Jeff Kennett has come out with some premium-grade tripe before, but his claim that pokie regulations could “send some AFL clubs to the wall” is up there with his best. It’s deliberate conspiracy-peddling, a paranoid rant about a one-armed man who wants to slice up footy with a rogue prosthetic.
Backed up by the hired goons at Clubs Australia, the lobby group with the gall to stand up there and tell us what is and what isn’t Australian, his complaint is that proposed laws to curb problem gambling will cost AFL clubs millions.
Tens of millions, in fact, says Clubs Australia. Well, tens of millions collectively. Once you factor in all the adjustments. And if the projected slump in revenue transpires. Extrapolated over about five hundred years. During which all the customers die of plague.
I haven’t seen hysteria like this outside a Beatles documentary.
Clubs Australia are an extravagant joke of an organisation, prepared to dog-whistle till their lungs pop to protect their revenue stream.
It was obvious from the opening seconds of their anti-regulation ad just how directly they were aiming for the lowest common denominator.
Oh look, that guy’s wife is a caricatured screaming shrew. Cos, you know, women are really annoying and that. Geddit? Do ya geddit? Yeah, chicks eh? Crazy moll.
Then, Chumpface and Co. head down to the pokies to complain about governments telling us what to do.
“They’ll be telling us how many beers to have next,” scoffs Bruce. If you’re about to drive your mate home, then they probably should, Brucie.
If there’s one thing you can take away from the ad, it’s that the second anyone says ‘un-Australian’, you can ignore anything else that comes out of their mouth bar tapeworm. The term has less meaning than supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
Nobody but nobody has the right to dictate what being Australian means. National identity, and its place in our lives, is innately personal and individual.
So-called Australian values are the values of decent people. You’ll find them in every country on earth. You’ll also find dickheads, in droves. I’ve met plenty of them in Australia. The Hawthorn Footy Club could probably point you to a few.
Yet ‘un-Australian’ is trotted out to silence debate, to illegitimatise other views, to make opponents into enemies. Let’s stop by the pokies for a flutter. Let’s stop by Cronulla and rough up some Lebs. Lead the way, Brucie.
Clubs Australia have shown no hesitation in going for this most odious kind of populism. Now they’re following it up with a similar tactic – the claim reforms will kill footy clubs.
I mean, we all like football, right? We’re all ordinary, Aussie, non-un-Australian blokes who love footy. Imagine if these reforms came in. No more football for you.
And not just AFL, but leagues clubs too – New South Wales has the highest gambling revenue in the country. The Sisters of Mercy will have us all watching needlework contests at the Stitchodrome by the end of 2012.
“According to modelling by Clubs Australia,” reported The Age, “Hawthorn would have to spend $1.125 million to upgrade its 75 machines and adopt a mandatory pre-commitment system.”
“Mr Kennett said most AFL clubs could not afford the upgrade, and smaller clubs could be destroyed.”
Aside from the brilliant move of having the main lobby group against pokie reform doing the ‘modelling’, does anyone else find it less than plausible that the cost will be $15,000, per machine, to install a spending-limit system?
The joint that jailbroke my mate’s iPhone could probably do it for fifty bucks apiece. Or you could pay a kid to switch it off at the wall.
Whatever the expense of modifications, clubs will more than cover them in the first year alone. Hawthorn made over $4 million from pokies last year.
The reason they’re so jealously guarding their machines is precisely because of that insane profitability.
Set them up, pay one bored attendant to sit in the corner, and watch the grey money flow in.
In any case, AFL clubs are hardly the poor cousins of Australian society. They can probably afford a dampener on their earnings, more than suburban Alzheimers sufferers can afford to forget pouring away their life savings.
Abolishing the slave trade probably put a dent in a few bullion stacks as well, but no-one is suggesting that Luke Hodge find a ship and sail to the Hawks’ next Gabba match via Vanuatu.
Not to mention the fact that the Western Australian clubs don’t have pokies at all, in line with state law, yet appear to be curiously present (and solvent) in current competition. I could swear I saw Freo play just the other day.
As for clubs going to the wall, the AFL’s new rights deal is flirting with the billion-dollar mark. The league is spending tens of millions setting up new franchises, stadia, and fixturing arrangements.
There’s as much likelihood they’ll let a club fail in the next few years as there is of Kennett re-opening Fitzroy High School.
“For government to keep changing the rules after people have entered into arrangements, in good faith, is unacceptable procedure,” said the former Premier.
Yes, mate. We also once had an arrangement, in good faith, that I could get onto a train and a guy would sell me a ticket, rather than four of them tackling me to the ground and abusing me for being a criminal.
