Gasnier returns, but with unanswered questions
By Brett McKay, 6 Jul 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
Related coverage
Kogarah Jubilee Oval’s prodigal son returned to top level rugby league last night, as Mark Gasnier made a solid if unspectacular return in the Red V in the Dragons’ 12-8 loss to Penrith.
The NRL’s own website could barely hide its excitement in the lead up, declaring, “Gaz is back! Yep, after 661 days in the rugby union wilderness, Mark Gasnier returns to the NRL…”
Though named on the bench in the less-than-familiar No.20, there was plenty of suggestion floating around over the weekend that Gasnier would slot straight back into the starting side. The loss of Kiwi back rower Jeremy Smith from the Dragons side did little to quell the speculation.
In the end, he didn’t start, but the 54 minutes he did play would have been more than first anticipated. He showed some glimpses of his old league-playing self too, managing a few offloads and a line break for the outing.
There were no obvious signs of trying to lay the ball back for the arriving ruck cleaner-outerers, but I do think I saw him mouth “pour les sakes de f…” as he dropped a pass in the Dragons last minute final attacking raid. As they say in the classics, he’ll be better for the run.
Of course it’s history now that Gasnier spent the past 18 months in France, playing two seasons of rugby in the borderline garish, but always bright, pink jerseys of Stade Francais in Paris.
With Stade, he linked with former NSW and current Queensland Reds coach Ewan McKenzie, who tried unsuccessfully to bring Gasnier across to rugby while coaching the Waratahs.
And he did pretty well in rugby, too. Though never really cementing himself in one position, often being switched between wing and inside or outside centre, “Marc” Gasnier (as he was referred) still maintained his ability to find the try line.
Obviously, Gasnier impressed the right people at Stade too, because as recently as April he was still very much on their wanted list. Stade CEO Mathias Poursine told the Sydney Morning Herald at the time, that despite not nailing down one particular position, Gasnier was set to become a game-breaker in rugby, and that his club would do all it could to keep Gasnier in Paris.
”I am sure he has not yet arrived at his best level in playing rugby union. He can really improve. He is one of the players in the world who, to me, is an X-factor player – a player who has in his hands the possibility to change something in the game. And only a few players have this,” Poursine said in April.
However, Poursine could also see the lure of heading home, too, ”I can feel that he misses the country,” he said later in the same article.
And the lure has been as strong as it has been persistent. Mentioned as a potential recruit almost twelve months ago when the Melbourne Rebels gained entry into an expanded Super 15 competition, the occasional whispers turned into rather loud screams when ARU interest in Gasnier became obvious early this year.
While the Rebels were obvious candidates from the start, Queensland also sounded like a likely destination with McKenzie now carrying the Reds’ clipboard, and even the Brumbies were mentioned at one point.
ARU High Performance manager David Nucifora even declared in February that Gasnier could potentially be a Wallaby tourist by year’s end if he was back playing in Australia by mid-year.
So here is where the unanswered questions start. For starters, what went wrong? How did negotiations with Australian rugby go from ‘looking to be finalised’ in mid-March, to arguments over length of contract in early May, to concessions of losing the race by the start of June?
What happened for rugby league and St.George/Illawarra to suddenly rocket back into contention?
Why was there hardly a noise from NSW this time around, given the pull of Sydney played such an obvious role in Gasnier’s return to the Dragons, and with the Waratahs then pursuing Scott Staniforth and signing Ryan Cross from the Western Force?
Was the interest in rugby from Gasnier just limited to earning Euros? And did Australian rugby allow itself to be used as a pawn for Gasnier to get back to Kogarah?
I just find it difficult to comprehend how the ARU, who at times ran a lone race to bring Gasnier back to Australia, could miss out on their man so spectacularly, especially after Gasnier himself had not twelve months ago said “I’m not going back to rugby league”.
Mind you, new Prime Minister Julia Gillard only weeks ago declared she was more chance of playing full forward for the Western Bulldogs as she was of challenging Kevin Rudd. Maybe things really do change that quickly.
Typically, the code extremists have raced to air their opinions too, with the ‘rah rahs’ declaring already that Gasnier wasn’t much chop in rugby anyway, while the ‘mungos’ decided Gasnier probably got bored only touching the ball once every 20 minutes.
