Time for a shakeup in rugby administration
By David Lord, 2 Jul 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- ARU, IRB, Rugby Solutions, Rugby Union, wallabies
103 Have your say
The Wallabies were brought back down to earth by Scotland (AAP Image/Paul Miller)
Related coverage
Rugby desperately needs a new image. Since 1996, when the amateur code turned professional, it’s no longer the rah rahs and the leather patches. It’s the second biggest football code on the planet and it should project that image.
For more ammunition, the Rugby World Cup is the third biggest sporting event in the world every four years, after the Summer Olympic Games and the FIFA World Cup.
It’s time for change, and for the code to be recognised for its significance on the world stage.
The International Rugby Board, the governing body, isn’t capable and is so deeply entrenched in tradition that doesn’t count any more. The ARU could, but it needs a major shakeup as well.
Why is it the best possible rugby administrators – former Wallabies, coaches, and lateral thinkers with a deep knowledge of the 15-man code and business brains – don’t want to have anything to do with running the sport they have revered for most of their lives?
Easy answer. They are either too successful in their chosen profession, or don’t need the pettiness and aggro the position attracts in large doses.
So the first solution is to disband the ARU. Rugby needs a new image.
That will have two immediate pluses – doing away with state representation, and end for all time the jealousies and bitterness between Queensland and NSW that have hamstrung rugby in Australia for far too long..
For the life of me I cannot see how delegates from Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, and Tasmania have anything of substance to offer rugby nationally. They are currently part of the ARU, but are just along for the ride.
Window dressing, trying to prove rugby is a national sport. Not even close.
Let’s get realistic.
Set up a new governing body and call it Rugby Australia, appointing five full-time supremos, and pay them $750,000 a year each. The chairman is to be appointed from within by the selected five.
And how are those administrators appointed?
Put 50 of the best Wallabies over the last 50 years in one room, making sure the 17 Wallaby captains over that period are included.
Also include renowned rugby thinkers like former Wallaby coaches Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Bobby Dwyer, Eddie Jones, and John Connelly, plus some vastly experienced media personalities, with rugby as second nature. Think Sally Loane, Norm Tasker, Jim Webster, Spiro Zavos, Wayne Smith, Greg Growden, Greg Clark and Rod Kafer, to name a few.
Not enough has ever been made of the enormous amount of rugby talent available.
What a spirited gathering of rugby minds that meeting would produce. And the net result would be the best five supremos possible.
Two of them to represent Australia at the IRB to shake up that dormant governing body. A third to represent Australia at SANZAR to give a wider understanding within rugby Australia of what other countries are thinking.
First cab off the rank, though would be the appointment of a CEO with a rugby background.
The quintet would be charged with heading the sub-committees required to improve the structure to make Australia the number one rugby nation again.
The five committees:
* Tour and representative rugby, including the appointment of the Wallaby coach and selectors.
* Club rugby. For so long there hasn’t been enough attention paid to grass roots rugby by the governing body. More on that shortly.
* School rugby, tomorrow’s Super Rugby reps, and Wallabies.
* Sponsorship and media, the lifeblood of the sport.
* And recruitment, especially among the indigenous players, who like the Ellas are so naturally gifted but rarely nurtured except by Lloyd McDermott, the first indigenous Wallaby, in 1962.
Those sub-committee heads would recruit specialist members, replacing the army of ARU employees who are currently not seen nor heard.
High on the list of priorities would be to clean up the club and sub-district scenes, starting with banning professionalism, and reverting to the old amateur status of every player paying an annual subscription to become a club member with training on Tuesday and Thursday nights, and playing only on Saturday.
Monday to Friday all club players would be gainfully employed, wherever they choose to work. The financial savings to rugby clubs would be mountainous.
Professionalism has sent just about every club to the wall. It should never have been entertained in the first place.
If the current trend continues there won’t be any breeding ground for Super Rugby, the foundation for the Wallabies. Club rugby will die a natural death.
And one of the tragic side issues has been the closing of so many licensed rugby clubs, the hub of club life. Every avenue must be explored to restore that vital link between player, sponsor, and supporter.