Guess where that went?
And is it any coincidence that Kennett is still a director at Amtech, a company that services poker machines? The thousands of them lining Crown Casino are thanks largely to the same man.
The whole thing stinks like a midsummer fish market. The Clubs Australia premise is a fraud. So is the hackneyed image of Aussie blokeship that they’re trying to invoke.
It’s perfectly symbolised by the fact that Tug Dumbly, the actor who plays the more buffoonish of the characters, is actually one of Australia’s very best poets and comedic performers.
He’s a fierce intellect who has spent years savaging companies and attitudes like those he’s now the grease-smeared face of.
But a self-employed entertainer has to eat, even if it is six hash browns, and it doesn’t take much to slip the bloke mask on. Ask the blokes who do it every day.
If you’ve given a second of thought to Kennett’s Nostradamus act, get real. Imagine this scene for a minute. The Hawks’ accountant tells them the reforms have passed Parliament, and they’re going to have to spend a mil to keep the pokies running next year.
What do you think Kennett would say?
“Well… ok fellers, I guess we’d better pack it in, hey? We’ve had a good run. Got ten premierships, somehow managed to make poo-wee stripes look respectable… yeah, as my old mate Gough said, it’s time. Let’s call it a day.”
Rubbish. I know it, Andew Demetriou knows it, and Jeff Kennett knows it better than anyone.
Restrictions on pokies are not going to bring any clubs down.
But maybe they’ll help them survive with a little more dignity.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Giants prepare to christen new AFL home (201)
- Could an AFL player make it in the NRL? (84)
- My colleagues are wrong: AFL State of Origin is a terrible idea (81)
- What AFL can learn from other sports (73)
- GWS Giants deserves more credit (71)
- Wagga residents, Canberra Raiders furious about GWS grant (62)
- The most even AFL season in years (61)
- Criticising coaches is a delicate business (0)
- Western Bulldogs vs Geelong: AFL live scores, blog (137)
- Mid-season draft opens up land of opportunity (5)
- Herald Sun footy will lose readers from pay wall (27)
- Introduce a mid-season AFL trade period (6)
- Contenders and pretenders for the AFL wooden spoon (17)
- Wagga residents, Canberra Raiders furious about GWS grant (63)
- Explore:
- AFL, Jeff Kennett, pokie reform


April 26th 2011 @ 7:26am
The_Wookie said | April 26th 2011 @ 7:26am | Report comment
The SANFL also went slightly nuts about the propsed reforms indicating several SANFL clubs would be under threat.
April 26th 2011 @ 9:14am
Hollywood said | April 26th 2011 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Isnt Mr Kennett heavily involved in depression awareness through Beyond Blue. Wouldnt he see this as a positive?
Surely anything that helps stop the vicious cycle of gambling addiction and the assoiciated depression would be a win?
April 26th 2011 @ 12:45pm
Ann said | April 26th 2011 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
You’d think so wouldn’t you, Hollywood? Anything that would prevent hundreds of thousands of people spending money they can’t really afford to spend, which would presumably have an impact in the amount of money it costs the government to help said people (or to not help said people, as applicable).
As Lemon says, WA clubs aren’t floundering around in poverty – I’d also be interested in seeing some stats of gambling addiction and the costs of gambling recovery services per head in WA versus the rest of the country. Maybe we should be learning from them? Can’t the clubs profit from something which is inherently connected to football/their players/the community, rather than just taking a cut from the pockets of the people who can’t afford it?
April 26th 2011 @ 1:45pm
Geoff Lemon said | April 26th 2011 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
The saddest thing is that a lot of potential problem gamblers go to play the pokies because they’re lonely, especially the elderly. They’re on their own, they’re bored, the winters are cold – so they go somewhere where there are people, where it’s warm, where there is light and activity. Surely it shouldn’t be impossible for clubs to offer that kind of environment while centreing it around something less destructive?
April 26th 2011 @ 2:23pm
Anfalicious said | April 26th 2011 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
All clubs should install 100 nintendo Wii! No kids will want to play them and they’ve got to be at least as entertaining as a pokie.
April 26th 2011 @ 4:25pm
mick h said | April 26th 2011 @ 4:25pm | Report comment
rubbish rubbish rubbish politicans and do gooders should get out of everyday australians lives. The club industry has done more for average people than what governments have. the tax that the clubs currently in nsw is unfair and the new lib gov is going to cut the tax.problem gambling will not be solved by what is being proposed it will come out in the future that some politicans family friend or member will have benefited financially by introducing this technology.clubs have more to offer than just pokies go and visit one geoff.
