- Video
-
Club Roar
Captured a great grassroots sporting moment? We want to see it!Content Collections
The Roar Community
- Join
- Login
Roar Rookie
Joined November 2018
0
Views
0
Published
32
Comments
Published
Comments
Still waiting for there answers to what the ball was touching if not the ground ????????
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
So you believe it was miraculously suspended in mid air ????????. You can see the grass above the bottom of the ball ????????
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
So he couldn’t see the ball clearly brood the grassline ????????. You are kidding right ????????. What was it you wrecked? Your eyes, bd size you are clearly blind ????
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
So where did it go after it moved off the foot? It was magically suspended in mid air? The ball below the grass line was just an optical illusion?
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
Harry Potter used his magical wand to suspend the ball in mid air. There is a hole in the ground where the ball is placed, therefore even though you can clearly see the ball below the grass, it’s not actually touching the ground. Other then those logical explanations I can’t think of any
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
What does it show then? If that isn’t conclusive then no try in a mass if bodies is conclusive ????????. The ball slides off of his four ti where exactly? You can see the ball broke the grassline ????. If that’s not conclusive then what is
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
Yeah but moving off the foot onto the ground is ffs
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
You can clearly see a grounding ????
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
No evidence? Are you blind. The bottom of the ball is clearly on the ground. What you think it was mysteriously suspended in mid air? Or maybe there is a hole there and even though you can see the ball below the grassline, it’s not touching the ground because if the hole
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
Made the right decision ????????. It’s clearly on the ground. It’s not even a debate, it’s on the ground.
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France
So 2017 counts for nothing??? By the way assistant coach is completely different to head coach. There is no reason whatsoever why barrett couldn’t be a great assistant coach. Plenty of assistant coaches have great records but struggle to be head coach
How the hell are the Sea Eagles contenders again?
But he got pretty much the same squad to the semis the year before?? When many of them were younger and less experience. So your comment makes no sense, he obviously got distracted last year and along with injuries made for a tough year. But to say he can’t coach when he got them to the semis in 2017 is ridiculous.
How the hell are the Sea Eagles contenders again?
Everyone forgets he got us to the semis two seasons ago, to say he couldn’t coach is bs, he showed his inexperience last year by letting outside problems distract him, that along with injuries meant a poor year. Manly fans can whinge and moan about barrett as much as they like, but he laid the groundwork for many of our current squad, even if last year was poor.
How the hell are the Sea Eagles contenders again?
You do know they made the semis two seasons ago, right. So how exactly have they being struggling for 4 years?
How the hell are the Sea Eagles contenders again?
Yeah pretty sure he did, did you actually read his post, and quotes from the bible?
A letter to Alan Jones on the matter of Israel Folau
You’re pretty naive if you believe a large number of people wouldn’t like to ban the bible
A letter to Alan Jones on the matter of Israel Folau
Actually you can, because folou posted a passage from the bible, the others were just writing vile comments out of there own head. If you can’t see the difference, we’ll then that’s your problem I guess
A letter to Alan Jones on the matter of Israel Folau
How was kerevis post motivated by folou??? It was a Easter post thanking Jesus for dying for him???? In which he was then asked to apologise. It had absolutely nothing to do with folou!!! You really should get some facts straight before writing the article
Tupou on Folau: No thanks for the stereotype
He was referring to
Kerevi being forced to apologise for thanking Jesus, not to folou’s comment. He clearly reposted Kerevis post, and never once mention folou. You have no idea at all if he agrees with folous comment at all
Tupou on Folau: No thanks for the stereotype
What stereotype? That Pacific Islander who are religious believe in Jesus and want to thank him for dying for there sins? His post had nothing to do with folou and homosexuals, he was commenting on Kerevi being forced to apologise for thanking Jesus for dying for him!! In other words if we (Pacific Islanders) can’t express our love for Jesus then you may as well sack us now. Do you think Kerevi should have to apologise for saying he loved Jesus and for thanking him for dying for him?? You clearly don’t even understand what it was all about
Tupou on Folau: No thanks for the stereotype
Well you’re obviously not a rhode scholar if you think he should walk without a payout, which by his contract he deserves, when you state clearly he may never get a job coaching again. If he arnt getting a job again, he would be stupid not to get the money he is entitled to. He will struggle to get a head coaching job in 1st grade but I actually don’t think he will have an problem getting a job if he isn’t to pig headed about it. He could easily get a job as a assistant coach for a while (there are plenty of ex coaches with worst or as bad as records doing that job now) or probably a job in England. If that goes well, he may get another chance in NRL 1st grade, as he is only young.
Baz, it's time to leave Manly – and no, you don't deserve a cent
He gave notice, he didn’t hand in his resignation starting immediately, therefore he is still contracted as head coach until July. By signing Hasler they have effectively fired barrett from the last eight months of his contract, its not rocket science or hard to understand. Therefore if they don’t want him at the club, and barrett hasn’t broken any terms of his contract, which he doesnt seen to have done, they have to pay him out.
Baz, it's time to leave Manly – and no, you don't deserve a cent
If he hadn’t he would be out the door already, pretty simple really. Of course he was signed as 1st grade coach, you seriously think any coach is going to sign a contract were he can be demoted to ball boy??? Not to mention that Barrett lawyers have already stated unequivocally that the contract was for 1st grade coach. No, a business can not demote someone after they give notice, you seriously believe a business can make someone do whatever degrading job they like just because they gave notice and wont be there in a few months??? You clearly have NI. No one said manly had broken any laws, neither has Barrett. The simple fact is that if Manly don’t want him at the club they need to pay him out. Barrett could agree to do another job for the same pay if he wished (But why would he want to do that) but they cannot make him work in any capacity as you state.
Baz, it's time to leave Manly – and no, you don't deserve a cent
Nah mate you are wrong. I see you didn’t even answer the question. What is the ball touching on f not the ground ? Come on explain what it could be touching other then the ground? There is clearly no body parts under it? So what is keeping it off the ground??
Six Nations: Late penalty decides England-Wales thriller, Aussie ref in strife after denying Scots winning try against France