Six steps to rebuild Australian cricket
By Tom Dimanis, 15 Jan 2011 Tom Dimanis is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Andrew Hilditch, Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Doug Bollinger, Phil Hughes
I just about vaulted my delicious Beef Stroganoff dinner (so lovingly prepared by my wife) when I heard Andrew Hilditch proclaim that he and his team had done a very good job as selectors of the Australian Test side.
As an Australian cricket fan, I took this statement as a direct insult. I mean, how dare he?
Three innings-defeats in an Ashes series made it so glaringly obvious that the side they selected were not up to the task.
I admired how Mr. Hilditch so brilliantly deflected the blame onto other areas, like the declining state of the Sheffield Shield competition. He’s a great lawyer.
The NSP, as they like to call themselves these days, dutifully demonstrated their gross incompetence with a series of baffling moves, which included their appalling handling of Doug Bollinger, an in-the-dark spin-bowling selection policy, and weak-as-urine batting selections.
The lack of preparation and common sense applied to the selection of the national team was so unbelievably careless. In contrast, the English squad came over with a smaller squad and were very well prepared, so much so that their plan B bowling options were better than their plan A attack.
Hilditch and co’s woeful selection policies have now filtered into the shorter forms of the game. Although at this stage the World Cup squad should be their primary focus, they should at the same time be thinking about the future of the Test side.
A decent rebuild, won’t happen overnight, but it will happen. It needs to start now. Like, RIGHT now.
If I was king, first move would be a swift drop-kick to Hilditch’s backside and an “adios amigo, don’t you come back, ya hear?”. And a “See ya later” to Jamie Cox too. I’d bring in Steve Waugh, I like his style. Boony, you can stay.
If I was king …
1. Replace Phil Hughes with Shaun Marsh
Phil Hughes is technically inept to handle quality Test match bowling. It’s a fact. He was averaging just over 20 in the Shield this season before his selection. He was hardly knocking loudly on the door, more like tap tap tapping on the window begging to be let in.
If opposition sides bowl to him wide outside off stump he will cream them. Bowl at his body and watch him wrap himself up into a human ball of mess. He can’t improve his technique from here, it’s too late, even at age 22.
Shaun Marsh has a solid technique and has been steadily improving. Given a decent 10-match stint in the Test arena he’ll eventually add some stability to the top order.
Simon Katich has had his time in the sun. It’s a shame because he would’ve made a great Test captain.
2. See ya later Steve Smith, hello Callum Ferguson
A mate of mine recently described Steve Smith as “a child with no technique and no patience.” Yes it was a harsh comment, but I couldn’t agree more. So apt, so very apt.
Should the Aussie hierarchy give him time to work on his technique?
Hell no.
Save him for the Twenty20 slap, tickle and giggle. His ugly batting style suits the bastardised format perfectly.
Ferguson is a solid run scorer and looks like a batsman. I’d send him to Sri Lanka as the team’s no. 6 when the Australians tour there in August, and take it from there.
3. Hey Haddin, here comes the Paine
Brad Haddin did a credible job standing up to the English this summer. He at least scored a century when the top 4 couldn’t. However, he has two things going against him – old age and dubious glovework.
Tim Paine has on the other hand has youth on his side, and he doesn’t muff catches behind the stumps. He’s pretty solid with the bat too. Aussie fans can only hope that he has the leadership skills the selectors think he has.
4. Dump Mitchell Johnson, replace him with anyone
I’m sorry to say but he’s had a free ride for the last year and a half. Can he get wickets? Of course he can. Can he bowl to a plan? Nup. Does he leak runs? More than a leaky boat.
He has the potential to be such a devastating bowler if he could get his head right. Poor Troy Cooley, he must’ve tried very hard.
Johnson needs a solid season in the Shield competition starved of international action to bring some desperation into his game. A one-match rest hanging around the nets isn’t enough.
There are a few bowlers ready to take his spot. Peter George comes to mind – is he the tall, metronome-type bowler we’ve been looking for since Glenn McGrath’s departure?
5. Stick with Beer
His selection was totally left of centre and he didn’t really deserve a baggy green after only five first-class matches. I think he only got selected because he has such a cool name.
All this aside, in the Sydney test he was giving the ball some flight and/or spin, vital spin bowling components that seem to be lacking in the modern Australian off-spin bowler. He’s also quite tall for a spinner which means he has the ability to offer some bounce to trouble opposing batsmen.