April 26th 2011 @ 6:03pm
Geoff Lemon said | April 26th 2011 @ 6:03pm | Report comment
I have, and I do. They certainly do have more to offer – it would benefit everyone if they concentrated more on that than the poker machines.
April 26th 2011 @ 9:31am
Roarchild said | April 26th 2011 @ 9:31am | Report comment
You should save the draft of this article for when the government takes a look at sports betting….and that one is a huge blight on all football codes and cricket.
April 26th 2011 @ 4:29pm
mick h said | April 26th 2011 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
go and live in china if you want your life that regulated no freedom of choice.governments don’t really want us to stop smoking drinking and gambling or do they? thats right they want to hit us all with a carbon tax. the anzacs would be turning in their graves.
April 26th 2011 @ 6:24pm
Anfalicious said | April 26th 2011 @ 6:24pm | Report comment
There should be a Godwin for invoking the ANZACs in a political and/or sport related context.
April 26th 2011 @ 8:41pm
mick h said | April 26th 2011 @ 8:41pm | Report comment
the anzacs fought and died for freedoms everyone takes for granted these days. governments are hypercrites in the they way they tax tabacco,alcohol and gambling. HOW IS ATTACKING ORGANISATIONS WITH POKIE MACHINES GOING TO STOP PROBLEM GAMBLING? IT WON’T BECAUSE GAMBLERS WILL TURN TO SOME OTHER FORM EG SPORTS, HORSE RACING OR ON THE INTERNET.
April 27th 2011 @ 12:02am
Geoff Lemon said | April 27th 2011 @ 12:02am | Report comment
Mick.
1) You don’t seem to understand the basic point. No-one has suggested that pokies be abolished. The proposal is that spending limits be imposed. You pre-choose how much you’re prepared to lose, then you can’t exceed that limit. The limit that you chose. Please explain how this is a denial of freedom?
2) You already live in a regulated society. You can’t drive more than 40 in a school zone, can’t dump your rubbish by the roadside, can’t burn off your garden waste, can’t drink three beers and then hop in your car. This already exists. If it didn’t, the place would be a shambles. Stop kidding yourself.
3) Pokies are by far the fastest way to lose money, because you can play hundreds of spins per hour. Try having that many bets on races. A gambler doesn’t get the same enjoyment from one $500 bet on a horse race as he gets from 500 $1 bets on a machine. Betting on sport requires paying attention to that sport and making decisions, not just pressing buttons. Pokies are an automatic, ongoing activity, which is precisely why they’re so dangerous. Problem gamblers might bet elsewhere, but would lose less money more slowly, and have a better record of what they’d bet.
4) If you can give me some concrete historical analysis regarding the ANZACs, we’ll talk about it. Until then, leave out the generalisations.
April 27th 2011 @ 9:37pm
mick h said | April 27th 2011 @ 9:37pm | Report comment
1. if the government wants to biring in this policy let them pay for it not the clubs or pubs casino’s
2. if i want to go and put $500 of my hard earned into a pokie machine thats my choice.
3. i agree we need regulation but when the policy is stupid do we just roll over and say thats ok. over regulation is unproductive.
4. geoff if i’ve got 1k and i want to put in on a horse for the win and it loses i have lost that money quicker than a pokie so how is a pokie the quickest way to lose.
5. being a returned ex serviceman myself with many family members who did not return and two grandfathers who fought but luckily returned i think i have an accurate and objective arguement ragarding the anzacs and military history
April 27th 2011 @ 8:47am
Anfalicious said | April 27th 2011 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Most ANZACS went to war to defend Britain, right up until they abandoned us after the invasion of Singapore. Everyone loves making the ANZACs say what they want them to, they’re kind of like Jesus like that.
April 27th 2011 @ 11:11am
Geoff Lemon said | April 27th 2011 @ 11:11am | Report comment
Precisely. It’s all the easier when they’re not around to actually dispute or confirm the words being put in their mouths. Speaking for someone else is inherently disrespectful. Those who go around invoking Anzacs in every argument should remember that.
April 27th 2011 @ 11:16am
Anfalicious said | April 27th 2011 @ 11:16am | Report comment
However, I think we can all agree that the ANZACs had hearts the size of Phar Lap’s.
April 27th 2011 @ 1:00pm
clipper said | April 27th 2011 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
mick h – I don’t think the ANZACs fought and died so that people could pour their life savings into a machine that made their owners a fortune – and I’d like to know what a hypercrite is – is it a hypocrite with ADHD?