Dragons back-rower Dean Young got his sneaky two cents in early, too, telling reporters last week “he probably hasn’t tackled anyone or played a hard game of footy in 18 months…” Oh Dean, aren’t you the jokester…
Don’t get me wrong here, I honestly think Gasnier playing league again is the best fit anyway, just as it was when Andrew Johns entertained the idea of switching codes years ago.
But just as I was with Johns, I can’t help but feel a touch disappointed that we’ll never get to judge Gasnier as a rugby player in Australia. And more so that the ARU could lose out from such a seemingly winning position.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A (2)
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW (7)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- ARU, Mark Gasnier, NRL, Penrith Panthers, Rugby League, Rugby Union, St George Illawarra Dragons

kingplaymaker said | July 6th 2010 @ 7:42am | Report comment
Brett I think the answer lies in the preposterous arrogance of the man.
Remember this is not the first time he has negotiated with the ARU. There was 2005 when he held public talks with John Connolly. At this point he was still only 25 and would have been a good investment.
And then 2007. Why when he did decide to leave didn’t he move straight to the ARU? Isn’t that what someone serious about playing rugby would have done? At this point he was 27, and although getting on would have had some years left in the tank for Australian rugby.
So finally he wanted to show his wares at the absurd age of TWENTY-NINE!!! What benefit is there for an outside back to starting a career when many players would be ending one? So he rocks up to the ARU and demands a ridiculous salary for a 29 year-old, having twice turned them down at more suitable ages.
This is the result of arrogance and contempt for union. Gasnier was unwilling to give his best years to the ARU, preferring to spend them either in league or earning money in France. Australian union came a low third in his list of priorities.
The problem of some big name league players, especially older ones, is obvious. Someone like Gasnier thinks he can demand what he wants when he wants, having had his ego massaged for so many years playing league, being constantly told he is the best and so forth. So he thinks the ARU should pay a fortune for a 29 year old.
In fairness to the ARU they said enough was enough. They offered him a basic contract, with the possibility to earn more by playing for the Wallabies and thereby proving his worth. They said ‘you’re 29, show us what you can do before we pay you the earth’. Gasnier being a prima donna was outraged at such insolence and went running back to league. Good riddance.
Gasnier at 29 did not merit big money. Folau at 21 would have done.
The best example is Sonny Bill Williams, who negotiated ONCE with the NZRU and MEANT IT. Instead of Gasnier’s three negotiating cycles, he was genuine when he entered the process the first time. He was willing to accept a reasonable contract, and to give his best years to the game rather than the tail-end of his career.
When the two of them moved over it was not clear who would make it. The answer is now known: Sonny Bill Williams, a better player and more importantly a better man.
The Link said | July 6th 2010 @ 9:37am | Report comment
kingplaymaker – interesting spin that SBW is a better man than Gasnier!!
So one walks out on his team mates, breaks a contract one year into a five year deal, tells people when he’s on the tarmac at Mascot and the other leaves his club with their blessing (due to third party deal falling through) plays Rugby for 18 months, gets shopped around by his manager like every other professional athlete in the world (hardly Robinson Cruso) then returns to his original club.
Yeah, its clear who’s the better man.
Why do you have to play for the ARU to be serious about Rugby? Get used to Australians chosing to play Rugby overseas, it will become the norm. Rugby fans trip over themselves to call their game international then can’t accept the reality that this brings for player movements.
kingplaymaker said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:17am | Report comment
I can’t think of a less impressive individual with regard to his conduct that Gasnier. The ARU should be thankful he isn’t a queen they need to cater for.
Ken said | July 6th 2010 @ 11:27am | Report comment
I’m struggling to understand what Gasnier did to irk you so? He negotiated with multiple parties to try to get the best price? Now I’m not crowning the guy King of all Virtue but that’s hardly unusual or a hanging offence.
Gasnier validly left his original League contract with plenty of notice, played Rugby in France for a couple of years seemingly very genuine about learning the game then came back to his original club in League and hasn’t said a bad word about Union despite plenty of media prodding. I agree with Brett that there does seem to be an unaccounted turning point where he went from all-but-signed as a Super Rugby player back to the Dragons – but with no parties accusing impropriety we’re left guessing about the reasons.
