Thorpie’s back in the pool and back in the race again
By Geoff Lemon, 2 Feb 2011 Geoff Lemon is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- 2012 London Olympics, comeback, Ian Thorpe, swimming
So Ian Thorpe is back. In a move that is sure to cheer up the country’s sports fans after some slim pickings of late, Australia’s five-time Olympic gold medallist today announced his intention to compete at the 2012 Olympics in London.
MORE OPINION: by Adrian Musolino below
Intriguingly, he says he won’t be contesting the 400 metres race in which he made his name, but will be concentrating on the freestyle legs in the 100 and 200 metre relays.
Thorpe’s comeback has been a long time coming, but in a way it’s little surprise. Indeed, the surprise is almost that it hasn’t come sooner. Thorpe had a mini-retirement after the 2004 Olympics, and his attempted comeback in 2006 was abandoned after illness and injury concerns.
“There’s just been something that’s kinda been nagging,” said Thorpe today. Quite. There was always the feeling he had unfinished business.
In any case, sporting comebacks are hardly rare, nor inexplicable. The strain of training and constantly being in the public eye can be enough to make sports stars withdraw from their chosen vocation. But when someone dedicates so much of their life and energy to one single pursuit, they’re bound to start missing it eventually.
Michael Jordan twice came back in the NBA, with solid results. Lance Armstrong came back from testicular cancer to win seven consecutive Tours de France, then came back again after a brief retirement. Tony Lockett’s attempted comeback, with respect, wasn’t quite as successful as either.
Martina Hingis won the Australian Open, US Open, and Wimbledon at the age of 16 and retired by 22, before her comeback three years later was evaporated through a rolled up 20-dollar note.
Kim Clijsters retired at 24 and had a baby, but the lure of the comeback trail saw her win this year’s Australian Open. In swimming, Libby Trickett and Geoff Huegill are two others to recently make comebacks for the green and gold.
Swimmers, more than many athletes, have to put in a lot of their work from an early age. It’s no rare sight to see swimmers of 15 or 16 representing their countries, winning medals, and even breaking world records.
That, of course, means that they’ve been in serious training from at least the very beginning of their teens. Only in sports like gymnastics do athletes have to do such hard yards from such a young age.
Some, of course, don’t have what it takes in their youth. The lure of glory keeps these swimmers in the pool, striving, into their late 20s and beyond. Occasionally we see an older swimmer have a breakthrough tournament. More often we don’t.
But for those like Thorpe and Hingis, who sweep all before them even before they’re allowed to order a beer, it’s easy to see how motivation would drop away. What else is left to achieve? Why sign up to another four years of hard toil? Once you’ve finished Lord of the Rings, you don’t feel that inclined to go back to the first page.
Hence the retirements, and the joy of not having to train and face cameras every day. But then, with a little more age comes perspective. Thorpe’s interim has probably been a lot of fun, but by now the thrill of freedom may have been Prozacked into something more mundane.
And of course, the competitive will that makes a champion is still there, even if it has been distracted for a while by fashion shoots or submerged in good champagne. “My drive is for performance, and that’s it.,” said Thorpe today, when asked what has motivated his decision. It was ever thus.
Considering the intense lengths of preparation to which he went in his youthful days of dominance, a comeback tilt 18 months out from the ultimate aim could be leaving his run a bit late. It’s more than a little nerve-wracking: the man himself conceded that he was risking what he called “a perfect career.”
But Thorpe, for all his lack of tough-guy blokey persona, is an extraordinarily focused and dogged individual. His determination is what drove him through all those lonely teenage years of following the black line, to the summit of world sport where we first encountered him.
While many may fear that the result will be more Lockett than Armstrong, we should back Thorpe in.
If anyone can make it, he’s the man to do it.
Geoff Lemon is a writer and radio broadcaster. He joined The Roar as an expert columnist in 2010, writes the satirical blog Heathen Scripture, and tweets from @GeoffLemonSport.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics, comeback, Ian Thorpe, swimming

February 2nd 2011 @ 11:11am
Nathan said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:11am | Report comment
good to see Virgin Blue involved, long time supporter of Aust swimming. what has thorpie got left to prove? he was and is a champion, but does he need to prove it again? i hope his motives are righteous!
