Ghana’s pain shows penalty shootouts a cruel game
By Ben Somerford, 3 Jul 2010
- Tagged:
- 2010 fifa world cup, 2010 World Cup, Asamoah Gyan, football, Ghana, World Cup
Related coverage
- Football news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news

Uruguay's Jorge Fucile, left, and Uruguay's Andres Scotti, right, react after Ghana's Asamoah Gyan, center, failed to score on a penalty kick. AP Photo/Ivan Sekretarev
Penalty shootouts … the old chestnut. Apparently there’s no better way of deciding a winner when the scores can’t be split, but try telling that to Ghanaian pair Dominic Adiyiah and John Mensah, or even Asamoah Gyan, after the Black Stars crashed out of the World Cup on penalties to Uruguay this morning.
Football can be a cruel game, but it’s never more cruel when a World Cup match comes down to a penalty shootout.
The tears which were shed by the Ghanaian players at Soccer City overnight testify to that. For the neutrals, Ghana’s pain made it hard to smile at Uruguay’s joy.
The fact is, inevitably, a penalty shootout creates a villain. Occasionally a hero is born (John Aloisi anyone?), but always a villain is made.
And with not only the weight of the nation on your shoulders, but also, in Ghana’s peculiar case, the weight of the African continent, the burden of a spotkick can be hard to handle.
Failing can leave someone understandably inconsolable. After all, the villain is always remembered.
Ponder Italy’s Roberto Baggio who was a star of the 1994 World Cup in USA with five goals, before he skied his spotkick over the crossbar in the final which handed Brazil the title 3-2 on penalties
Few will remember Brazil still had another spotkick to come which would’ve clinched it anyway had Baggio converted his. But inevitably the dramatic turn of events which saw a hero turn to a villain in the fraction of the moment is hard to ignore, nor forget. In some ways, a legend was made, but a cruel one.
On the other hand, who remembers the player who struck the winning penalty four years ago when Italy defeated France 5-3 on penalties in the World Cup final in Berlin.
It’s more than likely you will remember Zinedine Zidane being sent off or maybe David Trezeguet missing his spotkick, but can you recall Italy’s ‘hero’?
It was, of course, none other than our old mate Fabio Grosso.
The penalty shootout, though, is theatre and entertainment and it provides a resolution for the viewers. But it’s also a cruel game for the actors.
Some might say it’s the drama of the sport, but it seems artificial to me.
Some will argue that’s the challenge of a penalty shootout. Having the mentality and strength of mind to handle the pressure which comes with the situation.
They’d say penalty shootouts are not pot luck. Rather the shootout decides who has the mental strength required to win.
Hold your nerve and you’re the victor.
But is that the ultimate measure for who is a better football side? Perhaps it’s the most convenient, but it’s also the cruellest.
But this trail of thought is a well-travelled one and there’s few better alternative solutions, especially at a World Cup when there’s precious little time for a replay (although there’s some merit in the idea of replays for the World Cup Final, which really shouldn’t be decided this way).
You’ve probably heard the idea of each team removing a player every 5-10 minutes once a game goes into extra-time, in order to open it up and hopefully see someone break through for a winner.
But again, that’s a logistical nightmare at a World Cup, with there being no guaranteed timeframe for a resolution, ala the recent Wimbledon match between John Isner and Nicolas Mahut. As the Isner example shows too, a non-tiebreaker brings in the issue of fatigue in future rounds.
Maybe FIFA could draw lots like they do when two teams are inseparable in the group stage at a World Cup? It’d be less cruel, but it’d provide a lot less entertainment.
Maybe penalty shootouts are the best solution? I don’t know.
But witnessing the dreaded spotkicks in action in the early hours of this morning it was hard not to feel for the players on the losing side.
And that made me think, and hope, that there’s a better solution. I’d love to hear your thoughts or suggestions…
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- 2010 fifa world cup, 2010 World Cup, Asamoah Gyan, football, Ghana, World Cup


July 3rd 2010 @ 9:54am
Davstar said | July 3rd 2010 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Thank god they are out!
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:35am
Mega said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Why?
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:49am
Australian Football said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Mega,
What will Santo, Sam, and Ed do with this one tonight..? This should be painfully good or sad, but hopefully we can still see the funny side of it. Commiserations to the Ghanaians.
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:52am
Mega said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:52am | Report comment
It’ll be interesting. Has the Sam curse struck again? Hope his wearing an Argentine shirt tonight…
July 3rd 2010 @ 6:25pm
Davstar said | July 3rd 2010 @ 6:25pm | Report comment
Why?
because they have been out played in every game they played it was fortunate penalties that got them out of the group stage and red cards not their ability to play.
July 5th 2010 @ 5:27pm
BlackStar said | July 5th 2010 @ 5:27pm | Report comment
They done better than England, USA, France, Italy and left the tournament alongside Brazil
) Well done !
