Why negativity dilutes the Wallabies brand
By GrecoRoman, 21 Jul 2011 GrecoRoman is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- 2011 Rugby World Cup, Matt Giteau, rugby, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, Samoa rugby, wallabies
104 Have your say
Related coverage
Everybody watching the international friendly between Manu Samoa and the Wallabies would have been impressed by the sheer passion exhibited by the plucky Samoan underdogs.
This was a fantastic opportunity for the tiny minnows of rugby to step up and maximise their peculiar Islander rugby brand.
However, it didn’t end there. In what many pundits have labelled a ‘boil-over’, they even finished the match having scored more points than the men in gold which, technically speaking, was a ‘loss’ for the Qantas Wallabies One Team 2011.
There has been a great deal of vexation on this site and others over the respective points differential at full-time.
Of course, if the game had gone on for another half hour the Wallabies would probably have won the match, but in today’s world of instant gratification that fact has been completely overlooked to focus entirely on the negative side of the equation.
Surely we have to ask ourselves if the Wallaby message is being lost in translation.
Are we as the consumers of rugby union in this country ignoring the strategic overview developed painstakingly by John O’Neill and the Australian Rugby Union?
Rather than go over old ground by focusing on some individual performance paradigm which never addresses the holistic synergies of the group structure, we should look to consider the position the Qantas Wallabies are in at this phase of the 2011 Rugby World Cup journey.
Under head coach Robbie Deans the elite playing roster has implemeted this proactive relational mindset. Time does not stand still and despite the result against Samoa, the individual Wallaby is always thinking 60/60/24/7/365.
There has been much talk of attitudinal complacency, but as Robbie Deans said to an AAP media correspondent: “I don’t know what other people were thinking, but we certainly weren’t (complacent) … and we talked about that – internally and externally. We’ve obviously reviewed the game – now we’re looking ahead.”
This is the critical aspect so many posters have ignored. Sure, the ‘final score’ is possibly the only statistic that many rugby consumers consider at first glance, but what is more important is the seamless integration the Qantas Wallabies have built between the internal and external communication channels.
Moving forwards, or “looking ahead” to the match against the Springboks, the challenge will be to re-purpose the resources of the group without divolving too much in the way of summative evaluation in respect of the Samoa game or losing that integrated culture.
“It’s more about the fact that we lost. It’s more about the fact that we didn’t play well,” he said. “Had we not done either of those two things, the reaction may have been different.”
Robbie is again on the money in this instance.
The reaction may well have been different. This is professional sport after all. Opinions are subjective. What would we be thinking if they had done only one of those things, let alone both?
This is open to debate. We pride ourselves in this country knowing that the Qantas Wallabies are the only side in international rugby that can engage interactively for unplanned-for results. We apply the proverb “a watched pot never boils” not only to our game preparation management, but also our capacity to seize the moment when it arrives.
Even Wallaby captain Rocky Elsom has owned the reality of the criticism generated by the rugby consumer: “I would be surprised if everyone was happy about how it went. As far as I’m concerned, guys get given a jersey to do a job and no other reason.
“I don’t know how else to respond to that,” he said. “We don’t have a habit of talking about those sorts of comments as a group. Whether or not that’s motivation for guys – that’s an individual thing.”
So having identified the job’s variables, the match group develops mixed strategies to internalise the external statements and contain that within a holistic, logic-based paradigm.
There’s no point in incorporating these messages into the overall view without quantifiable parameters – after all, those psychological processes are individual, not necessarily a group-wide competence with the appropriate rugby playing kpi’s structured within it.
Having addressed that, Rocky analysed the dynamics of the group: “I feel like the guys are in a reasonable head space moving forward,” he said.
“As bad as it was, it’s important that everyone sticks together a little bit. We spent a lot of time as a group afterwards – there are things that you can do something about and then there’s everything else. (My message was) don’t dwell on the things that don’t help.”
Having an understanding of what the group can control is about building that circle of influence. Think internal. Think external. Think about what can be controlled. But don’t think about all three at the same time.
