
Jason Blake and Colm Begley of St KIlda collide with Grant Birchall of Hawthorn during the AFL Round 19 match between the Hawthorn Hawks and the St Kilda Saints at Aurora Stadium. Slattery Images
So your AFL club picked up Joe Bloggs, John Smith and Joey Joey Junior in this year’s National, Pre-Season and Rookie drafts. What do you make of it? It is hard to know.
Indeed, with Tuesday’s Pre-Season and Rookie drafts finalizing AFL lists, fans garner a sense of anticipation about seeing these youngsters in action next season, but it also makes supporters feel a tad vague about these unfamiliar names and faces.
Sure, nowadays it seems the top five or so National Draft selections generally turn out to be superstars, but beyond that it can be anyone’s guess.
So rather than pretend I know a lot about these teenagers, I thought about another way of making sense of it all.
And that direction would be researching every club’s recent recruitment and their rates of success and failure since the 2000 National Draft.
In turn, if I can discover a trend or two, perhaps we can brace ourselves for which clubs are about to strike gold in 2010.
The goal was to discover which clubs had failed with top 25 draft picks and which clubs had found hidden gems with late selections beyond the second round.
The criteria for a success or a failure was rather informal and based on whether or not a player had built a career for themselves as what I deemed a ‘good’ AFL footballer.
Some clubs who had an alarming number of early selection failures since 2000 included Richmond, Hawthorn, Collingwood and the Western Bulldogs as well as Adelaide, Fremantle and North Melbourne, while St Kilda, Geelong, Essendon and Brisbane had exemplary recent records.
While the Crows in particular, as well as Collingwood, West Coast and Geelong were regularly discovering hidden gems with late picks or rookie elevations.
Richmond is a club with a recent history of poor early selections, including picks such as Alex Gilmour (21 in 2003), Danny Meyer, Adam Pattison (12 & 16 in 2004) and Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls (8 in 2005).
But the Tigers had an early selection this year and that surely suggests they’ll get another Trent Cotchin, although they said the same thing about Richard Tambling (who I must admit did improve in 2009).
Interestingly, 2008 premiers Hawthorn have a rather hit-and-miss first-round record since 2000.
Of course, the Hawks focused on youth early in the decade, so high draft picks were frequent but many were wasted suggesting there’s a chance they may not be onto a good thing in 2009’s National Draft.
Nick Ries (21 in 2000), Richard Elstone (20 in 2001), Luke Brennan (8 in 2002), Beau Dowler, Max Bailey (6 & 18 in 2005) and Mitch Thorp (6 in 2006) are a few, although they added Luke Hodge, Lance Franklin and Sam Mitchell during that period too.
The Western Bulldogs are a curious example, with several inglorious high picks such as Tim Walsh, Cameron Faulkner (4 & 17 in 2002), Tom Williams, Jesse Wells (6 & 22 in 2004) and Jarrad Grant (5 in 2007) coupled by a few hidden gems with Brian Lake (71 in 2001), Daniel Cross (56 in 2000) and Josh Hill (61 in 2006).
Collingwood, too, haven’t drafted well with high picks in the past including Richard Cole (11 in 2001), Bo Nixon (21 in 2002), Billy Morrison (17 in 2003) and Chris Egan (10 in 2004).
But since Derek Hine’s arrival as the Magpies recruiting manager in 2005, things have taken a turn for the better with the recent acquisition of Dale Thomas, Scot Pendlebury, Nathan Brown, Steele Sidebottom and Dayne Beams.
Adelaide are an example of a club with a strange, inverted, recent history of drafting, with several high picks failing to make the grade including Lawrence Angwin (7 in 2000), Fergus Watts (14 in 2003), John Meesen (8 in 2004) and Darren Pfeiffer (17 in 2005).
Yet somehow the Crows seem to be the masters of the hidden gem. Graham Johncock (67 in 2000), Rob Shirley (56 in 2002), Nathan Bock, Ben Rutten (both Rookie Listed in 2002) Ben Hudson (58 in 2003), Jason Porplyzia (9 in 2005 Pre-Season Draft) and David Mackay (48 in 2006) are all good examples.
Indeed, recruitment is one thing, but nurturing talent and capitalizing on potential is another.
And no clearer could that point be represented in the fact that both of the 2009 Grand Finalists, Geelong and St Kilda, had outstanding recent success rates with top 25 picks since 2000.
But ultimately the success of a draftee comes down to the individual and it is anyone’s guess to know which path they’ll follow, so there’s an element of luck in it.
But maybe some clubs are better than others at encouraging individuals to head in the right direction
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Rob said | December 17th 2009 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Hello,
Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls was drafted 8 in the 2005 draft, not 2006 as you have previously stated. Since Francis Jackson have taken over as head recruiting officer, the tigers list look a bit more balanced with more promising key position players.
