England's captain Andrew Strauss as he holds the Ashes urn in 2009. AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth
Related coverage
I don’t particularly like sitting on the fence. And I am not going to start now. Australia will not win the Ashes in England this year and this is why.
In very simple terms, their batting just isn’t good enough.
The recent one-day international struggles have served the purpose of highlighting the inadequacies that are currently blighting the Australian side and this will extend to the five-day format.
Rotation and the sense, or lack of it, is consuming plenty of column inches, however, that isn’t the reason why the trip to these parts in the summer will ultimately end in disappointment.
The upcoming series in India could provide an extremely callow line-up with the chance to prosper in time for the highest profile fixture of all, or it could have the contrasting effect of throwing yet another rat among the pigeons.
Either way, if I was Michael Clarke or Mickey Arthur I would be harbouring deep doubts about my side’s ability to produce the necessary scores when it matters.
Only Clarke of the current incumbents could be bracketed as world-class and one outstanding player does not a productive top order make.
That is where the cracks in the facade lie.
When all are fit, the seam bowling options are pretty good, Nathan Lyon is a better spinner than he seems to be given credit for and Matthew Wade, while not as good with bat in hand as Brad Haddin, is a steadily improving performer.
But take Clarke out of the mix and what is left?
David Warner has talent and is doing slightly more than just cutting the mustard on the Test scene
Ed Cowan doesn’t have the all-round game to score heavily at such a rarified level.
Shane Watson can certainly play but only two top level centuries in 38 matches is a dismal return for someone of his experience and ability.
Phil Hughes has improved, and markedly so, but is still relatively naive and feeling his way back in. He isn’t likely to produce on a consistent basis.
And then there is, er, who?
Of all the candidates, it will be a novice, or virtually the same, who will be thrown into the middle order.
Wade could stay at six but that leaves a lengthy tail and would constitute a big gamble and taking such a punt would either be extremely brave or downright foolhardy.
A glance at who they are coming up against merely exaggerates the inexperience of the Australians.
Thirty-one centuries – this is assuming it will be Warner, Cowan, Clarke, Hughes, Watson, Wade and another – 22 of which have come from the captain, barely scratches the surface of the 97 that the likely Indian top seven can boast or the 71 their English counterparts can offer.
Such wetness behind the ears may not necessarily be a bad thing, after all, playing with a certain lack of knowledge can result in surprisingly good results but it isn’t looking likely if my eyes can be trusted.
What was shown in the recent series against South Africa and Sri Lanka didn’t hint at upcoming struggle, yet this included a prolific Mike Hussey and a sub-continental attack that was far from threatening.
Throw in the indecisiveness that gave Rob Quiney a baffling couple of games, Hughes a belated return and no number six in Sydney and the pond is muddied further.
So put all the aforementioned ingredients into the mixing bowl and the only outcome visible from this side of the world isn’t the one that Aussie fans would care to witness.
Even with the inbuilt bias towards the English, this isn’t a rose-tinted point of view.
Australia will not win the Ashes and that is why.
Alec Swann is a former Northants and Lancashire opener turned cricket writer. Outside of the joys of a Test match, Newcastle United and golf generally occupy his other sporting interests with a soft spot for the Newcastle Knights.
- Explore:
- Cricket, Michael Clarke, The Ashes

January 24th 2013 @ 6:02am
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:02am | Report comment
It’s okay because Arthur and Inverarity are keen to put forward Glenn Maxwell as a no.6 batsman and allrounder to save Australia at test level! He just performed really really well in the ODIs – you just have to listen to the commentary and the press conferences to be convinced of that.
3 matches, 22 off 37 balls (for an awesome average of 7.3), and 9.1 overs bowled for figures of 0-53.
Can’t bat, can’t bowl, but he’ll get selected because “he’s a great bloke” and he can field.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:52am
Sunil said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:52am | Report comment
If we don’t bring in khawaja we will be in trouble simply because he is one of the better players of swing which is out number 1 issue right now, Maxwell’s batting nor his bowling will stand up at test level
January 24th 2013 @ 9:21am
Hoy said | January 24th 2013 @ 9:21am | Report comment
He is a bloody good fielder though.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:17am
Brendon said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:17am | Report comment
That backhanded throw last night was awesome, god I wish he could bat or bowl
January 24th 2013 @ 11:35am
Vivek said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:35am | Report comment
Agreed Hoy but unfortuantely we don’t pick teams based on fielding, that’s a bonus but you must be able to bowl and bat and at present Khawaja is the best batsman to replace Mike Hussey but not sure about who the best allrounder is.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:34pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:34pm | Report comment
What’s with the all-rounder obsession? We don’t need one. Why even bother?
