With drugs so rife, could Australians be doping too?
By Andrew Sutherland, 12 Feb 2012 Andrew Sutherland is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Cadel Evans, Cycling, David Millar, Eric Zabel, Greg LeMond, Jan Ulrich, Lance Armstrong, Rolf Aldag, Tour de France, US Postal
Stuart O'Grady, centre, says GreenEDGE is crucial for Australian cycling. (AAP Image/Benjamin Macmahon)
In May last year a UCI report was leaked to the French daily sports newspaper L’Equipe. It was a list of the riders who competed in the 2010 Tour de France, ranking each on suspicion of doping.
Australians Michael Rogers, a triple world time-trial champion, and Matthew Lloyd were placed in a category that contained riders who showed “overwhelming evidence of some kind of doping, due to recurring anomalies, enormous variations in parameters, and even the identification of doping products or methods”.
Pre-race blood tests were compared with each rider’s UCI biological profile, with variations between the two determining the level of suspicion. The UCI was quick to point out there had been no actual detection of illegal substances.
Suddenly though the awful thoughts came. Such is the insidious nature of it all.
Could the stars of the recent golden age of Australian cycling be tainted?
Brad McGee, the first Australian to hold the leader’s jersey in all three Grand Tours, and the lead-out superman for the Tour’s green jersey winner Baden Cooke.
Robbie McEwen, the three-time green jersey winner who didn’t need a lead-out man.
Stuart O’Grady, yellow jersey holder and winner of the great Paris-Roubaix.
Cadel Evans, the only Australian to win the Tour de France, and deemed by some as the greatest Australian sportsman.
But what if his haunted look on the bike wasn’t the face of a man able to suffer more than others, but the result of ingesting something concocted by a Dr Frankenstein in Cadel’s Swiss château?
You find yourself looking unfairly for their associations with riders, teams, doctors, and directeur sportifs that suggest culpability.
Michael Rogers was at T-Mobile in 2006, you suddenly realise. He was teammates with Jan Ullrich, just before Ulrich was sacked for his involvement in the Operacion Puerto doping scandal, and with others who allegedly attended a clinic for blood transfusions days before the 2006 Tour started.
Ulrich’s involvement has just resulted in a ban and the removal of all results gained since May 2005.
One of our pioneering riders is inextricably linked to the murky past of professional cycling. Neil Stephens, a directeur sportif for GreenEDGE, admitted during the Festina Affair in 1998 that he injected EPO on team orders, believing it was a vitamin supplement.
Previously Stephens had been an impressive domestique for the all conquering ONCE team that was managed by Manolo Saiz, and became a directeur sportif for Saiz’s Liberty-Seguros. Saiz would later be arrested during Operacion Puerto.
Matt White, also a sporting director of GreenEDGE, was on Armstrong’s US Postal team that allegedly engaged in systematic doping. The allegation is according to the admittedly disgraced Tyler Hamilton and Floyd Landis, but also to Armstrong’s most loyal lieutenant (and Evans’ current teammate) George Hincapie.
Last year while working for Garmin-Cervelo as a directeur sportif, White was dismissed for referring Australian rider Trent Lowe to the former US Postal physician Dr. Luis Garcia del Moral. Moral came to prominence in 2000 when he was filmed by journalists dumping syringes and satchels well away from the site of the Tour.
According to Garmin the referral was only for a VO2 test, but contravened the team’s strict anti-doping and medical referral rules.
American cycling fans of course have just lived through the tumults of the Landis and Hamilton affairs only to realise that the worst is yet to come.
Appalled for so long that the French didn’t believe in their cancer survivor hero, and adamant that he had become the greatest Tour rider of all time without illegal assistance, they got a wake-up call when another of their cycling heroes Greg Lemond said he didn’t believe it either.
Lemond, a triple Tour champion and fellow comeback kid, having won two Tours after being shot in a hunting accident, was heard in conversation with Armstrong: “Listen Lance, I know physiology; no amount of training can transform an athlete with a VO2 max of 82 into one with a VO2 Max of 95 and you have ridden faster than I did.”
The claims against Armstrong made by Landis and Hamilton made Americans uneasy, but most comforted themselves with the thought that you can’t trust the word of a proven cheat. But then Armstrong’s closest teammate George Hincapie testified to the (now closed) US federal investigation into doping that he and Armstrong used EPO.
It’s not over: the United States Anti-Doping Agency intends to use the federal findings to continue its own investigations.