There are obviously many other permutations to these suggestions. But rather than get bogged down with detail as is rugby’s usual want, the simpler we can keep the concept, the more effective the five supremos will be. Then, they will get the Wallabies back on top of the rugby world again.
And keep them there.
This is the first in a four-part Rugby Solutions series running this week on The Roar. Our rugby experts will be answering the question: If you were in charge of Australian rugby, how would you fix the problems you see and make us the number one rugby country in the world, again?
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- ARU, IRB, Rugby Solutions, Rugby Union, wallabies


July 2nd 2012 @ 7:38am
mania said | July 2nd 2012 @ 7:38am | Report comment
as much as i hate to say it you need some professional admin/bureaucrats
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:36am
DingoBob said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:36am | Report comment
I think David Gallop would be the perfect guy to come in and clean things up.
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:20pm
Bob said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:20pm | Report comment
How did Gallop increase the popularity of rugby league in NSW and QLD, for that matter the rest of Australia?
As soon as he left, NRL suddenly appeared on southern states tv on the Gem network. Only took them, how many years? I believe the 1980s was the last time RL was on at a reasonable hour in the south.
How many NRL clubs are profitable compared to before?
Are players happy with the pay and conditions within NRL under this Gallop fellow?
Has RL increased it’s interest in Auckland?
Have attendances increased for Melbourne Storm matches?
What is the participation rate of RL in schools compared to yesteryear?
Personally, I just think Gallop is another News LTD apparatchik. Most hard working managers in Australia could have achieved the same if not better. Same goes for Demetriou in AFL. Football was around and watched in the masses long before these two jokers turned up.
Rugby needs to somehow increase it’s interest in Australia and get out of the private school domain. Tough job, they need a very kind and generous free to air tv operator, like AFL and NRL has. Good luck!
July 2nd 2012 @ 7:49am
SandBox said | July 2nd 2012 @ 7:49am | Report comment
I still have nightmares that the traitor Eddie is still the Wallabies coach with his “we’re almost building for something” garbage excuses. Please exclude him from anything to do with Oz rugby. United breaks guitars almost as often as Eddie breaks his own spin. Ahhh! Now I can’t sleep
July 2nd 2012 @ 7:56am
Jack said | July 2nd 2012 @ 7:56am | Report comment
No role for the paying customers?
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:05am
Rough Conduct said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
The Union boundaries need to be redistributed, we have outgrown the current model based on our states. We need at least 8 unions where population and junior catchment is evenly distributed. An 8 team semi-pro NPC can then be initiated, this is crucial to the sustainability of the sport in Australia. The SR teams should be sold off and the unions should run grass-roots rugby with their NPC team sitting at the top of the tree within each union.
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:30pm
soapit said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
and what would the 8 provinces be in this NPC?
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:52pm
Rough Conduct said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:52pm | Report comment
Would really need to have all the appropriate demographic data to make the correct decisions but I imagine our it would look a bit like this. If we redistributed our current 2 rugby provinces (say ACT is part of NSW) we might end up with these 9 unions, so this doesn’t work for an 8 team NPC, but if we add in VIC, WA and SA, we get 12, that might work for a two tiered 6 + 6 comp, or maybe we could whittle 12 down into 8.
I think this is a far better representation of the distribution of Rugby resources in Australia, I suppose it is a bit like Auckland being made up of Auckland, North Harbour and Counties Manakau – it makes much more sense. The point is that they would have to proper unions, not just for the sake of a semi-pro comp but real unions that control school, club and provincial rugby in their area.
NSW Metro – Sydney Inner City, Eastern Suburbs and Nth Shore
NSW Nth Coast – CC and Newcastle
NSW Sth Coast – Illawarra / South Coast
NSW Western Sydney – Western Sydney
Sthn NSW & ACT – no change
NSW Country – Rest of NSW
QLD Metro – Brisbane City
Southern QLD – GC, SC, Ipswich, Logan
QLD Country – Rest of QLD
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:09am
Brett McKay said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Lordy, I too am a little worried you see no use for the state delegates, especially considering two of those states now have Super Rugby teams. The Western Force particulary don’t need even less help from HQ than they currently ‘enjoy’.
