Qatar dream alive, but much to do ahead of South Africa
By Tony Tannous, 15 Oct 2009 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- football, Hassan Rabea, Mark Schwarzer, Oman football, Socceroos, World Football
154 Have your say
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Football - EPL, Champions League & Europe news

Harry Kewell of Australia is challenged by Mohammed Addullah of Oman and team-mate Mohamed Rabia Jamaan Al Noobi during a FIFA Asian Cup qualifying match, played at Docklands Stadium in Melbourne, Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2009. Australia is leading 1-0 deep into the second half. AAP Image/Joe Castro
Losing may not have been an option according to the marketers, but for much of the first half last night, Omani attacking midfielder Fawzi Basheer threatened to shift Australia’s planning post-South Africa from Qatar to Brazil.
Had Hassan Rabea taken the chance that Basheer delightfully teed up for him midway through the half, and had Mark Schwarzer not got his gloves to Basheer’s effort from the byline a couple of minutes earlier, losing may well have been the only option.
As it was, the Socceroos survived the first period, upped the tempo in the second, and ultimately did enough to deliver the killer blow, which came from the usual source.
It was an intriguing match, right from the start, with the Socceroos delivering on their promise to get at Oman and try and grab an early goal that would settle a nervous and expectant nation.
Kewell did some lovely early one-on-one work down the left, but the route to goal was more obvious; get it wide, especially to Brett Emerton and Luke Wilkshire down the right, and get it in to Josh Kennedy and Tim Cahill.
A direct header, knock-down or some second-ball-scraps, whatever it would took, that would be the mode. It is the Pim Verbeek attacking template.
Despite some good aerial outlet from Kennedy and Cahill, the ball just didn’t drop. That and some excellent aerial work from giant goalkeeper Ali Al Habsi.
Early the Socceroos defence, which has had many question raised about its age and subsequent lack of toe, kept a high line, even trapping Oman offside on one occasion.
But then, on 20 minutes, Basheer released the quick Amad Al Hossani down the right. He sped past Lucas Neill, drew Craig Moore across, only to miss his target in the middle.
That warning, the pace of Rabea and Al Hossani, and the trickery of Basheer forced the Socceroos back. For the next 25 minutes, the Socceroos were in retreat mode, a common trait under Verbeek.
The centre backs dropped off, the holding midfielders started treading on their toes, and the gap between defence and attack grew wider.
There was the odd bit of encouragement in attack, but, generally, heads were being shaken and quizzical looks were being exchanged, on the field and off it.
It is at times like this where eye-brows are raised about just whether there are enough legs in the starting 11 to compete at the top level. Whether Verbeek has refreshed the starting 11 enough since Germany?
Certainly there remains an air of predictability not only about the start 11, but much of Verbeek’s tactics.
Refreshingly, Dario Vidosic offered a little bit off the bench, but even Verbeek will admit there is still much to do to get this team ticking in the front third.
There were better signs in the second period as Jason Culina lifted his game and lifted himself higher up the pitch, and the Socceroos started to get a little more joy down the flanks.
Scott Chipperfield and Neill were battered in the first period, but showed they are made of stern stuff by bouncing back to influence late on, while Cahill and Kennedy kept offering themselves, eventually jagging a winner.
Surviving what looked a fair shout for a penalty, it finally looked like Australia’s night. Suddenly, job down, pressure released, the football came out.
On one occasion they even knocked a delightful 20 or so passes.
But it was a tense up until then, confirming Verbeek has much work to do.
Commercially, Cahill’s rescue-acts are priceless, for they allows the FFA to sign their Hugo Boss deals, crucial to the ongoing development of the game, but between now and June 2010, the focus should primarily be on ensuring the team suits-up on the field.
A reality check against the Dutch and a nervous night at Etihad should at least ensure that heads remain level ahead of South Africa, and that mightn’t be the worse thing.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- football, Hassan Rabea, Mark Schwarzer, Oman football, Socceroos, World Football

Dickroo said | October 15th 2009 @ 6:32am | Report comment
how the Socceroos can score in SA if they attack like last night and in the Dutch game?
