The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

Taking the Country out of City-Country

Roar Rookie
21st April, 2013
37
1017 Reads

Coffs Harbour’s BCU International Stadium is promoted as being a “first class sporting facility hosting local, regional, national and international sporting events.”

The City Council website also boasts seating for 20,000 spectators as one of the stadium’s key attributes.

So you can imagine the surprise in discovering the crowd for this annual event was just 4,645.

It reads like a tennis match at the business end of the 2nd set. And was this a smaller or larger crowd than the one attending the Australian Sikh Games in 2009?

What can we learn from such a poor turnout, other than some sections of the media have only just discovered a crowd problem?

Clearly, most of the local markets had finished by 2pm, so they weren’t direct competition for the Coffs dollar, though the Annual Exhibition of Fine Woodwork didn’t finish until 4pm, so the jury might still be out.

Recent posts on improving rugby league crowd numbers, as well as where the annual City-Country fixture actually sits within the game, have proven extremely timely.

While those on the City side of the equation have been debating the validity of the concept in an unedifying and self-absorbed way for weeks, country residents had a chance to respond in numbers.

Advertisement

Why?

Recall the NRL allowed AFL a five year window to ingratiate themselves with the locals out of sheer indifference.

So it’s easy to understand the country’s disaffection brought about by questioning the game’s value, and which manifested in yesterday’s today’s crowd.

At its most base level, City-Country is the recognition of country rugby league as a nursery for the great players of yesteryear and today, as well as the issue of propagating the game. As an Origin trial, it is useful, but of secondary importance.

Ticket prices were another factor, and entirely inappropriate for residents of waterfront Sydney Harbour, let alone Coffs Harbour.

Paying $75 for a family general admission ticket is preposterous when the Anzac Day match at Allianz Stadium is $55. A $50 uncovered seat dubbed ‘the Eastern Stand’ is a bit rich.

Further, the promotion of the event was hijacked by negative publicity and player withdrawals. This latter point was discussed last week, but the point remains that the NRL did not do enough to counteract it.

Advertisement

When sightings of the two most powerful NRL/ARLC officials are on a par with those of Elvis, you know there’s a problem.

If the NRL can’t nurture its own constituency, one questions how they hope to grow the game. From the micro issues relating to the rules of the game, through best business practices and onto the macro issues of expanding the game, the NRL and ARLC are falling woefully short.

The NRL/ARLC cannot spin the ball wide without laying a solid foundation in the middle of the park. They might like to keep it simple and adhere to core principles rather than banging on about jumping castles and off-field entertainment.

Those who actually understand economics appreciate that demand leads supply, not the reverse. Likewise, the best business managers understand that they need to listen to their customers, and then respond. Providing something nobody wants gets nobody very far.

The public are sending messages to the NRL and ARLC, but they’re not listening.

It’s a shame to have to always repeat that the game succeeds despite itself, but there you go, I just did it again. The problem is that there are clearer and more present dangers for the NRL with respect to competition for the sporting dollar. They can’t mismanage this way forever.

T’is a sad day in more than one respect …

Advertisement
close