Australia win but cricket the loser in dull end to Bridgetown Test
By David Lord, 12 Apr 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
Australia's Matthew Wade makes his ground. AP Photo/Andres Leighton
Related coverage
Rival captains Michael Clarke and Darren Sammy did nothing to enhance the image of Test cricket as the Australians fell over the line to win the first Test against the Windies by three wickets at Bridgetown.
I’ve never been bored watching a Test in over 60 years. The run chase and the field placings today were boring, boring, boring.
Sammy had four on the ropes from the start, two on each side of the wicket, leaving wide open spaces everywhere the Australians didn’t utilise.
Set 192 to win off 65 overs at only 3.02 runs an over, it should have been a stroll in the park with Australia’s attacking lineup.
If ever a Test match victory from nowhere was set up for David Warner to blaze away, Bridgetown was it.
No way.
For some unfathomable reason, master-blaster Warner went into his shell.
For the second time in the Test, Warner chased Darren Sammy outside off stump and was caught behind. Poor cricket.
Dismissed for 23 off 39 with the score at 1-31, Warner’s out-of-character passive batting was as ridiculous as it was infectious.
Opening partner Ed Cowan was even worse.
When Warner was dismissed, Cowan was only 4 off 24. By tea, Cowan had “raced” to 11 off 61. Pedestrian.
First drop Shane Watson wasn’t much better. He survived two close leg befores and a dropped catch by Sammy in the gully by the time he reached 4.
Watson upped the ante after tea, but pulled a rank long hop from part-timer Narsingh Deonarine straight down the throat of substitute Kieran Powell behind square to head for the shed with 52 off 57. What a waste.
Australia 2-106.
Cowan’s painful innings came to a close on 34 off 100 when he was caught by Shivnarine Chanderpaul off Deonarine. Australia 3-126.
Worse was to come. Ricky Ponting on 12 edged Deonarine onto his stumps. Australia 4-131.
And another with the world’s equal number one ranked batsman Clarke caught and bowled by Deonarine for 6 off 7. Australia 5-140. Every dismissal negative batting.
Matt Wade (3) was given out but survived the leg before decision on appeal off Deonarine, with Australia requiring 40 runs off 23 overs with five wickets in hand – if the light held. Still a romp if the Australians batted normally for the first time.
This was nightmare cricket to watch for Australians. Especially the usually reliable Mike Hussey playing dangerous small percentage reverse sweeps that went so close to the stumps. Brain explosion cricket.
None more so than the unreliable Wade (18), caught at deep cover by Devendra Bishoo off Kemar Roach. Australia 6-177, 15 more required.
Step up to the plate first dig hero Ryan Harris, fresh from a career high 68 not out.
Hussey greeted Harris with a timely and massive six off Deonarine, leaving 9 to get when Hussey became the next victim, bowled neck and crop by Kemar Roach for 32 off 26. Australia 7-189, three short.
Harris and Ben Hilfenhaus saw the Australians safely home at 7-192, Hilfenhaus surving a close runout for the winning run.
Australia won by 3 wickets off 47 overs. But there was nothing satisfying in the way victory was achieved.
Although a win is a win.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.

April 12th 2012 @ 8:26am
sledgeross said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Geez Lordy, being a tad harsh I reckon mate. Yes, Sammy went ultra defensive, maybe understandable given his relative inexperience and the unusual situation of being in a position to win a game.
Some poor shots from the usual suspects in the Aussie team, but lets not forget the deck was getting tough to bat on and looked very two paced.
I just cant believe we managed to chase a small total for a win (just)!
April 12th 2012 @ 8:33am
Disco said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Batting remains iffy to say the least. But then I didn’t expect the Windies attack to be as toothless as India’s.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:33am
Brett McKay said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
David, it’s like the old adage where we could hold a coin up between us and have completely different views despite looking at the same thing.
Over this Test, I saw a remarkable West Indies batting effort, followed by a high quality WI bowling effort that wrecked the Australian top order, followed by a high-risk/high-reward “all in” declaration by a daring Australian captain, followed by a high quality Australian bowling effort that wrecked the WI top order, followed by a run chase that went to the wire on a deterorating fifth day wicket.
What’s not to love?? If matches like this one don’t enhance the image of Test cricket then nothing will…
April 12th 2012 @ 8:40am
Red Kev said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Mr Lord just likes to take pessimism that one step further than normal; he’s the kind of guy who would look at some water in a glass and decide it was neither half-full nor half-empty but poisoned.
Great test for mine, although sad that the West Indies couldn’t finish it off, on balance I felt they deserved the win.
April 12th 2012 @ 11:22am
Claire said | April 12th 2012 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Well said. What a strange article. How anybody could be bored by the final sessions of this Test is beyond me. To be honest, if the choice is between the Australian dominance of the India series, and unconvincing but tense wins such as this one, I’ll happily take the latter.
April 12th 2012 @ 7:51pm
geno said | April 12th 2012 @ 7:51pm | Report comment
What a brilliant test, highly entertaining was this guy even watching the same game…..
April 12th 2012 @ 8:11pm
matt said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:11pm | Report comment
here here. Sensational test, shocking article. “Roar expert” is not the term i would associate with the writer in question.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:38am
Will Sinclair said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Fair go, David – they were batting on a crumbling 5th Day wicket in fading light…
I thought it was a brilliant effort, and a brilliant win by the Aussies. (Although – agree that the Windies were far too negative. They seemed to be hoping they could slow the game enough for the fading light/umpires to save them.)