The whole team lacks pace and Kennedy is still not a convincing No.9.
Very rusty interplay between the attackers and the pattern is very predictable.
Left side defence is the soft point as always. Although Chipper delivered an assistant cross, he was got outrun at least twice and should have given a penalty. Looks like Carney will be the first choice there.
David said | October 16th 2009 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Dickroo i agree with u Chippers, Moor, Kennedy should be droped they too slow. Kennedy especially come on he plays in japan is shocking on the ball his only good against Asia opposition case his tall – Vidoic is better in my opinion he at least plays in germany, Mc D can at least run and set up plays like he did in ireland with Cahill.
Culinas got worst since joining the A-league so has sterjovski etc in my opinion Rhy and Dario should make the squad from now to the world cup they are young have pace and are the future for the socceroos.
Reality is we will prob not make it too far in the wrld cup if we struggle to beat teams like Oman at home and absolutly get dominated by a quality oppsition like Holland.
Anyone who thinks we are better then we were in 06 hsn o iea ys we hve more players to pick from but out starting 11 in 06 was better then it will be in 2010. Guus is a10 time better coach then Pim n even though pim has done a good job to qualify for the WC2010. He hasnt made a go team out of the socceroos they play unattractive and in my opinion uneffective football. Everyone knows we dont have any stand outs in our squad i would personlly pt Cahill up in world class but the fact is not one player we have plays for a truely big club example man u, Real Mardrid etc.
Heres a sad fact the only player we have thatplays in the champions league its holman and although i dont think he is as bad as ppl say he is, we struggles in the green n gold
whiskeymac said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Oman were excellent, and really i felt we got through a very tricky game against a good team. but considering we had a full squad and were playing at home (albeit in front a small crowd – what was with that Melbourne?) why the nerves and rustiness? wasnt the Dutch game meant to freshen us up in preparation for the Oman match?
We are very predictible in attack and slow at times. If not for Cahill’s uncanny abilities we didnt otherwise look good for scoring (Neills shot being saved by the goalies face and Kewells first half strike aside), and we were very exposed down the flanks.
Wilkshire was good again, as was Vidosic when he came on. Pity he was fouled when he went on his big run, it would have been interesting to see what would have eventuated from it.
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Definitely a penalty against Chippers.
Carney starting to look like the correct choice for LB (but he still needs to improve on a number of levels).
Talk about predictability – Le Roy would have known Australia’s game plan better than Pim – little wonder Oman dominated large parts of the first half, especially with Australian so willing to give the ball back to them with barely a murmur.
The Bear said | October 15th 2009 @ 2:45pm | Report comment
Actually just watched the game again…. the Omanni dived…pretty much no contact. Ref let a lot go last night, too. Consistent and fair decision, the omani probably lucky he did not get a yellow for simulation. Yes, i was pretty shocked at the second look, but it was a dive!
Brian said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Not bad but I am less convinced than ever regarding Kennedy. I’d like to see Macca given more of a run in future. As for the crowd tickets were $50 and rising, the FFA have to be more realistic when setting prices for these games.
True Tah said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:58am | Report comment
Brian
the ground was two thirds empty and it was a full strength Socceroos side – it does not look good when we are trying to mount 2018 FIFA WC bid.
constantine said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
you look into it too much. its a wednesday night, for an asian cup and the tickets were very overpriced.i know 15 victory regulars that didnt go and decided to watch at home. its not a cause for concern and an asian cup tie does not affect a world cup bid. most of the australian public dont even know what an asian cup is so really who cares
AA said | October 15th 2009 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
True Tah,
Nice and easy Sir, considering that Holland went to Sydney, the high ticket prices for the Oman game and that 30,000 had been to Victory 5 days before, all is not lost. Melbourne have done a finejob the past few years to help promote the game. Supporters aren’t cash cows, and the Asian Cup still lacks prestige with the average Joe out there, so things aren’t as bad as you think.
Anyway, seating is arranged to suit TV views, so bear that in mind also.
TONY – great article Sir, I was at the game last night and it was good, The stadium looked great with the seating pushed in also.