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:33am
Shahsan said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:33am | Report comment
I don’t think the argument applies in this case, Ben. Ghana did have a gilt-edged, couldn’t ask for more, chance to win it in extra time but blew it.
I don’t like penalty shootouts either, especially when one team stifles the other for 120 minutes with the sole aim of getting to penalties (eg Steau Bucharest against Barca in the late 80s). But when teams dont do enough to try to win, eg Japan against Paraguay, then they cannot cry that it is cruel.
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:36am
whiskeymac said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:36am | Report comment
after the group stages it seems their penalty luck ran out at the wrong time. muntaris goal was a cracker and if it wasnt for the Uruguayan handball it wld be a semi for Ghana. tough on them and who wld have thought Uruguay cld win a shoot out?
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:39am
Australian Football said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:39am | Report comment
What a way to go out. A penalty in the last second of extra time and you miss—then to lose the penalty shootout. If you were a film maker you could not script a football team’s despair any worse then that.. But wait this was for real, in real time and life. Oh God the pain of it all. That would be enough to change a nation’s religion to Christianity..
______
AF
July 3rd 2010 @ 12:33pm
Andyroo said | July 3rd 2010 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
If it was a movie I would have bagged it for being unrealistic “that would never happen”…. feel really sorry for Ghana but something inside of me admires Uraguay for being prepared to cheat so absolutely with the handball.
July 3rd 2010 @ 2:01pm
AGO74 said | July 3rd 2010 @ 2:01pm | Report comment
It’s not a nice way for Ghana to go out the way they did but it is unfair to target Uruguay’s Suarez. I reckon if you ask any player at the World Cup what they would have done in the same situation the overwhelming majority would have done the same just to try and give their team the tiniest piece of hope which Uruguay were able to exploit by Gyan’s failed nerve.
July 3rd 2010 @ 3:24pm
whiskeymac said | July 3rd 2010 @ 3:24pm | Report comment
was it Suarez? doesn’t bode well for Uruguay if there best player is missing for the semi against a clinical dutch team.
July 3rd 2010 @ 3:31pm
Andyroo said | July 3rd 2010 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
It was Suarez, leaves a lot on forlan’s shoulders.
AGO74, I don’t want to paint Suarez as the villan either, but I did admire after blatently cheating he stone faced walked arround like he hadn’t done anything and did the “who me” face when he got a card.
July 3rd 2010 @ 3:38pm
whiskeymac said | July 3rd 2010 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
as an aside now Dunga has quit, how about him for the roos position?
July 3rd 2010 @ 4:13pm
AGO74 said | July 3rd 2010 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
I don’t recall seeing the ‘who me’ from Suarez? Maybe I missed it. My thought on the Uruguay reaction was an acceptance of the decision (by Uruguay standards at least) due to either the completely obvious nature of the offence and/or the moment at which it occurred in the last kick of the match.
July 3rd 2010 @ 9:29pm
Andyroo said | July 3rd 2010 @ 9:29pm | Report comment
AGO74
you have probably seen the replay by now but he definitely does the who me shocked expression, before that he was strolling into the scrum in the box like nothing has happened.
Cool as a cucumber and after seeing the replay made me laugh.
July 3rd 2010 @ 5:15pm
Australian Football said | July 3rd 2010 @ 5:15pm | Report comment
Whisky,
I have just seen the replay of Brazil vs. Holland for the first time and Brazil’s first half was brilliant and Dunga’s salary was much less than Pim’s—so yes a good candidate in my view. I hope he is approached and accepts the post. Besides he will need to vacate Brazil if he wants to stay healthy. No telling what his life will be like living there now.
July 3rd 2010 @ 10:52am
Midfielder said | July 3rd 2010 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Ben
The penalty is for broadcasters they have to have a finish … even RL has the golden point now…
July 3rd 2010 @ 3:27pm
whiskeymac said | July 3rd 2010 @ 3:27pm | Report comment
and tennis has the 2 game rule… and still had an 11 hour match recently! wonder how that screwed up the planning and schedules…
anyone know how long the the longest shoot out was (i assume it didnt involve england)?
July 3rd 2010 @ 11:02am
dasilva said | July 3rd 2010 @ 11:02am | Report comment
keep penalty shootout until the World Cup final and then play indefinitely for a golden goal ala John Isner and Nicolas Mahut
They surely can’t complain about fatigue in later round and winning the world cup should be worth the hard slog.
July 3rd 2010 @ 11:59am
rusty0256 said | July 3rd 2010 @ 11:59am | Report comment
The only problem I have with it is having penalties decide the World Cup Final.
As the most watched Football game in the World, this is the one game that should always be decided by open play. If both teams know they cannot hold on for a shootout they are much more likely to continue to go for it for the entire match. It will be the better match for it, and so it should be given its importance.
If there is no winner after 90 minutes, there should a Golden Goal decider (first to score wins). The game would continue on until someone scores. Just like a Final Set in Wimbledon, the teams just keep playing until someone scores the winner. They play in 15 minute periods with 5 minutes to rest and re-set tactics in between. Yes it does screw around a bit with TV programming but do you honestly think anyone will complain?
