Pietersen plunders as Aussies blunder
By Brett McKay, 6 Dec 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Adelaide, Adelaide Oval, Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, England, Kevin Pietersen, second Test, Test cricket, The Ashes

England's Kevin Pietersen runs to the Balmy Army on the hill in celebration after making his double century on the third day of the second Ashes test at the Adelaide Oval, Sydney, Sunday, Dec. 5, 2010.(AAP Image/Dean Lewins)
This Ashes series just goes from bad to worse for Australians, with Kevin Pietersen back to his dominating, arrogant best on Day 3 here at the Adelaide Oval.
Pietersen belted his way to 213 not out from just 278 balls, his first Test century in more than 18 months, and England reached 4/551 as the heavens opened during the tea break, bringing a premature end to the day’s procession.
It remains to be seen whether England would dare declare on the same tally that brought them undone here in 2006, or if they bat on and really take the match away from Australia.
The weather may yet play more of a role in the outcome of this second Test, with showers forecast again for Day 4, and heavy rain likely on Day 5.
Weather was the only thing likely to stop Pietersen though, as he drove, pulled, and swatted his way to his second Test double hundred. He will start the fourth day needing just 14 more runs to set a new career best.
This innings was Pietersen at his full pomp. Whatever the Australian bowlers served up, Pietersen dealt with it accordingly, sometimes with outright contempt.
At one point, Peter Siddle continued to deliver half-tracker after half-tracker and Pietersen milked runs at will through the onside. Then, with a field change made to put three men back on the fence between fine and square leg, Pietersen pulled successive deliveries through gaps for fun.
Later, Doug Bollinger was bowling reasonably well to a heavy-set offside field, only to have Pietersen walk across his stumps to whip through midwicket.
While Pietersen plundered, the Aussie bowlers could only blunder. Anything too short – and there was a lot of it – was savagely pulled, hooked, or even hoicked behind or in front of square.
Anything even remotely full was driven at will, with Pietersen’s driving on the up a particular joy to watch.
Xavier Doherty rarely threatened, but on the one occasion when he looked to have slightly beaten Pietersen in flight, the big South African from Chelsea was able to adjust his shot and deposit Doherty over the northern fence for a rather big six.
For Pietersen, this was a rewarding innings of redemption and for the work he’d put in during the lead-up to The Ashes series.
After play, he spoke of not so much being frustrated of the run over the last year and a bit without a Test hundred, but rather of the high standards he sets for himself. He did add, though, that this innings has been a nice reminder of why he plays the game, and why he enjoys playing in the big contests against the best players in the world.
In saying England’s “…plans have not been helped by the rain” Pietersen may have been hinting at a late afternoon declaration, but he was also quick to say the team will reassess where they are and do whatever they feel they need to do to try and win this Test match. If achieved, that would take them a long way to being the first English side to retain the Ashes in Australia in more than 20 years.
He mentioned the time he spent in South Africa prior to coming to Australia, and that working again with his junior coach, Graham Ford, was able to get his game back on track.
“He knows me, he’s known me since I was 6 or 7 years old, and the two or three little things we’ve worked on in South Africa have got me back to where I am.”
Ominously, Ford said back in September that “…if he gets his form back, the Aussies better watch out.”
After swatting aside a strange question of whether he was the outcast of the England side, the hollering and yelping from the new visitors’ change rooms as Pietersen returned from the press conference showed that the man is very much feeling the love again. And a comfortable and confident Kevin Pietersen can only spell bad news for the rest of the Ashes series.
For the Australians, Shane Watson was quite circumspect about the side’s chances, admitting, “We’ll have to bat unbelievably well from here to save the match.”
Asked how Australia would approach the fourth day, Watson suggested rather obviously at first, “if we’re bowling we need to take some wickets.”
“But then if we’re batting, we just need to keep it simple and get through that first little period, and then that first session. And then we just need to bat for as long as we can.”
Indeed they do.
Australia has been taught a fairly major lesson in how and where not to bowl in this Test, but at the same time, they’ve squandered some pretty decent batting conditions as well.
The prospect of batting for up to two days will be daunting enough, but the Australians will also have noticed the turn Marcus North’s gentle off-breaks were getting, and would know that batting for two days will mean repelling Graeme Swann. Again.
But, if they have any ambitions of winning back the Urn, then repel Swann they must. And Jimmy Anderson. And Broad and Finn.
The batting over the next two days for Australia needs to be from the top draw. There can be no bad run outs, no loose but ambitious wafts outside off stump, and certainly no trying to run the ball off the face to give first slip catching practice.