February 2nd 2011 @ 11:21am
Hospital said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Bah, Virgin Blue lining his pocket shouldn’t be his motivation! Or is it just a help for his training in Abu Dhabi?
February 2nd 2011 @ 11:24am
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:24am | Report comment
Breaking news: Ian Thorpe is broke and will gun for some cash.
He is simply to old for the requirements of modern swimming, a hero he is but a humiliated loser he will be remembered as in time.
Its sad really
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:33pm
mattamkII said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:33pm | Report comment
thats actually quite a funny statement given he was the man who re-defined modern swimming.
Your comment seems even more silly when you consider the current 400m WR is only .01 faster than his PB.
Sure the times have moved on a fair bit in the 200 and 800 but even if he cant catch up, wack him in a relay team and the fella ads value.
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:46pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
No one is claiming he doesn’t have talent but to think that he would even get close to his PB now is very far fetched.
When he was 21, training 6 days a week and smashing competitions nearly every weekend. Training in teams with the best of everything, in his prime in peak condition… that was the best he could do then and unfortunately its not the best anymore… move on and let the youngster who are heading there have a go.
Putting him in just the relay mean he takes up someone else’s spot on the plain and in the pool.
He squandered his money and now want to get back in the pool 7 years on at the age of 28 (30) by the 2012 games. If he did low key swimming comps for the last 6 years and stayed in the pool id say maybe but this is not the case. He is plomp, to bulky and any man 28 and above will tell you it gets harder and harder to shed the pounds.
Simple fact is this is for money and not glory, money wont push him hard enough.
Its media stunt to rake in some money and that spoils what he has done 8 years ago.
February 2nd 2011 @ 2:07pm
mattamkII said | February 2nd 2011 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
But if he one of the 4 fastest 400m swimmers in Australia is it a problem that he makes the team?
Also, we’re talking about swimming aren’t we? that doesnt happen every day of the week does it….
February 2nd 2011 @ 2:15pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 2:15pm | Report comment
No but training will be everyday, every single day… this is why not everyone make it to the games, its hard work.
If he makes it on what he can swim now(not what he did 8 years ago) then by all means.
We wont think about experience and chances for the young and up coming, no need to invest in the future, maybe they can ask him to swim in the 2016 games… hell why not 2020, he will only be 38
February 2nd 2011 @ 11:25am
Talisman said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:25am | Report comment
I think at 31 he’s probably in his prime, mentally & physically. He might just become greater than the greatest swimmer we’ve produced (just my opinion). But if it doesn’t work out, nothing lost – he’s still the best. As for motivation – I don’t know but the challenge is certainly there.
February 2nd 2011 @ 11:35am
Cotter said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:35am | Report comment
I think he is 28.
February 2nd 2011 @ 11:39am
Rabbitz said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:39am | Report comment
It will be interesting to see whether he can cut it without his “cheat suits”.
None the less I hope he only qualifies on merit, not reputation, although this makes me doubt it – “Thorpe’s decision was to return as an elite athlete at the pinnacle of the sport.”
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:09pm
Sean said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
His suit wasn’t one of the buoyant “cheat suits” you are referring to!
Personally I believe he is strapped for cash and wants to get as much sponsorship he can while still young enough!
Olympic qualifying is cut throat and he will only make the team if he qualifies…unless he falls off the blocks!
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:16pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
No Sean it wasn’t the buoyant ones of late but back then the Aussie team introduce new type fastskins via their sponsor Speedo that helped alot of records tumble and gave many an edge that they would not have without the skins.
Same principle only the effectiveness varies.
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:33pm
Rabbitz said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:33pm | Report comment
A lot of competitors could not afford the latest and greatest suits, so they were consigned to miss out on both the wins and the sponsorship dollars. The wins and records were not just based on the athletes talent and ability, it was also based on who sponsored who, especially those whose team was sponsored by a suit manufacturer.
Clearly there was something wrong with that system or the associations would not have barred the suits.
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:37pm
mattamkII said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
oh dear what rubbish….
Anyone who was going to go close to winning anything had access to those suites.
Many swimmers chose not to use them, still broke records and won medals.
Honestly, sometimes I wish people would actually think before they write front bar chat on here.
