Get used to it: Sky is all over this Tour
By Tim Renowden, 17 Jul 2012 Tim Renowden is a Roar Expert
2012 Tour de France winner Bradley Wiggins leads a new era of clean cycling. AFP PHOTO / JOEL SAGET
Related coverage
Team Sky has put the fear into its opposition, and they don’t seem to be losing their nerve. David Millar woke up in his hotel room on Monday morning, opened the curtains to reveal a shocking sight, which he shared with his Twitter followers:
“Swept opening my curtains to find beautiful blue sky, and… The Deathstar.”
Of course, it was Team Sky’s team bus, parked outside the Garmin-Sharp rider’s hotel room.
Tour de France Diary, Stage 15: Fedrigo makes it four for France at Tour 2012
“I’m still half asleep. Climb back into bed trying not to imagine them ripping us to pieces on every climb. All I wanted was blue skies.”
And so the winner of stage 12 summed up the feelings of many other riders and fans towards the most dominant team in this year’s Tour de France.
The black uniforms and shiny helmets, the impassive faces of the stormtroopers Eisel, Knees, Boasson Hagen, Rogers and Porte as they slowly choke the oxygen out of their rivals…without wanting to stretch the visual metaphor too far, I can see Millar’s point.
Even the team’s biggest problem only reinforces its dominance: having the top two riders in the race arguing over leadership is surely the most wonderful problem for any directeur sportif to have, although dinner at the team hotel might be awkward.
Frank Schleck virtually admitted as much to CyclingNews after stage 14:
“I think Froome and Wiggins are the strongest. I really believe that they are not beatable,”
In that case, I doubt Dave Brailsford will be too worried about a few awkward silences over the soup.
When riders of Frank Schleck’s talent are admitting defeat before the Pyrenees, and David Millar is jokingly comparing you to the Galactic Empire, you know you’ve put the fear into the peloton.
Any pre-Tour speculation about how Sky would cope with supporting the contradictory ambitions of Mark Cavendish and Wiggins has been melted away under the team’s laser focus on the GC, and then been squelched into the tarmac by the unrelenting tempo of its five super-domestiques.
The team is even belying its arch-villain status by demonstrating outstanding sportsmanship and respect for its competitors, holding up the race to wait for an agitated Cadel Evans after “tack-gate”.
Chapeau to Wiggins for his stance, particularly when Pierre Rolland shot off the front chasing the title of ‘Least Popular Frenchman of the Year’, and Wiggins had to calm the worries of teams concerned they were losing time to Europcar’s villain (who really should be made to grow a twirly pantomime moustache as punishment).
It shows that Wiggins, as single-minded as he is in pursuit of overall victory, is not willing to sacrifice the respect of the peloton and the fans to get it. He doesn’t want to win dodgy. A positive message to send in a week where he has had to repeatedly defend his character in the press.
So it can be hard to know what to think of Sky. We want to back the underdog and anyone-but-Britain, but can’t help admiring the strength of this team, partially driven by Australians.
The urge to treat Sky as the enemy has overcome many, judging from Mick Rogers’ reports of being booed by Australian fans (if this is you, you’re a flaming galah).
One-sided dominance can often deaden the excitement of racing, and there has been a certain plodding sense of inevitability about this Tour since the first time trial, but we can’t blame that on the team doing its job too well. It’s the others that need to improve.
It looks like we need to get used to the idea that Sky will be riding into Paris victorious, even if we’re not quite sure yet who will be wearing yellow. If that happens, the British will be as happy as the Australians were in 2011.
Unless someone finds a tiny thermal exhaust port in that Death Star, quicksmart.
Tim Renowden has been following professional cycling closely since Indurain won his first Tour. A former A-grade club athlete, and now a keen recreational cyclist and roller racer, he once rode very slowly up Mont Ventoux. Tim tweets about sport at @timehhh_sp.
![]()
Passionate about your cycling? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily cycling email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Bradley Wiggins, Cadel Evans, Chris Froome, Cycling, Team Sky racing, Tour de France


July 17th 2012 @ 4:02am
Axelv said | July 17th 2012 @ 4:02am | Report comment
Team Sky are too suspicious. If something is too good to be true in cycling, it always is.
The Grand Tours of Italy, France and Spain are very long, grueling 3 week events. It is not something that you can simply practice, train for and master in a matter of months, or years. It takes an entire career to improve in them year by year, until you hit peak age in your 30′s. Rider’s throughout their careers improve themselves gradually as years go by.
Christopher Froome before joining Team Sky in 2010, has completed 2 Grand Tours in his entire cycling career at age 27. Finishing 84th and 36th showing that he is a very average rider. Upon joining Team Sky he suddenly finishes 2nd in the Vuelta. Am I to believe that this rider can go from zero to hero and one of the best climbers in the world over such a short period of time? Yeah right! This has red flags all over it.
