The Roar
The Roar

AFL
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Collingwood's long night continues

Autoplay in... 6 (Cancel)
Up Next No more videos! Playlist is empty -
Replay
Cancel
Next
Roar Guru
6th July, 2020
108
1118 Reads

Every club has their new dawns. They usually comes just after a cataclysm.

Emerging from their first-ever wooden spoon in 1976, Collingwood appointed legendary Richmond coach, Tom Hafey. A grand final followed in 1977. Despite the defeat, surely the Pies were close to breaking their drought.

Losses in 1979, 1980, and 1981 proved otherwise.

In 1982, a player revolt – the players felt Hafey was overtraining them – followed. There was obviously some despondency also – losing four grand finals in five years will do that. Out went Hafey.

In came the New Magpies, a glamour administration determined to update Collingwood’s provincial attitudes by spending big and recruiting big and dragging the club into the modern age.

Cue excitement. Anticipation. Hope.

By 1986, the club was almost bankrupt. The bank recommended the club close their doors. Pay cuts and administrative resignations followed. A spendthrift and anonymous administration guided Collingwood to their drought-breaking flag in 1990.

The celebrations that followed set the tone for the decade – a decade where Collingwood unraveled, assembled a mediocre playing list, and gushed money, culminating in their second wooden spoon in 1999.

President Eddie McGuire relaunched the Pies with Mick Malthouse now at the helm. Within three years, Collingwood were financially solvent, had rebuilt their stature, and would compete in a grand final – again, only to fall just short. A year later, they were smashed in another grand final.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Eddie McGuire

Collingwood president Eddie McGuire. (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

Two bleak years in the wilderness followed. Failure does that. It cracks what was whole. Things start to go awry.

And it felt like it might become a dark time, with ageing champions on the way out.

But, through studious recruiting, Collingwood spent the new few years building the squad that would win the 2010 flag.

Surely this was not only a new dawn, but the brightest day.

They dominated throughout much of 2011, only to fall to a superior Geelong outfit in the grand final. Cue the succession plan. Out went Malthouse, in came Nathan Buckley as coach – and, with it, the herald of a new era.

Unfortunately, it’s never felt as if that era has ever arrived. It’s never felt as if that dawn has come, where change can reinvigorate an organisation and light the way to something better. It feels as if what they’ve built is a pastiche to cover what they disassembled.

Since that messy succession plan, the club has been unraveling a strand at a time. Premiership players have left acrimoniously. Drafting and recruiting has struggled. Injuries have been rife.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Administration has been unsettled.

There was a long period in the wilderness without finals.

And there have been headlines.

We’ve had several Jordan de Goey infractions, the Heritier Lumumba racial saga, Josh Thomas and Lachlan Keeffe’s drug strikes, the Sam Murray drug strike, the Brayden Sier “Phil Inn” stunt, the Jaidyn Stephenson’s betting scandal, the Steele Sidebottom Covid indiscretion, various Eddie McGuire gaffes … well, it’s a big list.

Every club has problems. But this many?

It’s a big, big list.

Heritier Lumumba

Heritier Lumumba. (AAP Image/Joe Castro)

Why? Why do these things keep happening? Is it karma? Is it bad luck? Is the club particularly good at recruiting miscreants?

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is the club culturally flawed? Does an outspoken blokey president encourage players to be extroverted? Does the “arrogance” and “chest-beating” Buckley talks about in the 2018 documentary From the Inside Out encourage misbehaviour?

I know supporters who’ve now walked away from the club, unable to stomach the ongoing issues – supporters who’ve turned in memberships they’ve held for decades; or who now only express a passing interest; and/or who are happy for their children to either not passionately follow Collingwood, or to adopt another club.

People will say clubs don’t need supporters like these – that they’re disloyal. But there is only so much that individuals can take. Marriages end. Relationships break down. Friendships are severed.

Jobs are left. And so on.

And that all happens when an individual decides they’re not getting value from the other party, and/or the other party is abusing them.

I’ve never bought into this narrative that you must support your club unconditionally. Nothing’s unconditional in life.

And you should be free to voice your opinion. If your club was repeatedly spluttering, if they kept making mistakes, why should you or why would you blindly follow them?

You wouldn’t do that with the Government. Or with a partner. Or with a job. So why are you expected to with a football club? At a certain point, you are well within your rights to ask, simply, “What’s going on?”

Advertisement
Advertisement

That’s where we are today, Collingwood.

What’s going on?

I feel for Nathan Buckley, who was handed the keys to a club who had a divided playing list, poor list management, chronic injury problems, a revolving door of football managers, an outspoken president, and numerous off-field distractions that required Buckley to diplomatically navigate through an unrelenting media, as well as a handful of exploitative journalists.

Nathan Buckley, coach of the Magpies, looks dejected

(Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

And I feel for the likes of Scott Pendlebury, Steele Sidebottom, Dane Swan, Travis Cloke, etc., who spent big chunks of their early careers helping build the team into a powerhouse, only to spend the latter halves squandering their potential while Collingwood sorted itself out, only to stumble again.

And again.

And again.

Collingwood will get past these latest issues.

Advertisement
Advertisement

That’s what they do.

But the way the club feels now, it’s just a matter of time before the next one.

The new dawn is long gone, and there’s no hint of another.

There’s no suggestion of reinvigoration.

Now we’re just left with the long night.