April 27th 2011 @ 9:43pm
mick h said | April 27th 2011 @ 9:43pm | Report comment
they have that choice but it would interesting to see what australia would be like today if the japanese had won and germany prevailed we possibly would not all be here expressing our opinion.
April 26th 2011 @ 9:51am
mds1970 said | April 26th 2011 @ 9:51am | Report comment
Excellent article Geoff, and I agree 100%. This campaign by the club lobbyists is utterly disgraceful.
Our society is seeing an epidemic of embezzled businesses, bankruptcies and bad loans, family and relationship breakdown, child neglect and suicide as a direct result of poker machines. Our government is not only right to finally do something about this, but would be deralict in their duty if they continued to do nothing.
And wasn’t the end of tobacco sponsorship supposed to kill Australian professional sport? Wasn’t it supposed to send cricket and rugby league to the wall?
What we see now, 15 years later, is that not only have cricket and rugby league survived and prospered; but have done so without tobacco money. Even if tobacco sponsorship was still legal, it would be unthinkable to accept it.
The pokie tax was supposed to kill clubs, and it hasn’t. The smoking ban in clubs was supposed to kill clubs and it hasn’t. Let me tell you a story, about a boy who cried wolf.
April 26th 2011 @ 1:40pm
Geoff Lemon said | April 26th 2011 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
Thanks, mds1970, and there’s a range of good points you’ve made. I did want to mention the tobacco sponsorship analogy, but was running out of space in the end. But yes, we did have the same doom merchants saying that would be the end of sport as we knew it, and the tobacco lobby saying advertising didn’t increase smoking rates. (In which case, why would they bother advertising?) Clubs Australia has as much credibility as British American Tobacco Australia or any of the tobacco lobby.
If your product is inherently that dangerous, it needs to be tightly controlled.
April 26th 2011 @ 6:28pm
Anfalicious said | April 26th 2011 @ 6:28pm | Report comment
If your product is inherently that dangerous, it needs to be tightly controlled.
And that’s the rub. I don’t want to see away with a society that allows us to enjoy our guns, drugs and gambling, but there is a necessity that it has a social cost that A) must be funded, which is why as a smoker, drinker and gambler (I haven’t got guns… yet) I’m in favour of sin taxes and restrictions on use, and B) must be regulated with an aim of harm minimisation.
April 26th 2011 @ 10:26am
Swampy said | April 26th 2011 @ 10:26am | Report comment
The proliferation of gambling advertising has become a disease in our culture that needs to be treated. Good article.
April 26th 2011 @ 11:06am
damos_x said | April 26th 2011 @ 11:06am | Report comment
” poo-wee stripes ” gold !
Pokies ( gambling) are exactly the same as alcohol & cigarettes, if the government deems them so bad that they have to advertise against their use then what the ?!
Of course many people can have a drink or a bet responsibly but obviously many can’t to the extent the afore mentioned adverts exist. Besides, if the argument is that without the pokie money the clubs wouldn’t have any revenue, then why isn’t it the obverse, that if it wasn’t put into pokies then people /fans/supporters would have plenty to spend on memberships/supporter gear ( or potentially groceries , schoolbooks etc etc) which makes it look like the clubs are actually keen to see the status quo maintained & if Kennett really is involved with Beyond Blue then he is one hell of a hypocrite & therefore can’t be believed no matter he says.
April 26th 2011 @ 11:19am
merv said | April 26th 2011 @ 11:19am | Report comment
Well said, well well well, this article should be front page of every major in the country, but good old news corp wont want that, they own the Bne Broncos and Melbourne Storm, good old Singo owmns plenty of pubs – bought not for the beer but for the pokies – pity his add is such an insult, oh dont forget Woolworths – biggest pokie owner, Coles etc etc talk about conflicts of interest !1 but come on Fairfax and the rest lets expose these fraudsters Anthony Ball, Peter Newell and that Bath sleaze for the lying cheating leeching parasite scum they really are!!!!!!
Go to getup.org.com.au to record a vote on their pokie reform petition, 41,000 others already have and they and Wilkie need our support as we are now seeing that like Kennet, Ba;;ieu in Vic, O’Farrell in NSW, Bligh in QLD are the enemy and are who they are up against.