February 2nd 2011 @ 2:09pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
OK Matta, so why do some wear them if they are no good?
the Faskskin’s biomimetic design surface mimics the rough shark denticles to reduce drag along key areas of the body. The characteristics of the fabric improve shape retention and increase muscle compression to reduce vibration and retain muscle shape to reduce fatigue and power loss. Athlete passive drag tests show full body FAST SKIN is 7.5%* faster than all other suits tested. The V-shaped denticle print of the fabric allows the body to slip through the water more smoothly. FLEXSKIN is a smooth surface material allows greater flexibility and less drag. Just like the shark’s skin, Fastskin and Flexskin were positioned to accommodate the changing flow conditions along the swimmer’s body to create the most advanced and lowest drag racing swimwear in the world to date. It is the most technically advanced swimwear ever made.
February 2nd 2011 @ 2:22pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
and no its not accessible to everyone, the suits that made everyone moan in the last games cost nearly 2K each, not like the poor countries will pay that. Companies like Speedo keep them under raps until the big events as to showcase them in the main pools without the bemoaning media.
Its not all black and white. Why then did the Aussie media make such a fuss about the german swim wear?
February 2nd 2011 @ 4:02pm
Rabbitz said | February 2nd 2011 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
$2k and can only be used a couple of times…
February 2nd 2011 @ 11:55am
Nick the second said | February 2nd 2011 @ 11:55am | Report comment
I think he might want to ditch the tanning booths for the rest of the swimmers sakes.
February 2nd 2011 @ 12:18pm
Stacker said | February 2nd 2011 @ 12:18pm | Report comment
He’s too old at 28? You’ve got to be kidding me, he’s the most successful Australian Olympic swimmer in history. Has everyone forgotten about Geoff Huegill? He still keeps himself fit, unlike Geoff, and when he came back at an even older age he won a commonwealth gold medal in the 100m butterfly as well as the medley. People are becoming to attached to the moniker that is youth, and dismissing those older because they don’t have it.
February 2nd 2011 @ 12:37pm
Rich_daddy said | February 2nd 2011 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
Thorpie’s has come out of retirement. But when will he come out of the closet?
February 2nd 2011 @ 7:41pm
Phil Osopher said | February 2nd 2011 @ 7:41pm | Report comment
Is Ian in the closet? What the hell would he be doing in there? He reminds me of Mr Garrison more than Tom Cruise.
February 2nd 2011 @ 12:41pm
DNB 2010 said | February 2nd 2011 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
What ever happen to the old Aussie support for those having a go! Go on Ian for deciding to have a go and see if he can make the team for London. At least he is honest in respect to qualifying through the trials then see what happens from there, if doesn’t make it well at least he can say to himself – I had a go.
Swimming is an individual sport and Ian is simply testing to see how far he can go and put those mental bugs to rest once and for all.
February 2nd 2011 @ 12:53pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
DNB you are right and very true blue of you to say so but I have it from a very reliable source that he is in financial strife, owing banks and Tax man money.
Chances are he is not going to win gold, silver or even bronse but the come back story and the sponsors will help out with the bills.
Now if you still think he is having a fair dinkum go then its your choice. Personally is makes me sick and the only thing that will change my mind is if he actually does make to even a bronze I will apologize.
Stacker, its not like other sports, swimmers have to train and train and train… 15KM swim in the morning, gym session lunch time and a 20KM swin in the late arvo. The stamina is there when you are early 20ies but fades fast after 25, especially if you are far behind on fitness which he is. He would be on some sort of roid program to bring him up to speed again but will have to go off it 5-6 weeks before a meet. This will reduce his speed and stamina considerably.
Make no mistake he WAS the best swimmer of our time but he will not make it to those heights again and when it comes to the Olympics if you are not improving you are going backwards.
Rich daddy
LOL
February 2nd 2011 @ 12:55pm
Republican said | February 2nd 2011 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
I reckon Ian would love to be able to go head to head with Phelps.
I say good on him for having a go but he may have left his run a bit late me thinks.
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:15pm
Sean said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
head to head in the pool or in bed?
February 2nd 2011 @ 1:18pm
TembaVJ said | February 2nd 2011 @ 1:18pm | Report comment
hehehe
He will be 30 by the 2012 games… simply to old, not without drugs.