The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

Opinion

Australia still fears enforcing the follow-on if Karachi is anything to go by

Autoplay in... 6 (Cancel)
Up Next No more videos! Playlist is empty -
Replay
Cancel
Next
Roar Rookie
18th March, 2022
25

The second Test between Pakistan and Australia, which ended in a thrilling draw in Karachi on Tuesday, brought to the fore one rather puzzling question: why is Australia so afraid to enforce the follow-on?

It looks like the decision made by Steve Waugh in Kolkata in 2001 still haunts the Australian team.

On that occasion, Australia – 274 ahead on the first innings – asked India to follow on.

Thereafter, what happened is well known: Rahul Dravid and VVS Laxman put on 376 for the fifth wicket and India finally waltzed out winners by 171 runs (coincidentally their own first-innings score).

After that loss, Australian captains have enforced the follow-on 14 times (13 wins, one draw).

It doesn’t look like Pat Cummins will go down the route of enforcing the follow-on.

In Karachi, Australia had a lead of 408 on the first innings, but still opted to go in for a second knock.

Patrick Cummins poses during the Australia Test Cricket Team headshots session at NCC on November 30, 2021 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Advertisement

Of course, one could argue that a team would like to have a rest after bowling out their opponent, but in this case, Australia weren’t in the field for too long as it took only 53 overs to send Pakistan packing.

And Karachi is far from being at its most oppressive weather-wise in early March.

Arguably, putting Pakistan in again, in the shell-shocked state they were in, could well have produced better results than the massive fightback they eventually produced.

In Pakistan’s second innings, after Australia had batted for just 22.3 overs, neither Mitchell Starc nor Pat Cummins looked half as threatening as they had in the first.

On the spin front, Mitch Swepson is too green to have a major impact.

Remember, even the late Shane Warne – a maestro – was massacred by the Indians when he appeared against them in 1992.

Advertisement

And while many would not agree, I personally feel that Nathan Lyon is well past his prime.

The final Test will be all the more tough as a result of Pakistan’s great escape.

But whatever the outcome, the first series in that country for Australia, after 24 years, has already been a great success for the game.

close