6. Sorry Punter
Ricky Ponting will be remembered as one of the greatest Australian batsmen … ever. Pure class and heart. Unfortunately he is out of form and the end to his career is nigh. The next Ashes series in 2013 is just too far away. His selection in the World Cup squad is a perfect departing gift.
If I was a selector I’d let him know the World Cup will be his swansong and his last chance for glory.
It would be great to see Punter go out with a bang. I’m sure if he’s presented with a last-ever tournament scenario, he will.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Andrew Hilditch, Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, Doug Bollinger, Phil Hughes



January 15th 2011 @ 6:36am
jmo said | January 15th 2011 @ 6:36am | Report comment
Haddin is a good keeper. In the test series he stopped all the wide wides – some of them would have been absolute classic catches if they came off the bat – and there were plenty being bowled. Paine missed one of these from Tait last night that I think Haddin would have got to but that’s just speculation. Paine looks more like a test batsman (ie. he has patience) based on his recent Tests in India. Haddin gets out in tests a lot playing 20-20 style shots. But batting is secondary the keeper should be selected for their keeping. If you think Paine doesn’t muff any catches behind the stumps then give him time. Should Paine be selected as a batsman in the same side with Haddin as keeper/captain? is the question.
On point 6. shouldn’t the world cup squad be selected from the best in-form players, not selection gifts for old pals. Some would say that’s how we lost the ashes.
January 15th 2011 @ 1:41pm
Tom Dimanis said | January 15th 2011 @ 1:41pm | Report comment
Haddin has been serviceable but he is only here for the short term – Australia needs to build with younger players now so they can peak at the right time.
If they are planning on picking Haddin as captain they might as well go with Katich instead.
January 17th 2011 @ 2:10am
John P said | January 17th 2011 @ 2:10am | Report comment
Hmm, missed three stumpings and dropped two catches tonight…
January 17th 2011 @ 4:14am
Lolly said | January 17th 2011 @ 4:14am | Report comment
He’s never been much chop against slow bowlers. He lets balls go through his legs and isn’t great with collecting for stumpings. That was particularly poor even for him though.
It made me laugh to read that Slater was making excuses for his poor keeping by claiming that he is nervous due to being dropped from the t20 team.
January 17th 2011 @ 8:11am
Tom Dimanis said | January 17th 2011 @ 8:11am | Report comment
Yes that was a shocking performance. Poor excuse from Slater, having competition for spots is supposed to make you play better. I reckon Haddin will be working closely with the spinners this morning!
January 15th 2011 @ 8:47am
Jammy said | January 15th 2011 @ 8:47am | Report comment
In any analysis of Australian cricket you have to seperate performances in Test cricket from ODI’s and certainly from 20/20 stuff – in fact 20/20 should be considered as an entirely different team, perhaps with an entirely different coaching set up etc. It will be in the future so why not now.
As for the test team the biggest issue is the captaincy. Tradionally Australian captains retire outright, that is unlike their English or or any other national team counterparts they give up the captaincy when they retire, or like the cases of Lawry or Hughes, when they are sacked or resign. That is, they don’t assume their positions in the side as non captain under a new captain.
So the selectors/CA have to decide who they want as captain – the incumbant Ponting or the annointed Clarke. It is a very tricky decision – Ponting the player is a great in a form slump. If he is sacked or retired he may be gone before he returns to form. Tendulkar and Dravid have proven that forms slumps may be only temporary, losing the only truly great cricketer from the set up before his time is up could be the worse thing that the selectors do.
The Clarke issue also goes against traditional Australian selection policy. Usually Australia picks the best possible team and then selects the best candidate from that team as captain. Right now Clarke is not in enough form to warrant a position in the team. For these reasons I would stick with Ponting as the captain, giving him time to find form. If he doesn’t then the axe comes and another captain is appointed, be it Clarke or someone else.
My test side would be:
S. Marsh – looks more technically correct then Hughes who needs to reassess his batting completely
Watson – needs to turn his starts into big scores. Potentially the best cricketer in the team, has he the maturity to go on with it?
Khawaja – Deserves a chance. In his cameos in Sydney looked to possess the skills needed to become a test batsmen of note.
M. Hussey – Fantastic in the ashes and deserves to go out in his own time, hopefully he realises that this may be within the next 2 years.
Ponting (c) – give him Sri Lanka, South Africa and the home series to prove he still has it. 5 may be the position that helps him regain form.
Ferguson – He may not have the potential of Smith but he his cricket is more advanced. Give him a shot, he can’t be worse than recent number 6s.