January 24th 2013 @ 2:27pm
Tony Archers Maroon Underwear said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
I agree with TheGenuineTailender
January 24th 2013 @ 3:39pm
Nick Inatey said | January 24th 2013 @ 3:39pm | Report comment
It came from 2005 when Andrew Flintoff destroyed Australia. Australian selectors are now convinced that to win, you need an allrounder. Which is just nonsense. 6 batters, one keeper, 4 bowlers. One of the batsman to bowl part time spin is handy.
January 25th 2013 @ 9:43am
Disco said | January 25th 2013 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Grooming him, even. They are so clever those blokes.
January 24th 2013 @ 6:23am
Johnno said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:23am | Report comment
Ivers picks anyone who gives him the Shivers. And Maxwell seems added to the list, to give Ivers the Shivers.
But in saying that do all coaches and selectors have favourites, is that a bad thing. All bosses in any industry, have favourites who they like the most and feel most comfortable with, even if they fear or respect someone more, they may not feel comfortable picking them coz they don’t like them as people. Is Ivers selections getting personal, over skill, hard to say yet, but some of his selections raises eyebrows.
January 24th 2013 @ 6:28am
sheek said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:28am | Report comment
Well done Alec,
Fence sitting only gives you splinters anyway. You’re right, the batting is our weakness.
And Red Kev, congrats on beating Johnno to first response this morning!
January 24th 2013 @ 6:47am
peeeko said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:47am | Report comment
yes, you got to get up early to beat Johnno , and he didn’t even mention Usman
January 24th 2013 @ 7:15am
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 7:15am | Report comment
I just thought it was his day off – yay /happy dance
January 24th 2013 @ 8:58am
Sunil said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:58am | Report comment
I will mention Usman, he needs the full series in India so he can show his class and get ready for the ashes
January 25th 2013 @ 10:05am
Disco said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:05am | Report comment
No chance. He’s not in the boys club.
January 24th 2013 @ 6:32am
Dave said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:32am | Report comment
You could be right which scares me. It was quite evident in the SAF and SL series that Aus rely way to much on MClarke. They need someone solid in that middle order to consolidate. And there’s no way Cowan should be in that team. Get kwaja back in there and return Watson to open. Get rid of Lyon and replace him with Hogg.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
January 24th 2013 @ 9:49am
TheGenuineTailender said | January 24th 2013 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Nathan Lyon would have taken an absolute bag-full this summer and praised amongst the best in the world if Wade could hold his catches and not fumble stumpings….
January 24th 2013 @ 10:10am
formeropenside said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:10am | Report comment
If he was an actual wicketkeeper, you mean?
January 24th 2013 @ 10:22am
aggregated drupe said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:22am | Report comment
Wade has looked to improve over the last couple of games. He is keeping better after his talk with Healy.
January 24th 2013 @ 10:37am
jameswm said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:37am | Report comment
He’s “looked to improce”? Come again?
He’s still as clumsy as ever.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:05am
aggregated drupe said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:05am | Report comment
His keeping was much better yesterday.
January 24th 2013 @ 4:54pm
Wilson Flatley said | January 24th 2013 @ 4:54pm | Report comment
You’ve got to be kidding.. “looked to improve”?? this is merely unfounded spin from Ian Healy trying to blow is own horn in the commentary box, there were barely any chances for him to take as half the sri lankans were bowled anyway. India will be the real test; these few one day and t20 matches do not give anything like a proper account of where he is as a keeper. It is not disputed that he is athletic and can adequately take the odd catch or stumping; his concentration is the issue, especially with spinners. They’d better be taking Hads along, i feel Wade’s days could be numbered.
January 24th 2013 @ 7:27pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 24th 2013 @ 7:27pm | Report comment
Wade’s days may be numbered but Haddin’s not?
January 24th 2013 @ 12:02pm
Mango Jack said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
As I said elsewhere..
