The Roar
The Roar

Advertisement

Busting the myths around Australia’s hardworking (or not..) hookers

Roar Guru
27th June, 2012
6

On the popular TV show Mythbusters, popularly held beliefs are tested with experiments and data. There are three outcomes: Confirmed, plausible, and busted.

I will look at common myths in relation to backrowers using available stats for the Super Rugby season to date. Most stats are from Fox Fantasy statistics.

The stats have a common scale of per 80 mins to mimic a complete match, so you can compare players who played less minutes.

Tatafu Polota-Nau (TPN), Stephen Moore, James Hanson, Nathan Charles have been selected since various quarters push for their inclusion in the Wallaby squad.

Myths about our hookers: (note I am not looking at scrummaging)

  • TPN has a low contribution / effort.
  • TPN has a high impact.
  • TPN is the worst lineout thrower.
  • Moore and Hanson contribute the most in general play.
  • Hanson and Charles are underrated.

(Table 1 posted in first comment)

Myth: TPN has a low contribution rate? Busted! He does not have the highest rate but it would be in the middle ground.

Advertisement

Myth: Moore contribute most in general play (ie effort)? Confirmed. Easily the highest.

(Table 2 posted in first comment)

Myth: TPN has a high impact? Confirmed, easily the highest.

(Table 3 posted in first comment)

Myth: TPN is the poorest line out thrower? Busted. Out of every 100 throws he throws 2.2 more not straight than Moore.

Interestingly, Charles is by far the most accurate.

Myth: Hanson is underrated? Busted. He has neither the workrate of Moore nor the impact of TPN, and his throw is just as inaccurate.

Advertisement

Myth: Charles is underrated? Busted. Statistically he is weak in every area except lineout throws.

Editor’s note: PeterK has some nice data in tables, but it was very difficult and time-consuming to format for this article. PeterK will post the tables in the comments.

close