Jan Ullrich has now gone down, but Germany’s true heroes Erik Zabel and his devoted domestique Rolf Aldag admitted long ago that they had used EPO.
The brilliant documentary Hell On Wheels followed Zabel and Aldag during the 2003 Tour as the sprinter was dragged up the tortuous mountain climbs by his tough, less talented teammate. It also showed them in exhausted silence as they sat in the team bus or shaved their legs in the hotel bathrooms. It seemed such an awful isolated existence.
During the case against British rider David Millar for EPO use, an account was given of his life as a pro cyclist. “Winning the prologue of the Tour de France made things worse; he had worn the maillot jaune of leadership, his ‘dream’, he said, and when it was all over he was back in his apartment with no friends and just a television for company.”
Despite knowing about the drug use, it doesn’t spoil the wonderful sentiments expressed by Zabel. “I owe so many of my successes to Rolf where he absolutely sacrificed himself and gave everything. That really binds you. You can say: ‘I’ll never forget you for that’, but you can never give it back”.
Making incriminating associations without proof is too easy and therefore unfair. Cycling, however, seems such a closed, tough and relentless world, it’s likely most have taken performance enhancers at some time just to survive.
Even so, if a weeping Cadel ever approaches a microphone with that sad haunted face and squeaks: “George H. gave me EPO!”, I think I’ll die.
Recommend this story.
Join us on Twitter
Follow @RoarCycling to get all Roar cycling updates.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


February 12th 2012 @ 3:58am
Tyler's Vanishing Twin said | February 12th 2012 @ 3:58am | Report comment
How do you know what George Hincapie testified to before the grand jury? The testimony was secret, there were no leaks and Hincapie has never said anything about it. You were on track right up until that sentence.
February 12th 2012 @ 11:16am
Andrew Sutherland said | February 12th 2012 @ 11:16am | Report comment
TVT:
CBS “60 Minutes” claimed they were leaked his testimony by admittedly unidentified sources: “A release from CBS stated that the station’s leading investigative programme “60 Minutes” had learned that Hincapie testified that he and Armstrong supplied each other with the endurance-boosting substance EPO and discussed having used another banned substance, testosterone, to prepare for races”.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/may/21/george-hincapie-lance-armstrong-drugs
February 13th 2012 @ 2:39am
Tyler's Vanishing Twin said | February 13th 2012 @ 2:39am | Report comment
From your own link above:
“Hincapie later released a statement through his attorney: “I can confirm to you that I never spoke with “60 Minutes”. I have no idea where they got their information. As I’ve said in the past, I continue to be disappointed that people are talking about the past in cycling instead of the future. As for the substance of anything in the “60 Minutes” story, I cannot comment on anything relating to the ongoing investigation.”
So where does it say, “Hincapie testified to the (now closed) US federal investigation into doping that he and Armstrong used EPO”?
February 14th 2012 @ 3:57pm
AB said | February 14th 2012 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
Hi Tyler,
I read the link and I think it’s clear that Hincapie isn’t going to admit to anything outside of the closed hearing. He didn’t deny the allegations, he said he had no idea where they got their info. So while it isn’t fact, it’s certainly very compelling
February 12th 2012 @ 7:23am
Kasey said | February 12th 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
TVT(great name for a cycling fan:) and Andrew,
could Aussies be doping? hell yes they could. Do we want to believe they are? No, like most cycling fans I’ve been here(the place that seems like the lowest of the low) only to cop another kick in the guts when the next tearful presser is announced:( Unfortunately the grand sport of cycling has such an image problem that any good performance now attracts the attention of the “well is he clean?” brigade. I was surprised that the Aussie media gave our Cadel such a free pass from this cynical attitude. I know Cadel is a loud anti-doping campaigner and doesn’t have even the slightest connection to Puerto or Michele Ferarri, but a free pass? God it would be devastating for cycling if either Lance OR Cadel was established to be a cheat.
February 13th 2012 @ 11:41am
jameswm said | February 13th 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
Well I think one will. Hopefully Cadel won’t.
Armstrong is established as a cheat in the court of public opinion. It just hasn’t been formalised yet.
February 14th 2012 @ 1:03pm
Danny_Mac said | February 14th 2012 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
I think the thing that people don’t realise about Cadel Evans, is the fact that he struggled for a long time in an era where practices were questionable at best, then as the “old guard” start to move on, he is there or there abouts.
The elephant in the room is the fact that Cadel only won because Contador wrecked himself in the Giro in a vain attempt to win all-three tours in a year and his crash early on in le Tour.