Regarding Wade, it was interesting following his reaction to Healy’s criticism. I reckon Healy saw problems with his technique (he was right) and was testing him out by going public. I thought Wade responded really well. He said all the right things and took it on board, and is starting to show signs of improvement, though he still inexplicably drops some simple takes. Wade has the right personal attribues of a good test keeper. They are a bit like rugby halfbacks, cocky little ba$tards that get in the batsmen’s face, chatting all the time, keeping feildsmen on their toes. Once he sorts out the few issues with technique, I think he will have a long test career.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:37am
Vivek said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Agree mostly with you mate, get Khawaja in at 4 and Watto to open, but not sure about replacing Lyon with Hogg, give him the Indian series to show what he can do.
January 24th 2013 @ 7:27am
Tony Tea said | January 24th 2013 @ 7:27am | Report comment
Thanks, Captain Obvious.
January 24th 2013 @ 7:30am
Garfield Robinson said | January 24th 2013 @ 7:30am | Report comment
Wont beat India either.
January 24th 2013 @ 7:43am
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 7:43am | Report comment
There’s an article in the Daily Telegraph that Steve Smith is in line to be named as the reserve batsmen for India and Steve O’Keefe as the reserve spinner. I’m not sure what I think of that.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:14am
Jason said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:14am | Report comment
If its The Daily Telegraph it is almost certainly wrong.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:18am
formeropenside said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:18am | Report comment
Still, its pretty troubling that Steve Smith is in the mix for a recall. Primarily based around him being the best fieldsman in the country, according to New South Welshman and assistant coach Rixon.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:45am
jamesb said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:45am | Report comment
they did give Victorian Rob Quiney a go.
January 24th 2013 @ 9:11am
Jason said | January 24th 2013 @ 9:11am | Report comment
If Smith isn’t even in the ODI side he’s hardly going to be in the Test squad.
The Daily Telegraph’s cricket “writing” is almost entirely based around talking up NSW players for the national side.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:41am
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:41am | Report comment
Jason, that Telegraph article was written by Ben Dorries of the Courier Mail in Brisbane, so he’s hardly going to talk up NSW players voluntarily. I’d reckon there’s more than a little bit of truth in it…
January 24th 2013 @ 12:02pm
DingoGray said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Mate your going to hate this, but I’d take bloody Brad Hodge over Steve Smith!!!!
He’s absolutely rubbish!!!! They can’t be talking about him in the Maxwell role, as he barely ever bowls now.
At least Maxwell bowls quite a bit!
January 24th 2013 @ 12:14pm
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
Dingo, you can have Brad Hodge! (And I reckon you were giggling like schoolgirl as you typed that – you’re loving this!!) Like Hodge, I just can’t stomach Maxwell, I don’t think he could turn the ball down the hill at Lords. And yes, Smith doesn’t bowl a lot, so that’s how much I think of Maxwell!!
January 24th 2013 @ 12:38pm
DingoGray said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
With a bit luck we won’t have to have any of those 3 mentioned!
I’m hoping the NSP will wake up to themselves and shelve the Maxwell experiment and give SOK a run.
A much better option to actually contribute with both disciplines
January 24th 2013 @ 12:09pm
Atawhai Drive said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Jason, as Brett says, Ben Dorries is a Courier-Mail journo who has no track record of boosting NSW players, or players from his home state.
Like any journalist, he’s only as good as his sources. And his source(s) have told him that Smith is in the frame.
Sources can be inaccurate, although a source who spins you a line doesn’t stay in the contact book for long.
Sources can also run agendas of their own, as any political journalist knows. It’s less common in sport.
Like Brett, I think there is more than a little bit of truth in Ben Dorries’ story.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:15pm
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
It’s worth mentioning, too AD, that Chris Barrett in the SMH is similarly running a story about O’Keefe being a bolter..
January 24th 2013 @ 12:37pm
TheGenuineTailender said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
At least O’Keefe has a good record…
January 24th 2013 @ 12:48pm
Jason said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Fair enough. I haven’t read the story but taking a step back, it would be illogical for the selectors to omit Smith from the ODI and T20 side yet keep him in the frame for the Test side.
Also, this is the paper that talked up Brad Haddin being picked as a batsman for Sydney.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:48pm
Jason said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
The story about SOK makes more sense.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:18pm
matt h said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Jason, “it would be illogical for the selectors to omit Smith from the ODI and T20 side yet keep him in the frame for the Test side.” What’s your point? You seem to be assuming a logical repsonse from the NSP. That’s a dangerous thing to do.
