Cronulla want hair follicle drug testing

By Warren Barnsley, Warren Barnsley is a Roar Guru

 , ,

4 Have your say

    Cronulla are pushing the NRL to allow the club to introduce mandatory hair follicle testing of their players to ramp up the fight against illicit drug use.

    The premiers have been hit hard by drug use in the past nine months, with star fullback Ben Barba and chairman Damian Keogh departing after separate cocaine scandals.

    The Sharks’ proposal would have all squad members and youth competition players older than 18 tested four times a year, News Corp Australia reports.

    The Rugby League Players Association has not ruled out supporting the measure but raised concerns the testing could encroach on players’ rights to privacy.

    The issue is being discussed by the NRL and RLPA in collective bargaining negotiations, but the league would not comment further on the matter until talks were concluded.

    Sharks coach Shane Flanagan told News Corp his players were on board with the idea.

    “We want to do this as a club. Not just as a statement about our culture but for the welfare of every player,” he said.

    It’s not the first time the NRL has faced calls to green light hair follicle testing.

    In 2015, former South Sydney chief executive John Lee raised the idea after players Dylan Walker and Aaron Gray overdosed on painkillers.

    Sports Lawyer principal Paul Horvath, a Melbourne solicitor with expertise in drugs in sports, said hair follicle testing had the potential to provide a higher degree of accuracy than other forms of testing.

    But he agreed with the RLPA that players’ privacy could be put at risk.

    Horvath said the testing was intrusive and could result in, for example, the unwanted revelation of a player’s issues with mental health.

    “The recent problems with the (former) Cronulla chairman are concerning in terms of setting the cultural tone of expectations within an organisation and no doubt Cronulla are seeking to clean that up,” Horvath told AAP.

    “The type of sensitive and personal information that’s acquired by the employer in testing hair follicles and the sorts of substances that can show up there has serious privacy implications,” he said.

    “It’s my view that the more appropriate channels for the introduction of hair follicle testing is through the players’ association in conjunction with the NRL.

    “The deterrence should be something that’s across the board in the NRL, rather than being sought to be created within one club.”

    © AAP 2018
    Do you find yourself logged out of The Roar?
    We have just switched over to a secure site (https). This means you will need to log-in afresh. If you need help with recovering your password, please get in contact.

    If you could choose from any and every NRL player in the competition, who would you pick in your rugby league dream team? Let us know with our team picker right here, and be sure to share it with all your league-loving mates.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (4)

    • June 16th 2017 @ 10:22am
      BrainsTrust said | June 16th 2017 @ 10:22am | ! Report

      The problem with hair follicle tests is that someone can test positive if they are in the vicinity of drug use, such as cannabis smoking or in close physical contact with a drug user. The AFL did a test on Collingwood players and so many tested positive but were some testing positive because of teammates or others taking the drugs. Just going to parties, night clubs or brothels could cause a positive.

      • June 16th 2017 @ 10:59am
        KingCowboy said | June 16th 2017 @ 10:59am | ! Report

        Wait a second, you can test positive for coke through hair follicle testing by visiting a brothel? I did not know that. You taught me something today BT.

    • June 17th 2017 @ 12:37pm
      Patrick said | June 17th 2017 @ 12:37pm | ! Report

      Lucky Paul Gallen is bald lol

    • June 17th 2017 @ 2:01pm
      GD66 said | June 17th 2017 @ 2:01pm | ! Report

      If there is to be random testing of players, how about including referees and bunker officials ?

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    , ,