I’ve been putting this article off for a while now. It has been sitting in my hard drive under various iterations since the Game 1 State of Origin loss for Queensland.

So, what’s changed? Why put this piece forward now? Well, for a start, certain recent media reports have given my concerns a bit more weight.

But before we get into that, we need to talk about Ben Hunt’s performances so far. Much has been made about that grubber on the third tackle in Game 2, and many of Hunt defenders have taken the position you can’t drop a player due to one bad play.

Now that’s a point of view I would generally agree with, however, a look back over the series paints that incident more as the consistent trend than an isolated brain snap.

For a start, it wasn’t the only seven-tackle restart Hunt conceded in that half of footy, let alone the series. Queensland’s fifth tackle options have been found wanting since the ball kicked off in the opening game and when a team is lacking direction in attack, the lions share of the responsibility rightly lands at the one who’s been given the role of directing the team around the park.

But it’s not just his direction and composure which has been an issue. His individual form hasn’t been great either. Hunt’s best attribute is considered to be his running game, but it’s an attribute that’s been surprisingly absent. So far Hunt has recorded eight runs for 61 metres.

To put this into perspective, 61 metres represents only 11 per cent of the total metres run between the four halves this series. Nathan Cleary, who is widely acknowledged to have been eased into Origin over his two games, equalled Hunt’s total runs for the series in his first game.

Even Anthony Milford bettered his former teammates running game in Game 1 despite only touching the ball four times in a fifteen-minute stint. Why a dominant playmaker picked for his running game would shelve that aspect of his game on the biggest stage is a question I just can’t answer.

Broncos player Anthony Milford

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

Now, a running game isn’t the only indicator of a half’s effectiveness, and Hunt received the ball more and threw more passes than any other playmaker this series.

So what’s been the outcome of all this increased ball movement? Well, to put it bluntly, not much. His 92 passes so far haven’t resulted in a single line break assist, while the only try assist he notched up was off a kick.

Speaking of kicking games, of interest in game 2 was Hunt apparently scaling back his monopoly of the kicking duties to a more even split with Cameron Munster, with the Storm five-eighthh kicking more and kicking further then Hunt while gaining two forced drop outs for his efforts in contrast to Hunt’s two seven-tackle restarts.

All in all, you expect more from your dominant half in the Origin arena and Hunts contributions to his side were found wanting.

However, and this may seem strange given the preceding paragraphs, I don’t blame Hunt for Queensland losing the shield this year. If that is what Hunt is able to bring to the table when made the dominant playmaker in the league’s tightest contest it doesn’t make him a bad player, it just makes him a bad choice for that role.

And the thing is, it doesn’t make him a bad selection either. Some may have doubts about a players ability fill a certain role, but no one really knows how a player will go until they’ve experienced it. Up until a player has actually had a chance to compete, their selection is as valid as anyone’s, and many a player has proven their doubters wrong.

No, it’s not Hunt’s abilities or the validity of his selection that concerns me, but the lack of an opportunity to get an accurate gauge into the viability of his skill set within the team that really concerns me, and it was entirely avoidable.

After such significant personnel changes since last series, Queensland couldn’t rely on their past formulas as a starting point and needed to quickly establish a reliable baseline from which they could build their series.

Yet, it came out during the Game 1 press conferences that Hunt was unable to train with the squad during camp due to injury. It seems that securing Ben Hunt’s position as the number seven was more of a priority than ensuring stability and cohesion in the new and untested combinations.

Ben Hunt after Origin 2

(AAP Image/David Moir)

This meant that Queensland were essentially flying blind coming out of the Game 1 loss, unable to discern how much of the loss was down to poor preparation and how much was due to the game plan built around Hunt.

Going into Game 2, the Maroons were essentially still at square one, relying on the hope their key organiser and strategy were sound foundations to build off rather than being able to make informed adjustments to personnel and tactics thanks to a reliable baseline from the previous game.

At a point in the series where all their efforts should have been focused on how to stop their opposition and expose their weaknesses, Queensland were still trying to work out what was working for themselves.

