Scott: drawing high AFL frees an artform


 , ,

4 Have your say

    North Melbourne coach Brad Scott is concerned that some AFL players have made an artform of drawing free kicks for high contact.

    As of this week, Scott’s opinion on such matters carries more weight because he is a member of the inaugural AFL Competition Committee.

    The committee takes over from several previous groups within the league, including the laws of the game committee.

    High free kicks is a hot topic, with Hawthorn coach Alastair Clarkson on Friday pointing to Geelong captain Joel Selwood as an exponent.

    That drew a sharp response from Cats coach Chris Scott, Brad’s twin brother, who accused Clarkson of offering alternative facts in terms of how many concussions Selwood had suffered during his career.

    “For the greater good of the game, we still have to focus on the guy who gets to the ball first,” the Kangaroos coach said after Saturday’s loss to Melbourne..

    “If the guy who gets to the ball first wills himself to the contest, then he should be protected.

    “But there are clearly players who do it really, really well and it’s an artform.

    “The umpires didn’t reward them last year and it seems to be, earlier in the year, there are a number of players from a lot of clubs who are doing it.”

    Scott was then asked about the fine line between drawing a free kick for high contact and earning a legitimate free.

    “Who’d be an umpire – tough gig, we should pay them a bit more,” Scott said.

    He added North players were coached to win the ball first and be prepared for the tackle.

    “It is a tactic, it’s not something that just eventuates,” he said.

    “Players are very adept at drawing high free kicks, so we just try and get in lower.

    “If you go high in the tackle, you’re vulnerable to being shrugged – we do work on it at training, with our tackling.”

    Scott said he was flattered to be asked onto the committee.

    “I love the game and I’m not intending to go on the panel (with) all guns blazing,” he said.

    “But I hope I can offer an answer to some questions in terms of, if asked, ‘if we do this’, what will happen as a response?

    “I’ve been concerned in the past (about) unintended consequences of changes.

    “So I hope my role will be one of offering an opinion as to what I think coaches and players will do if there are changes made.”

    © AAP 2018
    Getting hassled by a parent or partner about spending too much time playing video games? Now, you can tell them the story of how some ordinary gamers scored $225k for just seven weeks of work.

    Oldest | Newest | Most Recent

    The Crowd Says (4)

    • April 8th 2018 @ 10:11am
      Guttsy said | April 8th 2018 @ 10:11am | ! Report

      Some good old commonsense here. Protect the player with the ball, that is one of the umpires key job during the game.

      Further I would suggest that if a player with the ball has put themselves at undue risk (eg by ducking into a tackle or dropping the knee in a tackle) then it is the responsibility of the match review process to sanction the player (after the match when all of the factors involved can be clearly assessed) and not the umpires during the game.

      • Roar Rookie

        April 8th 2018 @ 11:32am
        Mattician6x6 said | April 8th 2018 @ 11:32am | ! Report

        Agree mate that to sanction under match review is beat way FWD with this.

    • April 9th 2018 @ 10:14am
      Smee said | April 9th 2018 @ 10:14am | ! Report

      Brad Scott wasn’t too concerned when Lindsay Thomas was all about playing for free’s.

    • April 11th 2018 @ 7:57pm
      Philby said | April 11th 2018 @ 7:57pm | ! Report

      Scott: drawing high AFL frees an artform

      Yeah, right.

      ….many think the same about drawing penalties in soccer.

    Have Your Say

    If not logged in, please enter your name and email before submitting your comment. Please review our comments policy before posting on the Roar.

    , ,