Adelaide may hold the answers to crowd concerns
By Adrian Musolino, 23 Nov 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, A-League crowds, Adelaide United, football

Adelaide United's Sasa Ognenovski (centre) celebrates with team mates after their 1-0 win against Queensland Roar after the A league Preliminary Final match in Adelaide between Adelaide United and Queensland Roar, Saturday, Feb. 21, 2009. AAP Image/Rob Hutchison
There is a peculiar occurrence happening in Adelaide – one that is defying the A-League trend. Despite the Reds struggling to recapture the form that took them to last season’s Grand Final, Adelaide’s crowd average has risen ever so slightly.
This time last year Adelaide was sitting pretty in the A-League with big home wins against Sydney and Wellington – a 6-1 thumping – before they jetted off to Japan to compete in the World Club Cup and returned home to continue their charge to the Grand Final.
The crowd average, for A-League games, was 11,712.
This season the Reds are in shambles.
The public has turned on Aurelio Vidmar. Their one-dimensionality and struggle to score – two goals from the last four games – has frustration growing.
Unless they find some goal scoring form quickly, there is a distinct possibility they could miss out on the finals.
Yet, despite this and the ongoing question marks over the club’s ownership, crowds have increased with an average, thus far, of 11,758.
The 9,578 crowd who witnessed their lucky escape to the Gold Coast, on a wet night following a miserable week of weather in Adelaide, was the first crowd under the 10,000 mark all season, and dented the season average that was hovering above 12,000.
The fact that it has increased – ever so slightly – up until this point is remarkable considering the club turmoil, especially in a season in which A-League crowds are down across the country – aside from the resurgent Perth Glory.
If any fanbase had reason to turn their back on a team it was Adelaide fans. Remember the ‘pissant’ comment? Vidmar, with his rants, certainly hasn’t made it easy for the club to portray a positive representation of itself.
So, how is the club retaining, and seemingly growing, their crowd base in this environment?
Adelaide United could well be showing the ingredients necessary for A-League franchises to overcome their crowd concerns.
For one, the team enjoys a large media profile in Adelaide.
With the NRL and Union receiving little media attention in a state without professional representation in either code, it’s a fact that the so-called fringe sports receive more mainstream coverage in Adelaide.
Away from the AFL season, it’s typical for United to feature prominently in the back pages of the local newspaper, The Advertiser. When former coach John Kosmina criticised Aurelio Vidmar, it was the lead sports story on the back page of the paper last Thursday. On Sunday, it was Vidmar on the back page as the pressure builds on last year’s coach of the year.
The club has worked hard to build a relationship with media outlets in the state, and constant ticket giveaways and competitions not only help increase the number of people going to games, it also builds awareness of the club and its fixtures.
There has been another key factor to the healthy crowds.
While Brisbane was lumped with the unpopular Saturday afternoon time-slot for many of its early season matches, Adelaide has been blessed with eleven Friday night home-fixtures; a popular timeslot that avoids weekend social event congestion.
It’s an incredibly favourable draw for the club, and it has undoubtedly helped with crowds this season, despite Adelaide having some of the highest ticket prices for individual matches across the league.
In addition, the Adelaide United brand has gained significant traction in South Australia, and they stand side-by-side with the Crows, Power, 36ers and Thunderbirds as recognisable Adelaide representatives.
Their fanbase are certainly a loyal bunch, particularly demonstrating so this season, with a Facebook group with close to five-thousand members highlighting the sense of community building around the club, not to mention using such outlets as a highly effective means of promoting upcoming matches.
Yes, Adelaide United did have a season up on its A-League rivals – aside from Perth Glory – debuting in the old NSL; they enjoyed a phenomenal run in the Asian Champions League final that galvanised Adelaide; and, along with Melbourne Victory, they are one of the most successful A-League clubs.
The aforementioned has all been fuelled by healthy communtiy programs that are engaging with locals.
The ability to sustain crowds during a period of such on and off field turmoil points at the importance of such factors in the bigger picture scheme of a franchise’s development.