A fully fit Contador smashes all before him – like Lance.
February 15th 2012 @ 8:46pm
Felix Lowe said | February 15th 2012 @ 8:46pm | Report comment
It was hardly “a vain attempt to win all three tours in a year” – Contador only rode the Giro because at the time his Tour participation was in doubt owing to his on-going clenbuterol case.
February 12th 2012 @ 8:12am
Hoy said | February 12th 2012 @ 8:12am | Report comment
I said in the article here on Lance, almost all winners are now doubted, or everyone prays they are on the straight and narrow, so they can believe in their sport and their heroes again. It is tough on the sport.
February 12th 2012 @ 9:25am
BigAl said | February 12th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
It would be extermely naive & childish – cringeworthy even – to believe that ‘everybody else’ is doing it, but none of our ‘Aussie boys’ would do such a thing !
February 12th 2012 @ 9:47pm
ptato22 said | February 12th 2012 @ 9:47pm | Report comment
Great article Andrew. With PEDS in all sports now perhaps the real question should be “Is it time to allow PEDS in professional sports?” Is it possible anymore to compete at the highest level without them?
February 12th 2012 @ 12:15pm
Cameron said | February 12th 2012 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
Well you can either spoil any interest you have about cycling about worrying about any performance, regardless of if their Aussie and if they are doping, or you can just watch and appreciate the performance for what it is and let the UCI and WADA deal with the “dark side” of things.
That said, if Our Cadel is clean, then he’s a lone man on the frontier…
http://www.cqranking.com/men/asp/gen/race.asp?raceid=2590
February 12th 2012 @ 10:08pm
Andrew said | February 12th 2012 @ 10:08pm | Report comment
In defence of cadel Anne Gripper the australian who was the head of the biological passport called him”the real deal” regarding riders taking PED’s. His ex coach Damien Grundy thinks he is clean and always was as his testing at AIS has always been similar. Also strange that he would choose as his coach the late Aldo Sassi sworn anti doping guy?
February 12th 2012 @ 12:37pm
sheek said | February 12th 2012 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
It would be naive of us Australians to believe we are squeaky clean across the board, when it comes to drug taking. We have our skeletons in the cupboard just like everyone else.
Perhaps not as many, but that doesn’t make us less culpable, or more moralistic.
February 12th 2012 @ 3:22pm
Aljay said | February 12th 2012 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
Why would you think for a second that Aussies have NOT doped?
February 12th 2012 @ 4:12pm
BigAl said | February 12th 2012 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
By the way Andrew, congratulations on a very professional article.
February 12th 2012 @ 6:35pm
Redb said | February 12th 2012 @ 6:35pm | Report comment
Richard Hinds wrote a tongue in cheek piece on presenting Olympic medals at the following Olympics to ensure all gold medal winners had passed doping tests in the interim. This is the great shame for the clean athletes as the drug cheats tend to tar them all.
February 12th 2012 @ 10:39pm
Daniel S said | February 12th 2012 @ 10:39pm | Report comment
We are talking about cycling right, the tour is almost a proformance enhancing drug expo. Of course an Aussie would be using something, it just that prevelant. The only one I can Garrantee is clean is Cadel, because he is the most anti-drug cyclist on the tour.
To pick a candidate, my guess is richie Porte who rode with contodor at saxo bank through out the last year. Rogers is a good guess too since he has managed to follow trouble through his stint at t mobile.
February 14th 2012 @ 5:24pm
Bob said | February 14th 2012 @ 5:24pm | Report comment
@Daniel S
“The only one I can Garrantee is clean is Cadel, because he is the most anti-drug cyclist on the tour.”
Rubbish. You’re speculating. You can’t guarantee any athlete, unless you live with them. How would you have a clue how ‘anti-doping’ he is? How would you have a clue how anti-doping the other cyclists are? Have you met and lived with them all?
Basing one’s opinion on an athlete’s statements – whether in public or to friends – is simply taking someone’s word for it.
@Andrew Sutherland
Having said all that – it’s equally unfair to say that many of the other Australian riders listed in this article, are doping. Again – it’s pure (and malicious) speculation. There’s no basis to link O’Grady, McGee, Lowe, Evans etc etc with doping. If I were one of those riders I’d be pretty upset with reading this article over my cornflakes. While it would be stupid to imagine that no Australian cyclists dope (plenty have been caught and suspended already), I think it’s totally unfair to publish many of these names in a doping context without any basis for doing so.