April 12th 2012 @ 8:38am
PLANKO said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Seriously you were suffering from writers block. I am telling you that my employer is very happy that I don’t have foxtel !! It would have kept my attention but I love test cricket.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:39am
Lolly said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
I don’t see how you can blame Michael Clarke. He couldn’t get out there and bat for Ed Cowan and Warner and he called that declaration which so few skippers would do in the first test match of a series. And I don’t understand what you mean by ‘Every dismissal negative batting.’ when referring to Punter and Clarke. Neither of them were batting negatively. Punter got a shooter!
Sammy on the other hand was at fault for being too negative, but his team is not used to winning or capitalising on good situations. At least they do get in them now though.
Cowan was horrible though. Laughably so. Very much unsuited to chasing a fixed target like that.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:42am
Spiro Zavos said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
David, chasing any total in the fourth inning of a Test in failing light and on a dead pitch was always going to be a difficult task. A fourth inning score of over 190 is a really formidable total on the last day and the last two and bit sessions of play.
The thing to do was to set a strong foundation, no early cheap wickets and so on, for the later batsmen to try and claw out a victory. Which was done. Remember Hobart and what happens when chasing and trying to set up a victory too quickly.
It seems to be, too, that after this tour Ricky Ponting should retire.
Also, Matthew Wade is probably not the long term Test wicket-keeper. Certainly if Tim Payne can return with something like his former form he will be a certainty for the Ashes Series.
Finally, Michael Clarke is shaping up to be Australia’s best captain since Ian Chappell. The declaration, 40 or so runs behind with time to have a good crack at the West Indies openers towards the end of the last session of play on the fourth day was right out of the Ian Chappell hand-book.
I don’t think this was a just a win, I believe it was, given all the circumstances of the match, especially the huge first innings total posted by the West Indies, a terrific win in the greatest traditions of Australian attacking cricket.
April 12th 2012 @ 9:01am
Walt said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Clarke is captaining well but I doubt Ian Chappell would have allowed Ricky Ponting to approach the umpires during the 65th over and request the ball be replaced while Clarke stood in the slips playing with his fingernails.
This was not a good look and Clarke and only needs to make these calls.
April 12th 2012 @ 9:09am
Happy Hooker said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
What Spiro said (except for the bit about Ian Chappell).
April 12th 2012 @ 9:23am
natehornblower said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:23am | Report comment
Well said Spiro. David you are clueless, I guess you have no idea about the dangers of slow, deteriorating 5th day wickets
Sammy did show some inexperience playing for a draw instead of going for the W. I would have preferred he attacked more, taking a leaf out of Clarke’s book with field placements. Also Roach was clearly the best bowler he had, he should have bowled much of the last session with spin from the other end.
April 12th 2012 @ 9:40am
Will Sinclair said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Well said, Spiro.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:45am
Walt said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:45am | Report comment
The whole Test was a struggle to get through and not due to the time zones.
I applaud Michael Clarke for actually going for the target rather than batting out a draw.
Warners tactics were baffling as you wrote. He needed to slash through the Windies and make them drop their heads.
Warner doesnt seem to be able to play consistent controlled cricket. And he didnt need to start trying last night.
Boring match, glad we won, but this match didnt convince any West Indian kids to put down the soccer ball and pick up a bat.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:56am
PLANKO said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
I am happy smoke peace pipe… Where were you watching from ?
April 12th 2012 @ 9:27am
natehornblower said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
This pitch is not in Australia, it lacked pace & bounce from the start & got progressively worse. The 22 players made a great game of cricket in spite of the conditions.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:59am
jamesb said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
“Set 192 to win off 65 overs at only 3.02 runs an over, it should have been a stroll in the park with Australia’s attacking lineup”
chasing 192 on a difficult last day wicket with 2 sessions remaining was never going to be a stroll in the park.
the first three days was boring, but the last couple it was tense.
April 12th 2012 @ 9:24am
PLANKO said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Jamesb agreed there has been many a side that has been rolled for alot less including Australia recently especially on a 5th day wicket that I have heard had some prematch one day action on it ?
April 12th 2012 @ 9:11am
Happy Hooker said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Fellow Roarers, what’s more important? Winning a test, or entertaining a well-past-his-best hack?
Methinks its not only Ponting that should retire.
April 12th 2012 @ 9:41am
Rugby Diehard said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
HH – I’m right behind you on that.
David – your continual habit of taking a deliberately inflammatory stance on the sports you write on doesn’t go unnoticed by the readership and I’m glad to see so many posters pointing this out.
On the cricket I would add, that the current Windies side who are trying to build themselves into a highly competitive test nation, and by the application evident in this test match I would say they are on the way. They did not throw their wickets away, they did not give up the fight. We can disagree with their field placings (which I do) but I for one was pleased with the application, there is no Garner, Ambrose, Marshall, Walsh, Richards, Richardson, Lloyd in this team but there is a side starting to show some fight and if a few supremely talented youngsters come through over the next few years and can provide some x Factor (I hate that overused term, but everyone knows what it means) to a side which has fight then you have the ingredients for a top cricket side again.
I woke up at at 6 to watch the last hour or 2 and loved it.
Me thinkst David that 20/20 is the sport for you.
April 12th 2012 @ 10:00am
Atawhai Drive said | April 12th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
A little cruel, HH. Anyone can have a bad day, or a bad Test match experience.
This was a gripping, old-fashioned Test which went down to the wire. I didn’t see much of it live, but caught up during the day.
Expecting a tight finish, I rolled out of bed early this morning and was glad I did.
It’s good to see the West Indies look competitive again. Australia can’t afford to take them for granted.
Our bowlers were right up to the mark but the batting’s a worry.