Adrian Musolino

By Adrian Musolino
August 12th 2008 @ 12:24am

2
Like it? Cheer it. More cheers, higher up on page.
Loading ... Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENT
View The Roar's top writers by sport.

Related coverage

Could motorsport ever be an Olympic sport?

As the Beijing Games heat up, the motorsport world enjoys it’s mid-season break, with riders and drivers lounging around Monte Carlo or partying in Ibiza. But could they one day represent their respective nations in the Olympic Games?

There were serious discussions before the 1992 Barcelona Games about the inclusion of motorsport, the Circuit de Catalunya having just opened not far from the Games precinct.

But nothing has come of it.

The IOC is against any form of motorised competition. The excesses of motorsport, the rampant commercialism and the large role the competitiveness of the machinery plays all seems to contradict what the Olympics stand for.

Also nationalism is the critical element in Olympic sports, as opposed to motorsport where competitors race for glory for their teams and manufacturers.

But the A1 Grand Prix series, the self-proclaimed World Cup of motorsport, pits countries against one another, drivers racing for the pride of their nation, and all with the same equipment.

It would be the perfect platform for an Olympic motorsport event: the stars of open wheel formulas – be it from Formula 1 or Indy Cars – racing for their countries.

By racing in identical machines, the competitiveness of the equipment is negated. The pit crews would consist entirely of people from each nation. Qualifying races could narrow the field to a final race, with winner taking gold.

And what about other categories in addition to the open wheelers?

Motorbike racing represents a different discipline from open wheelers.

Imagine Casey Stoner and Valentino Rossi representing their nations on the same motorbikes: perhaps a touring car discipline and a rally event.

It sounds great, but it is a long way off.

At a time when the global community faces serious questions over the environment, the IOC would be seriously questioned if they were to add a fuel guzzling sport.

The motorised equipment factor also looms as a critical factor.

Critics claim an athlete’s success should not be so reliant on machinery; that a competitor should not be robbed of gold by a mechanical failure.

But such things happen in cycling, for example. A flat tyre in the road race is just part of the sport, like mechanical dramas in motorsport.

There is also the well-held argument that drivers and riders are not athletes to be held in the class as cyclists or runners, for instance.

But this view is naïve.

It takes skill, precision, bravery and strength to carry a racing car around a track faster than the rest. Isn’t this represented in the Olympic motto – Faster, Higher, Stronger?

The IOC plays a delicate balancing act when deciding which sports to include in the Games.

Motorsport may be one step too far for them at this stage. But it’s worth considering.

Love this article? Nominate it for The Roar’s Armchair Sports Writer Award. Or vote now for this week’s nominated articles.

Like this content? Buzz it up!

Free Email updates:

Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...

 

Crowd Says (5)

  •   Boo Cheers

    sledgeross said  | August 12th 2008 @ 8:31am | Report comment

    Well, its not really a “sport” in the olympic sense, its more of a competition. Its more dependent on the quality of your car than actual skill. While drivers have to be fit, and have exceptional skill, I still dont think it is a “sport”. Not sure how to classify it really, but it shouldnt be in the Olympics.

  •   Boo Cheers

    True Tah said  | August 12th 2008 @ 9:22am | Report comment

    One thing with motorsports for me is that drivers seem to represent car manufacturers (e.g. Williams, Ferrari, McLaren, Jaguar, Red Bull) as opposed to countries.

    Given the amount of various forms of motorsport (i.e. Indycar, F1, Nascar, Stockcar, Motorcycle) which one would you choose?

  •   Boo Cheers
    View Adrian Musolino's Roar profile

    Adrian Musolino said  | August 13th 2008 @ 3:03pm | Report comment

    Perhaps an open wheel category, a touring car category, a motorbike category and a rally category open to competitors from each discipline.

  •   Boo Cheers

    Adam Pearce said  | August 13th 2008 @ 5:12pm | Report comment

    No its completely contrary to what the Olympics a competition of individual skill and athleticism.I’m a huge motorsport fan but this is unworkable, not to mention we get enough rubbish from greenies *now* imagine the vitriol that would come out from them towards the FIA and FIM and IOC.

    Not to mention IOC and FIA and FIM would take years to come to an agreement and it would make the olympics even more unaccessible to alot of countries that would bid.

    Nice idea but i think the olympics should stick to its ethos.

  •   Boo Cheers

    Redb said  | August 14th 2008 @ 9:11am | Report comment

    Can’t see it really. Other machines used in the olympics in sports such as cycling, rowing are still powered by humans and this what the Olympics are about.

    Redb

Have your Say

If you like this article, Subscribe! Subscribe to our daily email

Please be sure to enter your name and email before submitting this comment. Please also refer to our comments policy

 

Hot debate

What you're Roaring!

By signing up to the daily The Roar email you'll receive all the new articles and sports opinion that we put up on the website each day - delivered direct into your inbox. For free. We think it's the best way to receive our content.

Our emails contain the article along with the images - just like on the website.