Let’s compare him to the career of a very good climber of similar age.
Vincenzo Nibali age 27, has completed 8 Grand Tours in his career, starting in 2007 with 19th place in the Giro then 11th, 20th, 7th, 3rd, 1st, 2nd, 7th over the Grand Tours. This is gradual improvement of a rider, and displays the stereotypical cycling career of a climber. Another example is Cadel Evans Age 35, started from 2002, 14th, 60th, 8th, 4th, 2nd, 4th, 2nd, 30th, 3rd, 5th, 26th, and 1st in 2011.
Michael Rogers from Australia has been suffering from glandular fever in these past few years and hasn’t quite been the same rider since, despite him being a very promising mountain climber. After joining Team Sky he suddenly in career best form, well that was rapid! Richie Porte has always been a promising young Australian rider but has seen rapid improvement in his performances after joining team Sky.
Bradly Wiggins Grand Tour history is quite strange, begins at 123rd in 2005, 124th, 134th, 71st, and then 4th in the TDF in 2009, 40th, 24th, and then 3rd in the Vuelta 2011. Amazing transformation one would say?
The Team Sky doctor, Dr Geert Leinders is the former doctor of Rabobank. Look up his history while he was at Rabobank and why he lost his job.
Sorry, I can’t trust team sky, this is all too strange and coincidental.
July 17th 2012 @ 4:21am
Colin N said | July 17th 2012 @ 4:21am | Report comment
“Bradly Wiggins Grand Tour history is quite strange, begins at 123rd in 2005, 124th, 134th, 71st, and then 4th in the TDF in 2009, 40th, 24th, and then 3rd in the Vuelta 2011. Amazing transformation one would say?”
Wiggins in his early TDF career still concentrated primarily on track cycling, hence the three Olympic golds and six Word Championship golds.
So no, it’s not an amazing transformation.
Anyway, believe what you want.
July 17th 2012 @ 4:31am
Colin N said | July 17th 2012 @ 4:31am | Report comment
Just to add on that quickly, Wiggins first concentrated on the Tour in 09 and finished 4th, was disappointing in ’10 (atlthough finished in a respectable position), was one of the favourites in ’11 but crashed out.
His form isn’t a surprise.
July 17th 2012 @ 9:13am
Chris R said | July 17th 2012 @ 9:13am | Report comment
I think that the worst you can accuse team Sky of is “financial doping” – they’re the Man City of cycling and it’s paying dividends. The team has thrown huge amounts of money into building the best team in the world and I think we should actually feel pretty stoked about the fact that this “super team” includes a number of great Aussie riders! BMC and other teams just don’t have any answers to Sky’s ability to control the race completely on both the hills and the flats.
In regards to the more traditional forms of doping, Brad Wiggins wrote a heartfelt column about why he would never do it in the Guardian last week. I have to say – it was pretty convincing.
July 17th 2012 @ 9:37am
Colin N said | July 17th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
I agree. If any of Wiggins or Froome etc were found to be doping then I would be a mixture of devastated, angry, disappointed etc, but I don’t think there is any evidence to suspect them and it’s disingenuous to do so.
I too read that column and yes it was very convincing, although it’s not something I’m willing to base my whole argument on.
We can only base on what we see now and as you and others have mentioned, Sky are the best prepared and constructed team. They are also being tested during the tour (Wiggins went the other day to give his sample), so unless something is found, what is there to be suspicious about?
It’s disappointing that we are even discussing this, but I guess cycling, with its past incidents, have put itself in this position.
July 17th 2012 @ 2:31pm
Axelv said | July 17th 2012 @ 2:31pm | Report comment
Track Cycling does not prepare you for a 3000km event going up monster climbs, though it would help his time trialing ability.
He’s gone from a below average Grand Tour rider to one of the best in the world in the space of a season in 2009. That is an amazing transformation.
Believe what you want to believe, but I’m not buying this from Team Sky, 4 of their riders have turned it around to be in career best form within a short space of time. I’m not buying it.
July 17th 2012 @ 8:22pm
Colin N said | July 17th 2012 @ 8:22pm | Report comment
“Track Cycling does not prepare you for a 3000km event going up monster climbs, though it would help his time trialing ability.”
Exactly, which is why he decided to stop competing primarily on the track after the ’08 Olympics and focus on road racing in 2009. By losing six kilos during that time as well, it explains the improvement.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:17pm
sittingbison said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:17pm | Report comment
ColinN its not a good idea to open the weight loss can of worms, given he has lost 12kg in short order from peak physical condition (4% body fat) without any loss (in fact an increase) in power
July 17th 2012 @ 6:53am
Bondy said | July 17th 2012 @ 6:53am | Report comment
Us Postal use to dominate in a similar way when Armstrong was winning he’s tours.