In comparision, SBW walked out on his League team as a top paid player mid-week (after being named in the weekend’s team) without telling anyone. After seeing out a couple of years in France himself, he also shopped himself around before deciding that being an All-Black in the WC next year will help his ego/bank balance the most. He’s already admitted that he’ll probably move on when that contract’s finished (or maybe just next time he throws a tantrum). Enjoy him.
Pete said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
“Gasnier validly left his original League contract with plenty of notice” actually no. He stuffed around and that’s why the Dragons lost one of the Morris twins. Ask the Dragons fans who they’d rather have…
Ken said | July 6th 2010 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
I am a lifelong Dragons fan, wasn’t happy about Gasnier leaving in the first place (especially with the Morris situation) and have grave misgivings about them mortgaging our future to get him back. The fact remains though that he did nothing wrong. The 3rd party element of his contract wasn’t being fulfilled, he gave a deadline to get it fixed, nothing happened so he gave his notice that he wouldn’t be there next year. He saw out the year acting professionally rather than storming off mid-season crying to everyone how unfair life is when you have to play football for mega $ a la SBW
Gob Bluth said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:51am | Report comment
If you are relying on SBW to be your shining example of virtue you are battling.
Gatesy said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:03pm | Report comment
What was it all about, Ralphie?
Why did he bother going to Rugby in the first place?…. and why do we care about him now?…he’s just another mungo, again.
It’s not like Australian Rugby got any value out of him!!
Personally, I think he was just plain scared of having a go at Rugby in Australia and decided to fall back into the comfort zone of RL…………..at least he didn’t fancy himself playing AFL!!
hutch said | July 7th 2010 @ 2:58pm | Report comment
how is playing nrl being in a comfort zone? it is the toughest “rugby” comp on earth.
Working Class Rugger said | July 7th 2010 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
Hutch
‘it is the toughest “rugby” comp on earth.’
That’s a matter of opinion. How much Top 14/Guiness Premiership/Magner’s League or Super Rugby do you watch?. Until you have actually seen other Rugby Competitions to claim one as the ‘toughest’ is a little premature.
Mr Saunders said | July 6th 2010 @ 7:48am | Report comment
‘And then 2007. Why when he did decide to leave didn’t he move straight to the ARU? Isn’t that what someone serious about playing rugby would have done? At this point he was 27, and although getting on would have had some years left in the tank for Australian rugby.’
I believe the diametric opposite. Going overseas to learn a trade is a mark of respect for Australian rugby IMO, if, of course, he held firm designs on a Wallaby jersey. I remind you of the story of Brad Thorn.
I also have no idea how you think his various negotiations represent arrogance? That is how the private sector works. I also have no idea how you think Gasnier didn’t ‘mean it’ during his negotiations with Australian rugby, but that Williams did with NZ rugby. Were you involved in the deal?
kingplaymaker said | July 6th 2010 @ 7:49am | Report comment
‘I believe the diametric opposite.’ No suprise there then.
In fact there is much that is very familiar about what you write..
Mr Saunders said | July 6th 2010 @ 7:52am | Report comment
Doesn’t even make sense. This site is a forum for debate, questions and opinions. Sarcasm isn’t debate.
kingplaymaker said | July 6th 2010 @ 8:17am | Report comment
Knives out.
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 8:20am | Report comment
KPM, I take your point, and even get your annoyance to a degree. But I have to say that – ignoring the age – I didn’t mind the move to France to learn the game when it emerged that Gasnier wanted to try his hand in Australian rugby. In my mind it’s a much better outcome that Australia gets a “current” rugby player, rather than somone who has to learn, on the run, in the small margin for error that is Super Rugby.
As I wrote in the column, I really don’t know what happened for rugby to suddenly drop out of contention like it did. If indeed it was an exhorbinant salary request, then yeah, fair play to the ARU for giving the polite “no thanks” response. However, I’ve got my doubts about this.
Folau, who I had my doubts over as a potential rugby player, was reportedly the subject of an ARU + Rebels offer totalling somewhere near $600K, of which the ARU component was around $350-400K, and even then he would had to have played every Test to earn every match payment to get there. Like you, I would be very suprised if the ARU’s offer to Gasnier was any more than this, which is obviously less than the $450K that is being reported for the remaining years of his Dragons deal.