“We got to turn our minds onto the South Africans this weekend and respond as well as we can.”
Re-engineer and re-purpose. Focus on what is ahead. A very simple message. A rugby brand that can re-purpose correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to dynamically unleash itself.
The journey to the World Cup is multi-phased, not linear. Think integrated. It seems staggering, but it’s true! The Qantas Wallabies are engaged by the journey and are careful to select their macro inputs.
As consumers of the Wallabies’ product, so should we.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (407)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (268)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (249)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (246)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (195)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (173)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (209)
- Well, that’s almost done it for the Tahs (176)
- Rebels upset Tahs 24-22: dash finals hopes (65)
- Chiefs grind down Crusaders to win 28-19 (26)
- Reds back to scene of Super triumph (2)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (195)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (173)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (209)
- Has McKenzie cost Cooper the Lions Tour? (120)
- Does Quade Cooper really matter? (28)
- Rebels vs Waratahs: Super Rugby live scores, blog (415)
- Chiefs vs Crusaders: Super Rugby live scores (182)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- 2011 Rugby World Cup, Matt Giteau, rugby, Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, Samoa rugby, wallabies



July 21st 2011 @ 4:01am
Johnno said | July 21st 2011 @ 4:01am | Report comment
a great win by manu samoa, but i still think the win needs ot be put into context for what it is , and not blown out of proportion. My opinion and reasons why.
This is 2011 everyone in the World. Rugby is now a pro sport , and all the pacific island nations players are 100% full time athletes, playing, in Japan, euro Leagues, and the super 15. So they are just as physical in the same sports science physical condition as teams like , Aus, NZ, England, france , south Africa, etc and all the other teams like Italy and Irleand, and argentina.
So this myth almost as if it is so shocking for team like samoa to win, i believe demeans and disrespects the athletes of these pacific islands nations, who don’t get poached to play for australia, England , and New Zealand are.
Also lets put the Assie loss into context to. They only had 1 week maybe 6 days max to prepare as a squad. hadnt played together as a teams since november. And having to get requainted some of them and assembling a large 45 man squad is complicated and all the nerves would of been there all week all the players jostling for spots. And build team morale, and team dynamics takes more than 6 days or 1 week.
Also alot of the aussie teamhad not played for at least 3 weeks , and some 4 weeks so a bit of court rust, and general rustiness so to speak. Where as Samoa was match conditoned.
Some of Samoas tries were a bit of luck, against the run of play not actual tries created by sustained build up. And australia tactically treated samoa with contempt by not taking shots at goal. And Australia still did not get beaten by much especially in the 2nd half, Samoa still went at 100% they did not go to sleep and drop there intensity and Australia lifted there’s form the 1st half. I believe australia has alot more improvemnt in there team than Samoa do, but still both teams have more improvement in them with samoa, welcoming back some big gun players, Joe tekori, Henry Tuilagi as examples, and are developing nicely and will be a hnadful in the world cup, but the wallabies i still think come world cup time will be the superior team in my opinion.
I think if Australai played Samoa at say suncorp stadium in brisbane, or at Mlebourne rectagnular stadium with the same team that played samoa last weekend thats right the same 22 they would win, and rod davies apparantly was not wearing wet weather studs and he is 1 of th efastest wingers in the world. But a bit to 1 dimensional for me, but tuilangi is the best winger in the world but Rod davies made tuilangi look better than what he is, I don’t thinka peter hynes or drew mITCHELL, OR joe rockocko , or chris ashton, or JB PETERSON, or Tommy bowe would make him look as good they would either be his equal or just maybe shade him, or even be better than him.
And Rocky ELSOM IS A BETTER INTERNATIONAL PLAYER THAN SCOTT higenbotham and shoudl rightfully start, higgenbotham plays to loos he reminds me of nic kOSTER FORM THE STORMERS, NOT A STARTER but a good impact player, and Radike Samo is better than Mcalman, and Timani should still be looked at for the RWC.
