
West Indies' Shivnarine Chanderpaul, center right, celebrates winning the match with his teammate Ramnaresh Sarwan, center left, beside Australia's Mitchell Johnson, left, during the Group C Twenty20 World Cup cricket match between Australia and the West Indies at The Oval cricket ground in London, Saturday June 6, 2009. AP Photo/Matt Dunham
It’s cold here in England and occasionally windy as well. Perfect weather for cricket. The Poms love wearing an anorak to Lords or The Oval, a thermos of tea and a cheese sandwich tucked under the arm on the Bakerloo Line or Northern Line.
When they arrive at the grounds, they can buy a plastic bucket of beer to see them through the action.
The World Twenty20 Cup is up and running under dripping skies and temperatures in the teens. Somehow, after the first three days, all fixtures have managed to be completed, albeit the Scotland Vs New Zealand game being a total of 13 overs.
Despite the crush on the tube and the multiple layers of clothing, the shortest form of the game has set alight the generous crowds.
The sixes and fours from reverse sweeps and ‘ramp’ shots over the ‘keeper have people buzzing. They like this fluffy improvised stuff, a lot.
Perhaps, like the rest of the world, we have had enough soccer to last several lifetimes (England four Kazakhstan-nil on Saturday, if you missed the score from Almaty).
England’s shock, horror, “we are England and deserve to beat the guys across the Channel who play in clogs,” was appropriately played on the anniversary of D Day, but more closely evoked memories of Dunkirk.
England soon put the unthinkable in the past tense by thrashing a Pakistan team who have returned to the bad old days of inappropriate selections, dreadful fielding, and eclectic leadership.
Pakistan now have to beat the mighty Netherlands by more than 50 runs to avoid the elimination that pursued England.
Meanwhile, the Australians, unsettled by further alcohol fueled antics by the man with more comebacks than Dame Nellie, also need to win against a fairly handy Sri Lankan team on Monday evening in Nottingham to escape the ignobility of a two week training camp in Leicestershire while the nearest they get to the winner’s presentation is the TV set in their hotel rooms.
And all this in the first 72 hours!
Chris Gayle must have mistaken Brett Lee’s bowling for the first tee at St Andrews as he hit the Lazarus bowler over the five story high Bedser Stand, a couple of bounces on the slate into the surrounding streets.
Lee bowled all four of his allocated overs, a poor piece of captaincy in itself (or are the Australians still not treating a twenty over World Tournament as a fitness trial for the July 8 Test match?), going for 56 runs.
Mike Hussey didn’t get his hands on a high catch for the second time and wafted luckily with the blade. He continues to look like a man past his best.
Brad Hodge must be dizzy from shaking his head in disbelief.
Whether Australia make it past Sri Lanka and into the second round may be a moot point as the selectors must already be reconsidering their decision to select an under-done, out-of-form, aging bowler lacking any type of meaningful cricket since Christmas in the Ashes squad.
It makes a mockery of Doug Bollinger’s outstanding domestic form and palatable but limited international experience.
Slow bowling is proving its worth already in the Twenty20 and Australia select none.
The English media and fans lapped up the Australian loss as if gifted from the cricket gods. If their own team could lose to the Dutch, then it was good medicine for the locals when the Aussies to lose to anybody.
Ponting may not have his boys thinking or uttering the magic “Ashes” phrase, but any stumble by the men from down under is highlighted and magnified, often with the distortion that only the English tabloids can utter.
Ricky Ponting was not expecting to be under pressure this early in the northern sojourn. That may have come late in July and early August if a Test or two were lost.
The Twenty20 may be fun for some, but just ask the teams that lose if they feel like smiling.
By Monday, 8:30 pm local time, a new scenario will develop when the result of the Sri Lankan clash is known. The forecast is for more rain and no rise in the mercury.
If the game gets rained out, Australia are out of the Cup and into Leicester. But then, it never rains when you want it to.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Michael Hussey, The Ashes, Twenty20, World Twenty20 Cup

Steffy said | June 9th 2009 @ 6:41am | Report comment
oops
Robbos said | June 9th 2009 @ 7:24am | Report comment
When does the WC start?
