290 turned up at the Adelaide Oval for a domestic cricket match with, as my friend put it so succinctly, “Stuart Clark the only household name on the field.”
And that’s another point to remember. Until the ICC creates an international calendar with a window for domestic Twenty20 comps to have their own standalone period, there will always be a lack of international star names in the Big Bash, so Cricket Australia needs to keep some perspective here.
And by expanding the calendar too greatly, the Big Bash risks losing one of the keys to its success – the momentum generated by playing exclusively in December and January over the summer school holidays.
Cricket Australia need only look to England, the birthplace of Twenty20, to see how too much of the shorter format of the game can dilute the product.
The Friends Provident t20 domestic competition is contested between 18 first-class counties spread over two conferences, playing 151 matches in total.
But as the competition expanded, consuming more of the domestic calendar, crowds fell. According to ESPN Cricinfo, Warwickshire averaged just 3000 a game having once filled Edgbaston.
As one administrator said: “When it all started there were a handful of games, so the scarcity value made them must-see events, and the ticket prices were low. Now prices have rocketed and there are too many games in too short a time.
“Not many people can afford £20 a night eight or nine times in six weeks. So they come to one or two and miss the rest. It’s the same audience, it’s just been diluted. And when the buzz of a full ground becomes a more stilted atmosphere of a two-thirds-empty one, then the casual fans stop being drawn in as well.”
There’s no guarantee the Big Bash League will suffer the same decline, but England’s experience should act as a cautionary tale. No matter how many cheerleaders, fireworks and flamethrowers you use as part of your show, too much of the one product dilutes, particularly with Twenty20, which has yet to digest amongst many cricket traditionalists and still has a way to go to find a committed audience.
Further details of the new-look Big Bash League will be released on Tuesday, but in all the hyperbole that’s sure to accompany Cricket Australia’s announcement, they should take this next step with some caution and not kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
Follow Adrian on twitter @AdrianMusolino
Adrian Musolino is editor of V8X Magazine, and has written as an expert on The Roar since 2008, cementing himself as a key writer who can see the big picture in sport. He freelances on other forms of motorsport, football, cycling and more.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.



February 6th 2011 @ 5:58am
Terry said | February 6th 2011 @ 5:58am | Report comment
I’ve wathced most not all of the big bash series and thier crowds are compareable with the A League it must be solely T.V. ratings driven.
Again when watching the 6th O.D.I in Sydney that was an A League crowd and Australia chased down it’s highest ever total in the one day format.
You give people to much they don’t turn up.
February 6th 2011 @ 6:24pm
Ken said | February 6th 2011 @ 6:24pm | Report comment
That particular crowd was a record low I believe. Midweek dead rubber game at the end of a long summer with Sydney scorching through its hottest week on record, not really indicative.
February 6th 2011 @ 6:20am
Vinay Verma said | February 6th 2011 @ 6:20am | Report comment
Adrian, Cricket Administrators in the UK and in India were gob-smacked by the millions of Stanford and Ambani. The Stanford saga is well documented. The Modi and Ambani saga is still being played out. The IPL has been a sordid and compromised tale of rorts and conflicts of interest.
To rely on a business model where the money is more grey than green is being colour blind.
Sport,in the end,is compromised when betting ,either legal or illegal is invloved. My question is this: Is Twenty20 being driven by betting agencies?
Banning players and their agents from betting is naive. They can get a third party to lay the bets.
I do not want to divert from the thrust of your article but gaming is the evil twin of sport.
CA is being short-sighted in its rush to create a poor man’s IPL and is expecting to sell TV rights to theIndian subcontinent. For Indian broadcasters to be interested the games will have to be scheduled past midnight EST. We have seen that the IPL on Ch10 comes on at 1AM in the morning. This is prime time in India.
Unless CA has found a way to turn day into night they can forget about interest from India.
February 6th 2011 @ 8:31am
Rellum said | February 6th 2011 @ 8:31am | Report comment
The BBL’s most interesting moment will be when the franchise names and colours will be released. I look forward to the Brisbane Charge running out in hot pink to play the Geelong Rage wearing their flouro green and orange ensemble.
February 6th 2011 @ 11:12am
Marsh said | February 6th 2011 @ 11:12am | Report comment
Heard some of the names for the new clubs – Chargers, Heat, Blaze and so on. Plastic franchises indeed.
February 6th 2011 @ 1:04pm
Working Class Rugger said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
God I hope those are just rumoured names and don’t actually eventuate. Terrible. I would have preferred the existing State names to have remained with the re-introduction of the Canberra Comets and a NZ team.
February 6th 2011 @ 1:16pm
Rellum said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
Where did you hear that? I just made “Charge” up but it would be deeply unfunny if I was right.
February 6th 2011 @ 1:22pm
Megaman said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
The names for the Brisbane team – Blitz, Pulse, Chargers, Rush, Thunder or Heat.
http://www.novafm.com.au/nova1069/poll_brisbane-s-big-bash-team-which-name-do-you-like_95990
February 6th 2011 @ 1:35pm
Rellum said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
“One that will echo around the city. And one that truly represents how great it is to live in a city that has shed its country town shroud and is now energised, enterprising and self assured; with a background of courage, mateship and “can do” spirit.”
And then they come up with that list.Tragic.
February 6th 2011 @ 1:43pm
Timmuh said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
Oh, I like that. The Brisbane Tragic.
