Lingerie Football League launches in Australia [VIDEO]
By John Davidson, 12 Apr 2012 John Davidson is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- LFL, Lingerie Football League, NFL
Lingerie Football League comes to Australia
Related coverage
It’s the fastest growing sports league in the US, according to BusinessWeek magazine. It’s also the fastest growing women’s sport in the world, according to Brisbane Entertainment Centre general manager Trish McNamara.
Did I mention it involves attractive women, in lingerie, playing modified NFL football?
(Gallery from today’s press release and video below)
While A-League clubs die and NRL teams suffer severe financial difficulty, the Lingerie Football League (LFL) is having a crack at the Australian market.
They are holding two exhibition games, in Brisbane’s Entertainment Centre on June 2 and Sydney’s AllPhones Arena on June 9, ahead of the launch of an Australian league in 2013 featuring teams from Melbourne, Perth, Sydney and Brisbane.
The first LFL game was played in Los Angeles in 2004. Sponsors and TV coverage followed, and in 2009 a fully-fledged competition was formed. Over the past three years the LFL has secured a national TV deal in the US and is shown in more than 40 countries around the US, including Australia.
It has already held games in Canada and Mexico, and is planning to create leagues in Canada and Europe over the next two years.
As mentioned, in Australia, the LFL is shown on Fuel TV and organisers claim it has developed a “cult-like following” on the pay TV channel. It’s hard to move past the view that this is a sexist sport that objectifies women, purely for male viewers. But the LFL claims this is not the case.
“Most people have not seen a game, haven’t been a to a game, they’re just basing it on the term that it’s called the Lingerie Football League and that’s understandable,” Mitchell S. Mortaza, chairman and founder of the LFL, says.
“But honestly when you go to a game, what you’re going to see is incredible athletes that were former collegiate athletes that take the game very seriously.
“We use, certainly sex appeal in the title Lingerie Football League to sell the product, to bring media attention to it, to bring in curious fans but unless it was a real sport and we were serious about the athletics it wouldn’t have shelf life.
“Not only would it not sustain, it wouldn’t grow and we’re seeing the growth, both domestically and internationally, and that’s happening because of our focus on the athletics of it. Is it objectifying women? I don’t think so. They’re all educated women… They wouldn’t allow themselves to be objectified.”
The face of the LFL’s push into Australia is Australian player Chloe Butler, who is a member of the LA Temptation.
Butler, a former Australian rep hurdler and ACT rugby union player, says: “We definitely wouldn’t be a part of it if it were objectifying women. You have to admit it, marketing is a huge part of the entertainment business.”
Butler likened it to the use of sex appeal by English footballer David Beckham.
Adrian Purcell, two-time LFL All Star with Tampa Breeze, says: “I would never allow myself to be objectified. People come to the games for the uniform but they come back for what we put out there, the product we put out there.”
Check out my interview with LFL head Mitchell Mortaza and some footage of the media event today at Sydney’s Centennial Park below.
The LFL says it’s a real sport, one not played by models. The league proudly brags about the broken arms and noses its players have suffered as a sign of its toughness and competitiveness.
Real sport or not, the LFL has bold plans for Australia and the world. They say they are outpacing where the WWE and UFC were in their third seasons, and the creation of a World Cup and World Bowl is in place for 2014. NFL, the premium gridiron competition in the US, is not very popular in Australia, so it remains to be see how big a crowd they will pull.
Beach volleyball is played in bikinis at the Olympics, is this any different? Obviously other women’s sports here like the W-League and WNBL are played with proper uniforms, but undoubtedly the LFL would point to its wide appeal and global success as reasons for its use of lingerie.
The simple fact is, it’s hard to take seriously when the players are in their bras. But, according to LFL player Purcell, there are “no pillow fights” or “sleepovers”. Feminists won’t love it, but readers of Zoo Weekly will.
What do you think, Roarers?
