Live scores
Live Commentary
Brumbies : 10
vs
Jaguares : 13
| 39:00

USA Rugby forms a College Premier League

Dave Roar Rookie

By Dave, Dave is a Roar Rookie

Tagged:
 , , ,

25 Have your say

Popular article! 4,624 reads

    At a time when people are talking about talking and no one is offering a real concept, coaches from 14 of the country’s top colleges are bucking the trend.

    The coaches from right across the USA have opted in to a College Premier League.

    They have all said yes to the format and are ready to pull the trigger within a definite time frame. The projected kickoff date is spring 2011.

    All the teams that have signed on are ranked, including California, BYU, Utah, Arkansas State, San Diego State, Kutztown, Navy, Penn State, LSU, Texas A&M, Central Washington, Arizona, Dartmouth and Tennessee.

    ARN has had confirmation from every coach that has signed on so far that he and his program are rock solid behind the new league.

    The goal is to get the best teams on a regional basis to elect to participate in a Premier League that eventually would have 32 teams divided equally into four regions of eight teams.

    There would be promotion/relegation on a regional basis, creating a mechanism for a team to annually qualify up and take the place of the lowest placed team in each region.

    The season is tentatively slated to run from late February/March through May. The season would comprise seven regional matches with an eight-team (two per region) postseason. The last two teams standing would have played a 10-game schedule.

    “The potential to grow the game through exceptional collegiate competition exists right now,” says Navy’s Mike Flanagan. “The timing is right; spring is wide open for us to grab an audience.”

    The College Premier League could run concurrently with USA Rugby’s existing college competition, or be stand alone.

    As teams are owned by their universities, they would have the choice as to which competition they play in, or they could compete in both.

    Having stated a desire to establish an elite Division I college competition, USAR could choose to use the CPL as that competition.

    (Darrell Garner photo)

    The coaches who’ve signed on believe there are real benefits to having a College Premier League.

    “A premier competition is needed because it’s the natural progression of our sport as we continue down the road towards mainstream acceptance in the US sporting environment,” remarks Tennessee’s Marty Bradley.

    “It provides top competition for teams involved, plus produces a marketable entity for our sport.”

    In terms of costs, as teams are already spending their own money to schedule extra matches, particularly during the spring in the lead up to the national playoffs, they would use those same expenses to fund their participation in the CPL.

    And there’s a general belief among the coaches that the league would prove to be attractive to potential sponsors.

    “Through greater exposure on college campuses, because of a well-run high performing league, it could increase our opportunities for such things as sponsorship and access to television,” says BYU’s David Smyth.

    “These things in turn provide an avenue to the money that would help in legitimizing the sport of rugby on many college campuses.”

    “A new national collegiate competition is the best way to further expose, grow and market the sport,” comments Arizona’s Dave Sitton.

    “After decades of marginal success in the way of attracting sponsors and the very best athletes, a new structure that includes only college programs capable of championship caliber play, meaningful sponsorship, capable administration and dynamic promotion would advance our agenda.”

    “A new College Premier League is needed to showcase the best that college rugby can offer,” adds Texas A&M’s Craig Coates.” High quality games need to be played on a weekly basis to have any chance of creating a marketable product.”

    The consensus among the coaches is that a Premier League makes the most sense to genuinely grow and market the game.

    “Just a routine example of the business of collegiate sport,” says Cal’s Jack Clark. “Universities under full-ownership of their intellectual property and understanding what’s best for their students are opting into a competition with fellow institutions.

    “Routine, because universities enter conference agreements, tournaments and competition alliances in every sport they sponsor. The intention here is a well-informed approach aimed at the growth of the top tier of US college rugby.”

    It’s expected that coaches of the teams keen to get the new league underway will likely meet during the summer to nail down final participating teams, regions and a schedule.

    Have Your Say



    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (25)

    • March 17th 2010 @ 2:35am
      SA said | March 17th 2010 @ 2:35am | ! Report

      Hahaha no ways my mate Roland Evans plays for Arkansas State, this is awsome.

    • March 17th 2010 @ 8:11am
      jus de couchon said | March 17th 2010 @ 8:11am | ! Report

      Probably a nonstarter. The Yanks will never understand Rugby. Its not in their mindset. Rugby in USA is a College excuse for a p=ss up. Nothing wrong with that.

    • March 17th 2010 @ 8:57am
      Working Class Rugger said | March 17th 2010 @ 8:57am | ! Report

      jus de couchon

      In the past yes but recently things have started to become a lot more serious.It may happen it may not but the big difference here is there not waiting for USARugby to set it up.

    • March 17th 2010 @ 9:29am
      Cracker said | March 17th 2010 @ 9:29am | ! Report

      How would this new college premier league run concurrently with the existing college competition? I don’t know how the existing one runs so am unsure how a premier league would fit in with it.

      • March 17th 2010 @ 4:06pm
        Working Class Rugger said | March 17th 2010 @ 4:06pm | ! Report

        Cracker

        From my understanding current College competitions are based around regionak Leagues. This wouldn’t change all that much. The difference would be that the top 32 ranked College’s would form the Premier League. As stated there will also be four geographical conference’s with promotion/relegation. I’d imagine that the Top team from each existing Regional League would then playoff to be promoted into the Premier League on a annual basis. At least intially. If and again its a ‘if’ the CPL got up and running I’d expect in quick time to see a 2nd and even 3rd Divisions to be established not long after similar to most College sports.

        • July 11th 2010 @ 2:29pm
          Dave said | July 11th 2010 @ 2:29pm | ! Report

          My son enrolled at LSU this last week after 3 years at Walton (HS-GA) Rugby (was man-of-the match in the last two winning state champ games) – he is totally pumped about this – i hope it works out.

          • July 11th 2010 @ 2:38pm
            Dave said | July 11th 2010 @ 2:38pm | ! Report

            Note: My son wasn’t a “reject athlete” from another sport – I brought him up as a baseball player. He could play every position on the field and always made the all-star team in GA (a Baseball hotbed)…he went to one Rugby practice and fell in love with the game. It’s catching on in the South bigtime.

    • March 17th 2010 @ 9:33am
      Gatesy said | March 17th 2010 @ 9:33am | ! Report

      I’ve said it before.. the sleeping giant is awakening. It doesn’t matter if it will never be bigger than gridiron. That’s way too big but who cares .. as long as it becomes as big as Rugby in other countries, that’s all that matters.

      The more that emerging countries can challenge the old order, the better – and let’s not forget that 7’s is now an Olympic sport – you can’t underestimate the impact that that will have.

      • Roar Guru

        March 17th 2010 @ 11:40am
        rugbyfuture said | March 17th 2010 @ 11:40am | ! Report

        technically, rugby in the US is just as big as in Australia if you read it by the numbers.

        • March 17th 2010 @ 7:00pm
          Alders said | March 17th 2010 @ 7:00pm | ! Report

          The problem is that those participation numbers are not concentrated like they are here. Therefore, the standard of competition and development are inferior.

    • March 17th 2010 @ 1:23pm
      Big Al said | March 17th 2010 @ 1:23pm | ! Report

      Hajlelulah the greatest game of all, rugby union, about to awaken for proper in the land of milk and honey. Show me the rugger yeah!

    Explore:
    , , ,