Billie Jean King, the tennis legend, has played tennis all her life and fought for the course of women in the tennis world in between.
But there is a problem with that kind of extraordinary focus and obsession on a simple thing like chasing down a little green ball and returning it to sender. You tend to see things as you wish them to be, not as they actually are.
This is not exactly making things up – just that you mind begins to magnify things and you make football out of ping pong and deceive yourself.
The other day, the living legend said at the Australian Open that Serena Williams was doing for women tennis what Roger Federer was doing for tennis generally.
It was curious thing to say, not least because tennis is tennis, and whatever Federer is doing for tennis, he is also doing for women tennis, but because Serena is not Federer and both are completely different in comportment and behavior.
Roger Federer is a phenom and King, in her normal women rights agitation, must look for someone to cast also as a phenom in the women game. And who else but Serena who stood closest to equaling her 12 grand slams record?
It is always a hazardous enterprise to compare the Women Tennis Association (WTA) with the Association of Professional Tennis (ATP).
Women play best of three sets in the slams, while men play best of five. Women tennis lacks the speed and competitiveness in men’s tennis, though it is always equally a delight to watch – like watching the slow-motion replay of your favorite football match.
But that is where the similarity ends.
Did we say that female tennis is not competitive? Now do not tell Billie Jean King, she may threaten to shove a tennis ball down the throat of yours truly.
But pray, why did the female tennis world go on a celebration over the achievements of Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin?
This was clearly the worst misfortune to occur to the WTA and called for sober and solemn reflection not celebration. Two top players storm back after a two-year hiatus and guess what?
One dusts the reigning female number one player, Serena Williams, so thoroughly that she took out her frustration on a hapless lineswoman.
And the other took the same world number to three sets in Australia. I mean these women lay off (one to have a baby and the other to pursue other interests) and the rest of the pack (including Serena) were still on active service and yet see what happened!
Contrast that with Rafael Nadal’s absence for a couple of months because of injury while he was still the world number one.
On resumption, he has discovered that a lot of ground has been covered by those who were seeded below him and about six months later, he is yet to find his rhythm and compete with the boys he used to beat before he took the break.
Do you think that anyone of the top ten players in the ATP can take a one year break (do not even think of two years) and come back and beat Roger Federer or even have a single set with him? (I see you are shaking your head vigorously – I understand).
In the ATP, you cannot afford to skip training for a month without paying seriously for it, because your colleagues would leapfrog you.
But where is the women’s game?
Kim, dear Kim, comes out of retirement after having a baby and bringing the baby up. She takes the court by storm and drills her way like red hot knife going through butter to the bottom of the pack where Serena lurks like a panther.
She draws her and dusts her.
Then she squares off with another top ten player, the pretty, delectable ever-smiling Wozniacki and dusts her and lifts the US Open Title. One great leap for a tennis genius, but one sad commentary for women tennis and the top seeds.
While this was going, Justine Henin watched on television and comes to the conclusion that the women game has not moved significantly from where she let go. In fact the women game rolls on so slowly that you can get off it, take a stroll and come back and join the “train” where you hopped down.
She put a call through to her coach and enters the first tournament where she ends up playing the final with the comeback colleague, Kim Clijsters. Where were the other top seeds that had all the while been playing?
The women’s game is all about motion without movement.
Not done, she registers next for the Australian Open and storms through a tough draw to play Serena Williams, the world number one. She levels the game at one all before losing the deciding set.
I would have expected Billie Jean King to weep for women tennis after this embarrassment, but she is obviously still the “playing tennis of hope.”
I have a suspicion that Billie Jean King, Martina Nartilova, Steffi Graf, et al should all be contemplating whether to come out of retirement because nothing has changed much in women tennis from their days.
If Kim and Justine could do this, think of what Martina Nartilova could do – if she makes up her mind to thump the girls out there.
I watched the Australian Open spectacle on television and hung my head in shame. Commenting on Justine Henin, Serena Williams said she was better than she was before she quit the game and that it was like she never left.
Sweet Serena was partially right, based on her perspective.
Well the truth of the matter is that Henin moved, but women tennis did not move while she was away. So she came back and found it where she left it, and continued from there.
One would not have considered it necessary to hold up such decent and wonderful ladies like Clijsters and Henin as proof that women tennis is in a sorry state.
But after Serena Williams attempted to cash in on Billie Jean King’s comparison of her with Roger Federer and reinforced the warped thinking that she is the Roger Federer of the women circuit by saying that she wanted to equal Roger Federer’s record, one decided to watch the line and call “out.”