The sAMOAN TEAM HAD BEEN PLAYING A BIT RECENTLY IN THE PACIFIC NATIONS CUP SO WERE FAR MORE AQUAINTED WITH EACH OTHER, AND WITH EACH OTHERS GAME PLANS ETC.
The NZ ALL BLACKS I think will be rusty to this weekend vs Fiji, as it is there 1st game of the season together.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:07am
sailosi said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:07am | Report comment
All this result did was once again reinforce the austalian rugby communities ignorance towards the rest of the rugby world. The response to this loss has been embarrassing as i have said before, when we continue to hear that Ben Robinson is the best l/h in the world yet i could go and pick out another 20 just as good as him in Europe, When Greg Martin said Samoan fans should take a photo at 3-0 i almost broke the tv i was that frustrated. They just don’t get it, as John Connolly said in 2007 when Georgia almost beat Ireland,”the rugby world is changing and we better get used to it”. Remember that there are 146 Fijians earning their income from rugby in France, their are only 170 pros in Australia.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:11am
Sam Taulelei said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Sailosi
Don’t sweat Greg Martin. He’s a genuinely affable bloke who loves rugby but his brain is often disconnected from his mouth during commentary when he gets caught up in the moment. Not for him is insightful analysis. He’s Australia’s version of Murray Mexted who is a lovely bloke in person but can’t help himself behind the mic.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:55am
sailosi said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Sam, i actually like Marto it’s just the vibe they send out about rugby outside of SANZAR, they treat it as a joke and to me it’s unproffessional, we don’t see the football commentators take this attitude when discussing soccer competitons outside of Europe.
July 21st 2011 @ 10:00am
El Gamba said | July 21st 2011 @ 10:00am | Report comment
I agree – the risk of perception being truth.
July 21st 2011 @ 1:46pm
Funk said | July 21st 2011 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
You obviously haven’t heard the English soccer commentators talk about the A League….almost every time they bring it up (which is rare) you can hear them giggling in the bacground.
July 21st 2011 @ 2:30pm
Campbell Watts said | July 21st 2011 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
And rightly so, lets be honest
July 21st 2011 @ 1:12pm
Decs said | July 21st 2011 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
Johnny, the most sensible thing I have read all week. Context is often forgotten about.
Also for what it is worth I think Deans has left Gits out because he knows what he gets from him. McCabe et al now have a chance to prove they can step up.
Higgo while solid is not IMO an 80min test performer, but will add great 20min bursts. Deans needs to give Rocky minutes to regain his fitness.
My only surprise is no Vickerman to give him the same time to get back his match fitness.
July 21st 2011 @ 1:53pm
Handles O'Love said | July 21st 2011 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
Vickerman apparently has a back strain.
Rocky needs more than match time, I think he needs the elixir of youth. Please, please prove me wrong Rocky.
July 21st 2011 @ 1:54pm
thurl said | July 21st 2011 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
For all the context, the Wobblies still should have won that game
July 21st 2011 @ 2:05pm
Nat said | July 21st 2011 @ 2:05pm | Report comment
Johnno, actually the Samoan team that played recently in the Pacific Nations Cup was made up of local Samoans. This one was thrown together at the last moment of their professional expats mainly from Europe and Japan. So your excuse that they were more acquainted than the Aussies doesn’t hold water.
Also you state that Rocky is a better international player than Higgers. I’m not sure what you base this on. I’ve been a Rocky fan since his Nudgee days but his form has been on a downward slide since Europe (mainly due to injury) while Higger’s form has been climbing. I believe that Higgers has overtaken Rocky this year. Higgers had an excellent S15 – better than I’ve ever seen from Rocky, but I know you said “international player”, so the only recent evidence we have to go on is the Samoan test, where Rocky looked ineffectual and Higgers had a blinder for the 20 minutes or so that he was on.
Also I don’t agree with Greco who said that if the game went on for another 30 mins the the Aussies would have won. The Samoans won the last 20 minutes even after Genia, Beale and Higginbotham came on. Maybe they would have kept increasing their lead!
The Samoan team who played fantastically and deserved to win should be congratulated, not excuses made for the Australians.