In short, the blundering must stop now. The Ashes damn near depends on it.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (41)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- HENRY: Upcoming tour a tough initiation for new bowling coach (12)
- England win first Test by five wickets (5)
- Gilchrist says his playing days are over
- IPL sizzles and fizzles (10)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Aussie Hussey defends IPL after fix claims (2)
- Arise Sir James Anderson, the finest swing bowler ever (42)
- Cricket at the Olympics? No-ball! (22)
- Daniel Vettori deserves more respect (10)
- The left-handed advantage in cricket (11)
- Time for Ricky Ponting to pull up stumps on Test career (27)
- Brad Haddin must not be selected for Australia again (8)
- Is Australia finally warming to Michael Clarke? (7)
- Explore:
- Adelaide, Adelaide Oval, Ashes, Australian Cricket, Cricket, England, Kevin Pietersen, second Test, Test cricket, The Ashes


December 6th 2010 @ 5:37am
LeftArmSpinner said | December 6th 2010 @ 5:37am | Report comment
Brett, I can only agree completely.
Line and length, Line and length, Line and length, Line and length!!!!!!! It creates pressure and pressure creates mistakes and mistakes create wickets……………….
and the batting looks very vulnerable. Katich is injured. Watson’s body wont let him bowl and bat if they occur close together…… Punter is punter and will fight, but he is ageing. Clarke is out of form and yet to realise that this is a very important series. Huss will fight. North will get out cheap and Haddin will fight. So, only three batsmen of the top six who can be remotely relied on………………oh dear.
and we need to bat for two days to draw the game. bring on the rain, and plenty of it…………….
December 6th 2010 @ 7:31am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 7:31am | Report comment
Leftie, Jimmy Anderson on Day 1 spoke of not being too worried about whether it swings or not, and just to concentrate on bowling maidens, for they will bring the pressure and the wickets you mention. SImple stuff really, the sort of thing you’d tell the kids as they start coming through.
But I’m not seeing too much pressure building, and I’m certainly not seeing maidens being bowled either. There was way too much emphasis on the short stuff yesterday, and some of the lines being bowled would see a third grade bowler being dragged. If you serve up fruit for the sideboard, there’s gonna be a feast, and that’s what we saw yesterday…
December 6th 2010 @ 5:52am
Vinay Verma said | December 6th 2010 @ 5:52am | Report comment
Brett,it is time to be brutal. Australia are playing like the fifth ranked team in the world. They are falling down in the basics.Fielding used to be our strength. England are fielding better. This is a matter of concentration and practice. Are the Aussies practcising enough? I suggest not.
Except for Hussey,Haddin and Ponting(in his second innings at Brisbane) the rest of the batting lacks application. Watson has a fifty but has not gone on. Is he satisfied with a fifty? See Cook,Trott and Pietersen. Big hundreds.
Are Australia playing for nice little personal milestones? The big picture is a team score of 500 plus.
Australia’s second innings will tell if the batters are up for it. Ponting admits it will be a test of character. So there is some rough for Swann. Katich,Clarke Ponting and Hussey need to use their feet. Like all Australian batsmen are taught. The ball can’t turn if you get to it on the full or the half-volley. This will mean being brave and trusting your technique. The field will be up and there is no better time to be aggresive.
This is no a minefield in Kanpur. If the batters cannot score 450 in their second innings then it may be time for the abbatoir.
No excuses!. Perform or perish!
December 6th 2010 @ 7:24am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 7:24am | Report comment
yeah, it really is Vinay. But you’d like to hope that the Australian players don’t need to read The Roar to find that out. Quite simply, some of these guys are playing for their careers, and there probably can’t be much more at stake than there is.
Watson said it right last night, they just need to bat, and bat, and bat. And then bat again tomorrow..
December 6th 2010 @ 7:27am
Rugby Fan said | December 6th 2010 @ 7:27am | Report comment
Australia had two main plans for the series: make sure Pietersen didn’t fire and hit Swann out of the attack. They almost delivered on the second but were partly undone on the first count because England have handled an out-of-form Pietersen for some time and weren’t as vulnerable there as Australia thought. By taking a gamble on Doherty to unsettle Pietersen, they shortchanged themselves on attacking challenges for the rest of the top order.
In retrospect, Australia may come to regret letting Cook get going. If they had managed to extend his patchy form in Tests, it would have sown seeds of doubt about England’s batting ability and exposed Pietersen earlier which would have given them a better chance against him. As it stands, it’s the worst of all worlds with Cook and Pietersen both in the runs.
December 6th 2010 @ 7:34am
sledgeross said | December 6th 2010 @ 7:34am | Report comment
I think it simply comes down to Punter making the incorrect call to bat first. At the Gabba and here in Adelaide, days 3 and 4 have shown to be as benign and Gandhi and as flat as the Nullabor. Good players should be scoring runs on that deck. Now Australia will possibly have to bat on a moist, humid deck, and guess which bowlers will appreciate that more?
