Thanks for the article Geoff. Scrum definitely needs addressing. Haven’t been able to log on with my old account so I registered again
A left field solution. Pack the scrum without the flankers to de power it a bit, much less likely to see a collapse. Once stable, the flankers join in. Not sure if it would work but worth a try. If it is adopted, I’ll claim all the kudos via the Roar.
Is this a problem without a solution? Why thinking around scrums needs a reset
Thanks for the article Geoff. Scrum definitely needs addressing. Haven’t been able to log on with my old account so I registered again
A left field solution. Pack the scrum without the flankers to de power it a bit, much less likely to see a collapse. Once stable, the flankers join in. Not sure if it would work but worth a try. If it is adopted, I’ll claim all the kudos via the Roar.
Is this a problem without a solution? Why thinking around scrums needs a reset