Lmacca said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
What I find interesting is that 2 months ago, after the 3-0 towelling of Ireland, Aussie fans were talking about a semi-final appearance in South Africa next year. Now, after the loss against South Korea, the 0-0 with Holland and the lack of finishing in the 1-0 win last night, questions are again raised. Certainly the goals that flowed in Ireland have dried up. Is that potentially due to Josh Kennedy being in the line-up? I rate him as a genuine goal threat, but the Socceroos do tend to revert to a one-dimensional attack when he plays. He doesn’t quite have the ability to hold the ball up, so we aim at his head/chest and look for knock downs and lay-offs. And then cross from wide and hope for the best. It’s an approach that will work on occasion, but the lack of a plan B is worrying. The outcome of Saturday’s match was that Cahill isn’t getting enough ball in midfield, and again that showed last night, that he wasn’t providing the links to Kewell/Emerton. Not many times was the ball in front of the attacking 18 yard box, more often than not it was between the box and the sideline. When Kewell had a shot from range at the end of the first half it came as a real surprise, since the ball was hardly in that area.
Plus Culina and Valeri were not very impressive, seemingly not able to stop the Omani team running through the midfield, nor being very adept at facilitating the build-up play.
I’m not overly concerned, because the team has quality play in it. They just will need to produce it, because recently the signs haven’t been too good. Hopefully the remaining Asian Cup games will be used, as well as some good strong friendlies before the World Cup.
Rellum said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Does that mean Fozzy was onto something when he said that we love playing teams from great briton because we are so familiar with their style of football.
The Bishop said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Rellum, Australia have not actually played a team from Great Britain since England in Feb 2003.
Rellum said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Oooh, haha, they all play the same way
The Bear said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Fantastic write up, Tony. Finally the right Brett was on the park. I agree about the predictability. Not surprisingly the goal came from some basic driving into the box. Perhaps caught the Omani’s by shock, lol.
Realfootball said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:47am | Report comment
The team has become so monotonous, predictable and defensive since Verbeek took over. No wonder the Sydney/Melbourne game pulled half as many people again. Verbeek was a strange appointment – a singularly unsuccessful period at Sth Korea, marked by his dismissal (if the internet blogs are to be believed) after a player revolt over his defensive tactics, plus 2 unsuccessful stints in the J League. How on earth did that qualify him for our national team position? There must have been a dearth of options. My reasonably football literate view is that he is a limited coach with no vision or adaptability, and the sooner he is off our national ship, the better. Yes, he got through qualification, but he had a simply extraordinary amount of luck – as he did last night, when Oman should have scored from open play and should have had a penalty. Indeed, by far Verbeek’s best asset as a coach is his luck. The crowd last night wasn’t just about the opponents – it was about the way we play under Verbeek. He has harmed public perception of our national team, and through his arrogance (unjustified and completely undisguised) refuses to acknowledge that this is not Europe, and that in this market results are NOT all that matters. His achievement, in the end, has been to make our team much less than the sum of its parts – the complete opposite to what Hiddinck achieved.
David said | October 16th 2009 @ 1:07pm | Report comment
i agree with the fact that his tactics are predictable and he hs been lucky but when usay this is not europe thats fair but if we had an Australian coach we he try play more A-league players lik Archie Thompson god help us if that ever happens again.
One thing pim has done is convert n grow the squad with some young players rhys, dario, Lowry etc.
But his tactics are pretty poor i must say compared to guus but i admire how he stands up to Australian media and effectivly tells the truth the A-league isnt good enough and players should go to europe. Pointing out the problems the HAL has we allowing too much space, being to slow, technically our players are poor n d list goes on.
We all saw how poor the passes n skill was in our under 21s
FIsher Price said | October 15th 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Further evidence that the team is slow, predictable , lacking in flair… Verbeek is not my cup of tea.
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:00am | Report comment
I think the whole team lacks speed, definately our defence is very strong, solid & experience, but they lack pace in a big way, outside of Wilshire.
I’m not sure whether we lack pace, as speed of players or speed of our passing further up the park.. What I’m saying is a fast pass can beat any player for speed & a first touch can make up for a lack of pace.
