Arise, Sir David: Resilient Warner confirms his status as a great of the game

Dean Andric Roar Rookie

By Dean Andric, Dean Andric is a Roar Rookie

Tagged:
 , , ,

12 Have your say

    Almost two years after former Prime Minister Tony Abbott bestowed a Knighthood of the Order of Australia upon Prince Phillip, is it too late to have this ‘captain’s call’ reversed, because after his exploits in Chittagong last week, I would like to award it to David Andrew Warner.

    Insert dodgy Malcolm Turnbull impersonation: “Ladies and gentlemen, it is with great honour that I hereby present to you Sir David of Paddington. For your services to the game of cricket, as a nation we are truly thankful. Now hold this baby while I drink this beer.”

    It might appear strange to be heralding the arrival of a man that has already scored more than 5000 runs in Test cricket, however it seems that Warner has finally learnt his lesson and joined the cricketing elite.

    In recent months, Warner has come under fire from most sections of the media for his inability to score runs away from home, and graft them when it really mattered. Yet his exploits in the second Test, to secure victory for Australia over Bangladesh by six wickets and to level the series at 1-1, will ensure his cricketing immortality.

    Before arriving in Bangladesh late last month, Warner’s average in Asia was a mediocre 33 with only one century to his name from 14 Tests. While Warner’s place in the team was never at stake, his legacy as a great of the game was certainly being questioned.

    Warner has also been guilty of other transgressions, including punching Englishman Joe Root in a Birmingham pub, being fined for inappropriate on-field behaviour numerous times, and sending drunken tweets attacking members of the media. These contributed to his ‘bad boy’ tag and were a constant source of frustration. Many were left wondering how it was possible that such a talent could not translate promise into performance.

    When Australia really needed him, against Sri Lanka in 2016 and in India earlier this year, Warner spent more time on the loo after his lamb vindaloos than in the middle. In fact, prior to his back-to-back tons, in his last 15 innings in Asia, Warner had amassed the abysmal figures of 364 runs at 24.2.

    But like most cornered champions, Davy knew that his fortunes needed to change and change fast. Instead of trying to slug his way out of a rut, Warner showed the patience of Job, compiling what many pundits are calling his greatest ever Test innings.

    And kudos to our favourite Sydneysider (a Queenslander like Matthew Hayden would have worked it out much more quickly of course): here was a man that wasn’t a great player of spin, not a great occupier of the crease, or a good reader of the state of the game, completely stifling his natural instinct. Davy boy was doing us a solid, dominating in foreign conditions, and all for the good of his cricket-loving country.

    Had Australia lost this series 2-0 it would have been demoralising. The old enemy lies in wait and Australia currently sits fifth in the ICC Test rankings. Our last ten Tests have brought about our worst results in 35 years.

    Warner has taught us a much-needed lesson: sometimes you need to swallow your pride, put aside your ego and change things up a bit. In Chittagong, not only did Warner prosper in 40⁰C, when Peter Handscomb needed to reach for the Gatorade and Panadol, he put aside his swashbuckling instinct and finally grew a brain.

    Warner’s 209-ball ton was by far the slowest century of his career, and his innings lasted in excess of five hours. He hit only seven boundaries, one fewer than Smith’s innings of only 58. Instead of trying to hit the bowler back over his head, he waited, and played the ball late and square without his usual roll of the wrists. He spent ten minutes on 99, and despite a typical Warner brain explosion on 73, his dig had all of the hallmarks of a man who has grown.

    This a far cry from the boy who came to our attention by clearing pickets when he scored 89 off 43 balls in a Twenty20 against South Africa in 2009.

    David Warner of Australia skies a shot. (AAP Image/Mark Dadswell)

    AAP Image/Mark Dadswell

    But should we be surprised? Warner is used to breaking the mould. After said innings in 2009, Warner groupies wanted to see him thrust straight away into a star-studded NSW shield side. But cricket tragics had other ideas.

    “He can’t defend,” they said. “Can only slog,” they said. “Is a flat track bully,” they said.

    Yet when he was given his chance against Western Australia, Warner scored a composed 42 and, to be honest, he hasn’t looked back since.