So what happened?? Gasnier again ruled out an NRL return in March/April, and it wasn’t until late April that whispers of a back-ended Dragons deal emerged. But by then, the ARU was supposedly finalising their deal. Something just doesn’t add up………
kingplaymaker said | July 6th 2010 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Brett I see a player like Gasnier could well see the attraction of France as a place to learn the game without the irritating exposure and pressure in Australia.
Maybe he didn’t back himself to succeed well enough to earn the salary he wanted if it depended on match payments?
It must be hard as a 29 year-old to be confident about succeeding in a highly demanding new sport, especially when the body is on the verge of decline. The example of Andy Farrell who made the move at the age of 30 is a good one. He could never adapt and his body started to go downhill very quickly.
Gasnier’s interest in the Wallabies has always been obscure: why didn’t he move in 2005 having put all that effort into negotiating? Then having spent two years learning the game and spoken about his desire to be a Wallaby so much, he again decided against it.
My point about Folau isn’t based on his abilities but his age: 21 is a fine point to get a player. 29 isn’t.
I think the ARU should negotiate in a more aggressive way with these players. They should come to make an offer very quickly, and give a fast deadline to accept or reject it. If Folau had been given a shorter deadline he might have been snagged before the AFL came along.
However as the players seem to wield the power they may have to put up with their negotiating whims. But how much ARU money has been spent just negotiating with Gasnier??!!
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 8:56am | Report comment
quite true, and your example of Andy Farrell is quite apt, too. And I understood your point on Folau too, age was one of the reasons “I would be very suprised if the ARU’s offer to Gasnier was any more than…” what was offered to Folau.
Just on your point of the ARU geting tough, I’ve noted this year that the ARU seem to be making more incentive-type offers, even to the likes of Mortlock and other Australian players staying in Super Rugby. I like this method, it’s the national body recognising that hefty guaranteed contracts do nothing for bringing the best out of the players, so instead, let’s see them back themselves. Already, this method has called the bluff of agents for Thurston, Folau, maybe even Gasnier now, too.
And I can’t ignore the player managers in debacles like this Gasnier situation either. The managers only need a sympathising journo in the pocket to get out a story about the ARU/AFL/Roosters being “interested”, and before you know it, you’ve got a dutch auction being played out in the papers…
(this reporter is open to such offers, by the way…
)
kingplaymaker said | July 6th 2010 @ 9:16am | Report comment
I agree the ARU should be tough as senior sportsmen in both codes tend to get sky-high opinions of themselves which jar with their declining abilities towards the end of their careers.
They should also consider who they make the offers too. For example, at inside centre they have potentially Matt Giteau, Berrick Barnes, James O’Connor and Quade Cooper. So with four players they can afford to negotiate roughly with some and to lose them. At second row however beyond Dan Vickerman, to take the obvious example, they have no-one of anything like the same talent and so they cannot afford to negotiate too roughly and lose him as it devastates the team. So after this world cup they should choose their best two players in each position, pay them enough to keep them, and save their meaner offers for the players outside this.
Similarly with league players they should make better offers to younger players and worse ones to older ones. I agree fully with not getting 29 year-old Gasnier or 27 year-old Thurston who in any case is unnecessary as he would play in one of the Wallabies strong positions. However, I sense they went too far with Folau and choose the wrong league player and so lost him, in the same way they went too far with Vickerman and lost him.
It’s all about choosing the right ones.
Vinay Verma said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Brett,there is an opening in the IPL for more player managers….any likely prospects in Canberra?
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
because that’s what the IPL needs, Vinay, MORE player managers!!
Gatesy said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:13pm | Report comment
……hmmm!!…another opportunity for the salary cap auditors..! SSShh, fellas, don’t ask too many questions, don’t draw too much attention, but you have to think that,for a guy at the peak of his career, and prowess, he didn’t come back to the Dragons for peanuts (unless he’s a monkey.. and we don’t think he is).. so how much are they paying him …. and where is this money coming from? Maybe he’s on some pension from Stade Francais?? Interesting!
That seems to me the only logical conclusion. His agent obviously shopped him around and got his price up, and the Dragons were the winners. No doubt they only keep one set of books, which are available for scrutiny. I think that there is more to this story than meets the eye!!
