Caution and vuvuzelas dominate first week of Cup
By Adrian Musolino, 18 Jun 2010 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, FIFA, football, Jabulani, Jong Tae-Se, Socceroos, vuvuzelas, vuvuzelas ban, World Cup, World Cup crowds
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news

A Spanish supporter blows a vuvuzela prior to the World Cup Group H match between Spain and Switzerland at the stadium in Durban, South Africa, Wednesday, June 16, 2010. (AP Photo/Schalk van Zuydam)
A week into the tournament and it feels as if the 2010 World Cup hasn’t really got going yet, with some shocks and surprises, yes, but it’s been dominated by defensive teams more eager to avoid losing than going after matches.
The result has been the lowest amount of goals scored at the conclusion of the opening round of games in the group stage in the last 80 years.
What’s going on? Is the Jabulani ball to blame or are the vuvuzelas somehow bludgeoning the attacking instincts of strikers?
There are a number of factors at play.
Firstly, we can’t dismiss the sheer fear teams and coaches have of losing their opening game and the defensive/conservative tactics this results in.
Consider this: at the last three World Cups, only three teams who have lost their opening matches have gone on to reach the knockout stages.
It’s remarkable statistic when you think about it. No wonder teams are so cautious!
Out to avoid defeat at all costs, we’ve seen many a team sit deep and hold a structured defensive line (Socceroos are an obvious exception), only attacking on the counter.
The mantra’s been to survive the first game with a point at best, stifling any attacking football which has proved too risky for many teams to try when the cost of losing your first game is so high.
This will change.
Already we are seeing more open attacking play in the second round of group matches thus far, with a significant increase in goals – 13 goals in the first four matches of the second games.
But teams have been able to hold out more fancied opponents because the technical standard of players and coaches from around the world has increased as the network of player/coaching movement into professional leagues increases.
The result means the days of vast differences in performances and results between countries at the finals may be over, as the competition becomes closer.
Even a team considered to be a minnow has the tactical and technical ability to hold out more fancied teams.
Are there other possible factors for the slow start?
Altitude may be to blame on the players’ and the ball’s performance, not helped by the unusual flight path of the Jabulani and teams’ insistence on continually lobbing long balls which have been notably wayward – not to mention the lack of goals from set pieces. It’s hardly going to help encourage attacking football when the balls trajectory has been so inconsistent.
But there may be other intrinsic reasons.
Does the lack of passion and failure of so many of football’s superstars to shine for their national teams suggest that players just don’t have the drive and determination when playing for their national teams?
When North Korean Jong Tae-Se openly wept during his countries national anthem, it provided a welcome reminder of the patriotic fervor that seems to be lacking from modern day World Cups. It was confronting because it’s so rare.
In an age of multi-million dollar contracts and players playing weekly in the pan-European UEFA Champions League for multinational entities (many of the players could well be considered multinational themselves), do the players still have pride in the national shirt or is the World Cup just a big stage for them to promote their own brand?
Does a Cristiano Ronaldo really have the disposition to lead Portugal from the front or is he more concerned with his own personal goals, image and brand (like pushing Castrol “hot places, cold places” commercials)?
In the Olympic Games, nationalism and passion rule because so many of the competing athletes aren’t encumbered by stardom, so there seems to be more drive and honour in representing your country due to the personal hardships and sacrifices made to just get there.
Perhaps the downside of football’s mighty commercial success is the inevitable decrease in passion for the pride in representing your country, and we are seeing the result.
Perhaps the longer European season remains a factor, also.
Players who have come off elongated seasons that almost stretch across 12 months – and some who have had disturbed seasons through injury – may be too drained to give their best performances.
All these reasons may have contributed in their own way to the early stalemates in South Africa.
And the perception of a ‘boring’ World Cup has only been fostered, in my opinion, by the highly contentious vuvuzelas.
While I don’t want to enter into the debate on whether they should be banned or not (there are fair arguments on both sides of the debate) their constant drone does stifle atmosphere by taking the crowd and its chants out of the game.
So as the overly defensive and low scoring games have played out, with the Jabulani flying waywardly like a Roberto Baggio penalty, the incessant vuvuzelas have provided a fitting soundtrack for the monotony of the football being played.
Speaking of crowds, it would be remiss not to mention the banks of empty seats at numerous games.
While FIFA claimed it had came close to selling the majority of tickets after the prolonged saga over sales, crowds have notably been down, with the organisers and governing body blaming corporate and government ticket holders for staying away.
This is the result of sporting organisations (and leagues closer to home are also to blame) pricing fans out of sporting contests by catering to the corporate sector. The difficulty in getting tickets for your average fan has robbed so many of the chance to attend the World Cup, while South Africa’s socioeconomic health and the fact football comes second to rugby in the hearts of the locals also contributing to the crowd situation.
Hopefully the prospect of more attacking football attracts them to the stadiums as the tournament develops.
