Fitness, form and faith the concerns for the Socceroos

Australia's Harry Kewell at a Socceroos training session in Johannesburg, South Africa, Sunday, June 6, 2010. AP Photo/Rob Griffith.
There are two conflicting schools of thought on the Socceroos on the brink of the World Cup: one of unwavering optimism that the spirit and grit showcased in 2006 and solidified in qualification for 2010 will see our boys progress. The other is of pessimism that old legs (and an injured groin) will send the Socceroos out in straight sets.
We all want to be in the optimist’s camp, believing in Socceroos destiny and that the spirit of 2006 will help overcome the adversity of form, age and Germany. And they have some justification in their optimism.
Despite their differing personas and tactical nuances, there is a similarity between Guus Hiddink’s and Pim Verbeek’s Socceroos in their ability to grind out results and how they’ve instilled a winning mentality into their players.
For the pessimists, putting aside questions over Verbeek’s tactics, the biggest concern is the form and fitness of players throughout the spine of the Socceroos starting XI.
There won’t be any surprise in Verbeek’s XI. Assuming Kewell and Emerton are fit (a big assumption) the XI will look like this:
Mark Schwarzer (GK)
Luke Wilkshire (RB)
Craig Moore (CB)
Lucas Neill (CB)
Scott Chipperfield (LB)
Brett Emerton (RM)
Jason Culina (CM)
Vince Grella (CM)
Tim Cahill (CM)
Mark Bresciano (LM)
Harry Kewell (CF)
If Kewell doesn’t make it then Josh Kennedy slots into the lone striker role. If Verbeek doesn’t want to risk Kewell being run off his feet up front, then he can slot him into LM in place of the out of form Bresciano with Kennedy at the head. If Emerton isn’t fit, Richard Garcia gets his role.
Don’t expect any Hiddink-style surprises from Pim. We won’t be seeing Cahill on the bench against Germany, that’s for certain.
But throughout that XI is the concern over form and fitness.
At the back, Moore’s pace is a major concern, and the clubless veteran has struggled badly in the pre-tournament warm-ups. Of equal concern is the sluggish pace of partner Neill.
Both could easily be exposed by the strength of the Germans and pace of the Ghanaians. If so, tournament over.
There’s no concern with Wilkshire and Chipperfield on the flanks, thankfully. Both are reliable and consistent performers.
In the middle of the park, Culina has been as reliable as ever. Cahill is a gun, no question.
But Grella’s form is worrying. His mistake against the USA was woeful; his passing has been well off the mark (not good in his crucial position as midfield marshal); and his attempts to compensate for his lack of pace with overly aggressive tackling will have him back in the showers well before his teammates.
Also struggling is Bresciano, who seems to be a shadow of the player four years ago and is another who has lacked consistent football at club level.
Emerton and Kewell’s lack of football before the ultimate test of Germany is also a major concern. Can Verbeek risk starting them, lacking match fitness and underdone, alongside players also struggling for form in key positions?
Emerton’s battle to be fit is crucial.
The Socceroos are a significantly better side when he is fit and firing: linking brilliantly with Wilkshire on the right flank with the flexibility to go back or attack.
He is a more important cog in the Socceroos setup than the much more vaunted Kewell.
With Kewell out of action, Kennedy has taken the lone striker role and has been found wanting, albeit impeded by the lack of service from Bresciano and the absent Emerton.
There are undoubted weaknesses in the spine of the experienced but fragile XI.
So, if the Socceroos succumb to Germany, with the likes of Moore, Grella and co further exposed as the weakest links in the starting XI, does Verbeek have the courage to replace them with the second tier group with faith that players such as Michael Beauchamp, Mile Jedinak and co can do the job?
That could well be the decisive question once the tournament gets underway and will determine the Socceroos’ fate.
Pim, it’s in your hands. Don’t be afraid to be brave. It worked for Guus.
Or maybe the optimists have it right, and it’ll all be right.
We can only hope.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

James said | June 8th 2010 @ 2:50am | Report comment
Moore must go – total liability. Beauchamp or Milligan a better option, surely.
agga78 said | June 8th 2010 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Pim is a dud manager, he has picked a squad on reputation and not on form and fitness, Craig Moore is finished, we may aswell play Kevin Muscat at the back, as his form was bettter than Moore’s last season. Harry Kewell is at 40% fitness and half the squad has either not played for their club for months or are returning from serious injury. Verbeek has never tried to play a system to suit the players he had available, he has only ever selected players to fit his system of play, which didn’t give players like Scott Macdonald a chance to do anything in the national team, as we have seen in the last two friendlies even Kennedy a big tall striker has looked lost up front by himself, to be honest Macdonald was ok against New Zealand probably better than Kennedy has been in the last two matches.
