Will there be a Twenty20 replacement for NAB Cup?
By Ben Somerford, 24 Mar 2010 Ben Somerford is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Andrew Demetriou, NAB Cup

Chris Bryan of Collingwood evades Bachar Houli of Essendon during the NAB Cup Match between the Collingwood Magpies and the Essendon Bombers at the Docklands Stadium. Slattery Images
At the risk of sounding like a broken record (especially on the verge of the actual footy season), the AFL’s pre-season continues to have a clouded future. AFL’s Chief Executive Andrew Demetriou’s latest comments confirm that, but also hint at a radical future for the pre-season with a ‘Twenty20-esque’ appeal.
Speaking at the annual AFL captains get-together last week, Demetriou made it clear that the AFL’s head body hadn’t made any decisions about the future of the pre-season.
“It is certainly something we’re looking at because when we go to 18 teams in 2012 we’ll obviously have to work whether we’re going to play 22 or 23 or 24 rounds,” he said.
“In the event that we have a longer season, it would make it unlikely we’d have a pre-season competition, but we’d have to have some form of matches.
“So that’s the sort of things we’ll be working through this year and it’ll be an interesting exercise.”
Indeed, it is an exercise which will be widely debated and, speaking to the Sunday Herald Sun, Demetriou implored fans, pundits, scholars and basically anybody to offer suggestions about the format of the pre-season.
“If anyone has any ideas, I’d love to see them,” he said.
This certainly opens the topic up for public discussion and involvement.
It also reveals that the AFL are finding the answers to this problem quite difficult to unlock, although it is good to see they are transparent enough to acknowledge that.
It is, after all, quite a complicated issue, as the recent comments of varied opinion from a number of leading AFL personalities has shown.
A crucial point, though, is that AFL footy needs a pre-season and it is good to see Demetriou acknowledge this, claiming its existence was non-negotiable.
The players need some form of conditioning before the real stuff begins, and how often do we hear there’s no better way to build up match fitness than by playing matches.
Therefore, the format of the pre-season is what is up for debate.
This is why Demetriou’s comments in the Herald Sun were so interesting, as he hinted at the potential for a radical change in format.
“I think you have to congratulate cricket,” he said, about the summer sport’s success with Twenty20.
“I just think in this day and age (you have) Gen Y and people wanting everything quickly, not wanting to sit around for hours. Something shorter… is quite clever. Whether a variation of that coming into football happens, I don’t know.”
Twenty20′s version of Aussie Rules is hard to put your finger on, but it appears an oddly radical inclination from Demetriou.
In some ways, it lacks appeal, considering some of the gimmicks the AFL have introduced in pre-season, such as the tired ‘super-goal’ rule, which have at times detracted from the game.
But a condensed version of footy (with normal rules in tact) mightn’t be all bad in the pre-season.
And perhaps a decent reference point would be the Lightning Premiership, which the AFL held in the competition’s centenary year back in 1996.
All sixteen teams got together for three days of footy, playing games consisting of two seventeen-and-a-half minute halves out at Waverley Park, reminiscent of your typical state carnival. It also hinted at a Twenty20-type bash.
The idea of there being a ‘winner’ at the end of it might appeal, too.
Just compare the interest in the NAB Cup (which ascertains a winner) as opposed to the NAB Challenge (which is essentially just a bunch of practice games), which some are suggesting should be the future of the pre-season.
In the grand scheme of things, there’s plenty for the AFL to weigh up, but the key point is there needs to be a pre-season for the players’ sake.
For footy’s sake, the pre-season plays a role in generating hype and talk about AFL, whilst rival codes get underway and the NAB Cup, despite its criticism, didn’t do that too badly.
Finding a replacement to do a similar job won’t be easy, but Demetriou appears keen to explore a plethora of diverse, and perhaps radical, ideas.
It’ll be interesting to hear a few suggestions.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (9) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- AFL, Andrew Demetriou, NAB Cup

Brett McKay said | March 24th 2010 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Ben, or other AFL Roarers, has anything like Rugby 7s been tried in Australian Football circles??