Teams, such as the Socceroos tomorrow night, must chase games to stay alive. Caution will be thrown out the window in teams’ final two group matches, opening up matches and resulting in more attacking football… we hope!
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (38) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, FIFA, football, Jabulani, Jong Tae-Se, Socceroos, vuvuzelas, vuvuzelas ban, World Cup, World Cup crowds

James said | June 18th 2010 @ 5:57am | Report comment
Vuvuzela soundtrack – Vvvvvvvvv……vvvvvvvv………..vvvvvvvvvvvvv.
So bloody annoying!
cindy said | June 18th 2010 @ 5:57am | Report comment
The attendance to games has been brilliant except for one or two games. Most stadiums have had close to full capacity. Are we watching the same World Cup?
James said | June 18th 2010 @ 6:01am | Report comment
Did you watch the New Zealand – Slovakia game? Lots of empty seats.
punter said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:42am | Report comment
New Zealand v Slovakia in football is like;
Zambia v Georgia in the Rugby WC.
Russia v Morocco in the Rugby League WC
Holland v Kenya in the Cricket WC
Wangaratta v Shepparton in the AFL WC.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:51am | Report comment
Thats quite funny.
The Goergia vs Nambia Rugby union WC pool game in 2007 had Attendance: 32,549
at Stade Félix Bollaert, Lens
But it still drew more then the 23’000 who attended the NZ vs Slovakia FIFA WC 2010 poll match game…
Just saying.
punter said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:55am | Report comment
That was at 5 Euros a ticket, all the non games were sold very cheaply.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:56am | Report comment
So… whats your point? It still got 30K + for that non game.
What about the NZ vs Slovakia match? How much are they? And does it matter?
punter said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Of course it does, the average wage in France is much higher than in Sth Africa, this is still very much a 3rd world country.
The cost of games in the Football WC for the lower teams are the same for the better teams.
No difference.
The cost of the tickets was about 1/2 hour average pay in France.
The cost of tickets was about a weeks wages in Sth Africa.
Yes I think it does matter.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Dude.. just accept the fact Georgia vs Namibia in a RWC match got more then NZ vs Slovakia at a Fifa WC match..
Whats the big deal.,
Soccer is bigger then Rugby.. I dont see what the fuss is all about.
punter said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:21am | Report comment
So why do you pride yourself to come on the football tab & tell everyone how great the crowds in the WC in the Rugby WC.
Why was that so important to you?
I love my Rugby, I will be attending the match tomorrow night, but I feel no need to belittle the event by saying more people in England enjoyed the WC win in 1966 football WC than in 2003 Rugby WC.
If you don’t enjoy footall fine, no need to come on the site for football fans & bag out the game.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Umm.. excuse me.. i replied via the ‘recent comments’ sidebar.
And when did i say that that crowd was ‘great’. I was referring to your statment about Georgia vs Zambia in rugby…
When did i bag the game?????? I also watch the Soccer WC matches on TV..
Please im not deluded. Soccer is bigger the Rugby. But dont you go putting down rugby.
punter said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:42am | Report comment
I was trying to highlight that New Zealand v Slovakia are both nations of small populations & tend to have a low profile. They are also participating in the WC for the 2nd & 1st time respectively.
No offence to either Nambia & Georgia, but neither country have a high profile nor are they Rugby superpowers, hence why I picked those 2 teams in the RU WC.
Alders said | June 18th 2010 @ 5:44pm | Report comment
How many ‘average’ people are actually attending punter? I mean really. Let’s not kid ourselves.
MVDave said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:11am | Report comment
Crowds are averaging over 50,000 per game…2nd highest ever so whilst there have been no shows there has also been fantastic support for the tournament from a country where many people still struggle to survive never mind buy tickets to watch football.
Alders said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Wait till the African teams are out.
punter said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:46am | Report comment
Yeah, wait till the Aficians sides are out then it will be the finals with the cream against cream.
Can’t wait for the AFL WC, where is it held again Alders?
Alders said | June 18th 2010 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
You had me as a League supporter the other day. What next? Netball? If the 32 aren’t the cream of the crop why not have a 16 team tournament? Same for other WCs.
Al said | June 18th 2010 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Yep because no one will go to watch Argentina, Brazil, Italy, Spain or England!
Alders said | June 18th 2010 @ 5:49pm | Report comment
It won’t be the same is what I am saying really. Won’t be the same passion once their African brothers are gone.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Actually the average is 49,268 per match.
20 matches have been played with total attd- 985,355
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_FIFA_World_Cup
Socboy said | June 18th 2010 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Don’t believe everything you see in Wikipedia
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Um.. so where did the guy above me get his 50’000/ average.?
Socboy said | June 18th 2010 @ 9:53am | Report comment
I don’t really care but maybe you should look at Fifas website.
It seems your spurring for a argument Kovana by the tone of your comments in this thread.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 9:58am | Report comment
I am not looking for a argument.