Roger Federer is riding fierce storms of competition, while Serena is surfing in wavy waters. Women Tennis is as different from men’s tennis, as American Football is different from Rugby.
Federer plays best of five sets, women play best of three.
Serena has serve advantage over the women, whereas no one has such advantage in the men’s game.
Even the suave and dapper Andy Roddick, who holds the world record in service at 157 mph, does not enjoy much advantage in the men’s game and is not in the top four right now. But Serena’s 120 mph service is usually too hot for the other girls to handle.
The guys return everything above that with ease and a smile.
I say both games are miles apart.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Victoria Azarenka vs Maria Sharapova: Australian Open women’s final live scores, blog (89)
- The sporting fallacy of the Olympic ‘Games’ (46)
- Sonny Bill needs to start boxing full time (46)
- Djokovic vs Nadal was great, but do we need six-hour finals? (36)
- Sonny Bill looking sharp for his first real test (29)
- Sonny Bill wins title in first round (25)
- Nadal vs Djokovic: The match for the ages (20)
- Real boxing still exists: here’s where to find it
- London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come (10)
- New champ Williams looking to next fight (5)
- Aust and GB aim to convert 4ths to bronze
- Young pitcher signs big deal with Red Sox (7)
- World Cup Darts heartbreak in Hamburg (3)
- Mayweather and Pacquiao have shamed boxing (13)
- Real boxing still exists: here’s where to find it (0)
- London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come (10)
- World Cup Darts heartbreak in Hamburg (3)
- Mayweather and Pacquiao have shamed boxing (13)
- Will Tom Brady’s legacy be affected by one drop? (20)
- Sonny Bill needs to start boxing full time (46)
- Lachlan Murdoch squashing FTA sport for Fox’s benefit (4)


seiran said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:00am | Report comment
Yes, women’s tennis is not as skillful but it sure is nice to watch
rugbyfuture said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:19am | Report comment
you forget to mention that in some tournaments even though the women play less they get paid more.
ohtani's jacket said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:23am | Report comment
So what? Aren’t you the guy who thinks women’s rugby should be promoted?
rugbyfuture said | February 3rd 2010 @ 11:02am | Report comment
yes but i think its anti sexist to pay someone more to do less, even when they’re being paid absurd amounts.
ohtani's jacket said | February 3rd 2010 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
The only events that pay equal prize money are the four Grand Slams, the two season ending tournaments and the opens that are streamlined to have the men in town one week and the women the next. Men still make more money from the ATP tour than women do from the WTA tour and the men only play best of five sets at the Grand Slams. Considering that top tennis players make more in sponsorship than they ever do in prize money, it’s the lower ranked and unseeded players that benefit from having equal prize money for playing a first or second round match.
Tennis players don’t get paid for how much work they do. They get paid for how many matches they win. Roger Federer got paid $100,000 more for beating Murray in three sets than Nadal got last year for beating Federer in five. There is no sport in the world that pays anyone on the basis of time spent playing.
It’s not always the case that the men have the tougher matches. Way back in 1968, when tennis went professional, Rod Laver received £2,500 for beating Tony Roache 6-3, 6-4, 6-2 in the Wimbledon final. Billie Jean King won £750 pounds for defeating Judy Tegart Dalton 9-7, 7-5. Serena had a tougher run to the final this year than Federer did, so I don’t see how it’s a case of “more” or “less.”
It’s a case of men and women playing at the same event.
solomon said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:20am | Report comment
why you wrote this articles because you donot like serena williams. whatever you think she is the best player of all time. if the william sisters not playing tennis nobody watch tennis game male or female. like tiger wood not playing golf nobody watching golf. your articles is trush.
Nancy said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:44am | Report comment
From your comment I can see that you do not know tennis. While Serena is good, she is absolutely NOT the best female player of all time. While I don’t know who is the best of all time, certainly Steffi Graf, Martina Navratilova, Billy Jean King, Althea Gibson, and Margaret Court all deserve consideration. But not Serena, not by a long shot.
Mattay said | February 3rd 2010 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
Well, that’s like, your opinion man. And one I happen to disagree with.
Serena Williams is on a whole different level to the names you mentioned. None could stand up to her in their prime.
mushi said | February 4th 2010 @ 4:49pm | Report comment
You are right in one way Serena is on a whole different level. A full step and a half below Graf and Martina.