Sure, you might argue this was only a problem because Queensland lost the series opener and teams have won games with less than stellar personnel and tactics before. However, had Queensland won it would only have papered over the cracks and delayed the inevitable.

No other form of the game is under as much scrutiny as the Origin arena and weaknesses don’t stay hidden for long. Regardless, Game 2 was almost a mirror image of Game 1 where Queensland once again lacked direction in attack and were again unable to capitalise on the opportunities presented to them, putting them at a decided disadvantage.

Now, I said before I had no issue with Hunt’s selection in principle, but its the question over why Hunt was selected that raises some red flags personally and I fear it may be indicative of broader developments. I’ve never been overly convinced of the assertion that he was picked on form.

I find the term “form” far too open to interpretation to be a credible rational for selection and it’s usually more of an easily digestible justification for selection than a true reason for it. Even if a player is widely accepted to be the in-form player in their position, attaining individual success under a certain system is no guarantee that they’ll be compatible in a different system, especially if filling a different role entirely.

At any rate, it’s highly debatable that Hunt was, in fact, the “in-form” half at the time of selection. In the month immediately preceding the team announcement, Hunt’s Dragons were two from four in a period where they were the victims of two floggings and managed a win against the Storm in one of the worst games of the season with Hunt personally unable to finish two of his last three games due to injury complaints.

Daly Cherry-Evans, on the other hand, had enjoyed convincing wins over both the Storm and the Broncos (and came very close to beating the Raiders and the Roosters) and a lot of noise was being generated around possible Origin selection as a result. Yet, despite injury concerns, a dip in form, not actually being the main playmaker in his side and Queensland’s desperate need for a genuine goal kicker, Hunt got the nod.

Daly Cherry-Evans

(Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

To be clear, I’m not saying that Queensland should have gone with DCE, what I’m saying is the reasoning around Hunt’s selection appears to be based more on taking the team in a premeditated direction than on either form or the immediate needs of the team and it’s here Kevin Walters enters the picture.

Now while Kevie is entirely within his rights as coach to implement the team he sees fit, it does raise serious concerns when one of the key figures that his plans are based around fails to deliver. Even more concerning is the apparent cost of implementing these plans.

When Walters took over the reigns from Mal Meninga in 2016 he inherited a successful side. But more than that he inherited a successful organisation built around systems and principles that had led Queensland to dominance for the better part of a decade.

A quality side might win you a lot of games, but it’s the organisation behind the team that allows you to assert dominance over long periods of time. So, it comes as a surprise when elements of those same systems leading to so much success appear to be getting replaced or removed.

For instance, the loyalty concept has been one of the core principles the dynasty’s been built upon. While it’s been over-simplified to “pick and stick” by many, the general gist of it was not to drop proven performers based on club form, competition from younger players or a single poor game.

This resulted in a glut of valuable origin experience on-field and a strong tradition of sending off retiring players on their own terms on the footy field. At the same time, the side averaged a healthy two to three debutantes a year, ensuring the team was constantly being renewed while also giving rookies a stable environment to come in through.

However, in just his second year as coach Walters decided that mass changes were needed after the Blues ambush at Suncorp last year, dropping a number long-term regulars. The selectors at the time made a point of saying that the new look team was very much Kevie’s team, alluding to differences in the philosophy between selectors and the coach.

In the four games since, twelve new players have made their debut for Queensland and when questioned whether the loyalty card was dead after veteran players were again looked over in favour of younger players earlier this year Walters responded that he was being loyal to the debutantes from the previous year.

Now, this may well be his point of view, but there’s no denying that it’s a very different interpretation to the previous decade.

Any thought of the staggered retirements of the previous years continuing have since been shelved with nine long-term players either dropped or announcing their immediate representative retirements over the last twelve months (not including the non-selection of Matt Scott), with only Billy Slater expected to receive a proper send-off.

While this doesn’t necessarily mean the old guard are abandoning ship, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that actively over-looking veterans in favour of younger players would result in said veterans having a much shorter outlook on their rep futures.