You are the one wanting to argue.
Socboy said | June 18th 2010 @ 10:06am | Report comment
Show me where?
I just stated don’t believe everything you see in Wikipedia how is that lopoking for an argument.
Have a look at your comments in this thread and have a think about it.
Instead of being so defensive and provocative let’s try and have a rational discussion
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 11:40am | Report comment
I was just replying to the comment that average at the moment is 50’000+
Its not,, Not to be argumentitive or Anything..
Is 49’000+ not a good figure in your books?
49’000+ is huge!!!
Socboy said | June 18th 2010 @ 11:52am | Report comment
They are great numbers I never said they weren’t
What I am saying to you is maybe check you tone and the way you are responding to people.
Because at the moment you are coming across as aggressive. Like I said go back and look at your comments in this thread and you will see how easy it is to draw that conclusion!
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
Well im sorry if my posts were taken that way.
But i like stats and stuff.. And i always double check stats for many sports…
If someone had posted the ‘RWC 2007′ had 50K+ /match.. i would correct that statment as well.. since it was not 50k+.. but 45K+..
So yes.. apologies..
True Tah said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:26am | Report comment
The only thing boring about the world cup has been the whinging about the vuvuzelas. I’ve only watched a handful of games live- opening match, Socceroos v Germany, bits of Korea v Greece thus far, but these games are not boring. Hell the Germany game was a great advertisment for futbol as a sport, it showed how a great team can really display its skills (its just that Australia was not the great team).
One thing you futbol fans always claim is that you’re a lot more culturally aware than the rest of us, league, union, AFL neanderthrals who wouldn’t know Namibia from Botswana, a bushbuck from a sitatunga or Xhosa from Zulu.
Yet add a bit of South African culture to the World Cup and everybody seems to be whinging about the effect of the vuvuzelas. Harden up.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:28am | Report comment
Vuvuzelas are made of plastic??
krash said | June 19th 2010 @ 8:15am | Report comment
well said bro
Lu said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:30am | Report comment
You forgot Fifa’s war on miniskirts.. Can’t a girl show off her fine legs without being treated as a criminal?
FIFA have sucken to a new low..
krash said | June 18th 2010 @ 8:58am | Report comment
sorry, gotta correct you on one point.
i actually live in south africa, johannesburg in particular, and i can guarantee you that football does NOT come second in the hearts of the locals. rugby may be the more successful sport in our country, but football reigns supreme in terms of overall popularity, especially in joburg. this is due to a multitude of different reasons that would take me forever to list, so i won’t.
however, to illustrate the football’s edge over rugby, particularly in joburg, one only needs to use the english premier league as an example. the overall viewership for that tournament, as well as the uefa champion’s league, is by far and away larger than that of the super 14 or the tri-nations. heck, when i’m walking down the streets of this city people are almost always speaking of manchester united, chelsea, arsenal, or liverpool. rugby is often spoken of in select circles, and there aren’t many of those that ardently follow the sport. most only pay attention during a major event /match. this of course isn’t the case in places such as durban, cape town, bloemfontein and pretoria. rugby is life in those areas, BUT only amongst certain parts of the society (predominantly the white and coloured portions). amongst others? yip, football is everything.
and as for some of the half-filled stadia at some of the matches? i have to admit, i have been disappointed. but these instances have been mostly in the venues outside of johannesburg, which is not only south africa’s heartland for football, but also the central hub of commerce, economy, and just about everything else associated with societal affluence. therefore people within joburg are more eager, and also a lot more capable of affording tickets to go and watch the games. other venues such as those in durban and cape town have also been enjoying healthy attendance, because they are the next biggest hubs of commerce in SA. its in the more isolated, and rural parts of the country where attendance hasn’t been up to standard. places like polokwane, nelspruit, and, to some extent, bloemfontein and port elizabeth don’t have nearly the same populaces as the other commercial capitals of the country and, coupled with the fact that most people in these areas simply cannot afford world cup tickets, is what results in half-filled stadia.
so yeah, fifa should have been far more realistic with their pricing of the tickets.
kovana said | June 18th 2010 @ 9:25am | Report comment
I always thought the saffers loved their rugby.. Oh well.. Shows you that the Saffers 2nd sport is more succssful then the Kiwis national sport..Lol
Marshall said | June 18th 2010 @ 3:14pm | Report comment
Problem is club season is too long and players are buggered. How disappointing are the performances of so many of the superstars?
The Bear said | June 18th 2010 @ 4:10pm | Report comment
and they are the ones that actually made it to the Cup!!!
James said | June 19th 2010 @ 4:13am | Report comment
Even the England game on now isn’t to capacity. English journos saying stadium is 80% full
MVDave said | June 19th 2010 @ 6:57am | Report comment
Over 64,000 for England game in a ground that holds 67,000 for WC games is not too shabby…tournament still ave over 50,000 per game 2nd best ever.