The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

Wayne Rooney: Oh captain, our captain

Wayne Rooney for England. (AFP)
Expert
5th September, 2014
1

Already, just a few weeks after Wayne Rooney was made captain of his club and country, the dissenting rumblings are growing louder. After an anaemic and sluggish performance against Norway, England’s new order has started with a sigh.

Even more troubling than the Roy Hodgson’s tactical regression, back to a largely traditional 4-4-2, was the fact that when Wayne Rooney came off for his ex-teammate Danny Welbeck, England instantly looked more fluid and dynamic going forward.

It seems unlikely that Hodgson will drop his newly anointed leader, even in the face of such compelling empirical evidence. England fans have accordingly prepared themselves for another qualifying campaign defined by the stodgy, the incoherent and the sense of frustration they all know painfully well.

This was England’s attacking unit that started the match – Raheem Sterling (who was the standout player on the night) and Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain on the wings and Daniel Sturridge and Wayne Rooney up front.

Chamberlain had little joy on his flank, but Sterling was a bundle of dribbling and movement, darting in and out and looking exactly like the EPL’s most incisive attacker. One of Sturridge’s best attributes as a striker is his constant, intelligent movement.

At Liverpool, whenever one of his midfielders has the ball, Sturridge immediately finds an angle to pursue, a clear line that he traces in behind the defence. Philippe Coutinho, Jordan Henderson and Steven Gerrard usually reward this willing productivity with a pass on the button, but even when they don’t, Sturridge isn’t discouraged, tracking back into an onside position and quickly finding another angle.

His running stretches the defence, implicitly creating the space that Sterling thrives in. Rooney, to put it nicely, is not as active an attacker.

Their respective heat maps show just how much more involved Sturridge was against Norway. This is in spite of Rooney being the more reserved of the two positionally, with the ball being funnelled through him before it gets to Sturridge – in theory at least.

Advertisement

In reality, Rooney was a lethargic pivot in the attack, often slowing down the play and causing the build up to stagnate. His penalty conversion was one of the few good moments. But as soon as the energetic Welbeck came on, and Sterling was moved to a more central position, the attack looked lively and slick, with only a quarter of the match remaining.

If Hodgson is going to use a formation that utilises a number 10, then Sterling is the best choice for it. Adam Lallana would also offer as much passing quality, and considerably more animation than Rooney currently does. But Rooney is the captain, so what kind of choice would it be to leave him on the bench? It’s a worrying situation, with Hodgson facing the prospect of being forced to undercut his own decision.

It doesn’t get better for Rooney. At Manchester United, Louis van Gaal made him club captain, to muted response, then went out and bought Radamel Falcao. The Colombian, along with Rooney and Robin van Persie, make up a formidable front line, but in order to accommodate all of these players in a balanced formation, a sacrifice must be made somewhere.

At this stage, it looks more likely that Juan Mata will be warming the bench than it does Rooney, but many United fans, and neutrals, would argue that despite his captaincy and contract it should be Rooney who makes way.

It looks to be between Mata and Rooney to compete for that spot in the hole behind the strikers. And it may only be Rooney’s privileged position as captain that secures the position for him.

Mata is a more accomplished passer than Rooney, he possesses a more finely tuned ability to thread short passes through. In his last undisrupted season at Chelsea, Mata scored 20 goals in all competitions, showing that his goalscoring instincts are at least comparable to the Englishman’s.

Both players are refined dead-ball specialists. Rooney is certainly the more physical of the two, and offers a lot more defensively than Mata. But the addition of Falcao and the quality of Van Persie mean that it’s Mata, the pure number 10, not Rooney, who’s more of a striker-cum-playmaker.

Advertisement

Even if Mata was a panic signing from Moyes, he had been one of the best payers in the league only two seasons ago. The discontent surrounding the continued preference of Wayne Rooney grows.

This isn’t to say Rooney is a completely spent force, living high on some imagined quality, a sort of fraud undeserving of the privileging he receives. He is still an effective player for club and country, as his consistent goalscoring record suggests.

But with alternative options available and playing well, the twin fates of Manchester United and England both seem to hinge on how much weight Rooney’s captaincy carries when deciding the starting line up. Wenger dropped his club captain, Thomas Vermaelen, for most of last season, a decision justified by the excellent form of the alternatives that came in.

Will Van Gaal and Hodgson have the courage to do the same, if they need to?

close