So, an increased media profile, brand recognition, community engagement, favourable fixtures and a dose of on-field success has ensured a stable crowd.
No great surprise in those factors contributing to a clubs success, is there? For all the doom and gloom that has surrounded crowd figures this season, Adelaide should be used as the example that proves how fundamental these factors are to sustaining and building a fanbase, despite Vidmar’s efforts to undermine them.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- A-League, A-League crowds, Adelaide United, football

Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:09am | Report comment
I agree it is amazing crowds haven’t dipped in Adelaide considering their form and how Vidmar seems to put his foot in it, and I think you’re right about those factors making the difference. But it’ll be fascinating to see if they aren’t in finals contention if they can keep the average. Maybe the upcoming ACL campaign will help with that.
Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:12am | Report comment
Also I think Adelaide have had top good a draw. 11 Friday night games! They seem to be playing every Friday night. Think this has had a huge impact on crowds but surely the FFA must spread these around to other teams. Maybe it was to help Adelaide out financially.
Chris said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:13am | Report comment
The reason Adelaide’s crowds aren’t collapsing (like every single other club) is because Adelaide is the only city in Australia so boring that it manages to make soccer look good.
It’s testament to where the A-League is at right now that a season-on-season average crowd increase of 36 people is one of the best results in the competition. That said Adelaide look very good when one considers the A-League is drawing 5,000 less people per match than it was just two seasons ago.
Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Very good considering the teams performances have gone backwards
whiskeymac said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:25am | Report comment
not a fan than Chris?
James said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Good points Chris. Obviously a quiet day on the roar when we are devoting a whole article on one clubs average rise in attendance equating to not much more than a typical family with a few cousins and mates thrown in.
“on a wet night following a miserable week of weather in Adelaide”
Gee whiz…aren’t you luck you don’t play in winter then…..always something to blame…
Lazza said | November 23rd 2009 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Chris, what are you going to do when your country is playing in the “Greatest show on Earth” in a few months time?
Grit your teeth and pretend you like Soccer for a month? Maybe you would just prefer to show everyone how bitter and twisted you are by barracking against your own country in the world’s biggest sporting event.
Chris said | November 23rd 2009 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
The same thing as 95% of Australians – not watch. Just what you soccer fans do when real sports (ie sports that require you to have arms) are on.
person said | November 23rd 2009 @ 5:50pm | Report comment
congratulations chris..you managed to throw away any credibility your post might have had with an ignorent comment in the first sentence
M1tch said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:16am | Report comment
Isnt it fair to say Adelaide people love Football?
Thats why their crowds have suffered.
Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Yes, but the average has dipped lower in previos years so it hasn’t been a case of constant growth.
Realfootball said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:25am | Report comment
You really do have to wonder about the decision making process that lumps Brisbane Roar with a draw of Saturday afternoons and Perth and Newcastle matches that kick off in the heat of a summer day. Insane, breathtakingly misconceived.
I know there are broadcaster and ground limitations, but it will only get worse with new teams. The draw isn’t working this season and I believe that the draw has a great deal to do with falling attendances. Adelaide United and their crowds certainly support that argument. You cannot play a summer code in the day time. I don’t know what FFA are going to do about this, but they have to act for next season. That may well involve more mid week night fixtures. Traditionally attendances have been poor at these games, but “poor” compared to the impossible slots the Roar have had, and which Perth and Newcastle had this last weekend? I think not. This is a debacle of a draw and the FFA have to step up and accept responsibility and ACT for next season.
Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:29am | Report comment
Agreed. Adelaide got the good end of the stick, probably on purpose with their financial situation and all.
Pippinu said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Yes – good point – probably ok in August/September, but once mid October hits, the FFA should be staying clear of day time fixtures anywhere North of the Murray.
Thursday to Monday gives five nights – and once we get to six or seven games per round – they should all be used during the warmer months (at least Nov to Feb).
James said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:31am | Report comment
“North of the murray”
Pip, I daresay that during summer, the hottest days tend to be in the south with Adelaide and Melbourne more than capable of reaching 40 and over…
AndyRoo said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Even just watching on TV I feel for the specatators especially at grounds like Newcastle and Perth where it seems the ground doesn’t have a cover/roof. This “every game live and exclusive” is coming at quite a cost.
