The Roar
The Roar

soapit

Roar Guru

Joined December 2009

36.1k

Views

21

Published

7.8k

Comments

Published

Comments

first 2 minutes of the highlights is him playing 12 essentially exactly the way he can/should at the wallabies, there much more of the current player on show than when he’s at 13.
the stepping/pace tries involved some pretty ordinary defence and so you wouldn’t want to be using him for that anyway. wont work against better defences, he wont have gotten faster. he will have gotten stronger and more physical though (to account for some similarly bad tackling on those)

Rooster must remodel: Angus Crichton says he'd want to 'dominate' in rugby union - this is what he'd have to change

For me think is be sticking him at 12 and be the wrecking ball unit other countries have there. Best position for league second rowers

Rooster must remodel: Angus Crichton says he'd want to 'dominate' in rugby union - this is what he'd have to change

And not being able to enffect the rules

'We have to keep the essence of what rugby is about': All Black legend's worrying words of warning

Rugby desperately needs something like the six again rule.

Perhaps warning first a offence (not foul play) then penalty so penalties every second offence.

Or perhaps shirt arm with no scrum for offence other than foul play.

At the moment the refs have to decide whether to let the game flow or enforce the rules. Need a way to get both

'We have to keep the essence of what rugby is about': All Black legend's worrying words of warning

They run heaps and players stop in the line but they almost never call it. I don’t think fans realise enough how much it’s relied on and don’t make much noise. Suspect that officials are happy enough as it would make it harder to score tries and already too much stoppages and complexity

Obstruction turning a 'simple' game into complicated mess of decoys and defenders milking penalties

Agree on the non subjective being the way to go. I would probably tolerate a small amount by not awarding the penalty if the interfered defender doesn’t make sufficient effort to make the tackle. So fine if they get knocked over but if they fall over after a tap and don’t at least try and get across you don’t get rewarded. The difference should be fairly obvious

Obstruction turning a 'simple' game into complicated mess of decoys and defenders milking penalties

Yep a classic try assist

'Hang on': Forgotten Wallaby tipped for big year as Wright reveals 'biggest work-on'

Does far more good than bad over a game. He’s still a rookie at test remember

'Hang on': Forgotten Wallaby tipped for big year as Wright reveals 'biggest work-on'

Should make a lot of posters happy.

At least until they realise they’ll have to find something new to talk about after reds games

Vunivalu set to be dropped for Brumbies clash as Reds recall off-contract Wallabies star

It is careless because there is a way for him to have avoided head contact with more care.

I don’t think it’s all the tacklers responsibility. In this case I don’t think there’s much more Walsh could have done to reduce his risk (ducking would increase the risk)

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

Not really across the cnk/ Garrick one so I think one side of my mouth might be getting a raw deal there. Not sure how the may one has crept in here, let done being the main point

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

I can definitely see where you’re coming from but if one of them is jumping, running into that zone makes it very dangerous so they should have to jump or exercise some care when going beneath someone who is

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

When they make the call that running blindly into the space beneath someone who will be jumping (9 out of 10 ) could reasonably expect what happened

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

He didn’t break the time hoy posted above? Surely at least careless (reckless for mine)

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

I don’t think there’s any evidence defenders come off second best more often.

I think there’s pretty clearly some risk as it led to a serious injury. Then do we try and minimise it or not?

I know there are probably similar tackles regularly not causing injury but if there is a relatively easy fix (such as putting more onus on the tackler to prevent the accident) then I don’t think we need to settle for the situation where only luck (not the tackler or the rules) prevents you from getting a 6 week facial fracture

I’m not for send offs for all head clashes like union seem to want but there were a couple of unnecessary things he did that led to the risk going up a fair bit and they should be looking at those

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

And where is that place though ( not trying to single him out)?

Can you just run around doing risky things and as long as you don’t specifically mean to injure you have no responsibility for what happens to others?

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

Where do you see Mays responsibility to avoid dangerous accidents sitting?

Game’s gone soft, huh? League's tough enough without dangerous incidents getting feather touch from judiciary

He clocked off after contact with JT . No JT in the line he likely keeps jogging across close enough to react to the switch and have a shot at tt.

Stay clear of the defensive line

Moses-inspired Parra prove they're finals contenders but Manly seething as Bunker lacks 'common sense' with no-try call

We could try making super successful and be able to pay them closer to what they’re worth

'It's time we grew up': The jarring hypocrisy that proves All Blacks are getting key call all wrong

I’d say most of those you see don’t result in high contact issues. Anyway probably needs a closer look than I’m able to give it

The Wrap: Reds light up Melbourne, while it's lights out for TV over Lienert-Brown concussion

I’d like players dropping their top half into danger zone to turn to provide a decent non head target

The Wrap: Reds light up Melbourne, while it's lights out for TV over Lienert-Brown concussion

They can lead with their shoulders though instead of the head

The Wrap: Reds light up Melbourne, while it's lights out for TV over Lienert-Brown concussion

Always thought not replaying injuries when they don’t know it’s fine is more for the players family

The Wrap: Reds light up Melbourne, while it's lights out for TV over Lienert-Brown concussion

— COMMENT DELETED —

No excuse for Leniu being ignorant of the impact of his words - eight-week ban sends strong message against racism

What can happen to a ball carrier isn’t relevant here.

'What you permit, you promote': Reds slam late 'cheap shot', HMP set to start ahead of Lynagh in Rebels grudge match

close