While the Poms have been a better team, I dont think it is all doom and gloom. We have just made poor decisions when its mattered most, and thus made it easier for them.
December 6th 2010 @ 9:21am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Sledgie, I’m not sure that’s the issue, and Strauss admitted he too would have batted first had the coin come down his way. But you are right in saying that they should be scoring runs on that deck on Day 1, and unfortunately it just didn’t happen. But it must happen today and tomorrow, otherwise…
December 6th 2010 @ 8:03am
Briolex said | December 6th 2010 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Australia will be crushed, and I believe there are really no selection changes that could have changed the outcome or will change the outcome in the coming matches. 4 nil is looking a very distinct possibility. Compared to last year England have improved out of sight and Australia have dropped so much in terms of skill, application and concentration.
I believe the selectors and coach (and captain too I guess) have a lot to answer for for the slack fielding, poor tactics and inexperienced bowling attack that we had playing yesterday, and the baffling selections especially the batsmen selected.
But after all of that I believe that this may be the start of the march towards English hegemony on the world stage. This current batting form they are in, would be successful against any bowling attack currently operating.
Amazing to think that the Aussie team (in India) a few weeks back actually had a good chance for victory in both matches (especially game 1), and yet here at home. apart from the first 2 days at the Gabba have looked completely outclassed.
If England do fulfill their potential this summer, then this will give them confidence to succeed anywhere.
December 6th 2010 @ 8:26am
Rickety Knees said | December 6th 2010 @ 8:26am | Report comment
Australia has lost its mojo – this has been coming for a long while, only the selectors have not seen it coming. They have been living in a bubble and it would appear that it will only burst when they have lost the Ashes, yet again.
It is time for Punter to retire, Katich to take over and build a young team around him. Finding the talent is not the problem, there is plenty of young talent out there. Giving them the opportunity is.
December 6th 2010 @ 10:30am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 10:30am | Report comment
Rickety, My only issue with that move would be that if you’re tapping Ponting on the shoulder, Katich isn’t any younger and so will never be anything other than a band-aid solution. If you were really wanting to rebuild a side around a new captain (and presuming we’re overlooking Clarke), it would make more sense, to me at least, to install someone like White or Ferguson, or maybe even Watson (who is hardly ever mentioned), who at least will be in the side for a good while to come.
Replacing one 35yo captain with another one doesn’t really solve the problem, it just delays it. And Ponting at least is still fit currently…
December 6th 2010 @ 10:39am
Rickety Knees said | December 6th 2010 @ 10:39am | Report comment
Don’t agree Brett. Katich is made of steel and won a Sheffiield Shield with a bunch of kids playing very innovative cricket. Suitable youngsters could be brought in and settled down under his guidance. He would have a mandate to implement a succession strategy once a suitable emerging leader had been identified.
December 6th 2010 @ 10:53am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 10:53am | Report comment
no doubt about any of that at Rickety, my point is just that Katich at best has three years of Test cricket left in him, which doesn’t exactly give him a lot of time to build his team, start winning series, and climbing up the rankings again. At least with a captain who is White or Watson or Clarke’s age now, there’s still plenty of time for that captain..
December 6th 2010 @ 1:06pm
Rickety Knees said | December 6th 2010 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
IMHO it would not take more than 3 years to build a team and hand it over.
December 6th 2010 @ 8:47am
jameswm said | December 6th 2010 @ 8:47am | Report comment
I’ve got a different slant.
Imagine if it rains a bit and the Aussies show a bit of fight, and manage to save the test.
Then, for all England’s dominance, it will still be 0-0 going to Perth. England would have nothing to show for it.
I think the sole difference is that the English batsmen have shown more discipline, esp Cook and Trott. The Aussies get to 50 odd and think it’s easy, then get out. Cook gets to 50 and keeps going the same way, ie playing the balls in the right areas for him. Hussey did this – in fact he’s done it twice.
The Aussie batsmen made schoolboy errors – poking at outswingers outside off before they are set, run-outs etc – and have been made to pay for it.
I don’t know what they’ll do with their spinners now. I said all along I thought O’Keefe was a better bet – I don’t think Smith’s up to it. What odds Krejza for the next test? Or Hauritz?
If North fails or doesn’t get to bat in the 2nd innings, he has to go now. It’s well enough overdue.
As for the meds – Dougie strayed too full and too straight from what I saw. Harris was good in tough bowling conditions. Siddle doesn’t do a lot normally. Harris is good because he can keep coming in and bowling fast and accurately, with the odd bit of movement. That’s all McGrath ever did. I can’t see any other bowlers doing any better – Starc, Pattinson, George etc.
