The wins just keep coming for the Wallabies, backing up a pair of wins over the Springboks with a comfortable, if not clinical, 27-8 victory over Argentina.
Who was best afield, and who faces a nervous week at the selection table? It’s your chance to make the calls.
Over to you: you can rate each Wallabies player from one to ten in the form below. You don’t have to rate every player – if you didn’t catch enough of someone’s performance or don’t think they were on the field long enough for you to make a judgment, just leave them blank and it won’t affect their score.
If you need a rough guide as to what each score means, here’s what we go off.
1. Had he not played, the team would have been better off. Negatively affected the performance of the side. May
GodJohn Eales have mercy on his soul.
2. Anonymous. Was he even there?
3. Did some things that you expect a player to be able to do, but did a whole bunch of other things that sucked.
4. Was passable in patches, but not up to standard in a match of such importance.
5. Performed his role without anything really noticeable happening.
7. Pretty good, actually.
8. Very good.
10. Extraordinary. Calling them man of the match would be an insult.
Whether you loved Samu Kerevi’s game, want to show Michael Hooper some well-deserved love or put a rocket up a player you think needs to lift, it’s all up to you.
Ready to go? Head onto the form below and get cracking!