JimC said | July 6th 2010 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
Gasnier and SBW made the right move. They learned rugby union in a regular professional competition so had time to develop. Contrast that with Tahu who had to face the farce of the ARU season where the chances are you will have less than 10 games before being thrown into an international jersey.
By the time SBW plays for the All Blacks he will have played 2 seasons of T14, one NPC, and maybe one S14. That’s a much more logical learning curve than the ARU would have given him in their craven pursuit of column inches from more popular sports.
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
that was exactly my point above Jim…
James D said | July 6th 2010 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Hmm. I wish the rugby boys would have a go at the league boys as often as the opposite happened.
Just before a game came out with “Geez i wish we were scrummaging Leaguies today” before coming up against a gigantic scrum or something like that to balance up the ledger. Andy Raymond particulairly annoys me – the only exercise he gets in is the walk to the fridge and yet he feels it is his role and responsibility to denigrate the proffessional atheletes of another sport without provocation.
As for Gasnier.
I watched him play for Stade. He was ok – at best. On attack he was good at times but dropped the ball too often but on defence he was useless! – Matt Banahan got outside him twice in the same game. Matt Banahan (at 6ft 8 and 110 kg’s) is about as elusive as 3 month old.
I for one am glad he is back in the safety of his fishbowl where they can talk about how wonderful the salary cap is and the possibility of moving the game as far out as the central coast if they do ever expand. Or about how amazing state of origin fights are.
Gob Bluth said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:53am | Report comment
How bitter are you?
James D said | July 6th 2010 @ 11:01am | Report comment
I grew up in the SW of sydney and didnt like league. The years of being called many things due to the preference I have for rugby over league has made me bitter i suppose.
But really these league fellas continueously dump on Union as a sport and they never fight back. They constantly have a go at our props (Matt Dunning in particular) and yet we never mention that in league you only need to be good for 20 mins as a prop – you get a break after that. Or you dont have to know anything about anything because the ref will teach you how to “scrummage” every single league game because they are too think headed to realise one arm goes here and the other goes here.
Or the fact that the best league can offer rarely ever dint Union and make an impact – they get comfy behind the league media machine and once a game with tough challenges beats them they go scurrying back to the fishbowl.
Gob Bluth said | July 6th 2010 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Well at least you are honest.
But come on never fight back? What about Spiro and Peter Fitz give them some credit. Okay they might not have the appeal of Andy Raymond but they are certainly putting their shoulder to the wheel.
Also, your best league props are putting in for more than 20 minutes, that is the time for a young bloke learning the ropes….but we probably don’t need to go into this debate.
hutch said | July 7th 2010 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
i like how playing 50 plus tests at a sport you have never played before equals not making an impact. you can have your scrums mate, we’ll enjoy the big hits and spectacular tries!
ballboy said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:37am | Report comment
Never liked Gasnier after his mobile phone scandal a few years back. He’s scum and I’m glad he’s not playing RU anymore. When are the ARU going to realise that League converts on the whole just don’t work.
James D said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Agreed – the only ones that have a chance are the young ones who played both codes as a junior and actually have the drive to succeed in Union (well they appear to anyhow). Blokes like Chambers and Barnes come to mind.
Gob Bluth said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:56am | Report comment
AH BINGO! The “played as a junior” line matched with “genuine drive to succeed”. Excellent work getting the two most over used cliches into the same posting.
Have we worked out whether Cooper Vuna had a few runs in the Under 10s yet?
James D said | July 6th 2010 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Your lack of a point amuses me.
He played rugby till he was 15 then the leaguies gave him a bunch of cash – now he is bored and wants a real challenge
Gob Bluth said | July 6th 2010 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
A challenge is certainly a good way of looking at the Rebels.
James D said | July 6th 2010 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
Agreed
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 11:48am | Report comment
ballboy, the ARU thought highly enough of him to chase him for several months, and I’d doubt the “phone thing” ever entered the equation. And them realising “that League converts on the whole just don’t work” played no part either, they just dropped off.
My question is why they dropped off??
Bay35Pablo said | July 6th 2010 @ 11:52am | Report comment
My feel from reading the papers was:
1. He was getting homseick.
2. He wanted to win a premiership with the Big V, so it had to be now or never.
3. He’s looking at his post league career, which is always going to be better if he finishes in league than overseas where no one knows him.
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
all valid points Pablo…
ballboy said | July 6th 2010 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Brett – two possible reasons.
