Justin Gatlin, drug cheat or one of the great modern day sprinters?

Chris Lewis Roar Guru

By Chris Lewis, Chris Lewis is a Roar Guru

 , , ,

14 Have your say

    Given the constant booing that was directed at Justin Gatlin by the London crowd at the 2017 World Athletics Championships – when he was introduced before races and after winning the 100m (beating Usain Bolt) – should Gatlin be treated as a drug cheat or respected as one of the greatest sprinters?

    While Usain Bolt rightfully ranks as one of the greatest sprinters of all time, winning an unprecedented 13 global 100m and 200m titles since 2008, the following table shows that Gatlin also has an imposing global championship record – winning ten individual medals (including four gold).

    2004 2005 2007 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 2015 2016 2017
    Bolt 100m NA NA Gold Gold False Start Gold Gold Gold Gold Bronze
    Bolt 200m Silver Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold Gold
    Gatlin 100m Gold Gold Drug Ban Drug Ban Drug Ban Semi-Finals Bronze Silver Silver Silver Gold
    Gatlin 200m Bronze Gold Silver Semi-Finals

    While we all have a unique right to express our judgment, I don’t believe that any athlete should be booed after serving a drug ban and being allowed by the relevant sporting organisation to compete again.

    After all, given the high number of global sprint medalists that have been banned for taking illegal drugs in recent years, he was never alone. One has only to recall the banning of other Olympic/world sprinting champions including Marion Jones, Konstadinos Kederis and Tyson Gay.

    Gatlin’s 2017 world championship 100m success is an outstanding achievement for a number of reasons.
    First, Gatlin’s 2017 100m victory at the age of 35 is a staggering achievement in an event which ranks as one of the hardest and prestigious of all sporting events to win.

    Gatlin’s victory is also remarkable on the basis of winning two global 100m titles 13 years apart, arguably one of the greatest feats of successful sporting longevity in such an explosive sport.

    Second, in an era where drug testing has become more extensive and/or sophisticated given the many championship medalists that are being caught (including high profile sprinters), Gatlin has succeeded despite being one of the most tested of all athletes. At the national level, testing by USADA on Gatlin has been extensive since he made his comeback in August 2010: 2011 (8 times), 2012 (13), 2013 (14), 2014 (15), 2015 (16) and 2016 (14).

    At the international level, Gatlin was also subjective to extensive IAAF testing by competing very often in the Diamond League, a series of events throughout the season (mostly in Europe). Gatlin won the Diamond League for the 100m in 2013, 2014 and 2015.

    In contrast, some of the world’s top track stars compete sparingly on the circuit, preferring to stay at home in order to prepare for global championships.

    While some express anger at Gatlin’s life ban (for two failed tests) being reduced to four years because of cooperation with authorities and the first positive test in 2001 (amphetamines) due to medication he had taken since childhood to address attention deficit disorder, it is not Gatlin’s fault that he was allowed to compete again.

    Gatlin’s major crime was that he indeed was caught for illegal drug use when so many others were not, including in countries with far more relaxed or non-existent drug testing systems.

    Despite the British public being one of the best informed about illegal drug use in sport, very little adverse reaction is evident towards other track stars that have won global medals from countries where adequate drug testing regimes are almost non-existent.

    Usain Bolt and Andre de Grasse share a lighter moment as they cross the line during the 100m semi-final at the Rio Olympics

    In February 2016, at a time when the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) put Kenya on probation for failing to tackle PED use, despite over 40 Kenyan athletes testing positive since 2012, it was reported that Kenyan athletes were still being advised of drug tests a day or weeks before, thus allowing offending athletes not to turn up to testing times.

    In August 2017, an investigation of Ethiopia’s lax drug testing regime found that reporters could buy the blood-boosting drug EPO freely without a prescription from a pharmacy during the Ethiopian championships (May 2017); that data offered by Ethiopian drug testing authorities about the number of tests for the Ethiopian championships was dubious; and that a highly successful Ethiopian athlete admitted taking EPO before one of her biggest victories in Europe several years ago.

    Relevant to the Gatlin story, with Jamaica having very few out-of-competition for six months before the 2012 Olympic Games, with blood tests only beginning in Jamaica during 2015, the International Olympic Committee and WADA were accused of choosing to take no action over the presence of banned PEDs (including by male Jamaican sprinters) after reanalysis of samples from the 2008 Olympics.

    While WADA stated that low levels of clenbuterol results from the ingestion of contaminated meat, a former supplier of banned substances to top athletes (Angel Heredia) stated that Jamaican coaches had contacted him prior to the 2008 Olympic Games to enquire about whether clenbuterol was “good for sprinting”, and that he was “100 per cent” certain some Jamaican athletes used it at the Games.