-
- The LFL touched down in Brisbane – and Chris dragged himself to the game to convey the spectacle to Roarers
Twitter: @johnnyddavidson
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Bases loaded, but Australian baseball strikes out (25)
- Cheap Seats Podcast: Episode 7 (24)
- Will Tebow lead the Patriots to the promised land? (16)
- Could Vergne replace Webber? (14)
- 2014 MLB season set to launch in Sydney (13)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (13)
- Justin Gatlin and the question that remains (10)
- Declining MotoGP must change to suit riders (0)
- Suzuki to return for 2015 MotoGP season (0)
- Wimbledon 2013: Women’s Singles preview (0)
- New owners for Lotus (0)
- MotoGP’s three amigos sweep the podium in Catalunya (7)
- US Open: English Rose denies Jason Day his maiden major (1)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (13)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- LFL, Lingerie Football League, NFL






April 12th 2012 @ 3:30pm
turbodewd said | April 12th 2012 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
Hmm, if I want to look at near naked chicks I’ll hop on the net. If I want to watch football Ill watch NRL or NFL. This LFL? Not for me.
April 12th 2012 @ 11:55pm
Bludger said | April 12th 2012 @ 11:55pm | Report comment
It’s better than that garbage netball they are dishing up to us.
April 12th 2012 @ 3:40pm
Brett McKay said | April 12th 2012 @ 3:40pm | Report comment
Nice one Eds, sucked me in with the headline. Tough gig, covering this John??
I was tipping this to become The Roar’s first 1000+ commented article too…
April 12th 2012 @ 3:46pm
Chris Chard said | April 12th 2012 @ 3:46pm | Report comment
Anything played on the Gridiron (American football, Canadian football, Arena football etc) is worth a look in my books.
Since none of those organisations are willing to bring a game to Australia then LFL it is!
Also good to see the ladies having a crack and getting some time in the spotlight.
CC
ps Would also argue that the NFL is growing in popularity in Australia quite significantly thanks to far better coverage on free to air TV than in years gone by
April 12th 2012 @ 4:36pm
The Dishwasher said | April 12th 2012 @ 4:36pm | Report comment
LFL looks so Choice!!!
April 12th 2012 @ 5:48pm
Johnno said | April 12th 2012 @ 5:48pm | Report comment
LFL should BE censored or on a late time or having access to parental being able to lock it. What about the children and teenagers that will see this. Very wrong in my view, in my opinion LFL may send out subliminal sexualised messages.
And that is not good for children or teenagers to be exposed to such images .
And what about the issues of sexism and degrading of women. Women begin seen as sex objects, or having there sexual attractiveness shown off, what would the feminists be saying about LFL.
This i am not sure is good for society the LFL for the reasons I have given above.
April 13th 2012 @ 11:22am
Chop said | April 13th 2012 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Are you serious? Do you take your kids to the beach? Do they see cheerleaders?
I bet you haven’t even seen a game to judge.
It’s a great view I concede that but I’ll steal a line from a movie I can’t remember
‘They maybe hot but those chicks can play’
April 14th 2012 @ 4:18am
amazonfan said | April 14th 2012 @ 4:18am | Report comment
I’m not a fan of LFL, BUT…
“What about the children and teenagers that will see this. Very wrong in my view, in my opinion LFL may send out subliminal sexualised messages.
And that is not good for children or teenagers to be exposed to such images .”
Firstly, you are putting teenagers and children together? The average teenage boy has almost certainly seen far ‘worse’.
“And what about the issues of sexism and degrading of women. Women begin seen as sex objects, or having there sexual attractiveness shown off, what would the feminists be saying about LFL. ”
How can it be degrading if the women consent? Nobody forces them to do it. The same for being seen as sex objects. Whether they are or they aren’t, it’s the choice of the women to participate. Feminists may not like it, however I would argue that anyone who calls themselves a feminist (as do I) have to respect women’s choices.
Ultimately I don’t particularly like the game. But what I dislike even more is the idea that its willing participants are somehow degraded, or that it should be censored because of the children. That’s just ridiculous.
May 3rd 2012 @ 10:59pm
med_stu said | May 3rd 2012 @ 10:59pm | Report comment
This argument – “how can it be degrading of the women consent?” is a completely false argument. Just because a small percentage of women are willing to do something, doesn’t mean it’s not degrading to women in general. If you could convince 32 African American men to play football in loin cloths and African war paint for enough money, would not automatically mean that’s not seriously racist and degrading to all black people. I’m sick of this argument.
As far as I’m concerned the fact that the only way women’s football can get an audience is if they’re wearing lingerie is degrading and sexist by default. I’d like to play football, but as far as I can see men playing is interesting enough that people will go out of their way to watch, and pay a lot of money to watch them play fully clothed, but I’m only worth watching if I’ll do it half naked so people can leer at my body. Seems like a really fair and equitable system. Obviously none of those women are playing in this league because it’s the only way they can play football on a world wide stage, as ooposed to them just really wanting to play in almost nothing.
