Wallabies still doubtful despite win over Springboks
By Andrew Logan, 15 Aug 2011 Andrew Logan is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies
Related coverage

Australia's David Pocock front, is tackled by South Africa's Bjorn Basson during their Tri-Nations rugby match. (AP Photo/Rob Griffith).
From the start this Durban Test, the Wallabies’ change of heart was obvious.
Will Genia took the kickoff and five breakdowns ensued, the first policed by David Pocock, Nathan Sharpe and Ben Alexander, the second where the ball was taken forward by Rocky Elsom who was covered by Stephen Moore and Scott Higginbotham, and the third was James Horwill backed up by Sharpe and Sekope Kepu.
On the fourth, Higginbotham trucked it up into a withering de Villiers hit where he was backed up by Moore.
Finally the fifth was a Sharpe hitup with Pocock, Alexander, Horwill and Kepu in his pocket, before Will Genia opted to float over a box kick and put the Springboks under pressure.
Thus began a Test which highlighted the most frustrating aspect of Wallaby culture – that only at the final desperate moment after a horrible loss and scathing criticism, are the Australians able to get up for the occasion.
Rarely do Wallaby teams win tough matches against leading sides without the pressure of the final stages of a tournament or some stinging critique to prod them into action.
The Wallabies only win the tough games when put under huge pressure by the public and the coaching staff – generally speaking, the honour of wearing the green and gold is not enough to have the Wallabies putting their bodies on the line.
But for now, that pressure existed and the Wallabies responded.
The early exchanges were torrid and the Wallabies gave out as much as they received, to the point where some of the tackles bordered on dangerous.
First Elsom on Botha where a scuffle ensued, then Elsom again on Russow and then McCabe on Fourie – all tackles where the man was lifted.
It wouldn’t surprise if the Wallabies had been coached to lift the leg in the tackle to stop the Springboks rumbling forward on their feet. It was effective and had the desired effect of giving the Springbok forwards cause for thought.
All this effort was led from the front by captain Rocky Elsom who answered his critics with the biggest first eight minutes ever by a Wallaby forward.
In an astonishing opening to the match, Elsom made several big tackles, one clean linebreak followed by a 40 metre run, and won a couple of lineouts, as well as his work at the breakdown.
If the Wallabies were looking for a man to follow, they couldn’t have done better than Elsom. The only unfortunate part being that, like the Wallabies, Elsom had to get to the point of having the public calling for his head before he put in a big game.
By contrast, Richie McCaw does it every single match, regardless of circumstance.
Another defining feature of this game was the absence of Quade Cooper, who didn’t touch the ball until the 4th minute – a veritable eternity considering how much they have relied on him in recent times, and a definite contrast to the All Blacks Test where the Wallabies play immediately revolved around Cooper and Beale from the very start.
It appeared to be a deliberate ploy to keep Cooper out of the game and to take the Springboks on in the way they least expected, with direct forward running through the inside channels.
Indeed, the first time Cooper took the ball to the line himself from phase play was after halftime in the 45th minute.
If we had hoped that the Wallabies would heed the calls to win the forward battle before going wide, we were well rewarded in this match.
The centres Pat McCabe and Adam Ashley Cooper were rarely sighted during the first 40, but when the Wallabies opened up in the second half, both reaped the rewards.
Ashley-Cooper gave glimpses of his incredible athleticism and McCabe providing steadfast support to a James O’Connor shimmy, which led to McCabe’s first Test try, and the only try in the 14-9 win to Australia.
Although the Wallabies clearly made a conscious decision to play direct early, the lack of centre involvement also reflected some very poor handling by the men in gold.
Several times early passes went astray from first and second phase, leading to turnovers before the centres could be unleashed on the broken defensive line.
The Wallabies application was admirable, but their handling was awful, and the All Blacks will never allow such slackness to go unpunished.
The Wallabies also bombed two tries, first with O’Connor throwing a pass which was intercepted by Jacques Fourie on the Springbok line, and then with Kurtley Beale being wrapped up by some desperation defence.