January 24th 2013 @ 3:04pm
Jason said | January 24th 2013 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Wise words matt, but I am a little old fashioned in these things.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:08am
Disco said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:08am | Report comment
O’Keefe should have been tried in the last Ashes series ahead of Doherty and Beer. That said, I think hauritz was treated harshly after falling foul of Punter’s poor captaincy of him in India (and the latter’s misplaced faith in Doherty).
January 24th 2013 @ 11:38am
Vivek said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:38am | Report comment
I don’t think it has much merit in it, I think Khawaja should be the favorite to replace mr.cricket and for the allrounders lets see how David Hussey goes against South Aus today, won’t get a better chance then to bat on the Adelaide oval.
January 24th 2013 @ 6:49pm
Josh said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:49pm | Report comment
Out for 1 to extend his season to an average of 15 , highest score of 37 over 8 innings at the age of 35. That should mean he has no chance in hell -to be picked you need class, form , potential – he has none of the last 2 and not that much from a batting perspective of the first 1
January 24th 2013 @ 8:43am
DingoGray said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:43am | Report comment
No issue with Steve O’Keefe being mentioned as anything would be better than Glenn Maxwell……
However if Steve “The Biggest Hump in the World” Smith goes as a reserve batsmen to India, I’m off to Cricket Australia with a Pitchfork after James Sutherland’s head!
January 24th 2013 @ 8:51am
Lukeling said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:51am | Report comment
I always wondered what you would do with a pitchfork in an angry mob.
January 24th 2013 @ 9:08am
Matt F said | January 24th 2013 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Shake it around menacingly of course
January 24th 2013 @ 9:50am
TheGenuineTailender said | January 24th 2013 @ 9:50am | Report comment
If that actually happens, I’m going to start going for a different country.
January 24th 2013 @ 10:28am
Atawhai Drive said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:28am | Report comment
So TGT, in the language beloved of ABC Grandstand in its tweets, will you be rooting for England, or New Zealand?
January 24th 2013 @ 11:23am
TheGenuineTailender said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:23am | Report comment
I’m thinking the West Indies. They can only get better and have Kemar Roach, Marlon Samuels and Chris Gayle, all of which ooze far more cool than the entire Australian cricket team combined. They aren’t afraid of a bit of on field WWE either.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:46pm
josh said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
I hope Kemar Roach bounces Ponting in the match on tuesday.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:26am
Brendon said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:26am | Report comment
O’Keefe maybe, but Smith? Not gonna happen
January 24th 2013 @ 11:46am
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:46am | Report comment
Kev, I’m rather surprised Smith’s name has come up, but I think I’d rather him than Maxwell, if it has to be one of them at all (allrounders for the sake of allrounders, and all that..)
However, I’m quite heartened by Steve O’Keefe being suggested. As many a Roarer has pointed out, his first class batting and bowling numbers are a hell of a lot better then many realise. Realistically, HE is the one they should be looking at if they so desperately want a bowling allrounder.
Worth noting that O’Keefe and Smith are NSW’s spinners in the Shield game starting today. Zampa, who was also mentioned at different points, has been left out..
January 24th 2013 @ 12:21pm
Matt F said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
O’Keefe may well be bowling himself into the squad right now. 2/26 off 10 overs just before lunch
January 24th 2013 @ 12:36pm
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
Yeah, I’m keeping an eye on the score there Matt – though more for the next man in for WA (a former clubmate of mine). O’Keefe’s sudden elevation gives keeping track new meaning though..
January 24th 2013 @ 12:57pm
Matt F said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
John Rogers? Those Canberrans just keep popping up!
I was a bit surprised to see NSW elect to bowl but that WA batting line-up is very inexperienced from 5 down. One more wicket and NSW will be feeling quite confident.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:31pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:31pm | Report comment
Looks like tough batting conditions – everyone is scoring at slower than 50runs/100balls.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:38pm
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:38pm | Report comment
Reckon you’re right Kev. O’Keefe was on first change inside ten overs. None of the NSW bowlers are going at more than 3 an over, and WA’s RR is only just above 2.5. Must be a slow old deck at Blacktown…
January 24th 2013 @ 4:29pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
Looks like your mate just got himself the innings top score
January 24th 2013 @ 4:49pm
Brett McKay said | January 24th 2013 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
Just saw that Kev, out for 45 and a partnership of fifty-odd for the sixth wicket at a pretty crucial time. Another LBW for O’Keefe too…
January 24th 2013 @ 5:59pm
Matt F said | January 24th 2013 @ 5:59pm | Report comment
He did very well. It would appear to be a tricky pitch to bat on so that match looks really well balanced right now. NSW probably a little bit in front assuming they can restrict WA to around 250 (currently 9/232 so it should happen.)