Spiro Zavos said | June 9th 2009 @ 9:08am | Report comment
I take it from this that Geoff Lawson is unimpressed with the selectors and with the captaincy. From what happened against Sri Lanka he seems to have been pretty prescient. Surely this Ashes series will be the last for Hilditch and co selecting teams that don’t have a shape to them and failing to reward players who get results.
Brian said | June 9th 2009 @ 10:03am | Report comment
I agree Lee was over-bowled but given his lower order batting and good fielding he’s essentially a good T20 player. The bowlers were twice asked to defend sub-standard scores and couldn’t do so. Bracken’s pace variation bowling is much more suited to the sub-continent and without a genuine spinner there wasn’t enough of an ability to take the pace off the ball for quality players good against pace (Gayle, Sangakarra). The games were lost in the batsman inability to play slow bowling. T20 is so short you have to play your best batsman up front, how it is that Clarke (who with Symonds is the best slogger of spin bowlers) now opens in ODI but not T20 is perplexing. In fact how any batsman can be a middle-order Test & T20 player yet opener in ODI is beyond me? Also where is P Hughes? Being so short there is also no need to play 6 Batsman in T20 as guys like Lee, Johnson & Hopes can come in just as well as Haddin & Hussey to slog for 2 Overs. Rather than 6 Batsman a T20 team is really your best 4 batsman, 5 bowlers and 2 extras who are a good fielders and may come in handy. XI should have been more like – Hughes, Clarke, Ponting, Hodge, Haddin, Watson, Lee, Johnson, Hauritz, Bracken, Siddle. I guess like all new things the Aussies will get there in time.
Choppy said | June 9th 2009 @ 11:40am | Report comment
20-20 isn’t cricket. It just goes to show, the shorter the game, the odds of teams with less skills increases.
Let me ask this question:
If Australia played 10 tests against the Windies how many would they win? 8-10?
If Australia played 10 ODI’s against the Windies how many would they win? 6-8?
If Australia played 10 20-20′s against the Windies how many would they win? 5?
Bring on the ashes I say….
Sam said | June 9th 2009 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Choppy that is ridiculous. Basically you are suggesting that because Australia has less chance of defeating a team in a format that they clearly have no idea how to play, the whole concept of T20 is rubbish?
Yes T20 requires a bit of luck and a lot of momentum, but has other sides in this tournament have demonstratedsport , effective use of slow bowling and having flexibility in the batting/bowling line ups is key. The Windies demonstrated this with great variations of pace from Edwards and Taylor, whilst the Sri Lankan spinners were top notch last night.
Get a grip mate and realise that this Australian team is really not that flash in the T20/ODI version of the game, and too young to be proven in the test match format as yet. Here’s hoping you get towelled up by England, then maybe you can pretend Test cricket in England isn’t that important, only the ones played in Australia really count right?
WA said | June 9th 2009 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
Bring on the tests. Even if Australia were winning T20s it is inconsequential. No one who plays test cricket should even be selected for this bastardised version of the game. Give it to the kids.
LeftArmSpinner said | June 9th 2009 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Henry, from those days as the scribe/editor and probably printer of the UNSW cricket club newsletter, your journalistic skills have sure developed in the right direction.
Great article.
I can only agree with your assessment and history has since proven you correct with the Aussie defeat by Sri Lanka.
I haven’t watched either the IPL or the current tournament, but my son and I watched a replay of Warnies team winning a thriller in the IPL. Having been cruising defending 40+ runs from 21 balls, then giving away two overs costing 13 each, then picking up a few wickets to slow the chase, it was nothing if not exciting. It struck me that it is much faster and more exciting than baseball.
I really like the idea of the Netherlands, Ireland and scotland making some headway.
Packing Lords or the Oval is great but not much of an achievement given they seat only about 20K. But, it is good that the Poms have embraced 20/20. Now we need them to take the same attitude to the ELV’s. The principle is the same!!!! Entertainment!!!!
ilikedahoodoogurusingha said | June 9th 2009 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
Australia has not got to grips with T20 and we certainly didn’t deserve to do well….frankly I don’t care if we don’t, it is great as a bit of entertainment….but a world cup…please!! Leave it for the IPL.
Benjamin Conkey said | June 9th 2009 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
WA you just gave me an idea. Have a ‘Twenty20 Little League’, similar to the baseball version which is screened on ESPN!