It’s also a precedent which can result in players feeling pressured to make way for the next generation or to retire rather then languish in non-selection limbo. Case in point is the example of Darius Boyd who felt the need to retire from rep footy after game 1 despite making every indication that he wanted to keep playing in the lead up to selection, a move which reportedly blind-sided the Maroons coach.

Another principle the dynasty was built upon was no player was bigger than the team. This was reflected in a number of areas, but particularly in regards to team selections. Maroon teams were far more reliant on working together then individual brilliance and featured honest workhorses to compliment their stars abilities with every player having a role.

Looking over the series so far though would suggest a deviation from this as well. It’s hard to extract much of a game plan from the first two games, both featured early success with targeted raids down the edges early in the count, yet in both games they seemed to ditch what was working as the strategy seemed to dissolve into “get the ball to the halves and let them play what’s in front of them”.

Not only did this see the points dry up, but the lack of sustained, targeted pressure resulted in early leads being squandered as NSW were consistently let off the hook thanks to rushed plays, allowing them the field position needed to launch their own plays.

There was also the inclusion of Kalyn Ponga in Game 2 which seemed to be more because he had to be picked then that he was needed for any particular role. While individually he was good, his injection into the game seemed to disrupt the structures that had placed NSW on the back foot early.

Kalyn Ponga

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

After two tries and one disallowed in the opening twenty minutes Queensland would only cross the Blues line once in the following 60 minutes once Ponga was brought on. It appeared to be another example of a reliance on individual brilliance over sound strategy.

You see, for all of Queensland’s star power over the decade of dominance, individual brilliance never came at the expense of a good game plan. Victory came off the back of absorbing damage in defence and counter punching once the opposition took the foot off, drawing defenders into the middle and then sending it out wide to create the overlap and coordinated kick chases ensuring good kicks didn’t go to waste.

All of which required teamwork and for everyone to be on the same page which allowed for individual brilliance to be shown within the offensive and defensive structures themselves, not in place of them. The current game plan seems to have strayed from that.

So am I suggesting Kevin Walters is a bad coach?

I’m not entirely convinced that’s the case, there have been enough glimpses of how good Queensland can be during this series to suggest otherwise. I believe the current cracks may have more to do with an overzealousness to establish his own vision of what the team should look like.

There’s certainly been an eagerness to move on from the past shown over the last two seasons and while Walters certainly inherited a successful team, this series has been his first real opportunity to attain his own success separate from the legacy of past dominance.

On the other hand, the end of this series will also be the first real opportunity for him to evaluate the feasibility of his vision, and he deserves this chance. It will be Queensland’s approach to origin next year that will be the true insight into his long-term prospects.

And it’s here that we get to the recent reports that concerned me enough to convince me to stop putting off this article.

Rather than accepting the inevitable criticism after just the second series loss since 2006, Walters went on the defensive. From the press conference immediately after the loss he began mentioning decisions and moments that went against his side.

Now, things get brought up in press conferences and he was obliged to answer the questions presented to him, but in the weeks since “it didn’t cost us the game but” has almost become his personal catchphrase, trotted out whenever questioned about the teams shortcomings as though alluding to a victim card he could play but won’t, just as long as everyone’s aware that it’s there.

He also decided to have a go at the social media “idiots” for criticising his side. But the thing is that many of those he labelled “idiots” are in fact the very supporters his team is supposed to be representing.

They are very much entitled to voice their criticisms. Together, these two incidents seem to project an attitude of denial rather than accountability.

I sincerely hope this isn’t the case, because nothing good can come from that.

Getting hassled by a parent or partner about spending too much time playing video games? Now, you can tell them the story of how some ordinary gamers scored $225k for just seven weeks of work.

Have Your Say



If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

The Crowd Says (37)

  • July 11th 2018 @ 1:26pm
    KenoathCarnt said | July 11th 2018 @ 1:26pm | ! Report

    Iv always considered Hunt a no.6 that has always had to be a no.7 for the sake of the team. When he was at his best he was concentrating on running making little breaks in the middle for Milford to feed of him and the Broncos could score from anywhere. His short kicking game worked well when defences would rush him. Did Hunt go downhill from teams focusing on him more or did he go away from his best strengths? I think it’s a bit of both.