Haddin – adequate with the gloves. Has to realise that ‘playing your own game’ is fine when you’re 5/380 but not when you’re 5/80. Nothing between he and Paine except that Haddin has a few credit points from previous performances.
Ryan Harris – injury permitting. Whole hearted. May not be a long term player but will fill a role until another is identified or Johnson gets it together.
Siddle – Has guts both with bat and ball and isn’t just good on home soil.
Mitchell Starc – Tall and talented. Australian cricket needs to take a punt, Starc if not injured should be that punt.
Micheal Beer – his bowling was tight and looked to have promise. Needs to be given a few more tests at this stage.
Our bowling stocks are low – hilfenhous has surely played his last test, bollinger looks toothless after his fist couple of spells and johnson is a major disappointment except when playing in Perth. Spinning wise O’Keefe may be the next man if Beer fails.
Tough times ahead for Australian cricket.
January 15th 2011 @ 1:50pm
Tom Dimanis said | January 15th 2011 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
Yes certainly the captaincy is a massive issue, that’s one of the reasons why I think they are fast tracking Tim Paine. It’s a hard one.
Mitchell Starc is one of many good fast bowlers coming through, so it’s not all bleak – they just need to be chosen!
January 15th 2011 @ 5:57pm
Fisher Price said | January 15th 2011 @ 5:57pm | Report comment
So three more crap series for Punter as batsman and captain?! Ridiculous. Face facts – he’s rubbish.
January 15th 2011 @ 8:14pm
Jammy said | January 15th 2011 @ 8:14pm | Report comment
He’s rubbish? Previous history would suggest otherwise, especially concerning his batting. Previous history would also indicate that form can be found, and so ‘three more crap series’ is not a given.
January 15th 2011 @ 8:41pm
sheek said | January 15th 2011 @ 8:41pm | Report comment
There are no rubbish Australian cricket captains. Just the odd ordinary one, mostly good ones, & frequently better ones.
Perhaps FP, in your frustration, you’ve given too much vent to hyperbole…..?
January 15th 2011 @ 9:54am
Train Without A Station said | January 15th 2011 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Marsh for Hughes, Ferguson for Smith and Paine for Haddin? You’ve just replaced 3 players with players with inferior first class averages.
Shaun Marsh doesn’t even regularly open for WA in Shield cricket, and his form this season (batting lower down the order) has been batting in a different position. It would be ridiculous to take a gamble on a guy batting at 3 or 4 with an average of 35, and throw him in as a test opener. Stick with Katich and Watson now until some BETTER candidates actually put some performances together.
A player like Cameron White is a better 6 selection. He has a better first class average than both and is a potential captain.
As for Paine. He appears to have a future, but Brad Haddin has a test average of 40, keeps well and has scored when we needed him to. Paine is average 35 in First Class Cricket.
January 15th 2011 @ 3:22pm
Tom Dimanis said | January 15th 2011 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
Train,
It’s not all about averages and stats. The guys I put forward have the technique and mental resolve to play Test cricket. I honestly don’t think Hughes and Smith posess either attribute.
Watson’s average wasn’t too high either when they gave him a shot.
And I think Cameron White should stick to the shorter forms of the game.
January 16th 2011 @ 2:23pm
Train Without A Station said | January 16th 2011 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Indeed it’s not ALL about averages and stats, when they score these runs is important too (e.g. Steve Waugh as opposed to Michael Clarke). However what do averages tell you? Consistent performance. Generally players have recently had a test average about 2-3 higher than their first class average, even still it leaves these guys under 40. Picking players on potential not performances is has what has gotten Australia into this mess.
It’s time to stop picking on potential and start picking on performances. A player who could be a future test captain, or great player of whatever they want to say, is not much good to us if he isn’t consistently scoring runs today.
January 15th 2011 @ 7:52pm
Lolly said | January 15th 2011 @ 7:52pm | Report comment
Shaun Marsh is averaging over 50 since the beginning of last season in Shield. He is finally making up for his unreliability.
January 15th 2011 @ 10:32am
sheek said | January 15th 2011 @ 10:32am | Report comment
With respect Tom,
You have done nothing more than scratch the surface, very lightly. Band-aid solutions that will only last the life of a band-aid. Figuratively speaking, only weeks or months, if you’re lucky, depending on the vagaries in form of players.
What about the CA board that allowed a situation to develop whereby the production line is drying up? Not enough talent coming through, or receiving the tough finishing school required to take the next step up to international cricket.
Speaking about ‘finishing school’, why has the Sheffield Shield been allowed to fail in its core function? Unless the leading players appear in SS as mentors alongside or against the up & coming youngsters, then the SS is not doing its job.