The real question to come out of the day is how come NSW are up to their 95th over and the day is still going yet Test cricketers can almost never get through 90?
January 24th 2013 @ 6:30pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 6:30pm | Report comment
96 per day in domestic cricket is the requirement.
SOK bowled 28 overs which would lift the over rate. And I doubt domestic batsmen fluff about as much as international ones (including ours) with glove changes and sight screens.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:40pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
My only concern with that is that the selectors will once again mess Khawaja around. Play Warner-Cowan-Hughes-Watson-Clarke-Wade-SOK for the first two tests and then bring Usman over for the third and fourth tests when Watson flies home to be a daddy.
I would much rather see Warner-Cowan-Hughes-Khawaja-Clarke-Wade-SOK for the whole series.
O’Keefe does appear to be bowling well today in the shield. If he can get some runs as well the selectors may finally get over their collective man-crush on Maxwell.
January 24th 2013 @ 1:10pm
Brian said | January 24th 2013 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
I just don’t see how our batting has been good enough to consider playing anything less than 6 batsman. Surely it must be Warner, Cowan, Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Watson, Wade.
I can see the temptation of playing SOK but if he is that good put pressure on Lyon, if the pitch is such a dustbowl get Clarke to bowl or play just 2 paceman. Our brittle batting cannot support Wade at 6 and mickey mouse at 7.
January 24th 2013 @ 1:38pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
I can support Bailey at 6, I just think the selectors are hell-bent on playing an allrounder no matter what (they’ve been attacked so much over the issue they are digging their heels in) and SOK is better than Maxwell. It’s a “when life gives you lemons…” sort of situation.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:23pm
matt h said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Sucks that Watson can’t bowl doesn’t it. If he was fit (I know, I know, stop laughing) we could play Siddle, Pattinson/Brid/Starc, Lyon, SOK (a stropng number 8) with Watson as third seamer.
Maybe they can do this but use Wade as thrid seamer with Hughes keeping. Could help our bowling and keeping I reckon
January 24th 2013 @ 2:33pm
matt h said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
stroping = strong
January 24th 2013 @ 2:19pm
Peter said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
Red Kev i don’t see that happening against India and England becaues we will need all the batting strength we can muster. Alot depends on the coming games as well, if D Hussey gets a big one in Adelaide today that may change things though its the easiest ground to score on and his average of 17 in shield this year doesn’t inspire confidence. Khawaja for me is still the best guy to bring in as replacement for Mike Husey.
January 24th 2013 @ 3:05pm
Dan Ced said | January 24th 2013 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Cowan has to go. He is as boring, slow, and daft in Tests, as Peter Forrest was in ODI’s.
Watson, Warner, Hughes, Khawaja, Clarke, Wade, [spinning all rounder or D Hussey], Starc, Siddle, Lyon, Bird
January 25th 2013 @ 10:14am
Disco said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Oh, yes, Forrest who was the reserve Test batsman last time Australia toured overseas. (Scoffs)
January 24th 2013 @ 4:02pm
Sunil said | January 24th 2013 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
O Keefe is better then maxwell, get him in as all rounder and khawaja as batsman
January 24th 2013 @ 2:10pm
Timmuh said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:10pm | Report comment
O’Keefe as the second spinner. With Beer out of the running, that should be obvious.
Smith as anything. No. Not this year. That should be obvious.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:09am
Disco said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:09am | Report comment
They’ll pick Doherty.
January 25th 2013 @ 10:06am
Disco said | January 25th 2013 @ 10:06am | Report comment
Happy for O’Keefe to get a go, but Smith is too much of a slogger… like Maxwell.
January 31st 2013 @ 3:13am
ashfak joy said | January 31st 2013 @ 3:13am | Report comment
steve’o keefee woud be a gud chice, as he is both batsman and bowler, and a very gud off.spinner, at least better than lyon
January 24th 2013 @ 8:02am
Milksteak said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:02am | Report comment
“Wade, while not as good with bat in hand as Brad Haddin”
Haddin 3 centuries in 43 tests, average of 35.
Wade 2 centuries in 9 tests, average of 45.
Despite his continuing reputation, Haddin was an underwhelming disappointment in test match batting. He never provided when we needed him to and continually got out trying to “do a gilchrist” by lifting the run rate.