    • Roar Guru

      July 11th 2018 @ 2:51pm
      Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 2:51pm | ! Report

      I think people forget that Brisbanes success in 2015 was built around keeping the ball moving to tire out the opposition and capitalising at the back end of halves. Errors and poor decisions weren’t an issue as long as the ball was kept moving and the Broncs would win through sheer weight of attack, and that suited Hunts game perfectly. But since then everyone seems to be trying to shoehorn Hunt into a traditional halfback role and he hasn’t got close to being as effective as he was since. I think Hunt brings alot to the table, I just don’t think he’s been given the best opportunities to showcase that in several seasons, partly through his own issues and partly through trying to mold him into something else

  • July 11th 2018 @ 1:29pm
    no one in particular said | July 11th 2018 @ 1:29pm | ! Report

    He is Colt Seavers

    • Roar Guru

      July 11th 2018 @ 3:00pm
      Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 3:00pm | ! Report

      Perhaps, but selecting him for game 1 while unable properly prepare for the role put him in the position of being responsible for the team without any real indication of whether or not he was capable of carrying that load. I think concerns around the game plans going into each game are more pressing then individual performances, especially if the players are replaced but the game plans survive

  • July 11th 2018 @ 2:02pm
    KenW said | July 11th 2018 @ 2:02pm | ! Report

    Hunt has had a forgettable Origin series but the attention he’s got is out of whack with his actual performance.

    Unfortunately for him Queensland also had a generally disjointed attacking structure and, with those headline moments, he is taking a lot of heat for the entire structure. Game 1 they did fine with the forwards but didn’t know what to do with the pill – Hunt in late, Slater out late – but still in a losing side Hunt kicks a 40/20, gets a try assist from a grubber, and another try disallowed from a kick. Nothing special but not awful.

    Queensland looked at their most slick for the first 20 mins of game 2, which was focused on direct forward play and then getting the ball to Billy. This was probably the way they would have played Game 1 if Slater was fit. Hunt wasn’t getting any big stats from that period but he was doing a lot of the driving. They continue to that structure and manage a win and suddenly Hunt is a linchpin of a live series.

    Except that’s not the way it played out – Ponga came on and, while he looked individually very dangerous, Queensland didn’t. Hunt comes up with his dodgy grubber late and bang, you’ve got your scapegoat.

    • Roar Guru

      July 11th 2018 @ 3:15pm
      Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 3:15pm | ! Report

      Look, I don’t believe that he deserves to be lumped with the blame for the loss, but that doesn’t mean he deserves to retain his spot despite his performances. Hunt’s decision makingand performances contributed to the losses, but it certainly wasn’t the only factor. I tried to convey that in the article and my biggests concern moving forward revolves around how defensive Walters has been about the choices made rather than seeking to turn things around. I dunno what’s happening behind doors, but publicly offering excuses for losing isn’t a good look and fans usually have a pretty good sense about whether or not their team was hard done by. The fact that most QLD supporters are more concerned with their own teams performance then decisions that went against them shows how far out of alignment his statements are from public opinion.

  • July 11th 2018 @ 2:05pm
    Craig said | July 11th 2018 @ 2:05pm | ! Report

    Hunt was so poor you have to wonder whether he was given bad advice or he just choked, similarly to what he’s done before. Even in the Broncos good run in 2016, when he was at his best, other players such as Milford were shining around him. Hunt was still making regular and consistent blunders which turned my hair grey week in week out, it was only a matter of time before he did it in a big game.

    I completely disagree with your bit about Boyd, “. Case in point is the example of Darius Boyd who felt the need to retire from rep footy after game 1 despite making every indication that he wanted to keep playing in the lead up to selection, a move which reportedly blind-sided the Maroons coach. ”

    Boyd was asked to come into camp to cover for injuries and said he’s not interested and can’t be bothered coming back from NZ or wherever he was unless he’s guaranteed to play. To be frank, with an attitude like that I hope he was told to retire. Blokes like that are not welcome in any football camp.