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE SAMOAN RUGBY TEAM… YOU ROCK!!!
July 21st 2011 @ 6:11am
kelefua said | July 21st 2011 @ 6:11am | Report comment
Johnno – I agree with your assessment. Gone are the days where Pacific Island teams were filled with amateurs. The professional era is starting to pay dividends with Manu Samoa. They have been under the radar for quite some time and have been progressing nicely over the last few years. Remember there Northern Hemisphere tour at the end of last year. Taking Ireland, England and Scotland close in all three games. So it is no big surprise that they were able to beat one of the top 3 countries in the world. Forget if it were an Australian B side. Manu Samoa turned up to play!!
I look forward to seeing a full strength Samoan forward pack with Jo Tekori and Henry Tuilagi. This makes what to be a very interesting competition in the Pool of D. I have my money on Manu Samoa coming at least second in there Pool ahead of Wales, Fiji and Namibia. The game against South Africa in a sold out stadium is going to be a cracker. I wonder if Wales will send out there best team against South Africa or Samoa, then they have Fiji as there third game.
Go Manu Samoa!!
July 21st 2011 @ 9:09am
Tissot Time said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Kelefua love the name and your naked enthusiasm….. Speaking of names I was wondering whether Greco was related to a certain Helene who died by Achilles’ sword? We all know the pen is mighier than the sword!
July 21st 2011 @ 9:12am
Tissot Time said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:12am | Report comment
mightier….pen slipped..
July 21st 2011 @ 1:34pm
Nat said | July 21st 2011 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
The slip of a pen can sometimes be more painful than the slip of a sword.
July 21st 2011 @ 3:05pm
Mick said | July 21st 2011 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
haha. nice one.
July 21st 2011 @ 3:10pm
kovana said | July 21st 2011 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
@ Kelefua…
Love the name…..
I should change my name to Luafua….
July 21st 2011 @ 6:29am
Pot Hale said | July 21st 2011 @ 6:29am | Report comment
Jeez, GrecoRoman – I haven’t heard such meanderings since Marketing Psychobabble 101 at university.
I take great heart in this.
If Ireland lose their pool test match against Australia, I can’t wait to say: “Rather than go over old ground by focusing on some individual performance paradigm which never addresses the holistic synergies of the group structure, we should look to consider the position the Irish team are in at this phase of the 2011 Rugby World Cup journey.”
And the alarmingly insightful: “Australia finished the match having scored more points than the men in green which, technically speaking, was a ‘loss’ for the Ireland Team 2011.”
But of course, ” if the game had gone on for another half hour the Irish would probably have won the match, but in today’s world of instant gratification that fact has been completely overlooked to focus entirely on the negative side of the equation.”
Will we get another four points for that?
July 21st 2011 @ 4:44pm
Bruiser said | July 21st 2011 @ 4:44pm | Report comment
I think this article highlights, indirectly perhaps, exactly what is wrong with Australian Rugby. Too much hot air, psycho babble etc. Call it what you will. What about simply stating that the team were outplayed, outmuscled and out enthused. And Rocky owning that as Captain that they got spanked and looked like they were more interested in watching than getting stuck in and down and dirty. That’s what we need but I think they get confused messages from Dingo with all his pscho mumbo jumbo and start to belive they are superstars who don’t need to do the basic hard yards. Let’s get back to basics, please!
July 21st 2011 @ 5:27pm
vaguely said | July 21st 2011 @ 5:27pm | Report comment
Yeah, too much management speak for me to read the whole thing…
July 21st 2011 @ 7:14pm
GrecoRoman said | July 21st 2011 @ 7:14pm | Report comment
Pot
Think: How many times did you reference Ireland ‘losing’ in that comment? Think: Is that the way to view Irish rugby possibilities? We in the Wallabies community are focused on the end result. The metrics for Rugby World Cups are more well-understood if they are not results-centric.
July 21st 2011 @ 8:52pm
Forcefan said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:52pm | Report comment
‘Paradigm’. – telltale sign of bs!
