Why football is hamstrung in this country
By Adrian Musolino, 29 Jun 2010 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news
Leave it to Rebecca Wilson, the leader of the anti-“soccer” brigade that still inhabit pockets of the mainstream press, to unfairly kick the boot into the Socceroos and the World Cup. With sweeping generalisations and tired old stereotypes, her latest offering proves why pockets of resistance will never give “soccer” a fair chance in this country.
Wilson is entitled to her opinion, as we all are, but there are major flaws in her argument that need to be highlighted, otherwise she’ll be allowed to get away with such misinformation.
She writes: “This bunch of blokes who appear to have let themselves – and us – down very badly at the World Cup in South Africa.”
Ask diehard Socceroos fans or casual fans alike if the Socceroos let us down as they gallantly went down fighting against Serbia and the answer will be an overwhelming ‘no’. The Socceroos were a goal away from progressing to the knockout stages having rebounded from a four-goal defeat.
Australians like her need to wake up to the reality that this final frontier for Australian sporting success – winning a football World Cup – will be its greatest challenge, given the immense difficulty of taking on and beating so many footballing nations of such a high standard in the only truly global sport.
Not appreciating the huge depth and breadth of world football is the great flaw in non-football fans’ understanding of the game, and it’s why they can so easily label Australia’s performances as “ordinary” against countries as gifted as Serbia, Ghana and Germany.
Only when they understand where the Socceroos have come from and where they are now will these doubters be able to embrace the team and the game; relishing the challenge and not dismissing because of it.
Such logic is not unique to Australia. Following the USA’s World Cup exit, the New York Post’s frontpage read: “This sport is stupid anyway.”
It’s their loss, but it’s a shame we have to hear their flawed logic.
Wilson continues:
“Thousands of words have been written about what Australia, Pim Verbeek and the rest did wrong in that match. But not a single accredited journalist, commentator or expert who was sent to South Africa told the real, hard truth. They skirted around it, claimed the wrong team played against Germany and that the referees were to blame. They did not say the Socceroos were not as good as four years ago, the old blokes were too old and the young ones were just not good enough.”
Obviously Wilson missed the Harry Kewell saga (although she does refer to it in her article, funnily enough), which was caused by a journalist – sent to South Africa no less – questioning whether Kewell was, to use Wilson’s words, “too old” and “not as good as four years ago,” not to mention the countless other debates around the form of Craig Moore and Vince Grella.
On the A-League’s contribution to the World Cup, she writes:
“A penny should have dropped in the last few weeks that players coming out of the A-League have not got a hope against the world’s best.”
While the technical standard of the A-League is debatable, it’s a blatant lie to suggest its current and former players can’t compete on the world stage.
The A-League’s leading goal scorer Shane Smeltz scored against the defending world champions in a team coached by an A-League coach with four A-League players. Those A-League representatives helped hold the Italians to a draw and were undefeated in the tournament.
Jason Culina, an A-League captain, played all 270 minutes for the Socceroos and was one of the most consistent and reliable performers for the national team.
Players such as Dario Vidosic, Michael Beauchamp, David Carney and Mile Jedinak are products of the A-League.
They have more than a hope against the world’s best, and they’ve proven it.
Wilson continues on the World Cup in general:
“When you watch two full weeks of it and your pulse rate increases just three times out of 30 games, you are entitled to an opinion.”
Rebecca, if your pulse wasn’t sent racing while watching Italy-Slovakia, Australia-Serbia, Germany-England or Argentina-Mexico then maybe watching the World Cup, let alone writing about, isn’t for you. You’re entitled to change channels and watch something else. No one is forcing you to watch, and we’d prefer that you didn’t.
You may be asking why I’ve bothered to even respond to such an article. Such fallacies need to be countered otherwise they are allowed to foster and spread because, sadly, too many Australians take what the media produce and accept it as fact. It’s only by countering it that we can hope to bring some fairness and balance to our media and how the Socceroos and football in general are portrayed.
Finally, it would be remiss of me to avoid one obvious truth in Wilson’s article:
“Please don’t email to tell me I am a soccer illiterate – I already know that.”
I couldn’t have said it better myself.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, Daily Telegraph, football, Harry Kewell, rebecca wilson, Socceroos, World Cup

punter said | June 29th 2010 @ 7:01am | Report comment
She is mot Soccer illiterate, she is sport illiterate.
I have no problems with opinions, we all have one, it’s just some, we don’t want to hear from.
AndrewMc said | June 29th 2010 @ 7:09am | Report comment
Wilson will always have a voice while she is sleeping with the head of News Ltd
Art Sapphire said | June 29th 2010 @ 7:18am | Report comment
Adrian, Rebecca Wilson is the Pauline Hanson of sports journalism.
The good news is that she cared enough to write an article.
She should be grateful. Imagine being paid to write about a topic you know nothing about.
