The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

Form or reputation - which matters most?

What is Australia's football identity? (Image: AP)
Roar Guru
26th June, 2016
3

It’s the age old question that must drive team selection decision makers crazy. When making this particular judgement which is the more important, form or reputation?

It does not matter whether you are deciding over which available players to add to your fantasy teams, or whether you have to make the hard call over who will best represent the nation at the next major tournament.

There is no doubt that this is a tough decision to make. However, is the tougher decision to go with the in-form player or does the safer option lie in selecting the proven star player that has earned their stripes, despite perhaps not being at their best lately?

Ultimately, the selectors make decisions based on who they think can contribute best in guiding the team to victory. However team selectors are sometimes too reluctant in taking a risk in selecting an in-form player particularly if they are deemed to be inexperienced over an already established one that may not be in the best of form?

The obvious choice and what many selectors claim to do, is to select whoever is performing regardless of status, although many argue that there are certain players that you need to have in your squad regardless of their recent performances.

When it comes to a major tournament for example, there is no doubt that as supporters we want the players in our team that are proven, the ones that we feel can rise to the occasion. Of course current form and proven reputation must not be neglected, but when it comes down to deciding between the two, which one comes out on top?

Let’s create a hypothetical situation where we need to select the Socceroos team for the World Cup. Let’s say that arguably Australia’s greatest Socceroo Tim Cahill, is a little down on form and is not scoring at his usual rate.

Now we all know how important Cahill is to the Socceroos and how significant his contributions to Australia’s previous campaigns have been. However does his reputation earn him a place in the line-up despite recent form not warranting it, or do we take a risk and select someone like Jamie Maclaren who scored 20 goals in the most recent A-League campaign?

Advertisement

Luckily, the Socceroo selectors have been privileged in that they have not had to make such a decision as of yet – leaving Timmy out of a World Cup side would be considered a crime by many.

However, we must of course not neglect the fact that no one player is bigger than the team and sometimes, risks have to be taken for the greater good. This generally means leaving a star or proven performer out of the squad.

While this debate has certainly been a recurring one, this piece was triggered by something that occurred far away from home, that being England’s Euro 2016 squad selection.

While many fans enjoy seeing England implode in major tournaments some of the selection decisions were quite perplexing.

The main one that comes to mind is Fabian Delph’s selection over someone like Mark Noble in the English side. Delph is established as a pivotal player in midfield. However despite this, Delph only played 17 games in total, not starting once last season and only managed two goals.

In comparison, Mark Noble had arguably his greatest season yet, only missing one match and scored seven and assisted four, while in similar fashion to Delph maintained an 86 per cent pass accuracy rate. Noble ultimately playing a pivotal role in what was a very successful season for the Hammers.

Ultimately Delph was ruled out of the squad due to picking up an injury before the tournament, adding more fuel to the fire with Delph being quite injury prone.

Advertisement

It is very difficult to see, looking at this from a statistical point of view, how Delph made the cut ahead of Noble. Has reputation triumphed form in this instance?

When it comes to selecting players, there are certain players whom you would think would make the cut regardless, having reached a certain point in their career. Could you imagine Barcelona ever not selecting Messi in the side due to being down on form, despite being fully fit?

Nonetheless, these decisions are ones that are not easy to make. While it may be easy to criticise and to say that we know better, it is the manager’s or selector’s job to pick the players who they feel can give the team the best possible chance for victory.

So I put the question forth to all the Roarers out there, which is more important, form or reputation?

close