Smokygrayson said | June 8th 2010 @ 10:53am | Report comment
“we may aswell play Kevin Muscat at the back”
This.
We may as well play Muscat. I’m not a Victory supporter, but Muscat would arguably do a better job than Moore. He had a FAR better season than Moore, and has a extremely strong influence over his team.
Harvey the Scouser said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:06am | Report comment
that people are debating the merits of Muscat vs Moore to partner Neill says a lot about where this socceroos squad is at
FP said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:38pm | Report comment
I agree on Muscat, and I loathe that thug.
James said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
I’d prefer Muscat to Moore at the moment. More aggression at least.
sheek said | June 8th 2010 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Yep Adrian, hope it is.
While we hope, we breathe. While we breathe, we live. Until proven otherwise….. !
David said | June 8th 2010 @ 8:54am | Report comment
When you go into your first match looking to park the bus and hoping for a nil-nil draw you know there is very little hope. Im just gald Australia is there i guess and hoping we dont get pumped by England. We should of lost to USA 5-1 with the old bat Moore in defence we are playing with 10 men already. only hope is Kewell comes of the bench dribbles every one chips it to Cahill we score and pray Germany dont brin their shooting boots!
tony yeboah said | June 8th 2010 @ 9:15am | Report comment
It is interesting when you put that starting XI up and compare them to 2006. In Germany you had very fit, younger, determined players, wanting to prove themselves on the hightest stage. All of that starting XI in Germany, with the exception i guess of Kewell and Wilkshire, were playing consistently at an extremely high level. Now? Moore doesn’t have a club, Grella has barely played in 2 years, Emerton, Kewell have both been injured for a long time, Bresciano is underdone, etc. etc.
Pim dug himself a big hole with his comment on playing at a high level to make the world cup squad and then selecting underdone, injured players. But what else could he have done? With the exception of Scotty Mac, does anyone seriously think that a starting XI with players like Sasa, Joel, Eddy and Nicky would not have got torn apart at the World Cup. But that is the reality of it, we either go with underdone guys who have been there and done it before, or we go with less experienced players who may crumble under the pressure. When Beauchamp was selected for the squad, so many were bemoaning it, why? he is no good?, and now so many want him in the starting line-up.
This is how i see it going. Use the old, experienced group, fail and everyone was right, Pim is dud, it wasn’t the players fault, it was all because of the tactics. Succeed, Pim is still a dud, and it was only thanks to the players that we got through, and in spite of the tactics. Pim does not have the luxuries that Guus had of fit players, a real number 9, and basically no-one to answer to as there was no pressure on him to succeed, we were just happy to be there. And Adrian, you say be brave, it worked for Guus, well it did a couple of times, but failed on other occassions. But as usual we have selective memories. Kalac for Schwarzer against Crotia was one of the dumbest selections i have seen for a long time, and remember he didn’t attack Italy with 10 men.
I wish people would stop using this parking the bus mentality. Highly defensive, counter attacking football is the norm when a lesser team (yes, that is us) comes up against a more superior team. Portsmouth did this very affectively against Chelsea in the FA cup final, a game i thought quite entertaining, and they easily could have won. Australia’s only problem is we lack the pace up front to take advantage of any counter attacking moves. We could play like we did against Germany in the Confed cup a few years ago, 4-3 to Germany, thoroughly entertaining but ultimately cost Farina his job. Result vs entertainment, ultimately tournament football only has one answer for that, results mean everything.
Harvey the Scouser said | June 8th 2010 @ 9:44am | Report comment
intelligent post, good read
David said | June 8th 2010 @ 10:22am | Report comment
I agree with Tony in that when Verbeek does succeed he gets no cerdit for it. He has done a good job results wise. But we are not talking about Verbeek we are talking about a squad thats over the hill and a manger who lacks a central defender and a top striker. Germany will stop Cahill and mark my word so will Serbia then what do we do?
Kennedy is no good sorry but he hasnt improved in the last 4 yrs if anything he has got worst since leaving germany. He scored a lucky goal against denmark and he has played terrable in the last 5 games for Australia.
The problem with Verbeek is he picks the tactics not to suit players or opposition but to suit him self. I agree we need to play defensive against nations like Germany, Holland etc but against Indonesia? qatar? even in Firendly games at home.
I reckon if MacDonald was playing against USA when Verbeek shifted to 4-4-2 he would of scored 2-3 there was that many balls that floted passed the USA goal and no one was there to finish it off once Cahill left the field.