But the encouraging part was that when the Wallabies were judicious with their options, they opened up the Springboks with the ease of a housewife opening a can of beans.
Had some passes stuck and the support players been a metre or two closer, the score could well have been 30.
Part of the Wallaby dominance in the second stanza accrued through a rampant Wallaby scrum, greatly assisted by the shift of Bok skipper John Smit to tighthead. Former Springbok prop Os du Randt was recently scathing of Smit’s continued selection, and on this performance it’s hard to argue.
Smit was totally off the pace in the loose (a stark contrast with his replacement Bismarck du Plessis) and his scrummaging was dire.
The Smit/du Plessis/Steenkamp front row was overwhelmed by a resurgent and heavy Wallaby pack – a fact which must provoke South African concern and Wallaby optimism in equal measure.
Ben Alexander and Sekope Kepu were both fully functioning adult front rowers in this match, and the hooker Stephen Moore played all over his opposite number Smit – by the time du Plessis joined the fray, the battle was won.
After their listless performance last week, the Wallaby forwards to a man stood up to be counted, and few more so than Nathan Sharpe.
Sharpe’s omission from the NZ tour was more about shuffling players for game time than form-related, but in this match he showed his real value to this Wallaby side, and he must be an automatic World Cup selection.
Apart from the strong scrum, Sharpe was tireless in the loose and made several fighting ball carries to get the Wallabies on the front foot.
Late in the match, he and James Horwill forced a turnover from a Springbok maul through sheer brute strength and force of will, and it was this sort of uncompromising play that Wallaby supporters will be looking for in the pointy end of the RWC.
Anthony Faingaa was another who put a strong reminder of his talents to the selectors. World Cups are won with defence and Faingaa is without question the toughest defensive centre in Australia.
His timing isn’t bad either – his rushing shutdown of JP Pietersen was a wonderful example of anticipation and correct decision making, as was his late game takedown of Jacques Fourie, a notoriously difficult man to put down.
Overall, this was a Wallaby performance to be proud of, but only when the Wallabies can strong two or three of these together, can Australian rugby fans start to get excited.
The Wallabies have a nasty history of disappointing those who care for them the most.
This team has shown that they can bring out the big guns when their backs are to the wall, but they struggle for motivation when the stakes aren’t as high or when the public is on their side.
It’s only when they arrive at the last chance saloon, that they seem able to pull their boots on and stand up to the gunslingers of world rugby.
This makes them prime targets for a boilover in the pool stages of the Rugby World Cup and unless they can complete this Tri-Nations with a strong, aggressive performance against the All Blacks in Brisbane, they remain doubtful prospects for Eden Park in October.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (161)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (158)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- McKenzie or White: who will be the next Wallaby coach? (13)
- Chiefs back on top after downing Bulls (5)
- Rebels know Super improvement needed
- Quade can play way into Wallabies squad (2)
- A Kiwi’s advice to Wallaby supporters (15)
- Confessions of a rugby union traitor (9)
- Reds focus on Brumbies, not finals
- A Kiwi’s advice to Wallaby supporters (15)
- Confessions of a rugby union traitor (9)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (10)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (14)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (24)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (50)
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Springboks, Tri Nations, wallabies


August 15th 2011 @ 8:04am
Moaman said | August 15th 2011 @ 8:04am | Report comment
A breath of fresh air!! Nice read and couldn’t agree more. Been sayiing for a while now that the Australian fans need to DEMand more of their team and not kneel down in supplication each time they perform half-decently….
August 15th 2011 @ 9:00am
LeftArmSpinner said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:00am | Report comment
doubtful prospects, maybe, but still 2nd favourites…………..ahead of Boks and England. France are the unknowns, just like a souffle. you never know until it comes out of the oven.
August 15th 2011 @ 9:07am
mikeylives said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:07am | Report comment
Good article Andrew.
August 15th 2011 @ 9:17am
mr said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Agreed good balanced article, are you sure you are allowed to write this on the roar?