I’m not saying Wade is the best Australian wicket keeper ever, but I’d like to know how Brad Haddin was better with bat in hand???
January 24th 2013 @ 9:05am
The Bush said | January 24th 2013 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Yeah I was wondering what that comment was all about. I’d say Haddin was better with the gloves, but now where near as good with the bat…
January 24th 2013 @ 12:06pm
Justin2 said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more, Wade’s batting is far superior. Haddin for all his promise ended with an ordinary average and certainly didnt justify his talent with the willow.
January 31st 2013 @ 3:23am
ashfak joy said | January 31st 2013 @ 3:23am | Report comment
i agree with justin, wade is a youngster haddins already 35. so i prefer wade.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:15am
jamesb said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:15am | Report comment
We are going around in circles in regards to rotation policy, or Australias chances in the Ashes.
The real burning issues for me are:
Why is Australia struggling to produce batsmen?
Why is Australia struggling to produce a spinner or two?
Why is Usman Khawaja getting some rough treatment from the selectors?
Are there problems at the top at Cricket Australia, similar to Cricket NSW?
There might me other issues at play, but basically as a cricket fan, I just want to know:
What the hell is going on with Australian cricket?
January 24th 2013 @ 8:43am
eagleJack said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:43am | Report comment
I think Australian cricket is going along fine with only 1 world class player on its books. Gone are the days of us having 4 or 5 players in a world XI. Having said that some of the younger guys coming through are heading in that direction. Patience is the key.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:47am
jamesb said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:47am | Report comment
I hope your right
January 24th 2013 @ 10:08am
Jason said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:08am | Report comment
At least in 1989, Waugh, Boon, Jones and Marsh had already had reasonably long test careers, let alone Alderman, Hughes and Lawson.
January 24th 2013 @ 10:47am
Peter said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Guys i haven’t ben happy with Khawaja’s treatment but i think selectors have him marked as their key batsman for the Indian series which i am looking forward to.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:31am
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:31am | Report comment
He has two chances to force their hand – Ryobi Cup against Tasmania at the Gabba on Sunday and the PMs XI match against the West Indies at Manuka Oval on Tuesday – hopefully he takes one of them.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:41pm
Felix said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
Red Kev, completely off topic but I recall you were interested when I posted a while back about a good prospect young top order player in QLD. His name is Dom Michael, scored 162* over the weekend.
He has scored 855 runs at 53.40 this season, three centuries and 3 half centuries from 18 digs. Strike rate is 53.5, so he’s in no rush. Hopefully he gets a start for the Bulls soon.
http://mycricket.cricket.com.au/common/pages/public/rv/cricket/battingav.aspx?entityid=13711&id=CBA
January 24th 2013 @ 1:06pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
Good – the Bulls need a decent opener. With Khawaja, Burns, Forrest, Lynn, Reardon and Pomersbach they have decent middle order batting, they just lack a good opening pair – Broad, Townsend and Kemp don’t really cut it.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:56pm
DingoGray said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
How old is this kid? Might be time for him to be given a go.
The opening spot as Red Kev has mentioned is a massive issue for the Bulls.
Might also be time to get Pomers in the 4 day team!!!!! The question at who’s expense?
Fingers crossed it’s Uzzie’s & possibly Burn’s as they should be on Tours overseas!!!!!!
January 24th 2013 @ 3:31pm
Felix said | January 24th 2013 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
I think he’s 24 or so Dingo – I went to Uni with him, however I made up the ‘elderly gentleman’ contingent of the course. I recall him telling me a story about batting in then nets with Cricket Australia videoing him, he hit a straight drive back down the pitch that hard he smashed their $30,000 camera which might’ve kept him out of the side for a while!
He’s usually down at three from memory but seems to be opening lately. I’d say there is a huge opportunity for him to come in and open, because as you guys have said, we’re not the most solid opening partnership in state cricket.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:16pm
Timmuh said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
Red Kev, in other words he has zero chances. Limited overs should mean nothing for Test selection. It doesn’t matter if he knocks up 200 in each game, or loses all three pegs first ball in each.