What about the selectors ignoring form & sticking with the “usual suspects”? The paragraph preceding partly explains why the selectors are frightened to introduce new talent – they themselves don’t trust the game’s domestic structures anymore.
Why has the national team developed so many poor practices in techniques & skills? What are the plethora of coaches actually doing? Are so many coaches around the national team necessary? I would say not.
What is the core function of the cricket academy going into the future? Is the primary focus still on producing test match skills, or is this being eroded in favour of T20 skills? Where’s the demarcation?
There is an endemic failure of systems from CA right down to the national team playing roster. It’s almost as if we live in an age where people consider it their birthright to retain their position as player, coach, selector, administrator, board member, etc, so they can continue to draw on their attractive pay packets.
Listen to all these people, & it seems justifying their existence, rather than their performance, is all that matters. Since when did being a test/OD/T20 player, coach, selector, administrator, board member become a right, & not a privilege that must be earned??? At all levels…..
Three forms of cricket appears unsustainable. If test cricket is considered king, then one day cricket must give way to T20 cricket. The ‘Big Bash’ can then take over the OD’s role of revenue driver, allowing both SS & test cricket to survive & flourish.
So you see Tom, your article has merely skipped over the REALLY tough questions facing Australian cricket. And international cricket…..
January 15th 2011 @ 3:12pm
Tom Dimanis said | January 15th 2011 @ 3:12pm | Report comment
With respect Sheek,
You’ve been misled by the title that was given to this article. The focus of this post was to suggest some immediate selection ideas for the Test side with an eye to the future. It was not an attempt to provide a full scale review of a rebuild of Australian cricket.
I agree a review must be conducted at all levels, but it should’ve been done after the 2009 Ashes defeat.
January 15th 2011 @ 8:39pm
sheek said | January 15th 2011 @ 8:39pm | Report comment
Tom,
The title ‘Six steps to rebuild Australian cricket’ suggests more than just changing several personnel selections.
However, maybe the title was at the behest of the editors, & not your own? In any case, I accept your explanation.
January 15th 2011 @ 9:35pm
dasilva said | January 15th 2011 @ 9:35pm | Report comment
I think the original article was “Tough Decisions For Test Selections” if you look at the URL
January 15th 2011 @ 6:45pm
Jason Cave said | January 15th 2011 @ 6:45pm | Report comment
This is why a extensive review is needed urgently. While cricket in this country is not at the crossroads, it’s more of facing the most challenging period not seen since the rebel tours of the mid 1980s, especially seeing that AFL and NRL clubs are ready to pounce on the best young cricket talent to convince them to switch sports. A independent review board consisting of the following should be appointed and start work IMMEDIATELY irrespective of how Australia goes in the World Cup:
CHAIRMAN: John Howard/Ric Charlesworth
MEMBERS: David Parkin, Ross Smith, Ian Chappell, John Buchanan, Ron Barassi, Robert Walls, Federal Minister for Sport Mark Arib
And every single aspect of Australian cricket SHOULD be put under the microscope: Club, Sheffield Shield, Test, T20, ODI, Australian Test team, player development etc.
January 15th 2011 @ 11:05am
EvertonAndAustralia said | January 15th 2011 @ 11:05am | Report comment
I’d personally keep Haddin. Also along with dropping Johnson, also drop Hilfenhaus. Get McKay and Bollinger in.
January 15th 2011 @ 11:18am
Train Without A Station said | January 15th 2011 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Without a doubt we need to look at the bowlers as well. While only 3 of our 6 batsmen at the moment are performing at a level required, the bowlers inability to take 20 wickets shows that there should be changes made beyond the injury replacements the selectors have made.
January 15th 2011 @ 3:25pm
Tom Dimanis said | January 15th 2011 @ 3:25pm | Report comment
How disappointing was Hilfy? I had my reservations about Johnson but I thought Hilfenhaus would be our leading wicket taker.
January 15th 2011 @ 11:36am
Viscount Crouchback said | January 15th 2011 @ 11:36am | Report comment
Oh, I could happily read these navel-gazing posts for the next four years! There is such fun in analysing a losing sports team, especially an international sports team, and even more especially an international sports team that is seen as a barometer of national vigour. Is it the players? Is it the structure? Is it the board? Is it the T20? Is it those pesky Victorians and their ghastly AFL? Is it the hair-tinted Generation Y? Come on, Jeeves, tell me who is to blame!