August 15th 2011 @ 9:18am
sheek said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:18am | Report comment
Andrew…. you nailed with your sentiments!
August 15th 2011 @ 9:26am
Brett McKay said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Great stuff Loges, and I do agree completely. Interestingly, the same could be said of our cricketers at the moment: just as they’ve been pretty much given up on (generally speaking), they’ve turned in two dominant performces for big wins in Sri Lanka, and with Ponting, Johnson and Clarke – -much maligned all of them – leading the way…
August 15th 2011 @ 9:26am
jameswm said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:26am | Report comment
I’ll still go against the grain and say Sharpe still hits like a wet mop and missed tackles, and Rocky was caught out down the blind twice. Isn’t that the blind side flanker’s first responsibility at the scrum? He actually passed it on one occasion though, which was a first.
August 15th 2011 @ 10:51am
Andrew Logan said | August 15th 2011 @ 10:51am | Report comment
True James – the skills were lacking for many players here I felt, including Rocky on the blind. If they can maintain this level of first 20 mins intensity, they’ll have a chance vs NZ.
August 15th 2011 @ 2:55pm
flying hori said | August 15th 2011 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
No chance Anaru, ABs will always be one step ahead, it was a game the wallabies had to win and thanks to a Bok side that played their 1st game to gether and ran out of gas, the wallabies did. NOT VERY IMPRESSIVE I MUST ADD, heaps of room for improvement and must before the Brisbane game.
August 15th 2011 @ 9:28am
Capital said | August 15th 2011 @ 9:28am | Report comment
Good work Andrew
Agree in spades. It was good to see the Wallabies build momentum and apply pressure.
It was good to see phase ball – not Cooper cutting the centres from minute one.
It was good to see determined defence and the tight five work as a unit.
And it was good to see Elsom lead the team by example for the first time this year.
The Wallabies sometimes remind me of my days in the Army. We had guys who would get bad comments in their preliminary Annual Report (3 months out), work for 3 months – get a better report, then slacken off.
Until these guys can compete in the first round of the Bledisloe, or when it is not a dead rubber – we might have a team that learns to dominate on a consistent basis. This was a good result, but I hope that they do not become complacent once selected and start to believe their own hype. This side has a lot of potential – mostly unrealised at this time.
August 15th 2011 @ 11:04am
kingplaymaker said | August 15th 2011 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Hmmm…I agree that they do play well when under the greatest pressure: on the plus side this maybe why they sometimes win world cups, as fear of being knocked out forces one or two great one-off perfomances
There are still big problems which would have been exposed against the ABs. There was a lot of mobility, energy and aggression in the forwards, but little physicality. Someone like Palu, TPN, Samo or Timani has to come in to add this or Jerome Kaino, Thorn, Mealamu will bash them back all day.
I’m afraid I think this is the worst attacking centre partnership in Wallabies history. AAC is the ghost of what he was. Aside from Barnes the only alternatives are just a very little better. I said they should have got Folau and Inglis when they were available last year. Genia, Cooper, Ioane, Folau, Inglis, O’Connor, Beale would have been an RWC winning backline. But JON doesn’t buy league players anymore, not having learnt that the relative failures of Sailor and Rogers to Tuqiri were because they were 27 and he was 23. Folau and Inglis would have been 23 and 20…The young convert better, that’s the lesson.
They can’t seriously take Vickerman after no rugby in three years. It’s sentimental fantasy. Timani has played a full Super season. Probably any player who has would be better than one that hadn’t played rugby for three years.
The Wallabies handling was awful. Large numbers of knock-ons always mean one of two things:
1) Rain.
2) Nerves/weak confidence.
This weak confidence although it pulls out the committed performance described in the article, is worrying.
August 15th 2011 @ 11:04am
OldManEmu said | August 15th 2011 @ 11:04am | Report comment
“Biggest first eight minutes ever by a wallaby forward.”
Wow. That is a topic in itself.