The Roar’s Test cricket Team of the Decade
By Brett McKay, 19 Jan 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Cricket, Glenn McGrath, Shane Warne, Test cricket
110 Have your say
The Roar’s editors suggested an interesting challenge for me the other week: to come up with a Test cricket Team of the Decade.
Teams of the Decade are all the rage this month of course, just like Teams of the Century poured out from any possible source this time ten years ago. CricInfo named their Player of Decade – Ricky Ponting – just last week, but are yet to give him ten team-mates.
With a bit of luck, I’ll get my team out first.
So, keen to i) impress the editors, and ii) try and limit myself to a First XI, I took to the challenge with gusto.
Among the first notes I scribbled were “who captains?” and “who ‘keeps?”
Not ten minutes later, I had 33 names. And with 13 or 14 of those names having captained their country at some stage in the last ten years, as well as three wicket-keepers, I was no closer to answering my questions.
Maybe this won’t be as easy as I thought.
The problem with these sorts of discussions and debates (and I’m quite sure there will be debate) is not so much who you pick, but who you left out.
And I can see that is going to be the case here. I mean, pardon the pun, but how’s this lot for openers?
Langer, Hayden, Smith, Strauss, Gibbs, Sehwag, Jayasuriya…
How do you possibly pick just two of them?!
And right there, I’ve just opened myself up to the prospect of objectivity, or even just the perception of it. Is it wrong that the first two openers I’ve named are Australian?
But then again, surely it wouldn’t be unexpected that an Australian, writing for an Australian sports website, might include one or two Australian players?
No, of course it wouldn’t.
Especially when you consider that the decade in question included one complete 16-Test Australian winning streak, and a good chunk of another one. Think of the page reads, Brett, it’ll be fine. Just name the team.
So, a Test cricket team, made up of the best cricketers in the world from 1 January 2000, just after all the Y2K panic fizzled into New Year’s drinks, up until the completion of the 2009 Boxing Day Tests.
How hard can this be?
The openers in contention are already out there, so I might as well knock them out of the way. If I just looked at run aggregates, Matthew Hayden and Graeme Smith are the picks, with Smith a bit over five hundred runs ahead of Justin Langer and, unexpectedly, Chris Gayle.
But it’s just too hard to spilt Hayden and Langer as an opening pair, for mine. As a combination, they run second behind only Greenidge and Haynes in the history of Test cricket as the best pair to ever take on the new ball. They get the nod at the top.
I had a few preconceived ideas about who I wanted in the middle order, to the point where I wasn’t even going to look at the stats. I did eventually, just to confirm my preconceptions, and the top three run aggregates belong to Ricky Ponting, Jacques Kallis, and Rahul Dravid. So in the end, I don’t even need to shift them from that order.
Number 6 in the order is a little more difficult. Mahela Jayawardene, Kumar Sangakkara and Sachin Tendulkar all made within a thousand runs of each other in the ten years, all averaged more than 53, and all made more than 21 Test centuries.
Ultimately, I’ve gone with Sangakkara. In trying to separate the three, I’ve found that of the top fifty scores in the Naughties (from 400no to 222, mind you) Sangakkara has made five of them, against Jayewardene’s four and Tendulkar’s two. Sangakkara also played the least Tests of the three, and what’s more he evens up the number of left- and right-handers in the top six. As a leftie, that sounds fair to me.
Number 7 is probably no surprise. I was kind of joking about wondering who’d ‘keep, and I always assumed it would be Adam Gilchrist. Stats confirm it too; over a thousand runs ahead of Mark Boucher, and 14 more dismissals, though interestingly, Boucher took one more catch. The clincher – if it was ever needed – is that Gilchrist cleared the boundary 99 times in Test cricket over the decade, more than any other player. And really, how could I leave him out?
The bowling wasn’t too difficult in the end either. Shane Warne and Glenn McGrath pick themselves really, and I was pretty happy to let stats determine the last couple of spots.
Muttiah Muralitharan is light years ahead in terms of wickets taken, and so deserves a spot. With Kallis in the side already, and a more than handy seamer in his own right, he allows me to pick a second spinner. Picking Murali does mean McGrath doesn’t bat at No.11 though!
The last spot then, goes to Makhaya Ntini, who took the most wickets in the decade of all the quicks. What did surprise me was that Brett Lee is second on that list, just in front of McGrath. For that, Lee can be the 12th man.
Ricky Ponting is the Captain, and again, that wasn’t too hard a decision from the final eleven.
Notable omissions are obviously Jayawardene, Smith, and Tendulkar as already mentioned. Virender Sehwag would be another, having made three of the top nine scores of the decade. Shaun Pollock was one who I thought might have gone close too.
So there it is, the Team of the Decade done. A team I’d happily pay to watch, too.
But given I’m a selector, I’d like to think I might get a freebie.