Could you devise game like say, AFL12s, where each team just runs a forward, centre, and back line plus the ruckman and two followers?? Play it with 12 minute quarters, or 12 minutes halves, whatever. Double-headers, Supergoals, Yellow cards, miked-up coaches, bands, fireworks, cheap tickets and pies??
This just came to me with my morning coffee. Could it be the AFL Twenty20??
Black Diamonds said | March 24th 2010 @ 9:54am | Report comment
It could be Brett – but I don’t think its needed.
The game is great as it is – not too long, not too short. In terms of AFL clubs, I think such a concept has limited utility.
Where it could be useful, and an area that the AFL should look into – is perhaps overseas. The Pacific, USA, South Africa, maybe even New Zealand.
A 12 man a side game in these “new” areas would be of use – given the reduction in the amount of people needed to play the game by a third, this is where the AFL should be looking at introducing “AFL12″
Brett McKay said | March 24th 2010 @ 10:05am | Report comment
BD, I better find Andy D’s email address then….
Westcoast929406 said | March 24th 2010 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
The 9 a side concept used quite a bit overseas on Rugby and Soccer football grounds is another way forward – Officially the AFL itself only recognises 14 a side in the Laws as the minimum number.
It appears the AFL executive is now willing to accept ideas from the huge number of fans the game has in this country. How long have we waited for that to occur.
Sven man said | March 24th 2010 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
Dont think its really needed. Especially if they do extend the season, it would become even harder to drum up support for the pre season, regardless of the format.
davelee said | March 24th 2010 @ 8:01pm | Report comment
I dont know Svenman. We need a pre-season. As Ben says, there’s no doubt players need games. Generating some kind of public interest in that is something which would be nice and the NAB Cup has been doing that. If a 20/20 comp does that, then why not, but the AFL need to be careful about the gimmickry of these comps. I de-test supergoals.
bever fever said | March 24th 2010 @ 9:02pm | Report comment
IMO nine a side comp is needed, very popular in O/S comps.
http://www.worldfootynews.com/article.php/20100217152010327
http://www.worldfootynews.com/article.php/20100203131452809
http://www.worldfootynews.com/article.php/20091227191919490
IMO it is very hard to get 24 players together for a team, it is much easier to organise around 12.
I have a mate who organised a footy team this year for a amatuer comp, he has around 40 names/players but really it is not enough for 2 teams so he only entered one, with players getting injured, going /moving away etc, he may use 30 players for the year.
I would imagine his team is not the only one in this position, what happens to the other 10 or so players who are not going to get a run, they either get involved in running water , move to another team or play another sport.
With a 9′s comp all these players would get a run, it makes sense … you know it.
ruckrover said | March 25th 2010 @ 5:59pm | Report comment
Yes 9-a-side is played widely by overseas Australian Football leagues. It would work well in Australian primary schools and in growth areas like NSW and Qld.
Fits onto a soccer/rugby pitch, high aerobic fast game with all players getting twice the ball for game time compared with a full size match.
A weekend pre-season tournament of AFL clubs playing 9′s would help promote this much needed version. It would be very fast and have entertainment as well as novelty value. Could use small rectangular stadiums to get fans close to the action.
Rugby 7′s shows the way – it isn’t going to replace full 15-a-side Rugby but it gives a lot more exposure and growth to Rugby.
Redb said | May 7th 2010 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
3 games on one night, 2 by 20 min halves. The AFL’s version of Twenty20 for the first round of the NAB Cup at least starting in 2011 but not finalised….
“the key innovation of the new format would see the 18 teams divided into six pools of three for the opening round of the competition.
Each pool team will play each other once in shortened matches consisting of two 20-minute halves with a five-minute half-time break with the three games to be played in succession on the same day.
In the night timeslot example given by McLachlan the first match would kick off at 7.40 with the next starting at 8.35 and the last to begin at 9.30.”
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/93801/default.aspx
Full proposal and format for discussion:
http://www.afl.com.au/portals/0/afl_docs/afl_preseason_2011_proposal.pdf