If the move is to get away from state representation completely (a la what Cricket Australia are trying to do, and what has already been put to the ARU by the Australian Sports Commission and tied to Government funding), then perhaps there is some merit in that. But for too long the ARU has just focussed on NSW and Qld, whereas there needs to be a more nationalistic approach to developing the game.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:39pm
Blue Blood said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
Too bloody right. The current admin is already too NSW and QLD focused. Every state with a Super team need a voice. Without an equal voice there can be no equal playing field in Super rugby. The current decisions are made for the two main states at the major expense of the minor states. Consider this weekend. The Force had to fly in two academy players to fill late injury gaps. If the WA academy was still here there would have had players locally based who had also trained with the group. Those two didnt know any of the plays, line out calls or team mate names. With people like you in the media this won’t change. Appalling that you feel this way in private, embarrassing that you would admit to this view in writing. Shockingly biased and ignorant.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:45pm
Justin2 said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
I have heard very strong mail that the Rebels will be starting an Academy again next year. The Super15 clubs are furious with JON and the administration over this fiasco.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:48pm
Brett McKay said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
Blue Blood, when you say “people like you in the media”…….
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:17pm
Blue Blood said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
Directed at David mate. I agree with what you have said and am floored at what David has written.
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:26pm
Brett McKay said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
just had to check BB, I was starting to wonder what I’d said!
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:19pm
Elisha Pearce said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
He means you, Brett. All. Your. Fault. hehe
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:26pm
Brett McKay said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:26pm | Report comment
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:26am
Turnover said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Hi David,
Thanks for your article. I think you are quite correct regarding the ‘banning of professionalism’ in the club scene. Not sure if that is the term I would use but let’s spread the talent across all the clubs. Sydney Uni shouldn’t be able to have enough super rugby players to provide their own side.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:27am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:27am | Report comment
I’m getting sick of the theory that just because you’re a good player you should just waltz into administration. That’s the sort of thinking the breeds financial ruin and a sense of entitlement in the the admin ranks.
Let the players play and the administrators administrate.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:35am
Football United said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:35am | Report comment
“For the life of me I cannot see how delegates from Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria, and Tasmania have anything of substance to offer rugby nationally. ”
hese states are responsible for maintaining Rugbys national presence in their respective area as well as providing the means for future talent to come out of these areas. They are important because without them we will continue with the status quo of Rugby only being viewed as a eastern states game and Melbourne Rebels and WA Force will have to make do with just poaching Queenslanders and New South Welshman.
What will former players know about administrating a national organisation and game? Some might have some business nous like Eales or McQueen but they are first and foremost players, not corporate types.
The ARU should be looking to Europe, and specifically France, and find what the administrators (and which ones) are doing there that is actually making both grassroots and professional rugby such a success story.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:57am
Harryonthecoast said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
The “experts” Dave mentions as some who could run Rugby includes Greg Clarke. Excellent! Now perhaps we can find out what Polata-nau’s grandmother’s maiden name is. That would be more interesting than most of his interminable waffle!
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:38pm
Brian said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:38pm | Report comment
Totally agree I have no idea why people think he adds any value to the enjoyment of the game
July 2nd 2012 @ 9:08am
Tigranes said | July 2nd 2012 @ 9:08am | Report comment
David I wouldnt be paying 5 delegates $750K each, thats too much,
I dont understand how union cant tap into the number of CEOs/corporate heavy hitters that are tied to rugby. Two of the CEOs of the Big Four Banks (Gail Kelly, Cameron Clyne) have strong ties to rugby. Paul Ramsay, boss of Ramsay Health Care is a rugby fan (although he is a big rugby fan).
Just because some bloke played rugby to a high level doesnt automatically equate him to a top level administrator. By that token Fatty Vautin would have made a great commentator.spokesman of rugby league, instead his flagship show The Footy Show has about as much credibility as his mates at Keddies.
July 2nd 2012 @ 10:19am
Snobby Deans said | July 2nd 2012 @ 10:19am | Report comment
Tigranes – totally agree. Seems like a huge number and totally random? Why not $250k? $500k?