May 4th 2012 @ 12:58am
Geoff Lemon said | May 4th 2012 @ 12:58am | Report comment
Well said. Agree, agree, agree.
May 4th 2012 @ 2:04am
amazonfan said | May 4th 2012 @ 2:04am | Report comment
“This argument – “how can it be degrading of the women consent?” is a completely false argument. Just because a small percentage of women are willing to do something, doesn’t mean it’s not degrading to women in general.”
I don’t agree in the slightest. You may consider it to be degrading, however that does not make it objectively so.
“If you could convince 32 African American men to play football in loin cloths and African war paint for enough money, would not automatically mean that’s not seriously racist and degrading to all black people.”
There is a massive difference between the two. Putting women (or men) in a willing situation where their bodies will be gazed upon, which happens in other sports such as beach volleyball, is not even in the same planet as perpetrating the stereotype that African-African men are uncivilized and primitive (which is what the implication of that is).
“I’m sick of this argument.”
I’m sick of the ‘it’s degrading to women in general argument’, so I guess we’re both sick of something.
“As far as I’m concerned the fact that the only way women’s football can get an audience is if they’re wearing lingerie is degrading and sexist by default.’
Good for you, however, perhaps the women who participate disagree you? You may consider it to be degrading and sexist, but don’t pretend as it is anything but your opinion.
Furthermore, as I said in my earlier post, I don’t really like the game. I think it’s stupid, and there are other women’s sports I am much more interested in. However I don’t think it’s degrading. You may, fine, however I’m going to leave it at that, as I’ve said all I have to say on this matter.
April 12th 2012 @ 6:36pm
Matt F said | April 12th 2012 @ 6:36pm | Report comment
I agree with turbodewd here. If people want to see semi-naked chicks then there are plenty of alternatives and if they want to watch football then they’ll probably just stick with their traditional code/s of choice. Gridiron isn’t popular enough in Australia (though in fariness it does appear to be growing a bit) for the LFL to develop a long-term following once the obvious novelty wears off.
That being said, I’m rather envious of you right now John!
April 12th 2012 @ 7:10pm
Mal D said | April 12th 2012 @ 7:10pm | Report comment
I’m not sure what society Johnno lives in but what a load of rubbish! I don’t see any difference between the LFL and any other sport like female- wrestling, volley ball,athletics etc.
April 12th 2012 @ 8:00pm
p.Tah said | April 12th 2012 @ 8:00pm | Report comment
Look at the name Mal. Lingerie Football. It’s not a sport. It’s a very sad marketers wet dream.
May 4th 2012 @ 1:03am
Geoff Lemon said | May 4th 2012 @ 1:03am | Report comment
Precisely. The uniforms in athletics or the like have a practical purpose. The volleyball ones don’t, and that’s why they’ve been the subject of a lot of complaint, including from plenty of volleyballers.
The ‘uniforms’ for LFL state clearly that the most important thing that a woman has is her body, and the willingness to get it mostly naked. It says that the primary worth a woman has is her ability to turn on a man. That’s the very definition of objectification: that the human being is of secondary importance to the tits. And that’s a pretty ugly perspective.
April 12th 2012 @ 7:33pm
c said | April 12th 2012 @ 7:33pm | Report comment
I must say that I have watched a couple of games on Foxtel I like their shorts
April 12th 2012 @ 9:51pm
Big john said | April 12th 2012 @ 9:51pm | Report comment
Well it has to be better than womens tennis. The game would last longer anyway.
April 12th 2012 @ 11:06pm
KNACKERS said | April 12th 2012 @ 11:06pm | Report comment
Many of the fairer sex have long complained that womens sport is vastly underepresented in the public space
let os hope that they are the first to applaud this audacious attempt to place women’s sport front and centre
May 21st 2012 @ 3:13pm
Kate said | May 21st 2012 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
This does not get ‘women’s sport’ front and centre. This gets women’s bodies front and centre. Men aren’t going to these games because of some sudden urge to support women’s sport. They’re going for the T&A.
April 13th 2012 @ 12:57am
Dubble Bubble said | April 13th 2012 @ 12:57am | Report comment
Makes sense.If they want people to watch womens sports whose practitioners are generally inferior to the males in any particular sport ,hence haviing male/female divisions, then the women have to bring something extra to the table.