We look solid & Predictable, we do seem to have the ability to blow teams of the park. Maybe this is what we have & have to accept that until the small sided generation come thru.
This showed in our 2nd half where we completely dominated the Omanians, when they inconsistency, lack of experience & fitness showed up.
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:24am | Report comment
After being made to look silly by the Dutch, I guess we didn’t expect to be made to look silly by the Omanis (which they did in the latter parts of the first half).
And most of these blokes played against Oman in the Asian Cup – so complacency shouldn’t have been an issue.
I have to admit, a few months ago, I would have thought that having a team of 30+ experienced players would be a plus for SA next year – but I’m now starting to doubt that.
A few younger players are going to make their mark by that time, perhaps far earlier than we first thought – and that may be a good thing.
The crowd was a surprise – when the game started, it hit home that this was a pretty ordinary crowd – and certainly at odds with recent crowds for both the A-League and other internationals.
This was a very important game for us – it was a vital win – I’m still struggling to understand why only 20,000 would turn up.
Could it be that Fos’ articles are starting to make an impact?
As Henk said in his pre-game interview: this is international football, real football, it’s not Australian Football – a 1-nil win is still a win.
Very true – but do Australians really believe it deep, deep down inside?
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 9:29am | Report comment
There were 30k to the victory game so I suggest other issues are the reason Pip.
I don’t think the players were complacent, effort was not the problem. The massive gap in midfield between Valeri/Cullini and Tim Cahill is.
Vicentin said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:27am | Report comment
You can’t be serious ….”Could it be that Fos’ articles are starting to make an impact?”. I can’t believe your still spruiking that ridiculous blog of yours that may yet get to one thousand comments. Give it away Pip.
Pippinu said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Am I the sort of character that would intentionally push something merely to reach the magical number of 1,000?
Could I be so transparent and superficial?
Art Sapphire said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:39am | Report comment
C’mon Pip – why are you struggling to understand why 20k turned up?
1. Tickets were priced from $50 – $90.
2. The weather was crap. Most people in Melboure either watched it live at home on Fox like I did or went to the local pub.
Ofcourse you would keep pushing your barrow Pip. Especially if you consider that about 200 comments on that thread are yours. Thats more hot air than what it took to get the Hindenberg of the ground
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:53am | Report comment
Thanks Art, I was wondering why the poor crowd down in Melbourne & wanting an explanation from a football person.
BTW Art 3-0.
Redb said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Yes that is futbol’s problem, you keep listening to the same voices reinforcing the same beliefs.
Criticism from non-futbol folk? – that must be ignored they don’t understand.
Redb
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Redb,
I’ve been in grounds where we get 5k for a WC qualifier or in matches against European teams with 25K & the visiting team outnumbers the Aussie fans by 3 to 1.
So 20K in a rainy melbourne day with prices ranging from $50 – $90 for Oman is still an improvement.
BigAl said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
‘…20K in a rainy melbourne day …’ – didn’t they shut the roof ?
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:58am | Report comment
From an interstate perspective watching on TV I like a midweek game. Hope this doesn’t put them off doing more.
Michael C said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:58am | Report comment
and everyone has just recently spent all their dollars on going to see Pink and the Black Eyed Peas!!
Surprising though given the publicity about the seats getting moved in.
Robbos said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:51am | Report comment
Thanks Vicentin, I read that snide remark awell & I thought, na I won’t bite, very childish by our Pip, but then I have been known to make the odd childish remark to wind up the masses.
Redb said | October 15th 2009 @ 10:53am | Report comment
Pip,
Australians arent sold on the Asian Cup, it is not elite.
The World Cup is the pinnacle most generic sports know this, it is only futbol hubris and Frank Lowy’s wishful thinking that embracing Asia is the huge way forward for the game here and somehow a strategic advantage on the other codes.
Not saying it wont be bigger in 20 years, but 20,000 is very ordinary. Closed roof mitigates the weather.
MV only once have got 30,000, the rest of have been 15-20K.
Craig Foster you beauty
Andy Harper was interviewed on SEN this morning and he was fairly disappointed with this and recent efforts, he beleives that there is no comparison between they way this current Australian side is playing and the one that did so well in 2006.