That is the problem with Verbeek his in flexability, and he presses on in playing players he is mates with Moore being a good example he has played shocking in the last 4 game he has played for Aus especailly againast USA and NZ yet Verbeek refused to give Lowry or someone a shot when he had a chance. That is why football intelligent people question Verbeek in regards to what he has achieved he has done a good job but there are alot of question marks in his coach imo.
The Bear said | June 8th 2010 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
yes. all of that.
FP said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Hear hear on Kalac and the impotent attacking threat v Italy.
Rob said | June 8th 2010 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Kalac for Schwarzer ?…You have a short memory then .
Schwarz is pretty solid now but at the time he had at least one guaranteed clanger a game in him each game. Good shotstopper, very poor positioning. He spent the previous games too scared to come off his line . The fact that Kalac went all week at the knees is another matter.
Stevo said | June 8th 2010 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Couldn’t have put it any better!
Realfootball said | June 8th 2010 @ 9:16am | Report comment
All the problems come back to Verbeek. Our WC should not be in this perilous position, nor did it need to be. Any coach who continues to play Moore, Grella and Bresciano in the starting eleven is simply incompetent. The only consolation is that in 3 games he will be gone forever. A 4th game would prove that indeed the age of miracles is not yet dead.
Colin N said | June 8th 2010 @ 9:25am | Report comment
“Any coach who continues to play Moore, Grella and Bresciano in the starting eleven is simply incompetent.”
But what exactly are the other options? There seem to be very few from a neutral’s perspective. I would say Serbia have a better squad than Australia on paper and Ghana on a par.
I keep reading that Australians want to see entertaining football and many have commented that against the USA, the style of football was ‘better.’ However, you lost against a team who are of similar quality to Denmark, a side you beat playing ‘negative football.’
Realfootball said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
Valeri in for Grella, Jedinak on, move Culina forward on the right. Lose Garcia. Drop Bresciano and bring in Vidosic. Drop Moore and bring in Beauchamp.
All these options have been tried in the warmup games and all of them realised an immediate and significant improvement in team performance.
It is absolutely not accurate to say Verbeek doesn’t have options.
The Bear said | June 8th 2010 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
yes. all of that. plus with an option to play a second striker if need be.
Harvey the Scouser said | June 8th 2010 @ 9:46am | Report comment
realfootball
tony y answers this very well above, there aint options
with Adrian’s article, the only thing I would add is that Garcia is not up to it, and you may as well go with someone like Vidosic who at least brings a bit of enterprise to the table
interesting that the Socceroos’ best depth lies with its DMs (last world cup, it was with the AMs), nothing for it, play to your strengths, congest the middle and hope for the best
Rob Gremio said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:05am | Report comment
I agree that the better option would be Vidosic in for Garcia.
I also think that Grella needs to be taken out of the starting lineup for Valeri, who has been playing far better than Vinnie has.
I was flabbergasted the other night when, in the post-match analysis, Trimmers and Harper (or was it Slater, can’t remember) refused to even touch on Grella’s performance, except for the goal he put on a plate for the Americans. They avoided mentioning Grella like the plague apart from where it was totally unavoidable. He must be a good mate of those guys, because dear god, Vinnie had a stinker, and has had stinkers since he came into camp with the team. He has to be dropped.
Harvey the Scouser said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Rob
true what you say about Grella
I think the reason is that no one wants to conclude the worst case scenario for someone who was really a shining light four years ago, it’s human nature
but he is symptomatic of a bigger problem – too many players have insufficient game time under their belts the past six months
Rob Gremio said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:12am | Report comment
True, but to be honest, this is the world cup. we have better players in that position, well, definitely one in Valeri, but I would probably argue that Jedinak is worth a shot in that position too.
Funnily enough, both are playing regular football in decent leagues…
AndyRoo said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Rob if Garcia’s not up to it (I kind of agree) then I think it will be Cullina on the right (assuming Emerton isn’t right to go) and Valeri to come into the central midfield position next to Grella.
Rob Gremio said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
That is probably the likely outcome, yes. But not the outcome I would have hoped for…
But then, In Pim We Trust, right? (ok, there are many on here who don’t trust, but I do. I think he’s done a good job so far, but he does need to bite the bullet here, I think)
Australian Football said | June 8th 2010 @ 9:39am | Report comment
“Any coach who continues to play Moore, Grella and Bresciano in the starting eleven is simply incompetent.”
These men are fine players and no one in the squad are better or more experienced. The problem lies with Pim, who is incapable of putting a rocket up their arses to lift their game.
_____
AF
AGO74 said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:04am | Report comment
strange post. do you honestly think that is the solution to the problem?!?!