The Roar’s Test cricket Team of the Decade: M.Hayden (Aus), J.Langer (Aus), R. Ponting (Aus – Captain), J.Kallis (SA), R.Dravid (Ind), K.Sangakkara (SL), A.Gilchrist (Aus), S.Warne (Aus), G.McGrath (Aus), M.Ntini (SA), M.Muralitharan (SL), B.Lee (Aus – 12th man)
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Cricket, Glenn McGrath, Shane Warne, Test cricket

Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 5:56am | Report comment
For the stats-lovers, I’ll post links to the individual CricInfo 2000s records later in the morning. The main page is
http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/current/records/index.html?id=200;type=decade
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:19am | Report comment
the stats lists as promised…
Most runs: http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/batting/most_runs_career.html?class=1;id=200;type=decade
Most wickets: http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/bowling/most_wickets_career.html?class=1;id=200;type=decade
Most dismissals: http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/keeping/most_dismissals_career.html?class=1;id=200;type=decade
Opening partnerships in Test History: http://stats.cricinfo.com/ci/content/records/283663.html
vinay verma said | January 19th 2010 @ 6:53am | Report comment
Brett, Firstly on your choice of captain in RP..I agree but have you changed your impression of him in the last 12 months. I know you never rated him as a great captain but merely “good”. Sangakkara would get my vote as vice captain under RP.
I would have Dale Steyn to partner Pigeon. Steyn has an average of around 23( Ntini is 28) and a strike rate of 39 (Ntini’s SR is 59) On batsman Friendly pitches since 2004 Steyn is far and away the most penetrative fastman.
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:18am | Report comment
G’day Vinay, not quite the case about Ponting – it’s true I don’t have him rated as high as his predecessors, but I’ve never called for his head either, despite disagreeing with his field placements or bowling changes, etc at times. I think considering the cattle he’s had sine The Retirements, he’s actually done a reasonable job.
His selection was pretty easy in the end. Of the final XI, he’s by far the longest serving national captain, and of course now has more wins under his belt than any other Test Captain. There’s another guy in my side there who I think would have made an outstanding captain were it not for his over-active text-thumbs, and who I’d be interested to see how he’d go leading a side like this if it were ever to play, but in the end, Ponting was a no-brainer.
Steyn-Ntini was a close call, I’ll admit, and in the end I gave NtIni the nod for length of service and sheer number of wickets. If the side was over the last five years instead of ten, Steyn would be among the first picked…
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:23am | Report comment
Vinay, by the way, I’m still struggling to cope with naming a team with McGrath batting at 9!!
vinay verma said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:29am | Report comment
Ntini at 11 and Murali at 9 would do me. Murali can be a thrashing machine and he has a good eye(make two of them)
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:46am | Report comment
I’m not quite so sure about that Vinay. All three are genuine No.11s, but McGrath is certainly the most correct of the three. Murali and Ntini tend to jump around waving their bats all over the shop, as if they’re trying to guide planes in to land…
vinay verma said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:25am | Report comment
Hi Brett, fair enough on Punter. Yes,Warney would be a great Captain and Punter would have no hesitation playing under him. Sheek alluded to Captain’s taking more responsibility and over the last 12 months Ricky has been a strong advocate for the eminence of Test Cricket. I see that Kolkata have bought out his IPL contract and this only emphasises Ricky’s priorities. He is not about the big bucks and as I said a while ago, in time Ricky may well be considered one of our greatest Captains. I dont say he is there but the next two years will tell.
Kersi Meher-Homji said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:46am | Report comment
Brett, I realise it’s a tough call to select a team of the decade. But how can anyone exclude Sachin Tendulkar?
davido said | January 19th 2010 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Agreed! Should be 3. Ponting 4. Tendulkar 5. Kallis (Just pipping Jaya because of his bowling.) What a team that would be!
Forget the Stats, Sachin is a match winner.
sheek said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:54am | Report comment
Brett,
“Among the first notes I scribbled were “who captains?” and “who keeps?” ” How very English of you, considering the captain first!
Traditionally, it’s said the difference in selecting English & Australian XIs is this: We Aussies pick our best XI, then choose a captain from within the group. The English pick the captain first, then build the team around him.
Re your team, there comes a point where perception overrules stats. I would have Sehwag batting with Hayden. You have two scoring ‘turtles’ – Dravid & Kallis. Since Kallis’ bowling is useful, Dravid ought to make way for Tendulkar.
Batting turtles will save matches, but they don’t necessarliy help win test matches. Which is why Kallis will never be seen in the same light as Sobers.
There will always be a question mark surrounding Murali’s bowling action, but his stats speak for themselves. I agree with Vinay, Steyn ahead of Ntini. Ntini was an honest toiler, but short of the very best.
IMHO, Brett Lee is way overrated. To be rated a genuine test bowler, your bowling average must be below 30. Lee was too wayward, & too inconsistent. Something for Johnson to consider also.
Anyway, great effort. Funny thing about cricket – the numerous stats are supposed to help, but sometimes they also get in the way!
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:18am | Report comment
Quite right Sheek, and while the team came together pretty easily for me in the end, I wasn’t kidding about the 30+ names just on first thoughts. There’s just so many great players and performance over the last ten years that beg inclusion, yet plenty over them were over looked.