July 22nd 2011 @ 4:56am
Pot Hale said | July 22nd 2011 @ 4:56am | Report comment
Greco
Think: Bollox
Think: Bullshite
July 22nd 2011 @ 1:27pm
ooaahh said | July 22nd 2011 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
waste of my lunch break
July 21st 2011 @ 6:33am
Sam said | July 21st 2011 @ 6:33am | Report comment
Greco,
There is no such thing as an ‘international rugby friendly’. This is a term from soccer, perhaps sometimes used (as an excuse) when one’s team looses.
I agree, if the game had gone on for another half hour the Wallabies would probably have won, but what a completely and utterly irrelevant statement! If the Wallabies had twice the number of players on the field they would probably also win …..another thing for the instant gratification seekers of todays world to acknowelde.
How is the “seamless integration the Qantas Wallabies between the internal and external communication channels” more important than winning. What does that even mean?
Actually what does your entire article mean? Is your point that loosing isn’t all bad because they may yet win the rugby world cup?
July 21st 2011 @ 3:37pm
jeremy said | July 21st 2011 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Sam, it’s a parody of the groupthink coming out of the ARU at the moment, and GR does it very, very well…
Samoa measured the success of the game in a very straightforward way, ie they scored more points and won.
Deans et al played down the result and talked up the positives, ie it was a ‘learning experience’ not a loss, and there would be ‘valuable information taken forward’ not a wake-up call.
GR and others on the site are quite rightly annoyed about the meandering commentary coming from leaders, coaches and players on the Wallabies.
July 21st 2011 @ 7:20pm
GrecoRoman said | July 21st 2011 @ 7:20pm | Report comment
Sam
Thank you for your your feedback. It is valued. You contributed some interesting and valid points. They will be considered in defining our path on the Wallaby rugby journey. Have a great day!
July 21st 2011 @ 8:05pm
Sam said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:05pm | Report comment
Ha, a comedy script. My apologies. The subtlety was lost on me.
July 21st 2011 @ 6:40am
Scotty said | July 21st 2011 @ 6:40am | Report comment
I’m an Englishman who regularly reads articles on here but I don’t really comment. But in this case I think it’s necessary.
If the Australian side ever read your article and believe what you write then they’ll be sunk. Let me break it down as to why, by highlighting certain statements within your article and presenting my issues with them:
Statement one: “Of course, if the game had gone on for another half hour the Wallabies would probably have won the match, but in today’s world of instant gratification that fact has been completely overlooked to focus entirely on the negative side of the equation.”
The truth is that Samoa won the game within 80 minutes. Rugby Union isn’t played over 160 minutes and Samoa legitimately beat Australia through playing a physical, aggressive and fairly intelligent game based on being clinical in the opposition territory. Furthermore, a Wallaby supporter or a member of the Australian rugby community won’t get instant gratification by losing to tier 2 nations.
Statement two: “Even Wallaby captain Rocky Elsom has owned the reality of the criticism generated by the rugby consumer”
What is a Rugby consumer? It implies that Rugby is a brand which can be exploited. Maybe in the business sense in which commercial deals are hammered out in the boardroom (such as being branded the ‘Qantas Wallabies’) but on the field consumerism doesn’t come into it – raw results do and the truth is that the Wallabies don’t have neither a vision nor the necessary grit to iron out wins when the going gets tough – particularly up front.
Statement three: “The journey to the World Cup is multi-phased, not linear. Think integrated. It seems staggering, but it’s true! The Qantas Wallabies are engaged by the journey and are careful to select their macro inputs”
Is this a Rugby team or a hard drive system for Microsoft? Macro inputs? Do you reckon when the tight five are up against it when playing the likes of England, the Springboks or the All Blacks that they are thinking about Macro inputs? Of course not. Again, this business way of thinking in your eyes is flawed.
Summary Conclusion: My conclusion is that Rugby Union is a game based on confrontation and collaboration. Confrontation with the opposition and collaboration within the team. It is also a game based on the principles of continuity, pressure, territory and, obviously, scoring more points than the opposition.