April 27th 2011 @ 11:06am
merv said | April 27th 2011 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Well said Merv! Methinks they squeal too loudly, I hear many are cancelling their “club membership” or not renewing now that their CEO’s or grand pooba presidents have been outed trying to support opposition to this inspired break through in help for gambling addiction, notice that their add and every comment they make NEVER MENTIONS POKER MACHINES……Hmmmm, the decent people dont want to be associated with an organisation that is blatantly saying we cant survive unless we keep stealing money from people, “members” that they do not want to give us.
April 26th 2011 @ 11:37am
Andrew said | April 26th 2011 @ 11:37am | Report comment
NRL Clubs in NSW said similar things would happen when Labor putting a tax on high revenue leagues/RSL/etc clubs. They said the same thing when smoking bans were put in. It’s like the little boy who cried wolf. Yes some are much worse off, but as you can see most NRL clubs are responding the right way, focusing on new revenue streams like memberships which should have happened a long time ago. Not to mention some clubs like Newcastle, Souths and Melbourne, still seem to get by without having any leagues club supporting them.
So really they are only crying because pokie money is just too easy. Means they actually have to work to create these revenues streams that will be needed to support the clubs into the future.
Will say I hate pokies and hope these laws get up.
April 26th 2011 @ 12:32pm
Simo said | April 26th 2011 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
My slightly senile immigrant grandpa tends to believe a lot of what he sees on TV (think Funeral plan ads that tell you that you are horrible if you don’t uy your own funeral, beer ads that tell you this beer is better than that for whatever reason etc.). He saw the Clubs Australia ad and even he pointed out that just the other day ‘there was one of those government peoples things on the TV telling me not to gamble because it’s bad’ and observed, quite introspectively ‘now I’m old, confused and don’t know if I should be keep my money or becoming more of an Australian.’
Does anyone else ever get a twang of pitty, maybe even some sort of sadness when they walk past a club, casino, pub etc and see older people lined up at the pokies?
April 26th 2011 @ 1:34pm
Geoff Lemon said | April 26th 2011 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
Absolutely, Simo. One of the saddest things I ever saw was in the casino on New Year’s Eve, watching the rows and rows of pensioners failing to even glance up from their machines at midnight when everyone else went outside to watch the fireworks. Even the croupiers got a glass of champagne and a ten-minute break to have a smile and a laugh, but the pokies players kept right on dinging.
April 26th 2011 @ 4:45pm
mick h said | April 26th 2011 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
geoff,
do you know all these pensioners personally?do you know their financial situation?they could be millionares, they could be self-funded retirees, they could be at the casino for their first time ever, they could be a regular’s at the casino, you don’t know i don’t know so for you to say that was one of the most saddest things you saw is rubbish.
April 27th 2011 @ 8:48am
Anfalicious said | April 27th 2011 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Would the enjoyment of any of these people be affected by having to predetermine how much they are willing to lose?
April 26th 2011 @ 1:03pm
Daniels said | April 26th 2011 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Yeah i was wondering why the hell jeff kennent would of jumped on the pro pokie bandwagon. He is involved in mens depression, through Beyond Blue. I always thought that would mean you are against gambling, since you would think that it is a number 1 cause of depression.
I have to say he would be one of the biggest hypocrites in the world.
April 26th 2011 @ 1:06pm
Daniels said | April 26th 2011 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
i just thought of one thing you forgot to mention. He was responsible for Crown, the flooding of the market with machines
April 26th 2011 @ 1:36pm
Geoff Lemon said | April 26th 2011 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
He certainly was, Daniels. I did allude to it, but yes – Kennett is the reason there has been such a proliferation of machines in Victoria. The club dependency on that revenue is a recent phenomenon. From memory there are something like six thousand machines in Crown alone.
April 26th 2011 @ 3:00pm
Sherrin-Burley-Faulkner said | April 26th 2011 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
So if AFL clubs get rid of pokies, will the casino get rid of them, the local footy club that has a dozen ?, no easy answer to this.
In WA, we dont have any, and i dont miss them, but when i lived in the east i enjoyed having a bash from time to time.
Moderation is the key, and the vast majority of people use it, some fall over the edge.
April 26th 2011 @ 3:21pm
Geoff Lemon said | April 26th 2011 @ 3:21pm | Report comment
SBF – you’re right that the majority of people use moderation. The problem is that most of the money doesn’t come from the moderate. The parliamentary enquiry into this may have found that only about one percent of people are problem gamblers, but they contribute up to forty percent of pokie revenue.
In any case, one in a hundred is not an insignificant number by any means. If one in ten thousand people ended up in hospital from contaminated food, the stock would be recalled and the company taken to the cleaners.
There is, as you’ve said, no easy answer. But no-one has proposed getting rid of pokies, just limiting the amount people can bet.