Pippinu said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:29am | Report comment
Good article.
The Adelaide situation is indeed worthy of further analysis, and the FFA would be derelict in its duty if it weren’t doing precisely that.
It is an unlikely situation that a club would increase crowds despite going through some turmoil and its worst season on record (although it has to be remembered that what happened the previous season is often more relevant than what is happening presently).
The timing of games is part of the mix – for cultural reasons some timeslots willl suit some cities better than others – the sooner that is worked out the better (although that has to be balanced against showing five live games each weekend).
I think a bit of consistency with timing helps a lot – fans get into the habit of going to a game on a particular day and time – that sort of thing should not be underestimated at all.
The Adelaide situation is at the opposite end of what happened to Sydney and Newcastle when they won the Championship, with crowds actually dipping the following year (although it has to be said that both succombed to the Champion’s curse to at least some extent).
Melbourne managed to bump up its already impressive membership numbers after both of its Premiership/Championship doubles, but the fact that average attendances have hovered around its membership number this season suggests that 50/50 fans might be in some form of holding pattern, either waiting for the new stadium or waiting for the new team.
Redb said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:40am | Report comment
In terms of crowds, I bet the FFA are hoping Central Coast dont continue to dominate. A Grand Final between Melbourne and Sydney would be an A League marketers dream, but those pesky Mariners (as Midfielder has been trumpeting all season) look too good at the mo.
There is no doubt that Melbourne crowds are boosted (extra crowd above members) playing Sydney whereas Adelaide are just easybeats. Early days Adelaide were a drawcard away at Melbourne, but they get beaten so often they resemble Port Adelaide.
Redb
M1tch said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:45am | Report comment
Most comps want the biggest teams in the grand final..
Pippinu said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:48am | Report comment
A CCM vs Nix grand final is just about one of the worst GF combos imaginable!!
AndyRoo said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:56am | Report comment
If they keep playing like they do now CCM won’t be such a bad draw, Nix play good football too….. but no doubt those teams suffer from being teams “no one cares about” largely based on location.
Hammer said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:48am | Report comment
only to someone who lives in Melbourne or Sydney …. both the Mariners and Phoenix play good football – unlikely as it may be a GF in Wgtn would conceivably be a sell out akin to last weekend
Jaredsbro said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:20am | Report comment
Bumper rivalry in the majority of sports played in Australia, well there is truth in what you say Redb but hardly a marketer’ss dream in a comp that as others in this thread are saying is struggling with any kind of mainstream appeal…
Maybe the A-League needs teams like the Central Coast to actually win the comp, who knows how mant fans the code has in that region as there is now nothing else played there top-flight
You see like with Melbourne’s ‘second Rugby club’, in order to succeed on a truly national stage soccer must think outside the box and all, what works in an inter-suburban comp doesn’t work one team per town. A merely symbolic/tokenistic rivalry in all footy codes is hardly the solution..as what does Sydney FC and Melbourne Victory actually mean to the ever-vigilant casual fan. Even Cricket’s NSW/VIC rivalry is pretty much a forgone conclusion these days
Redb said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:35am | Report comment
I did say ‘A League; marketers dream. In what has been a lacklustre season for the A League, a Grand Final between Sydney and Melbourne would provide suitable media fodder and wider fan interest.
Chris said | November 23rd 2009 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Can’t help remembering the disastrous Jets v. Mariners final a few years ago (a Mariners “home” game in Sydney). Only 36,000 turned up – and it was out-rated on TV by the NSW v. Otago game on at the same time! I’d be very interested to see what happens if the GC win the right to host the GF (very possible as they are in the Top 3). Would it it be played at Skilled Park (capacity 27,500) or Suncorp?
jimbo said | November 23rd 2009 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
Exactly, should have been played to a packed out Bluetongue Stadium with the Mariners Jets GF tickets the hottest items in town.