1. the emergence of enough young talented outside backs this year has made his apparent allure seem…well…less alluring. Look at the average age and calibre of Chambers, Horne, Beale, AAC, Hynes, Ioane, Barnes, Leallifano, to name a few. Why go hunting for another talented outside back? I didn’t see him play in France but from what I’ve read he didn’t set the world alight.
2. League is where he was loved, in particular, St George. Look at the hype he received in the lead up to last night’s game. the crowd went nuts when he warmed up. I suspect people like Gasnier, who have grown up in the shadow of his father for so long and then stepped out to make his own name for himself in League, crave and need the attention. He know he could get it in league. Wasn’t sure about Union. The combination of the two reasons may be why he’s wearing the red and white strip. ARU may have dropped a little and he may have as well. Then again, maybe the Dragons have offered him a better contract than what has been published. they haven’t won a premiershp since 1979. Someone knows the answers to your question. I merely speculating.
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
Ballboy, my suspicion if that perhaps only Gasnier himself knows the answers, and so we either may never know, or read about it in a Danny Weidler exclusive…
As I wrote, I’ve got no issue with him returning to Kogarah, and it just seems a better fit all ’round (and for plenty of reasons, as you’ve mentioned. Btw, it was his uncle, too, not father – Reg Gasnier). But I would like to know why the ARU are strangely quiet on his return, considering the noise they were making in the first few months of this year…
M1tch said | July 6th 2010 @ 4:14pm | Report comment
isnt the ARU burnt from league players? im guessing he is at the dragons for less money..perhaps they dont want any coverage that is the case
ballboy said | July 6th 2010 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
I thought uncle and father were the same thing in the Shire – sorry boys. Cheap shot but couldn’t resist. you know we’re all only jealous
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
that’s the sort of cheap shot that I’m happy to see hasn’t eventuated today, I somewhat expected more from the “code extremists”, as I called them. I certainly wasn’t expecting quips about close families!!
Timmypig said | July 6th 2010 @ 2:43pm | Report comment
I went to school with his cousin. YOIKES! It’s been a while but she was sure better looking that Gaz is. I’m not sure she could play rugby as well, or league for that matter.
Ballboy that’s certainly the case once you’re west of the Illawarra Line. Engadine is bogan, Heathcote is insular but Helensburgh! Crikey – lots of good banjo players there. And is Loftus still controlled by the Loftus Underground? The 1970s have passed by so I guess things are a bit more settled in Loftus now ….
The Other Reds Fan. said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
What has Gaznier got to do with rugby now? This article should be under the league column.
Lets talk rugby. How about this – Vickerman and Rodzilla Blake to be in our starting pack at next year’s world cup. What do you think?
Brett McKay said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
it shouldn’t TORF, becuase I wrote it asking the questions of rugby, not league. I thought that was pretty obvious…
And as much as I’d love to see Vickerman and Blake back, currently they’re as much chance as Gasnier. At least Blake is now a confirmed Rebel, and I believe even played for West Harbour on the weekend, and so could theoretically get a call-up at any time now.
Until Vickerman re-signs with the ARU, I’m as much chance as getting selected for the RWC…
The Other Reds Fan. said | July 6th 2010 @ 5:00pm | Report comment
Sorry. Because of the title I didn’t read the article. The title should have been something like “Gasnier and rugby part company. Why?”
BTW, article in today’s Australian about Vickerman possibly coming back early to try for world cup.
Gatesy said | July 6th 2010 @ 10:15pm | Report comment
Damn right!!
Next year! said | July 6th 2010 @ 1:14pm | Report comment
Don’t forget that one of the key reasons (or so Gasnier says) is that he is coming home as that there is illness in the family – to be fairto Gasnier the travelling demands of the S15 would be far greater than the NRL – so we need to keep this in context
The question I would like to put is that imagine if the ARU spent a bomb on Gasnier and he didn’t work and then as a result of spending too much on Gasnier the ARU did not have enough for Vickerman who is tried tested AND PROVEN ?
Spend the cash on proven players – why take the risk with NRL players – this argument is starting to get tired now – they don’t seem to work in Australia (internationally yes with Brad Thorn and Jason Robinson) – to me this is like Cricket Australia buying a baseballer to cross over – different game different skills