Don’t worry, her next piece will be about whether debt reduction measures in the G20 will avoid a double dip recession.
Can’t wait
Mister Football said | June 29th 2010 @ 7:52am | Report comment
The New York Post makes a good point.
Art Sapphire said | June 29th 2010 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Which is why you watch so much of it
whiskeymac said | June 29th 2010 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Mister f is like the kid that pulls the girls hair because he likes her so.
Cpaaa said | June 29th 2010 @ 10:51am | Report comment
Judas dont you have somewhere to be?
st penguin said | June 30th 2010 @ 9:19am | Report comment
The NY Post headline is just tongue in cheek.
This world cup has generated huge interest in the US – hence the jokingly petulant headline.
Unfortunatley, I think their 2022 bid prospects have only increased since the WC.
Towser said | June 29th 2010 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Cant see why it is worth an article Adrian. Thought by the headline Ray Chesterton & Mike Gibson had joined Rex Mossop & Won Casey in a combined article. Harmless stuff.
As an aside though if I was a self proclaimed illiterate on a subject,pride & intelligence would tell me not to comment for the sake of appearing a fool to those who were informed on that subject.
AndyRoo said | June 29th 2010 @ 8:27am | Report comment
I really don’t think Wilsons piece (or any anti soccer piece unless it’s an editor) is worth worrying about. The world cup is on FTA and hopefully the Socceroos will be too. People can then make up their own mind if they don’t like football than so be it but it’s much better than the days when the media was preaching to people who hardly saw football and were more vulnerable to opinion pieces.
I would prefer we just ignore it and move on rather than give them the attention and incentive to do a follow up and increase their click thru’s. She’s a professional troll and either hugely praises or hugely bags whatevers in the news at the time.
Mattay said | June 29th 2010 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Read the first couple paragraphs in the paper on the weekend, then didn’t bother with the rest of it. Same with Graham Cornes’ article in the same paper on pretty much the same subject. Flicked over a couple pages and there’s 2 double-page spreads.
I can’t stand the hypocracy of some of these news outlets that lets these “journalists” rant on opinion pieces one week, then offer free socceroo scarves the next.
Rebecca Wilson (and Graham Cornes) are non-entities as far as sports journalism is concerned and only have a job because of the vitriolic and ignorant nature of their writing and what it does for circulation numbers. Don’t play the game.
Les Murray wrote a fantastic piece one time knocking Wilson down a few pegs.
RickG said | June 29th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
I agree this is a pretty poor premise for an article.
On the other hand, I can give you some more relevant reasons for football being hamstrung in Australia:
The sub-standard refereeing in the game’s biggest showpiece
FIFA’s refual to move with the times and use technology
Football fans’ snobbery and put-downs to would-be converts to the game.
I was totally on board in the lead-up to the cup. I was enthiused excited and devouring all the info I could on the game I played for 5 seasons as a kid but never liked or respected. I read Fozzie’s book. I read the blogs here and on TWG. I almost forgot about the rugby codes. I was a football fan!!! or so I thought.
After a few games of the WC (not just the Australian ones) I started to turn. To be honest I felt betrayed and let down in a way. The poor and inconsistent refereeing got to me – 7 yellow cards in the 1st half of one game that wasn’t spiteful or overly physical in my view. Cahill sent off for admittedly a poor tackle but a totally innocuous one. Kewell sent off for what the ref couldn’t possibly know for sure was a deliberate handball. Of course, a send-off means you miss the next game too (too harsh a penalty except for the worst of offences). Two yellows in separate games for minor offences (or no offence at all) and you miss the following game no matter what! That’s grossly unfair.
The clincher though was Kaka’s send off. It was a disgraceful show of bad sportsmanship and cheating from the Ivorian but the decision stood! How can that be? No post-match review panel and Kaka had to sit out a game!
Add to all this the disallowed goals and off-sides not picked up, not to mention the appalling acting with players hitting the deck like they’ve been shot by a sniper.
I know I’m not going with the ‘accept it, it’s part of the game’ line, and I don’t think I ever can.
I’m sure i’m not Robinson Crusoe here. THAT’s why the game’s hamstrung in this country unfortunately. A real shame as it can be a beautiful game.
Gibbo said | June 29th 2010 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
a bandwagon jumper at the start of the cup falls off after watching a few games and then sticks the boots in??? what a strange phenomenon…
why do people who dont like watching football regularly expect to suddenly love every minute of the football world cup?
RickG said | June 29th 2010 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
I never expected to love every minute. I’m exasperated by the amateurism and injustice of some incidents.
This ‘bandwagon jumper’ as you (snobbishly) put it is the kind of person that needs to be won over to grow the game here. I have two pre-school aged boys – soon I’ll be choosing their weekend sport, and no doubt we’ll be supporting a team of some kind in a code of some kind. Get it Gibbo?