Samoa showed Australia how to do that at the weekend by using their tight forwards to deliver the ball and allowing strong ball carriers to break the gain line from depth. When they didn’t have the ball for lengthy periods, they were aggressive but controlled and physically didn’t allow the ‘Qantas Wallabies’ to play their own game.
They aren’t showing much good form, and even a win over a weakened Bok side will only paper over the cracks. Hopefully for your sakes it will be able to be fixed in time for the RWC, because God only knows what could happen to the Australian side if they face a serious side who can really demolish them up front and genuinely starve them of ball.
July 21st 2011 @ 1:16pm
brendo said | July 21st 2011 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
Scotty
He was joking.
July 21st 2011 @ 3:07pm
Wylie said | July 21st 2011 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
Apparently the English don’t understand sarcasm
July 21st 2011 @ 7:39pm
GrecoRoman said | July 21st 2011 @ 7:39pm | Report comment
Scotty
I’m not sure the Qantas Wallabies would read this article. Ultimately, as Rocky pointed out in the quote within the article, only some guys who get the jersey to do a job are definitely motivated by external inputs. I do agree that Rugby Union is a game based on confrontation and collaboration. Absolutely. I’m not sure about England, but the rugby community here in Australia prides itself on our collaborative approach. What does the term “confrontation” really mean? Obviously our goal is to rev up our power to optimise without reducing our aptitude to maximise. That is the game-plan approach when things are getting tough up front as you rightly point out. Cheers.
July 22nd 2011 @ 2:48am
sph45 said | July 22nd 2011 @ 2:48am | Report comment
Wow Scotty. Ummm… you’re obviously a prop.
July 21st 2011 @ 7:53am
sheek said | July 21st 2011 @ 7:53am | Report comment
Greco-Roman,
There are usually two problems with life.
1. Not enough attention, or thought, to what is going on in our world (Australians at present on many fronts – distracted by carbon tax).
2. Over-analysis, or too much thought into what might be a straight-forward problem.
You’re guilty of the second point. The Wallabies lost a test they were expected to win. Whether they had a 3rd XV, a 2nd XV, or a combination of the two, is irrelevant.
The test match was scheduled. It was lost. What it highlighted was flaws in the Wallaby game that have always been there, at least for most of the past 5-6 years, others historical.
Anyway, I’m going to stop now because I can see myself falling into the over-analysis trap…..
July 21st 2011 @ 8:21am
Rabbitz said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:21am | Report comment
The bottom line for me, is that in a couple of years time the record books will only show that Manu Samoa won. It will show the score, but all the useless babble about “B” sides will be forgotten.
Manu Samoa out played the Wallabies. End of story.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:45am
sheek said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:45am | Report comment
“Manu Samoa out played the Wallabies. End of story”.
Absolutely…..!
Now the Saffies will pay (or at least that ought to be the postscript)….!!!
July 21st 2011 @ 8:32am
Who Needs Melon said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:32am | Report comment
sheek, I agree with you on point 1… and on the over-focus on carbon tax incidentally… but I think that Greco is making the same point to some degree as you are on 2… albeit very obscurely. I am positive Greco is parodying and lampooning our current Wallaby coach in part to highlight his avoidance of publicly issuing simple statements in favor of obscure, cryptic babble which we all try to make sense of.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:05am
Sam Taulelei said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:05am | Report comment
“highlight his avoidance of publicly issuing simple statements in favor of obscure, cryptic babble which we all try to make sense of.”
You mean just like the national coach he’s obviously lampooning.
July 21st 2011 @ 8:30am
Jiggles said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Grecco that was gold! You cynical pr!ck!Grecco that was gold! You cynical pr!ck!
July 21st 2011 @ 8:33am
The Bush said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:33am | Report comment
This is possibly the funniest article I have ever read on the Roar.
Greco, please, oh please, keep up the good fight!
