The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

The Shooter and the Gambler in the US presidential election

Expert
1st October, 2008
4

I’ve long held the theory that you can tell a lot about the mindset and character of a person by their favourite game. And this theory applies as well to the way that person likes to play their favourite game.

Indians, for instance, play cricket, especially when batting, with strokes of more wristy elegance than the majority of Australian batsmen have played over the ages.

The best of the Australian batsmen have tended to have a more pragmatic, outcome-based style than most of their Indian counterparts.

There are exceptions, of course.

Sachin Tendulkar has been more ‘Australian’ with his batting technique and Suni Gavaskar was very much like Geoffrey Boycott in his ‘English’ blocking and negative batting style.

This theory can be applied to the US presidential election.

In his younger years, Barack Obama was a gifted and enthusiastic basketball player. And he showed he still has the swish when he was asked in Iraq to shoot baskets with the troops.

He effortlessly sank a long basket, even though he was wearing a suit.

Advertisement

John McCain is a dedicated poker player. He plays for hours, is very determined about winning and is apparently a fearless gambler.

I think this gambling, one-hand-turns-everything-around style reflects McCain’s instinct to go for king-hits in this presidential campaign, with the choice of Sarah Palin being an outstanding (foolhardy?) example of the big kill instinct that poker players develop.

The basketball ethic is that gifted individuals (such as Michael Jordan) take the big shots but play within a team environment. Obama plays the part of Jordan while looking to both sides of politics to find a common ground for policies.

Is politics a game of poker, or more like a basketball game? My guess is that the truer analogy is the basketball metaphor.

close