Gibbo said | June 29th 2010 @ 1:56pm | Report comment
it wasnt snobbish. in your article you state that you are not a football fan and you decided to get on board before the world cup. is that not jumping on the bandwagon? please enlighten me otherwise if i’ve read your post incorrectly.
AndyRoo said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
I actualy agree with RickG, those elements he described are off putting, their real problems for Australian audiences not just putting the boot in. The only reason I think football fans get upset is because we know it won’t be changed so you just learn to accept it how it is… doen’t mean I have to like it.
On the plus side most of what Australians have a problem with isn’t present in the A league.
I am still enjoying the Cup but they are things I would prefer aren’t issues. Kaka should have been available to play against Portugal.
Art Sapphire said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
Andyroo – The solution is for RickG to watch Santo’s Cup Fever
AndyRoo said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Art I pretty much perscribe that to everyone.
Runny nose and fever….you should tune into SBS at 10:00 pm.
Gibbo said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
by “australian audiences” do you actually mean “people who dont watch football regularly enough to have seen similar things a million times”?
some calls go your way, others dont. imo kaka is a shame because he’s brazilian and they have a tradition of playing beautiful football, but when lampards goal was called play on everyone knew the vitriol which would stem from the english press… it’s like: cue hillarity! sucked in england!!
game on!
Towser said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:25pm | Report comment
“On the plus side most of what Australians have a problem with isn’t present in the A league.”
Thats the bottom line isnt it really. I guess it depends pretty much on how much football you have watched. The World Cup is a unique event not to be confused with domestic football which usely potrays that countries culture. as you indicate.
Seen very few incidents at the Roar that raise the ire of the crowd. such as those at the World Cup.
The unfortunate thing is that World Cup because of its magnitude is a magnet for casual sports watchers who are not au fait with the nuances of the World Game.,following it year in year out.
For every controversial incident there is many more footballing moments to savour,like watching Brazil for 90 minutes this morning.
AndyRoo said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
by “australian audiences” do you actually mean “people who dont watch football regularly enough to have seen similar things a million times”?
Pretty much that’s what I mean but also those raised on English football as a kid. After a while such things don’t really raise much of an eyebrow and I don’t get upset unless it’s against the Socceroos but I can see why others get upset by it.
If Rickg had of come on complaining about soccer sissys or whatever then I would have given him the thumbs down but I thought he was pretty genuine.
THAT’s why the game’s hamstrung in this country unfortunately. A real shame as it can be a beautiful game. resontated with me because I used to love watching Brazil but Rivaldo in 2002 was a big turn off and I found myself going for Turkey…my innocence was stolen Gibbo!
I was going for Chile this morning despite my man crush on Kaka.
Art Sapphire said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
Absolutely Correct Towser – the Round of 16 games have been excellent.
Quarter Finals in the wee hours this Saturday and Sunday Morning will be something to look forward too. Germany v Argentina, Brazil v Holland etc, etc
Gibbo said | June 29th 2010 @ 2:43pm | Report comment
Hahaha, great anecdote andyroo.
its the stuff like the Rivaldo incident which keep things (like Kaka’s dismissal) in perspective. personally, i get off on the cheeky nature of the efforts to con the refs. i mean, football is traditionally the working class sport (as opposed to union, traditionally speaking) so i say long live the rapskalian attempts to cheat and lie and get away with murder (figuritively), all for the sake of glory, all in the name of sticking it to the man
RickG said | June 29th 2010 @ 9:42pm | Report comment
Hey I love Cup Fever! Towser, your point is a good one. I know all football fans have one or more domestic leagues they follow where the issues I outlined above don’t really figure. I guess that lessens the impact somewhat. It’s just hard to accept that in the biggest sporting event in the world these blantantly wrong and unfair things are accepted as part of the game. Fans deserve more and should expect more.
AGO74 said | June 29th 2010 @ 9:22am | Report comment
She’s an idiot. There are also football equivalents towards other sports. Let’s just forget about these idiots and talk about the football.
whiskeymac said | June 29th 2010 @ 9:34am | Report comment
does the caveat of illeteracy at the end of the article entitle her to spruik nonsense? no. its abit like saying “only joking” after calling someone names. however she is entitled to her opinion – the fact she bothers writing so much about a game and offering opinions on it is interesting. but not so interesting for anyone to really get overly excited about.
new york post is a tabloid – was it a tongue in cheek response/ purposefuly churlish headline because the team got knocked out after givin the sports public a buzz? yes. its the response any spoilt kid wld offer when things go wrong, but am sure it was a “joke” and not a serious coment on the WC. the same paper had a big article on the 1-1 “win” against England. i suggest that in this respect it was a good headline.
Glen said | June 30th 2010 @ 12:59am | Report comment
it’s “Illiteracy” dude… It kind of kills your credibility