Could you imagine say Argentina and Germany crashing away at each other in the 4th period of extra time, neither team willing to give up, it would become not only great theatre but the final scorer would be remembered and feted forever.
July 3rd 2010 @ 12:15pm
st penguin said | July 3rd 2010 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
I’m not sure. In theory it sounds like a good idea, but extra time is usually awful football because neither team wants to commit people forward.
The “play until someone scores” may just result in hours and hours of boring football.
July 3rd 2010 @ 12:45pm
damos_x said | July 3rd 2010 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
As a person who played a bit i really don’t see what all the fuss is about. A player could miss a sitter during the game & would still be the ” villain” as in this article or score & be the ” hero” so really all it comes down to is that the penalty weighs the odds heavily in the favour of the shooter & thus attack is encouraged over defence , ie, the ‘keeper & isn’t that what everyone wants ?! Seriously, 11 metres & an open goal save for a player who pretty much has to either make a choice & dive one way in hope or stand still & see if their reflexes are good enough or the shot poor enough to make a save.
Yes a lot can be at stake but a lot is at stake when a defender has to risk a tackle in their own box & mis- cues, receives a red card & is now a ” villain” but I don’t hear any calls for the send-off rule to be scrapped. If we are to remove the penalty shoot-out then why is the individual penalty during the game acceptable where the shoot-out is not ? Surely it presents the same apparently psychological risk for a player & thus has no part in the game if this line of thought is to be pursued.
However, since a penalty is considered part of the game then isn’t a more logical way to decide the drawn contest given the game is about scoring goals rather than other ideas such as removing players ( I love six-a side but do i want to see this played on a full size pitch ?) or counting corners ( encourages attacking football but ultimately celebrates the denial of a goal by defenders rather than the success of attackers & further-more leads to just as much controversy as it is a situation decided by the officials much the same as a foul in the box does) or even shots on goal ( could I shoot from halfway with no hope of scoring but still claim that I was shooting at goal ! facetious I know but the point is clear) or even a decision by coin toss or counting the red & yellow cards given during the match.
For my money the only real alternative to the penalty shoot-out is the one I believe was tried in the MLS or it’s earlier equivalent ( correct me if my memory fails me please) where it is a shoot-out but the attacker takes possession from an arbitrary distance from goal & has a limited time to score. At least this is a simulation of actual play but I can’t help but come back to the fact that since a penalty kick is also a valid part of actual play that we have just done a circle & and are merely debating the form which it takes rather than is it a good thing or not.
In summation I will leave this thought in relation to the WC shoot-out debate- highly paid professionals who practice constantly shooting at an open goal from close range, if you miss perhaps you should be a little upset.
July 3rd 2010 @ 1:21pm
Rich_daddy said | July 3rd 2010 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
Ben,
It was Fabio Grosso (the man who dived over Lucas Neil) who struck the winning penalty for Italy. David Trezeguet was the only player to miss, his shot hit the underside of the cross bar.
I think Ghana overachieved in this tournament, they never really impressed me and were in some ways fortunate to get out of the group stage. They didn’t beat anyone of note and found the going pretty tough against an Australian side who played with 10 men for over an hour.
Maybe a bit harsh but Uruguay have been playing well and deserve a spot in the semi final.
July 3rd 2010 @ 2:04pm
AGO74 said | July 3rd 2010 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
I agree that overall Uruguay deserve their place in the semi’s ahead of Ghana. For mine they were the worst team in Group D but they got some luck. Did you know that the last minute penalty was Ghana’s 5th penalty received in the last two World Cups?! Astonishing. I don’t think any other nation has had anywhere near that level of penalties awarded to them. Looks like their luck finally ran out in that last minute……
July 3rd 2010 @ 4:22pm
stevo said | July 3rd 2010 @ 4:22pm | Report comment
bit of irony in that ghanas only goals in the group stage came via penalties too, but when they get one (6) to get them to the semis they cant do it
better team went through, the african tv pundits wont know who to back now, there were a lot of predictions for ghana to win the cup coming out of south africa…
July 3rd 2010 @ 4:41pm
ItsCalledFootball said | July 3rd 2010 @ 4:41pm | Report comment
We wuz robbed – we should have beat Ghana but we only finished behind them on Goal Difference.
July 3rd 2010 @ 2:20pm
Axel V said | July 3rd 2010 @ 2:20pm | Report comment
This is one of the cruelest games I have ever seen.
Gyan will be haunted for the rest of his life, and there is nothing he will ever be able to do to avenge this, it doesn’t matter if he wins 10 champions league finals in a row from now or not, because he’ll never be able to reverse what happened here and Ghana will not get an oppurtunity like this to become the first African team to make the semi final of a world cup for a long long time. Millions of Ghanains and Africans will feel the same way, trully a tragic event for African football. I’m not African and have no deep connection with Africa and that missed penalty at the end of extra time had me crying :’(