Australian Football said | June 8th 2010 @ 11:56am | Report comment
Put it this way; Guus had a rocket up everyone’s arse when he was in charge. It showed on the training paddock when bellowing out his instructions. The fear of God had nothing on the fear of Guus.
Derby County FC said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:34pm | Report comment
AF
No amount of rocket up Moores backside is going to make him run faster! etc etc
Australian Football said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
DCFC
I think he’s fine—just not fit enough yet, and that’s up to Pim to get him up to speed. He is fast enough and reads the game well enough. Do you really think Beauchamp is faster than Moore or can read the game better than Moore?
tony yeboah said | June 8th 2010 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
I agree, if Australia keep there defensive lines tight like we did against Denmark than his pace is not really an issue. If it is an open game like USA then we are in bigger trouble than whether Moorey if fast enough. You don’t forget how to read the game and that is one thing that he has always been brilliant at. If we have our defense back pedalling with Klose etc bearing down on us than it wouldn’t matter who we had defending, we would be screwed. I actually think that Beauchamp is a better player than a lot of people give him credit for, but against Germany in the first game of the World Cup, a repeat of Paraguay anyone?
Realfootball said | June 8th 2010 @ 1:36pm | Report comment
AF – come on, what planet are you on. Beauchamp is MUCH faster than Moore. No comparison. Reading the game, most likely not. But not only is he much faster, he is also much taller and that is factor that will come into play in our games. Moore has been consistently found wanting in the air. He is simply past it and should have stayed retired.
Australian Football said | June 8th 2010 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
“a repeat of Paraguay anyone?” (tony yeboah)
RealFootball—he is taller—that is as much as I will concede. On the turn and chase; he is hopeless. You must have seen that game at Suncorp he was at left back I think (?) and was as slow as a snail.
Realfootball said | June 8th 2010 @ 4:35pm | Report comment
Suncorp was years ago, and he played centreback. He made one memorable mistake, that was it. I don’t know where this “slow” descriptor comes from. Beauchamp main asset has always been his speed. He’s quick. We saw that against New Zealand.
If you want mistakes, you must have been at Skiled Park the day Moore let Smeltz score 4 goals out of 5.
Australian Football said | June 8th 2010 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
“slow” descriptor is right—he was the heir apparent for Moore and then he disappeared. Moore had to come back out of retirement if you remember because of him and his lack of pace and positional sense. One reasonable recall for Beauchamp against NZ in the second half and suddenly you are calling him the solution to the centre back problem—no thanks I’ll stick with Moore at this late stage.
Realfootball said | June 8th 2010 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
AF, I agree with you about Moore, Grella and Bresciano, except you got the tense wrong.
It should read “were” fine players, not “are”. Moore is too old, Grella and Bresciano have barely played for one to two years. Right at this moment, they are not up for it.
TheMagnificent11 said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
Bresciano is overrated. He’s a good player but nowhere near the praise he gets. The guy gives the ball away far too often. Under Hiddink he was more a bench player and Sterjovski was higher in the pecking order. If Kewell is not playing on the left, I’d prefer to see Chipperfield pushed forward and Carney play left back.
Mick of Newie said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
I assume Emo and Kewell will not start. They will be brought on to chase the game or saved for Ghana.
I am with Andyroo, Culina to right mid to keep an eye on Lam and give him something to think about. Valeri in alongside Grella.
If the game is to be chased Emo and Kewell can come on, if we are hanging on for a draw Holman can run around like a headless chook and Ruka can do the defending from the top.
tony yeboah said | June 8th 2010 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
Alright i am ready to be ncrucified here, but i think that if Emerton doesn’t play, then Holman should start at RM. He is energetic, fast and makes good runs, gets in good positions, something that Garcia doesn’t, and i think that Vidosic might be a little green for such a big game. His finishing is still of great concern, but Lahm is one of the best attacking left full backs out there and if Holman can keep him quiet as well as creating some worries for the German defence with his running than that would be a big plus for Australia. Maybe it is time for him to either be a champ or be the chump that so many think he is.
I was actually thinking that the way this Jabulani ball is flying around that i must dust of the trusty old left boot and bang a few in against Serbia in the first game to help the Aussies out. Maybe the Roger Milla of this World Cup.
AndyRoo said | June 8th 2010 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
I am not agaisnt Holminho starting. He’s one of the few regulars that seems in top form.
The fact Garcia isn’t making much of an immpression despite playing in front of Wilkshire (who is doing well) is damming.
The Bear said | June 8th 2010 @ 4:38pm | Report comment
I won’t snub holman in this case (espec if Kewell is also not fit). If it means Vidosic is the super sub, sure.