For Perth you’d have to drop Doherty and probably bring in another quick – or Andrew McDonald. He’s a decent alternative to a spinner, esp at Perth, and he does tie down an end. If Kat is injured and you drop North, a crock Clarke becomes your only spinning option – unless you bring Khawaja in to open so you can get Smith at 6. Smith may not quite be a test no.6, but you could get away with him there better if you had McDonald at 8. That would give you three quicks (from Harris, Siddle, Bolly, Hilfy and George), plus Watson, plus McDonald, plus Smith. Probably a better attack that the one we have now.
So if Kat is injured, I’d probably go with
Watson
Khawaja
Ponting
Clarke
Hussey
Haddin
McDonald
Smith
Harris
Siddle
Bollinger/Hilfy/George
RK – and it has to be remembered that you can’t expect the new guys to excel straight away, esp the bowlers.
December 6th 2010 @ 9:30am
Rabbitz said | December 6th 2010 @ 9:30am | Report comment
James
My only concern with that selection is Clarke.
He is clearly struggling with injury and this is (in my opinion) causing him to bat and field poorly. At this stage they Aussies can not afford the luxury of carrying him.
Resting him, to allow recovery is the only real option BUT, who would be the replacement?
December 6th 2010 @ 11:29am
jameswm said | December 6th 2010 @ 11:29am | Report comment
Rabs I’d leave Clarke there for now. He has been our best test batsman for the last 18 months, and I’d like to think a return to form is just around the corner. I do agree he looks completely out of sorts, and have no idea if the injury has something to do with that.
I like the idea about installing Kat as captain with the youngsters, but we’ve got buckleys of that happening. The team could be:
1. Katich
2. Watson
3. Khawaja
4. MClarke or Hussey or ditch them both – I’d say Hughes if I thought he was ready
5. Ferguson
6. Smith
7. Paine
8. O’Keefe/McDonald
9. Harris
10. Two of Bollinger/Hilfenhaus/Siddle/George
You bring in Khawaja, Ferguson, Smith, O’Keefe and Paine – any or all of whom could have strong 10-15 year test careers if brought in now. I guess Haddin’s done OK, esp. this series, but Paine should be brought in at the slightest drop from Haddin.
December 6th 2010 @ 10:25am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
James, I like your point about England having nothing to show should it still be 0-0 come Perth, and in some respects it would be a similar scenario to England’s fighting draw at Cardiff last year. That time of course, Australia had nothing to show for its evident dominance, and we all know how that series went.
That said, Aust will need to fight like we’ve not seen before to bat for the next two days. But Watson and Katich are looking good already, so it’s a start….
December 6th 2010 @ 8:53am
The Clint said | December 6th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Australia looks absolutely shocking at the moment to say the least. Fieldings gone, can’t bowl and only 3 bats are looking like scoring decent runs. As soon as Australia can’t win the urn they should turn to youth and look to rebuild as they did in the early to mid 90′s. If by the 4th test we still have hardly improved, bring in the likes of Ferguson, Khawaja, Smith and possibly George, Starc, Cameron, O’keefe, White, Wade, Paine and Hughes should be looked at too.
The only positive I can see out of Australia at the moment is how well ( regardless of the figures) Harris bowled. He was the only bowler who looked threatening and didn’t look like he was just giving up. To me Harris at the moment is the best bowler in Australia, well when fully fit.
December 6th 2010 @ 9:03am
Koops said | December 6th 2010 @ 9:03am | Report comment
Can’t get interested, dont really care, my kids play, and i go along and watch on sunday morning, and i enjoy it, or maybe enjoy them enjoying it, but don’t really care if Australia wins or loses, and i am not sure when it happened, probably about 5 to 10 years ago.
Maybe when Clarke was being groomed, maybe because we were dominant.
December 6th 2010 @ 9:18am
Darwin Stubbie said | December 6th 2010 @ 9:18am | Report comment
What this team needs is a dose of someone like Steve Rixon – heard Ponting interviewed after yesterday and he was basically resigned to losing this if the game goes for the full 2 days … no fight there whatsoever
December 6th 2010 @ 10:36am
Brett McKay said | December 6th 2010 @ 10:36am | Report comment
that’s not the worst suggestion Darwin, Rixon would certainly bring some mongrel with him. I can answer the question about what Neilsen actually does, too – he gives Ponting throwdowns (*facepalm*).
Interesting in the nets this morning, Ponting, Katich and Hussey were all having a hit, and Watson had either had one already, or was waiting to go in. This was a bit after 9 bells this morning, and I thought it was interesting that Clarke wasn’t there. He may well have had a hit already, it should be said, but it was interesting nonetheless that he was the only top 5 bat not there…
December 6th 2010 @ 2:49pm
Lolly said | December 6th 2010 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
So was Watson. He looked resigned too. Really weird, they are paid too much to look so ‘I give up.’ Perhaps I should respect their honesty though? I don’t think they can win in a pink fit. But they need some youth who are more optimistic now that is obvious.