Look up their careers sometime, Serena has a fair few grand slams to go to catch them
ohtani's jacket said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:21am | Report comment
Henin and Clijsters’ comebacks are nothing new. The same thing happened when Monica Seles returned from the stabbing incident. Margaret Court spent a year out the game when she got married and did the calendar slam the year after she returned. If women and men’s tennis are incomparable then there’s no point comparing them just because Billie Jean King made some comment about Serena being the Federer of the women’s game.
Besides, neither Henin or Clijsters have proven that they can sustain their comebacks. Seles was inconsistent upon her return and you didn’t make any note of how badly Clijsters crashed out of the Australian Open, suffering the worst defeat of her career.
mark said | February 3rd 2010 @ 2:45am | Report comment
I smell prejudice not exactly from the writer but from th tennis community. You couldnt but sense the reason the womens game was being criticised when the belgians left was because serena was winning the big prizes. Now justine is back and was denied her fairy tale ending..instead of giving credit..some tennis experts rather than give credit where due decide to attack her style of play insinuating that its inferior to justine.
Whether these people like it or not.. serena williams is the greatest tennis player of this generation, her titles and slams speak volumes.
BJK was right, she is the female federer…
These so called tennis experts might be prejudiced but even they cannot deny she is a phenomenon.
Jimmy Nellis said | February 3rd 2010 @ 3:32am | Report comment
Often fans are indeed prejudiced…..against the favorite.
Especially when that favorite dominates the competition(s) for an extended period.
I know I’m guilty of it. Who doesn’t hate NY Yankees or Man U if you’re not one of their supporters?
Pretty natural. Completely unbiased with tennis though. No faves….just enjoy the sights.
That is what you were referring to right?
baltimore tennis examiner said | February 3rd 2010 @ 3:02am | Report comment
Although it might be too early to determine if Henin or Clijsters are really back in the mix, it is a telling sign that they are competitive after an extended stay away from top level tennis.
It is quite an accomplishment that the Williams sisters have been able to dominate for so long. It is a testament to their great talent and work, but it also raises questions about the rest of the top women players.
Are the Safina’s, Ivanovic’s and Jankovic’s doing any thing to advance the game? They don’t seem to be making any progress in closing the gap between the Williams and the rest of the field.
Is it a lack of skill or just poor training and coaching?
brad said | February 3rd 2010 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
Serena is the female Federer. FEMALE Federer. She dominates female tennis like Roger does Mens tennis. She will end her career with more grand slam titles than any other female tennis player. She is better than Steffi Graf. Too often we place more weight on the past and our generation is short changed. Roger is a phenomenen and that is thanks too to Rafael Nadal
Edgar said | February 3rd 2010 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
I read your article on woemn tennis. Sounds like you just wanted to write something for the sake of writing and making a name for yourself. Otherwise your arguments about women tennis are very weak.
Vicki said | February 3rd 2010 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
You say women’s tennis isn’t completive. Either is men’s tennis with Roger Federer win everything. Brad there is no way Serena is going to catch Margaret court record. If you think she will your kidding yourself. Serena deserved her Aussie open win but there is the possibility that the four slams could go to four different players. Justine will get better once she played more tournaments and gets on the clay she will win the french open once again as Serena is no where near as good as Justine on clay. Venus will most likely win Wimbledon and Serena might win the us open. That makes her slam total 13 if I’m right and then she may only play another two years.
Serena’s domination of the tour is over.
Damo said | February 3rd 2010 @ 5:47pm | Report comment
This article was about the state of the women’s game not about how good or bad Serena is. She was only used as an example. By the way Serena is no doubt one of the greats and I respect her alot but she is NOT the female Federer.
I’m sorry but female tennis is not very good right now. Without even comparing it to the men’s, you can tell that women’s tennis is week. In the Australian Open, most of the women’s matches were error ridden with poor shot making, some even struggling to get their second serve in! I’m an amateur and I can get my second serve in consistently with something on it. Like the writer said, it is ridiculous that 2 players who spent up to 2 years out of the game and can start winning and making finals of big tournaments right from the get go. I’m glad that Clijsters and Henin are back though, we might get a few more decent matches to watch.
Thankfully there are some rays of hope. The Henin-Dementieva match was brilliant and I thought the Na Li-Serena Williams match was also very good. Henin played an absolutely flawless match in the semis as well. I missed the final but assume that with 2 great players, the tennis would have been very good. Let’s just hope that some other women can match the challenge set by Henin and Clijsters.