Richard said | December 17th 2009 @ 8:54am | Report comment
Yeah. Good article. Hope springs eternal at this time of the year with every recruit’s resume reading like a certain star in the making. You’ve got to hand it to Geelong and St Kilda though. St Kilda have drafted very well. But Geelong in particular have been outstanding in developing players within a winning team culture. They have been able to bring the best out of players who may well have been run of the mill at other clubs. It would be interesting to know whether any of the clubs analyze the reason for players failure to reach potential. Why is it that so many who look so good at the start fall by the wayside. And what characterises a player who is underestimated at the beginning and goes on to be a champion.
Redb said | December 17th 2009 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Geelong have been very astute recruiters and used local knowledge to bring in local kids.
Gibbo said | December 17th 2009 @ 9:41am | Report comment
all part and parcel of being the greatest team of all.
ren said | December 17th 2009 @ 9:23am | Report comment
I think this article says more about the development of young players by the clubs rather than their recruiting success.
Also it seems that teams with more local nowledge (FFC, WCE, AFC, GFC, PAFC in particular) seem to find more hidden local gems as they have a closer eye on the local scene, particuarly the WA and SA clubs.
There is also the argument that wealthier clubs who have the capacity not just for better and further reaching scouting but are able to support more rookie listed positions.
Geelong’s bigges advantage was the father son selections before the bidding system was brought in, thouhg admittedly there have been a few misses as well. St Kilda seems to be recieving the benefits of their drafting from the early parts of the new mellenium.
Sam said | December 17th 2009 @ 9:56am | Report comment
Richard Tambling has been improving steadily from day 1 that he arrived at the club. His rise has not been meteoric like a certain KPF that he is often compared with, but he has not taken a backwards step in the 5 years he has been at Richmond. Add to that the fact that he is a solid person and a great clubman and his contribution to the development of the indigenous institute at Richmond and his drafting can only be seen as a win. It really bugs me reading opinions that are born from little thought and seem to be developed simply from the back pages of the tabloids. I am however, impressed that you noticed him improve in 2009. Same as he improved in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008 but I suppose the papers didn’t say anything positive about him in those years.
Michael C said | December 17th 2009 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Ask me in 5 years whether we won in the draft.
At this point though – I’m very comfortable with North MElbourne’s drafting. They seem to have got a couple of relative bargains in Black and Bastinac outside of the top 15.
via the Rookie draft, well, Daw is a kind of magic,…..for the club……and that’s another story.
Chad said | December 17th 2009 @ 10:32am | Report comment
its obviously the off season when personal opinions start being sold as news, Ben, how do you come to the conclusion that a player is good or not? i would say the measuring stick for a “good” AFL player would be judged on premiership success and how that player has performed in assisting the team reach that goal. So if my philosphy is anything to go by all those crows players you have mentioned are as big of spuds as the richmond players you mentioned in the start of your article.
Kazama said | December 17th 2009 @ 10:50am | Report comment
Agree with Michael C, it will take some time to see who won and lost here.
I’m happy with the Crows picks. I was hoping to get JMP at 13 but then when Talia fell to us we just had to take him…upset that Port then pounced on Jasper at 16! Gunston and Shaw (as well as Talia) are typical of the players we’ve drafted in recent seasons – tall, athletic types that can play forward or back. James Craig is a friend of a friend and I know that he is absolutely rapt to be at Adelaide as he is a mad Crows fan. He’s also the sort of kid you want to draft in terms of mentality, in that the guy simply loves playing footy and that’s really all he’s in it for.
Rookie draft – I think if Luke Thompson can get his body right he could turn out to be a bit of a steal for us. I don’t know much about Aiden Riley but the two Matts – Wright and Jaensch – are guys who maybe were overlooked previously because of off-field incidents (someone ko’ed Wright with a glass bottle and Jaensch was dumped from the SA u/18s coz he was caught drinking the night before a game) but from watching them at SANFL level they have the potential to step up to AFL grade – and if they don’t they’re only rookies so not much lost there really.
So overall, I’m happy, but they could all turn out to be total duds or superstars, or more likely some will make it and some will disappear. Either way we will have to wait and see what happens.
kordova said | December 17th 2009 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
detective somerford,
buck up sunshine…
Ben Somerford said | December 17th 2009 @ 2:45pm | Report comment
Buck up I will kordova!!
Anyway, thanks for all the responses readers.
Just to briefly respond to your comment Chad. Naturally, personal opinion (as I stated in the article) came into deciding who was a success or failure, but obviously there were other elements ie. whether a player was still on the club’s list, or any AFL club’s list for that matter, how many games they’d played (depending on when drafted), as well as my take on them. I retain the belief that’s fair criteria.