All that said, I would be taking Khawaja : if only because there aren’t any other options. Quiney has done little in the Shield, Burns likewise, Lynn has even been dropped, Shaun Marsh unimpressive in first class, Ferguson very little; maybe Doolan but I’m not convinced yet. The lack of options is also why I would retain Cowan and Watson, at least for India.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:21pm
Peter said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
Yes agre Timmuh Khawaja should be given first crack at Huss’s spot and i am sure he will do well, just needs to know he won’t be dropped after 1 game so he can play more freely.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:26pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:26pm | Report comment
I am of the opinion that Khawaja has already forced the selectors’ hands. His returns in cricket this summer have been remarkably consistent. Khawaja’s 2012/13 domestic season has yielded 438 runs @ 39.8 in First-Class matches, 257 runs @ 51.4 in List-A matches, and 206 runs @ 41.2 in the BBL. Even if you include his 3 off 11 in the only ODI he has played he still averages 41.1 (across 22 innings) whenever he takes guard regardless of the format of the match.
I notice that the article praising Smith makes note of Khawaja being asked to improve his fielding but fails to mention that his fielding has been excellent this summer for the Bulls and ignores the run out he made in the ODI.
One would hope that the selectors actually look at these things, but Inverarity makes me doubt it.
January 24th 2013 @ 3:33pm
Brendon said | January 24th 2013 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
As much as I’d like to see ussie in, averaging under 40 with the red ball isn’t that great, hopefully he takes his chances over the next few weeks
January 24th 2013 @ 3:51pm
Red Kev said | January 24th 2013 @ 3:51pm | Report comment
Khawaja got 8 and 0 in the last shield game before the break, while it hurts a progressive average (it was game 6 of 10 for the season) it does not destroy a good season of form.
Plus – the tour squad for India is announced before the Bulls play another shield match.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:10pm
Mango Jack said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
Then why haven’t they given him valuable test experience against SL? Baffling!
January 24th 2013 @ 12:49pm
Terry Kidd said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
Guys I would leave Watson out of the tour squads until he plays some cricket and proves his fitness. I would select Doolan and Khawaja as the batsmen and O’Keefe as the extra spinner/all rounder.
To date Watson has not even earnt a spot at his own numerous press conferences.
January 24th 2013 @ 12:08pm
Mango Jack said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
You generally rotate in circles, james!
January 24th 2013 @ 12:44pm
Boris said | January 24th 2013 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Spot on jamesb. There was a good article written by Darren Berry late last year around the state of cricket in Australia and he raised the condition of Shield wickets as a concern. With green tops all over in the first half of the Shield season batsmen aren’t making runs and spinners aren’t required because the seamers are taking all of the wickets, or when the spinners do bowl the conditions aren’t conducive.
In relation to Usman, it’s quite baffling. Surely a dead rubber at the SCG vs Sri Lanka is the perfect opportunity to blood Mike Hussey’s replacement after Watson was ruled out with injury?? Instead, they play four quicks and bat Wade at six because they don’t want to hurt one of the bowlers’ feelings after giving them all a go under the rotation policy.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:35pm
matt h said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
Is thiis possibly because of early starts to the season to accomodate the BBL?
January 24th 2013 @ 8:27am
aggregated drupe said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:27am | Report comment
We can win if we pick a side and stick with it. Our pace bowling is better than theirs, We have Michael Clarke and Matthew Wade looks to be improving his keeping. David Warner and Phil Hughes are consistent now too.
January 24th 2013 @ 8:56am
Sunil said | January 24th 2013 @ 8:56am | Report comment
The ODIs in Brisbane and Sydney were the best benchmark on how our batting will go and it want a good result as neither bailey, David hussey or Maxwrll did well, I saw Khawaja’s innings against tasmania where he out scored their entire team and he is a must for the swing conditions we will get in England
January 24th 2013 @ 10:42am
jameswm said | January 24th 2013 @ 10:42am | Report comment
It doesn’t matter how Bailey, Hussey or Maxwell went recently if they aren’t picked in the test team.
January 24th 2013 @ 2:30pm
matt h said | January 24th 2013 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Agreed. Please God add Smith to that list. They simply have to use Warner, Hughes, Clarke, Cowan, Watson , Khawaja. It makes no sense to bring in from outside that group at this point. Watson does deserve to come back. Khawaja does deserve first crack at Hussey’s spot, and Cowan has done just (just) enough to get a start.
And then there is the reserve batsman, noting that Watson will be going home. I would take Bailey or Burns.
Forget an all rounder unless we actually have one. All we have is a series of no-rounders, or fielding all rounders if you will.
January 24th 2013 @ 11:48am
Peter said | January 24th 2013 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Sunil boof described that innings from Khawaja as the best he has seen.