    Not surprisingly, while many in the London crowd targeted and booed Gatlin, preferring to assume innocence for all other champion competitors who had never been caught, others felt obliged to provide some sanity to events.

    Immediately following the 100m final at the 2017 world championships with the crown booing Gatlin, Bolt stated of Gatlin “he is a great competitor. I’ve always said that about Justin Gatlin. You have to be at your best and I wasn’t and that’s what I respect about him because he competes and I really appreciate competing with him. “He’s an excellent person, as far as I’m concerned. He’s good at it and just a good person”.

    Gatlin also indicated that Bolt immediately offered “congratulations” and stated, “You don’t deserve all these boos”.

    Gatlin’s legacy, while being remembered for being caught on illegal PEDs (notably testosterone or its precursor in 2006), should be one of considerable success and an immense determination that enabled him to win global championship medals over a fourteen year period.

    To win a 100m global championship at the age of 35, against one of the greatest all-time sprinters (Usain Bolt) and a London crowd booing your mere presence, is an extraordinary sporting feat.

    Do you find yourself logged out of The Roar?
    We have just switched over to a secure site (https). This means you will need to log-in afresh. If you need help with recovering your password, please get in contact.

    This video is trending right now! Submit your videos for the chance to win a share of $10,000!

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (14)

    • August 8th 2017 @ 9:06am
      jameswm said | August 8th 2017 @ 9:06am | ! Report

      You’d have to say Gatlin is as likely to be clean as anyone. And if he was deliberately taking testosterone in 2005, there would likely be no residual benefits by now.

      I think one reason for the longevity is the 4-year ban. It meant his body got saved the extreme strain of heavy training during that time.

      Bolt respects the guy and reacted positively. I think that is the example the rest of us should follow. It’s that simple.

      Who knows what other athletes are getting illegal assistance. You mentioned the Kenyans and Jamaicans, and their lax testing. Farah’s coach is suspect but could be clean. Bolt has guys from his squad who have been busted, but Bolt is faster. Is he sufficiently superior to do that clean? Maybe – look what he ran as a youngster.

    • August 8th 2017 @ 12:44pm
      Chris Lewis said | August 8th 2017 @ 12:44pm | ! Report

      yes, contrary to opinion of some, benefits of PEDs dissipate with non-use. how else can you explain the dramatic decline of performance by many after they are caught.

      however, quite possible that some athletes still know how to beat system, albeit it is getting harder.

    • August 8th 2017 @ 6:49pm
      Ritesh Misra said | August 8th 2017 @ 6:49pm | ! Report

      Chris, Super piece. Can you throw some clarity on the exact offences in 2001 and 2006. Thanks

    • August 8th 2017 @ 6:53pm
      Chris Lewis said | August 8th 2017 @ 6:53pm | ! Report

      Thanks Ritesh; same to you for your piece.

      there are some good articles around about Gatlin’s first positive test.

      this just a summary from Wikipedia.

      In 2001, Gatlin was banned from international competition for two years after testing positive for amphetamines. Gatlin appealed on the grounds that the positive test had been due to medication that he had been taking since his childhood, when he was diagnosed with attention deficit disorder. The appeal resulted in an early reinstatement by the IAAF.[8]
      On July 29, 2006, Gatlin told the media that he had been informed by the USADA that he had given a positive doping test in April the same year. He claimed his innocence in the matter:
      I cannot account for these results, because I have never knowingly used any banned substance or authorized anyone to administer such a substance to me.[9]
      It is believed that the substance that Gatlin tested positive for was “testosterone or its precursor.”[10] The failed test was revealed after a relay race on April 22, 2006 in Lawrence, Kansas. The “B” sample was confirmed as positive in July.

      I don’t really know how guilty or innocent Gatlin was with both tests.

      • August 9th 2017 @ 8:17pm
        Ritesh Misra said | August 9th 2017 @ 8:17pm | ! Report

        Thanks. Bot for the appreciation on my piece and these inputs as well

      • August 9th 2017 @ 8:17pm
        Ritesh Misra said | August 9th 2017 @ 8:17pm | ! Report

        Thanks. Bot for the appreciation on my piece and these inputs as well

    • August 8th 2017 @ 7:37pm
      Chris Lewis said | August 8th 2017 @ 7:37pm | ! Report

      they even have a poll on whether Gatlin should have been booed.

      What about other athletes that competed at London 2017 champs with previous drug bans?

    • August 8th 2017 @ 7:41pm
      Chris Lewis said | August 8th 2017 @ 7:41pm | ! Report

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    , , ,