The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

Tri Nations needs more Argie-bargy

Roar Guru
3rd September, 2009
65
1791 Reads

The Tri-Nations needs Argentina. Why? To add some variety to a tired format and include a team that needs regular international competition and is deserving of a place at the SANZAR table.

An even number of teams is a better fit for a tournament than an odd number.

Four teams allows you to schedule double header matches each round, taking advantage of the timezone differences, and give rugby a high profile against other codes.

Four teams allows you to tweak the competition format to three rounds culminating in a final between the two teams with the most points. This means that home and away matches will alternate each year, like the Six Nations tournament.

Each team is guaranteed two home matches one year and only one in the alternating year unless they secure a home final finishing top of the table. You can retain the existing points allocation systems for wins and bonuses.

With two games a weekend, you can schedule a weeks’ rest between each round to offset the travel factor.

As I see it, there are three problems with the expanded Tri Nations format.

With only two teams playing each round, it creates a black hole of interest for the third country not involved. This makes it difficult to sustain any interest for the wider viewing public.

Advertisement

Without a true final to the competition, there is no natural climax for fans or broadcasters unless results and the draw work in their favour – such as last year’s “final” between New Zealand and Australia.

The expanded competition always means one team is disadvantaged with the draw and it takes too long to finish.

So a revamped format along these lines played over seven weeks for 2010 would resemble this:

Round 1
NZ (home) v Australia
SA (home) v Argentina

Round 2
Argentina (home) v NZ
Australia (home) v SA

Round 3
SA (home) v NZ
Argentina (home) v Australia

Final
Top two finishers

Advertisement
close