    Warner’s Geoffrey Boycott impersonation has also left him in esteemed company, becoming just the third Australian opener after Bob Simpson and Matthew Hayden to score back-to-back hundreds on the subcontinent. It is this type of adaptation and dedication that will hopefully see Sir David educate a few Poms come November 23 in Brisbane.

    Finally, Sir David has realised that your bat doesn’t always need to ‘Kaboom’, sometimes it can just pop.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (12)

    • September 13th 2017 @ 8:55am
      Neil Back said | September 13th 2017 @ 8:55am | ! Report

      Not sure if this is tongue in cheek or tongue up his cheeks ….one of the two.

    • September 13th 2017 @ 11:40am
      Liam said | September 13th 2017 @ 11:40am | ! Report

      He’s made two tons in Bangladesh.

      He hasn’t toured India and averaged above his career totals. He hasn’t really demonstrated anything other than, when facing a weak opponent on a deck that isn’t diabolical, he can hit the ball around. The only difference here is that he was capable of being patient, and that he can show genuine desire to defend his wicket.

      That’s a good sign, but hardly an exhibition of his rise to being a game great.

      • September 13th 2017 @ 10:25pm
        Bobbo7 said | September 13th 2017 @ 10:25pm | ! Report

        Agree. A good player but not great.

    • September 13th 2017 @ 1:19pm
      AGordon said | September 13th 2017 @ 1:19pm | ! Report

      Let’s look at “Sir Dave’s” figures from a different perspective.

      He has now played 66 Tests and it has taken him till Tests 65 & 66 to work out that temperament trumps technique. In other words, he must be in the slow class at cricket school because it’s taken him till now to work out the best way to help his team, and not himself, is to sum up the conditions and bat accordingly.

      The truly great batsmen have either had the right the temperament from an early age or quickly developed it. These are the guys who can score at what ever speed the game and the conditions allow.

      Warner needs to continue to show he is a team player by making scores when things aren’t going the team’s way, as he did in Bangladesh. If he does that consistently for a few years, make him a “Sir”. As it stands, he’s still a bit of a court jester….. great to watch sometimes, but really only in it for himself.

    • September 13th 2017 @ 1:25pm
      Geoff said | September 13th 2017 @ 1:25pm | ! Report

      Haha.

      Great? Hes a great batsman in the basic sense of the word, nowhere near an all time great of the game which is the only substantial use of the word.

    • September 13th 2017 @ 1:43pm
      The Big Red V said | September 13th 2017 @ 1:43pm | ! Report

      Agree Liam, compared to the other minefields they generally play on in “Asia”, this was a road and if Warner could not score runs on that, he could not score runs anywhere!!

      Had he been dismissed on 73, there would be no articles written praising him, but the words “brain” and “explosion” would still have been used. BUT, as they say, “if my aunty had balls, she would be my uncle” and as such, he went on to make a ton and the rest is history.

      Hardly a likeable guy, much in the same mould as Captain Charisma (aka Michael Clarke), but great to watch in full flight, I’ll admit that!

    • September 13th 2017 @ 2:09pm
      bigbaz said | September 13th 2017 @ 2:09pm | ! Report

      so , in both matches Warner top scores, has the only tons of the tests and if he couldn’t score runs on that he could not score runs anywhere. Doesn’t say much about the other batsmen from either side, one who is supposed to be the best bat in the world. He will never please some.

      • September 13th 2017 @ 2:15pm
        Ouch said | September 13th 2017 @ 2:15pm | ! Report

        Warner could score 100 each time he bats but the richard heads of this world will still be negative.

        • September 13th 2017 @ 3:04pm
          AGordon said | September 13th 2017 @ 3:04pm | ! Report

          Typically thoughtless comment.

          Warner can bat, but he does NOT think of the team first, which is why he has issues with his temperament. This is also why this guy will NEVER score decent runs away from his comfort zone. If and when he grows up and stops being a “Richard Head”, maybe, just maybe he might earn some respect.

          As it stands, he gets it when he performs with the bat and, outside Australia, it hasn’t happened too often.

    Have Your Say



    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    Explore:
    , , ,