The “English” notion of captain first, team second was really only consigned to the notes, and again, it was more trying to think about the contenders. As I’ve said in the column, I actually picked the XI first, and from that Ponting was the standout option as captain.
Kersi asked above how I could exclude Tendulkar, but really, it was the same way I excluded Lara. In my mind, and looking at the figures for the decade, there were just better options. I actually had a harder time deciding between Sanggakara and Jayawardene than I did overlooking Lara and Tendulkar.
M1tch said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:55am | Report comment
I would go for Shaun Pollock over Ntini, better bowler and handy with the bat
Justin said | January 19th 2010 @ 7:59am | Report comment
Brett thanks for the link. Great topic and never easy to put together a side with so many talented players.
My side would be (minimum 50 tests)
Hayden
Sehwag
Ponting
Lara
Kallis
Sangakkara
Gilchrist
Pollock
Warne (c)
McGrath
Murali
In summary:
but hey he is still playing despite some tough times.
Hayden was phenomenal with 29 hundreds. Some say flat track bully but there werent that many. Check out his Indian series where he swept and swept.
Sehwag – how can you not have him? He wins matches in 2 sessions, a freak. Sometimes he is boom or bust but with this lineup you can afford to let him have a lash. Average over 50 with a s/r of 80 at the top!!!
Ponting – Best 3 since Bradman? If not he is very close, a great fighter and counter attacking bat.
Lara – Another all time great, could do it anywhere and was great to watch.
Kallis – An all rounder of the highest order, will need to do some bowling as the third seamer.
Sangakara – not sure what his average is when not keeping but I have read its up over 70! Hence he just bats for this team. Brilliant player in all conditions.
Gilchrist – one of the best bats ever, another match winner like VS at the top. Freak.
Pollock – One of the great bowlers and very handy with the bat as well.
Warne – Best LS of all time and a brilliant cricket brain. Handy bat and beautiful hands.
McGrath – Another all time, persistent line and length.
Murali – best chucker the game has seen
Skipper is a toss up really – I dont rate Ponting that highly yet none of the others have a heap of experience. I would love to watch SKW captain, he would bring a lot more though to it than most.
Sachin misses out, not by much but the bats in this side bar VS are far superior in other areas of the game, particularly fielding.
While I would have loved an express quick, none have played enough to warrant selection. Bond would have been brilliant and an all time if he had not been injured. Steyn will get there but only 34 matches so far.
Rusty said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:11am | Report comment
You wouldnt buy a fifth day ticket to watch these guys – this side would score alot of runs and with Pigeon and Pollock in tandem would be very difficult to score against. Over in 3 maybe 4 days tops
Justin said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Yeah administrators would hate it but it would bring the crowds in
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:19am | Report comment
and Rusty, that’s exactly why I’d be hoping for freebies!!
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Justin, in the end, I just couldn’t break the Langer-Hayden partnership. That’s not to take away from Sehwag and Smith (who I both mentioned), but more it was a simple case of the total of the pair being more than the sum of the parts…
Redb said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:44am | Report comment
Can’t put Langer in despite partnership with Hayden.
andrew said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:15am | Report comment
I agree with most of comments:
Sehwag before Langer and there has to be a spot for Tendulkar.
Polllock is good but if you are going for a bowling all-rounder Flintoff is a far option. I kow Flintoff has his bad days but when he is on there is no one better.
Justin said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Andrew – to me its about consistency when you are talking about such rarified company. Flintoff just didnt do it enough and I think Pollock was a superior player particularly with the ball. FF probably sticks in the mind for a couple of Ashes Tests but Pollock was brilliant throughout his career.
Rusty said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:36am | Report comment
I agree with you on this – FF had some brilliant moments, even managing to string them together for awhile but to my mind he was too inconsistent and statistically not that great. Ok he has had major injury worries but compare bowling FF managed 220 at 32.38 compared to Pollock 260 at 24.76. Freddie also only managed 3 5′fers compared to Pollies 6 x 5′fers and 1 x 10′fer.
sheek said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Brett,
Here is another twist. Look at the figures for runs per test of the following batsmen (doesn’t take into account innings played or not outs, simply runs per test).
Brian Lara 91.24
Sehwag 86.30
Sangakkara 85.78
Hayden 83.74
Ponting 83.51
Pietersen 83.17
Dravid 81.59
Tendulkar 80.21
Kallis 78.81
Langer 73.30
To get an appreciation of this, Bradman averaged 134.54 runs per test he played. Make of this what you will!
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 9:51am | Report comment
interesting Sheek. I’m surprised Langer is on that list actually, it’d make interesting reading to see what his runs per Test gigure was once he came back into the side as an opener. You’d imagine it would be better than what’s listed there…
Brett McKay said | January 19th 2010 @ 8:27am | Report comment
Several of you have mentioned Shaun Pollock now, and as I touched on in the column, he’s one I had in my mind going into this challenge. In the end though, Kallis was too good to leave out, and in the end proabably cost Pollock a spot…