    The only thing I can consider in Hunt’s defence is McCullough at dummy half, he’s not creative at all and in the origin environment he’s been even less creative than normal. He essentially just shovels the ball on and tackles all day, solid but not dangerous. This really puts pressure on the halves, especially Hunt. There’s no other option to McCullough (except perhaps Hunt himself) so its not a selection blunder, but there’s a real lack of depth at hooker for QLD at the moment.

    • Roar Guru

      July 11th 2018 @ 3:27pm
      Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 3:27pm | ! Report

      McCullough’s “lack of creativity” has never been an issue for the Broncos attack though, and his combination with Hunt was a key part of their attack while Hunt was at the club. Ironically enough, McCullough’s actually run the ball more then Hunt has so far.

      To be fair on Boyd, he wasn’t asked to come into camp to cover injury, he was asked to come in to assist with preperations. Slater wasn’t ruled out till much later. Boyd was also still managing hamstring issues and some time off was probably exactly what he needed given he was looked over for selection. I’m not sure it was quite as petty as you seem to view it.

      • Roar Guru

        July 11th 2018 @ 4:03pm
        PNG Broncos fan88 said | July 11th 2018 @ 4:03pm | ! Report

        Have to agree with Craig.

        I feel that Macca has somewhat lost his zip and creativity at rake over the last couple of seasons. His kicks from dummy half have been very poor every game I have watched.
        Jake Turpin was a breath of fresh air over the weekend. He had the young pack charging over the advantage line every carry and always delivered front ball for Nikorima and Milford to run onto.

        Broncos have failed to beat any opposition over 9 points this year, look what happened when Macca had a rest against Gold Coast.

        • Roar Guru

          July 11th 2018 @ 4:18pm
          Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 4:18pm | ! Report

          To be fair, he missed half of last year due to injury and suffered a freak accident this season as well, I think he just needs a bit of time to get back to his best.

          I wouldn’t put too much stock in their performance without him on Sunday though, it was a bottom 8 team with a depleted forward pack. To his credit his pack has held its own against much more fancied packs (Souths, Warriors, Sharks, Raiders) and he’s been a key part of their defence. We saw how much of an impact losing him was last year despite his apparent lack of creativity.

      • July 11th 2018 @ 4:30pm
        Craig said | July 11th 2018 @ 4:30pm | ! Report

        “Has never been an issue for the Broncos attack” – except, it always has been a problem.

        In 2016 he missed 5 games, the results were 5/5 without him and we scored freely.

        Round 9 – win against Sharks by 2 points
        Round 10 – win against manly 30-6

        In rounds 13, 14, 16 we scored 36, 26 and 40 points without McCullough, all wins.

        Maybe a statistical anomaly, but we scored freely without him there.

        No way or shape you try and talk up McCullough, short of a glaringly obvious dummy he’s got nothing in attack.

        • Roar Guru

          July 11th 2018 @ 4:53pm
          Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 4:53pm | ! Report

          And they won twice as many games with him in the side, finishing 5th and making it to the semis only to be knocked out by some JT magic in extra time, so it’s not like they were struggling whith him in the side.

          Brisbane also went on a 6 game winning streak while Hunt was injured last year, that doesn’t mean that he doesn’t offer anything in attack either (at least in club land)

  • Roar Guru

    July 11th 2018 @ 2:10pm
    Nat said | July 11th 2018 @ 2:10pm | ! Report

    Well thought out and put together Emcie.
    I accept this is a transition period for Qld as much as NSW and I don’t envy Kevvie for having an incredible burden of success to uphold. While I don’t disagree with his selections, some of the way he used the players appeared odd – to say the least, and not just this year but in series past. Someone like Michael Morgan (or Peachy) is a genuine utility with strike power but the likes of Hunt last year and Milford this year getting limited minutes off the bench at the back end of the game gives them no opportunity at all. Further taking away a genuine hooker and defensive beast to do so (in G1) caused more issues than it solved and essentially that’s where NSW ran away with it. Couldn’t agree more with your G2 analysis. Not only about Hunt and Ponga but even the forward rotation. Tonight will be interesting too. Agree Hunt had to be moved on but not to the bench. That indicates that he will replace McCollough at some point, therefore, exposing defensive deficiencies through the middle again. Qld need a utility player and (as you say) a plan that adds variation but doesn’t detract from any part of the team.