February 6th 2011 @ 1:50pm
Megaman said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
Big Bash League team names:
Sydney No Crowds
Perth Isolateds
Adelaide Bogans
Brisbane Tragics
Sydney No Crowds Mark Two
Melbourne Carlton
Melbourne Collingwood
February 6th 2011 @ 9:49pm
Lolly said | February 6th 2011 @ 9:49pm | Report comment
Perth Secession.
February 6th 2011 @ 11:24am
Josh said | February 6th 2011 @ 11:24am | Report comment
When this was first announced I was keen to see new teams in NSW and Victoria – being origionally from th country and being sure that they would want to spread the game – I looked forward to the bush blues based in Newcastle but playing games around the state taking on Sydney – we have always hated sydney people and I am sure the Vic country people thought the same – but now I will stop watching 20/20 as even though im now based in sydney I dont have any connection to a sydney team – NSW yes but sydney no and I am not alone
If they choose new names — they are going to be horrible americanised names – why not australian names I am sure if they had names like the Perth Platapus, Western Sydney Wombats, Adelaide Sharks , Brissie Nippers, etc – real Australian names I am sure we would like them more
They also need to remeber 20/20 is entertainment not sport as such and treat it as such – make the games fun and offer better facilites for spectators and something different – changing grounds, celebrity players, etc
I do like 20/20 though as it can e used to keep the real cricket going at state level
February 7th 2011 @ 3:46pm
Matt F said | February 7th 2011 @ 3:46pm | Report comment
josh, it wouldn’t have made a huge difference whether they put a rural team in or not in terms of local players. the players won’t be state based like they are now but can come from anywhere.it’s possible that the one team may have 1-2 or even no players from the local area in their team. also becausae the major revenue will come from Indian TV expect 1 or 2 indian players in every side as well (not that that’s nescessarily a bad thing as long as they are the big name players.)
i’ve also read reports that both sydney teams may be based at ANZ. how does that develop fan loyalty? if one plays at the SCG at least they would have the east/west division. creating 2 new teams from the same city and playing them at the same ground creates no point of difference for potential supporters. on this point a newcastle/woollongong/gosford/canberra team may have at least created some difference.
incidently does anyone know how the teams will sign players? AFL style draft? IPL style auction? free agency model like the NRL?
February 6th 2011 @ 12:50pm
damos_x said | February 6th 2011 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Mate Cricket Australia don’t even know if it is a goose or a chicken, all they know is they picked the best bird at the time for the job & yes it’s true you can’t eat golden eggs but they do make nice trophies & should please the main sponsor !! lol
February 6th 2011 @ 1:48pm
MrKistic said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
They’ve already gone part way down the English path by cranking up the prices this season. Uncool. Now, they’re destroying everything that people know about our cricket competition on the assumption that people will just start barracking for some bull being rolled out of a marketing department somewhere.
Well the answer is simple people, don’t go next year. Boycott it. Let CA know that you’re just not going to watch Melbourne Maxx. Ever. They only listen to money these days, so speak to them in their own language. No patronage means no money. Then they might finally listen.
And yes, Maxx was one of the options in the survey that cricket Victoria sent me. Maxx. FFS.
February 6th 2011 @ 1:52pm
Megaman said | February 6th 2011 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
Maxx????? That’s the worst of the lot. What’s with the second x? Double the max?
February 6th 2011 @ 2:23pm
Rellum said | February 6th 2011 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Well I won’t be going.
February 6th 2011 @ 2:44pm
Timmuh said | February 6th 2011 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
I guess CA don’t care what we think. T20 is aimed at people who are not big cricket fans, and the Big Bash is aimed primarily at those who don’t have any attachment to the Shield and its state based teams.
The idea would seem to be that T20 is more about the spectacle than the game or any following of the teams involved. The theatre goers will go (and watch on Fox), when they go to no other cricket, and in Melbourne and Sydney with more people a decent slice will go more often. Whether or not CA is right in thinking that, we will see next summer. So long as the selectors don’t keep thinking that performing in T20 means you can play Test cricket, who really cares.
February 6th 2011 @ 3:10pm
Scott said | February 6th 2011 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
The Brisbane Floods?
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
February 6th 2011 @ 3:46pm
The Bush said | February 6th 2011 @ 3:46pm | Report comment
Excellent, and when it expands let’s bring in the Cairns Cyclones!
I also like the Gold Coast Tats…
February 6th 2011 @ 4:16pm
Steve War said | February 6th 2011 @ 4:16pm | Report comment
There should be a hiatus on any decsions on the future of cricket until after the inquiry into Cricket Australia – their judgement is really in question
Will Tasmanians from Launceston or Burnie now warm to a side called Hobart. etc.?
And I prefer the Gold Coast Snick-o-Meter Maids
February 6th 2011 @ 4:18pm
Megaman said | February 6th 2011 @ 4:18pm | Report comment
Good point. In some places moving to city teams rather than state actually hurts the team. Same would apply to Gold Coast and Townsville residents if they don’t get a club and Queensland is replaced by Brisbane.
February 7th 2011 @ 10:16am
peeeko said | February 7th 2011 @ 10:16am | Report comment
the frist ODI in sydney was a sell out and the first 3 days of the test were as well, so i dont know why you would call the sydney franchises ” nocrowds”
February 6th 2011 @ 4:33pm
Rhys said | February 6th 2011 @ 4:33pm | Report comment
Just a small point to correct, it’s the Redback’s Shield team, not Test team.