Redb
Art Sapphire said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:13am | Report comment
“Criticism from non-futbol folk? – that must be ignored they don’t understand”
That the wisest thing you have said in a while, redb.
1. The roof was open last night on Pim’s instructions. He wanted the Omanis to feel the weather
2. For Australian football to develop we need to be part of Asia – it is not Lowy’s hubris.
3. MV only plays against interstate team. This means no away support. In that respect their attendances are quite healthy.
Have you got anything else to say considering you did not watch the game last night.
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 11:30am | Report comment
I dont think the crowd figure can just be ignored though.
Melbourne got big crowds to SOO.
The shine obviously has come of a bit if people don’t want to pay $50 to see Lucas and Timmy…or for the first time in 8 years Harry Kewell. 3 years ago it may have sold out on the Socceroos name alone.
I don’t think it’s the end of the world but wether they look at pricing or making the Socceroos more available for media work before the games. Channel 10 complained about access and actually showed the footage of them interviewing Dirk Kuyt. They were promised 5 mins and about 40 seconds in the interview was halted (no curly questions were asked).
Their is probably a little arrogance creeping in to how the Socceroos are handled and that could be looked at.
Redb said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
You can pump the up the Asian Cup and ACL all you like, there is only so much hubris in the Socceroos/HAL tank that sports fans will accept.
Dont get me wrong I like the Socceroos and will follow their WC campaign with keen interest, but to expect non futbol diehards to just lap everything up that is soccer – well your just kidding yourself.
Redb
Michael C said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
Just as a Melbourne soccer attendance scene setter -
This season, MVFC – 6 games, 5 below 20K and last week just over 30K for SFC.
At Docklands (Etihad nee Telstra Dome) – MVFC had only gone sub 20K once before in round 7 last year.
Last year, only one crowd exceeded 30K, (rnd 9 v SFC), previously, in V3, 30K was exceeded twice and in V2 crowds of 32K vs Ade and effectively 40K and 50K for the two SFC games.
The venue crowd average has decreased over this time from 32K to 26K to 24.5K and now to 20K for MVFC.
Now – assuming these soccer fans haven’t dropped off the face of the earth…..
…..I might suggest that soccer fans have become increasing displeased with Docklands Stadium as a venue.
Which draws me to put the query forward – - from next year on, would this type of fixture (Socceroos hosting Oman/Qatar/Bahrain etc) be hosted at the new squared venue in Swan St? Presently I’d assume that to be a yes.
Simmo said | October 16th 2009 @ 4:10pm | Report comment
Put your money on it.
mahony said | October 15th 2009 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
If being in Asia were only about Asia Cup participation and revenues from the associated gate – then I would agree with you. Frank was spot on and you have missed the point. The Asian FOOTBALL ECONOMY is large and growing. The ADDITIONAL Asian games have allowed us to develop players/coaches/referees who would neved have had the chance of development against Fiji et al (including via a specific Asian ‘pathway’ for development age based teams and women in particular). Continental club football will provide new CLUB REVENUES over time. The strategic importance of Asia to Australia provides FOOTBALL SPECIFIC OPPORTUNITIES to partner with government. Asian membership also provides us with a platform for a WORLD CUP BID which we would not have had otherwise (join the dots – football is bood business in Asia, government likes business in Asia, government funds World Cup Bid for strategic reasons). I do agree that the Asian Cup is not elite in the global sense, but if we host it, it will return significant INFRASTRUCTURE DIVIDENDS to football. Frank was not demonstrating hubris – but vision. I, for one, have the patience to watch his vision unfold.
AndyRoo said | October 15th 2009 @ 5:08pm | Report comment
There is so much more potential in Asia… could you imagine going back to Oceania (shudders)
Even NZ who are a long way behind Australia in Football development are now talking about the move. I would have thought they would want a few more years of the easy money qualifying for Club World Champs and Confed Cup provide but even they see the potential.
AA said | October 20th 2009 @ 5:10pm | Report comment
NZ won’t be in Asia for a while mate, if at all.