The FFA and rich club owners like Palmer and Con playing with the rules and making stupid decisions, smells like the old NSL and is contributing to the fall in crowds at the A-League.
Realfootball said | November 23rd 2009 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
Good point about the timing of games and “habit”, Pip. Very true. The games have been all over the show this year. And again, as you point out, Adelaide this season would appear to support the argument. This could be made to work in the clubs’ favour if some kind of pattern was worked into the scheduling of midweek games.
Brian said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:34am | Report comment
I think its down to one word – Atmosphere. Adelaide play in a rectangular 14k capacity stadium which could almost be custom built for an HAL side. The atmosphere at their games is fantastic. Melbourne will hopefully get the same thing at the Bubble. Otherwise only Perth & Central Coast play at an appropriate stadium. The HAL need 15k capacity stadiums to generate atmosphere. This is how football grew throughout europe in the first place.
Pippinu said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Yes – it’s about a 16k capacity – and it’s pretty much perfect in every sense (just about the only HAL ground that is not used for any other sport too).
AndyRoo said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
The night games at a regualr time are important factor too.
Brisbane crowds are always better for night games, and the all over the shop nature of their home fixturing hurts as well.
James said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Are you forgetting the SFS for Sydney and the Suncorp for Brisabane? Both are fine stadiums built for rectangular sports…no atmosphere because they don’t have the crowds to generate it…
Robbos said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:09am | Report comment
No atmposphere at the SFS? Have you ever been to a game James?
I’ve been to many sporting events in Sydney, including RL club matches & RU Int’l & despite the small crowds the atmopshere is not the problem at SFS, the Cove is just awesome. They match anything League or Union can do with bigger crowds as far as atmosphere.
James said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:23am | Report comment
No I have not been to any match at SFS, although i have been to ANZ for a Wallabies game and that place needs at least a half full house to get going
I was responding to Brians “Otherwise only Perth & Central Coast play at an appropriate stadium” comment…i would have thought that SFS and Suncorp (which I have not been to either) are more than appropriate, given that they are world class rectangular venues.
Chris said | November 23rd 2009 @ 1:56pm | Report comment
Suncorp is great for Broncos games. I guess thats the difference between 36,00 (Broncos), and 6,000 (Roar)
Victer said | November 23rd 2009 @ 1:32pm | Report comment
This is a problem for brisbane, the stadium is just too big. Ballymore would be a good size but it isn’t convenient for transport
Gweeds said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Spot on. I agree with everything Adrian said but having a ’boutique’ stadium instead of those huge stadia than some teams insist playing in makes a difference and makes a difference.
True Tah said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Adrian,
Im a bit bemused by saying that HAL gets a lot of coverage in the Adelaide local press and that it has helped Adelaide to get fine crowds, many blame the press in Sydney, Brisbane and Melbourne for holding back the game.
Redb said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:42am | Report comment
I think the point about parochialism is right about Adelaide though and the media picks up on this.
Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Self explanitory isn’t it. More press = more attention = more awareness = more support. More effective than advertising.
Robbos said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Yes it’s that simple. Very simple reason why Turquri was the highest profile Australian Rugby player.
Fisher Price said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:53am | Report comment
You’ve pointed out that Adelaide is and has been blessed with a unique set of circumstances. But I’m not sure this is a model that could flow on to other locales.
keeper11 said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Can’t comment on local coverage by ‘the advertiser’…who owns it ?
but fact is Brisbane , Sydney and Melbourne all face an indifferent if almost hostile local high-selling news-limited tabloid in theire home-towns..
Sockah stories are invariably buried behing horseracing..except ofcourse when its a ‘shock/ crisis ‘ headline to beatup and spin..
( gets the Oikees of this world all hot and happy ofcourse….)
Revenge, nastiness and unethical beahaviour by news-limited due to footballs deals to commercial rivals Fairfax maybe ?
….or the usual age old agenda to bag ‘tha foreign game’ , make ‘us’ feel better and to protect ‘our’ beloved true blue foody codes….
Marshall said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:46pm | Report comment
Advertiser is News Limited. In today’s Tiser there is three pages of football, two for Adelaide united news.