    • Roar Guru

      July 11th 2018 @ 3:38pm
      Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 3:38pm | ! Report

      Yeah, I can cop mistakes being made or oversights in planning, it happens whether you win or lose. When they start to become a trend though it’s another thing entirely and you have to question the processes that lead to them. What seems strangest to me is how the QLD coaching position seems to be reverting to how it was before Mal came along and implemented so much structure behind the scenes. The fact that Kevie felt he could do the QLD thing while being an assistant at the broncos as well as media commitments is very different to how the role has been treated for the last decade and a bit. If Kevie felt like he could just turn up and coach is it a surprise that formerly important processes seem to be going by the wayside?

    • July 11th 2018 @ 3:41pm
      jimmmy said | July 11th 2018 @ 3:41pm | ! Report

      Nat , I don’t mind Hunt on the bench. He covers a couple of positions and he has the potential to be that player you bring on if you are behind and need to spark things up. I do agree though that he is not the player to close a game out,
      As much as I love Macca he only has one attacking weapon , a highly overused dummy which fools no one these days. Hunt has a really good running game and as long as you can get him to concentrate on running he will be OK.
      Hunt is not a starting half at Origin level but I seriously can’t think of anyone else (who is available) who could fill the bench utility spot in this game.

      • Roar Guru

        July 11th 2018 @ 4:07pm
        Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 4:07pm | ! Report

        The problem I have with Hunt on the bench is that if you’re going for pure impact there are players that add more spark then he does (injecting him usually results in him replacing someone rather then adding another option) and if he’s there to cover injuries there are players that are much more versatile then he is (he’s virtually limited to either 7 or 9). I think there are better option for utility, or at least better options to incorperate into a game plan.

        I think people forget that Hunt’s running game was at its best when combining with other ballrunners (Milford and Nikorima on the field at the same time) rather then him creating something out of nothing. I don’t think putting him on the field and just expecting him to run will have the same success if there isn’t a gameplan built around that.

        • Roar Guru

          July 11th 2018 @ 5:42pm
          Adam said | July 11th 2018 @ 5:42pm | ! Report

          Milford would make much more impact off the bench than Hunt in my mind. Like you said, in game 1 he touches the ball 4 times and makes more metres than Hunt did the whole game. I’m not necessarily saying that Milford is even an option for SOO, it’s just if you were looking for impact surely Hunt isn’t your guy

          • Roar Guru

            July 11th 2018 @ 5:57pm
            Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 5:57pm | ! Report

            He saved a try as well. I still probably wouldn’t pick him anywhere but 6 if he was to make the side though, the only spot he can really replace is the halves and if you’re planning on replacing a half in Origin they probably shouldn’t be there to start with

  • July 11th 2018 @ 2:48pm
    Brendon said | July 11th 2018 @ 2:48pm | ! Report

    I think whilst Hunt is being used as a scapegoat, his performance was pretty ordinary at best. Excluding the infamous 3rd tackle kick and penalty try, his entire game was non-existent. There was one scene where he went to tackle and simply got palmed off. It was pathetic to see in an Origin game.

    I am all for a fair go, but at the same time, we can’t become NSW, we can’t give the same player (looking at you Pearce) another go because he is the inform club player. Hunt played bad, move on. He hasn’t built up the good will to allow for bad performances (unlike players such as Chambers), we have 2 games to go off, so 100% of his games have been poor.

    Move him to the back of the line.

    • Roar Guru

      July 11th 2018 @ 3:47pm
      Emcie said | July 11th 2018 @ 3:47pm | ! Report

      That’s how I see it, he deserved a shot and he was given a shot, but there’s no point persisting if it’s not working. I think that there are legitimate reasons to look elsewhere in this case that go beyond just scapegoating. I mean, he’s 28 and has played over 200 games, has been part of many finals series and a grand final while surounded by elite players and one of the best coaches in a generation, it’s not like his game he’s going to grow further as a player if he hasn’t already

Explore:
, , ,