Well, chaps, at the risk of making the Ashes more competitive more quickly than I perhaps should wish, I have to tell you that the answer is perfectly obvious. In fact, it’s so simple as to be laughable: You go out and find the cleverest, hardest, savviest coach in international cricket regardless of nationality. Then you pay him whatever he wants. And then – and this is the crucial step – you do whatever he tells you to do. That’s it. Problem solved.
And if this seems too easy then ask yourselves how England have gone from being bowled out for 51 in Jamaica in 2008 to dishing the Aussies for fun in 2010. Same players, same structure, same buffoons in charge at the ECB – but one new coach, Andy Flower, who calmly weaves a silk purse out of what appeared to be a sow’s ear.
Admittedly, you need a smart, phlegmatic, well-bred captain too, and he might be rather harder to come by – but CA can do half the job tomorrow just by picking up the phone to Gary Kirsten.
January 15th 2011 @ 3:31pm
Tom Dimanis said | January 15th 2011 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
Viscount,
I very much agree about getting in a decent coach. Would love to see Steve Waugh come in as coach but it ain’t gonna happen. As a matter of fact I would love to see guys like Taylor and Warne get involved with the game. Unfortunately there are bigger bucks in media than coaching, so while the greats go on to call the game, the fringe players take over the coaching roles, and wallah! 3-1
January 16th 2011 @ 2:50pm
jamesb said | January 16th 2011 @ 2:50pm | Report comment
This is my gut feeling why Steve Waugh turned down the Australian coaching job.
A few years ago, his wife Lynette was hospitlised with a brain haemorrhage. That puts a bit of perspective
I think Steve Waugh doesn’t want to spend months on end with the team away from his wife and family. Thats understandable. Waugh did 20 years of that as a cricketer. I just think he wants to slow down
Someone did suggest a mentoring role for waugh. Thats a start.
January 15th 2011 @ 7:54pm
Lolly said | January 15th 2011 @ 7:54pm | Report comment
Fat chance of Teflon going any time soon, Viscount.
January 17th 2011 @ 8:18am
Koops said | January 17th 2011 @ 8:18am | Report comment
Viscount Crouchback said Admittedly, you need a smart, phlegmatic, well-bred captain too, and he might be rather harder to come by.
Oh, i dunno, Clarke’s parents owned a indoor cricket center, thats cricket royalty in this country !!.
January 15th 2011 @ 12:53pm
whiteline said | January 15th 2011 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
Sheek,
fair point but as I’ve said many times, it starts at grade cricket – that’s where you learn the game. The battle between grade and suburban clubs is being won by surburbia for many reasons – least of which is less training committment for senior players with jobs and families. Cricket Australia and the respective state bodies have ignored this for the past 15 years and now are paying the price.
January 16th 2011 @ 7:40am
sheek said | January 16th 2011 @ 7:40am | Report comment
Whiteline,
True, it starts at grade cricket, or even earlier at junior cricket.
CA has this lifestyle problem, that people simply don’t want to give up the enormous chunk of time that cricket demands. It might have been okay 100 years ago, or 50 years ago, but today we have more distractions, & a shorter attention span.
Another reason why I think T20 will boot test cricket out eventually.
Unless of course, the cricket authorities have the will to make test cricket relevant to today’s society & lifestyles…..
January 15th 2011 @ 2:16pm
jamesb said | January 15th 2011 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
I’ll give you a wild card as far as wicketkeepers are concerned.
Peter Nevill from NSW
played 8 games
runs: 444
ave: 63.42
100s : 2
January 15th 2011 @ 8:32pm
djsinnema said | January 15th 2011 @ 8:32pm | Report comment
Here is a team they should work towards, and should play in the ashes, when they are in England
Shane Watson (c Fact is he is the 2nd most experenced in this bunch)
Shaun Marsh
Usman Kwahja
Micheal Clarke
Aaron Finch
Steve Smith
Travis Paine (WK)
Peter Siddle
Mitchel Starc
Micheal Beer
Peter George
Remaining Squad
Mitchell Johnson, Phil Hughs and Peter Nevill
January 16th 2011 @ 12:12am
Anthony said | January 16th 2011 @ 12:12am | Report comment
This should be australias team for Sri lanka
Hughes
Khawaja
Watson
Clarke (c)
Hussey
Ferguson
Haddin
Johnson
Harris
Siddle
Beer
Marsh Paine bollinger/McKay o’keefe/smith
Watson at 3 he will need to bowl alot more in the sub continent and at 3 he might turn those 50s into 100s
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.