Some of my favourites;
Everybody watching the international friendly
they even finished the match having scored more points than the men in gold which
Qantas Wallabies One Team 2011
Of course, if the game had gone on for another half hour the Wallabies would probably have won the match
Sadly Greco, you left out my favourite Robbie line from the weekend’s post match interview:
“We finished second today”
You can’t make this stuff up… I mean seriously, it’s a one-on-one contest; you win or lose, you don’t finish second Robbie…
July 21st 2011 @ 10:09am
Harry said | July 21st 2011 @ 10:09am | Report comment
We finished second today … FFS, you couldn’t make it up!
Deans has demonstrated that he can do sports-blabble with the best of them. He actually speaks more twaddle than Eddie Jones, which takes some doing.
Or to put it another way: The current leader of the coaching group tasked with steering the Qantas Walalbies playing group has moved the needle foward in twaddlespeak in a positive way. When he came to the job with a clean slate he must have been aware that Eddie and his coaching group had attained a really strong benchmark in correlating sub optimum final score outcomes with positive messaging to the stakeholders in the post game environment.He’s taken that legacy to the next level and thats important in the overall scheme of things particuarly in relation to ticking the boxes with the chief stakeholder from a coaching leaders perspective, JON.
July 21st 2011 @ 10:15am
The Bush said | July 21st 2011 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Harry,
If you’re interested, I wrote an article detailing all the issues wrong with Deans’ coaching reign a few days ago. Unfortunately about forty (40) other articles were published that day so it fell down the list rather quickly.
If you go to my profile you can have a read… It highlights exactly what has gone wrong over the last three (3) years…
(sorry for the plug Greco)
July 21st 2011 @ 7:46pm
GrecoRoman said | July 21st 2011 @ 7:46pm | Report comment
No probs for the plug Bush. Harry brought up the quote from Deans about “finishing second”. I certainly would have considered it if I had seen it. I suggest to both of you to look at this year and the next stage of this journey as being like the ‘Tour de France’. Ok, so we didn’t get the stage. Samoa crossed the line first. Good for them. They can stand on the podium for the day and exchange cheek kisses with a couple of pretty girls. However, we are now coming up to the big mountain stages and the Qantas Wallabies team are still the ones wearing the yellow jersey.
July 22nd 2011 @ 11:02am
The Bush said | July 22nd 2011 @ 11:02am | Report comment
Greco,
I can’t believe you missed the “we finished second today” comment.
Easily the best comment of the post-match interview.
I might have to stop reading your comments Greco, my work is beginning to question the laughter escaping my office…
“However, we are now coming up to the big mountain stages and the Qantas Wallabies team are still the ones wearing the yellow jersey.”
July 22nd 2011 @ 11:38am
Nick_KIA said | July 22nd 2011 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Hey Bush are you a lawyer? I’m always intrigued that you go with the number in brackets thing after spelling the word.
July 21st 2011 @ 8:38am
johnny-boy said | July 21st 2011 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Greco is probably peforming a valuable service in Australian rugby by mocking the meaningless trash that comes out of head office and Deans. Keep it up Greco – eventually they may get sick of being made fun of and becoming a target of ridicule and might decide they are better off just telling it like it is. You can start on our politicians next.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:04am
Sam Taulelei said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Another brilliant parody by Greco Roman, thanks for making a pleasant start to my morning.
I don’t think the first few posters realised that you’re taking the mickey.
July 21st 2011 @ 9:14am
The Bush said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Or the next few…
July 21st 2011 @ 9:26am
Sam Taulelei said | July 21st 2011 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Sorry people don’t mean to hijack GR’s thread
Bush when are you posting the next part of your article series? Looking forward to another good read.
July 21st 2011 @ 10:18am
The Bush said | July 21st 2011 @ 10:18am | Report comment
Sam,
Unfortunately, despite the huge amount of time I spend on here, I’m actually employed and tragically my employer is of the opinion that I was not employed as a journalist.
Anyway, I’ve decided that the next part of my series will discuss JON and the ARU from 2007 to 2011. My aim is to release an article a week leading up to the World Cup.
After JON and the ARU (which may constitute two (2) articles), I plan to discuss players who have disappeared, those who have emerged and also our major opponents and what they’ve been doing…