July 17th 2012 @ 7:36am
Dscaper said | July 17th 2012 @ 7:36am | Report comment
Jens Voigt did an interview for ITV, and said that the reason why Sky are so good is thru their being 1% better than the other teams at everything. Diet, training, equipment, you name it, 1%. He added that once you added all the 1%’s up, it makes a huge difference in terms of actual racing. Mention was made of Sky turning up at all the races with turbos to cool down on, and Jensie went so far as to say that nearly all the teams were wondering what the hell was going on and laughing – once they all worked out that there was a scientific reason, all the other teams rushed out and got some.
Team Sky and British Cycling have had this plan out in the open for years now – right from their days on the track, which were highlighted in Beijing when they owned the velodrome. Every element of cycling was looked at in fine detail to see if it could be improved. They also started the season much harder – word has it they have a “boot camp” at the start of the season in alignment with their Olympic programme, when they push everyone to their limits from the get-go. Most of the other teams were sitting at home, sipping wine and watching TV.
Sky also tailor the training to the individual with incredible detail. Everything is measured, plans altered to meet weakesses, and measured again. The word from nearly every person who has worked within Sky has said they were stunned as to the level of detail they go into with each rider and the amount of effort they put into marginal gains… the marginal gains that put you above the rest.
Brailsford isn’t the sort of man to take fools gladly, but if you can show him that you’re willing to put yourself to the task 100%, then he’ll back you up with every possible LEGAL advantage at his disposal.
July 17th 2012 @ 2:34pm
Axelv said | July 17th 2012 @ 2:34pm | Report comment
The EPO cheats also put down their success to that.
You don’t think that the other teams are having a strict diet? The other team’s don’t train hard? Their equipment is inferior? Absolute rubbish.
July 18th 2012 @ 4:18am
Dscaper said | July 18th 2012 @ 4:18am | Report comment
Having a strict diet is one thing – having a better diet than your opposition is another.
Training hard is one thing – training harder than your opposition is another.
Having good equipment is one thing – have better equipment that your opposition is another.
If you are given two equal athletes and one is given better food, better training and better equipment, then all other things being equal, their chances of bettering the other athlete are improved. At it’s heart, denying this to be true undermines the very idea of natural selection. If that were absolute rubbish, I’d be outside hunting wild boar with a spear most of the day.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:19pm
sittingbison said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:19pm | Report comment
ho hum, don’t you think they are all looking for the 1% ers in diet, training and equipment? The “we trained harder” catechism of USPS and Lance is a little tiresome.
July 20th 2012 @ 3:45pm
Bones506 said | July 20th 2012 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
I don’t buy the 1% as far as diet and equipment.
July 17th 2012 @ 8:22am
Roundy said | July 17th 2012 @ 8:22am | Report comment
Having watched the British track teams prep in great detail for a number of years, I am not at all surprised that they are able to achieve such good results at an event like the tour. Their training methods are different their focus is unrelenting AND they chuck bags of money at it.
Looking at axelv comments above- I would say that Nibalis result of 19th in his first tour was more of a sign of doping than the improving results of wiggins and Froome.
Just about all of the riders on the Sky roster would be the number one or number two rider on any other squad. They do not have a single rider that is making up the numbers and still have 8 of 9 still riding. Negev you have that many talented riders, all with world class training techniques, you are going to win.
And I agree, Tim. Those Aussies booing Porte and Rogers are a disgrace.
July 17th 2012 @ 8:54am
Justin Curran said | July 17th 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
‘Least popular Popular Frenchman of the Year.’ Nice one. Wiggins pulling the peloton to a standstill when Cadel had his punctures was all class, and I think he has garnered a lot more respect from the public after his public outbursts in the first week of the tour. Got to say I was pretty disappointed last night when the peloton didn’t chase the breakaway. Poor old Cav, now he has two hellish days in the mountains before one last chance at glory.
July 17th 2012 @ 9:47am
Aljay said | July 17th 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Wiggins punctured on the tacks himself, along with 20 other riders, it wasn’t just for Cadel. But good on him for following peleton convention and as the man in yellow, pulling them up.
July 17th 2012 @ 10:08am
Colin N said | July 17th 2012 @ 10:08am | Report comment
Wiggins didn’t puncture, he wasn’t happy with his bike so changed it on the descent.
July 17th 2012 @ 9:31am
Cam B said | July 17th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Does anyone else remember the days when the T-mobile team had Riis and Ulrich at 1 and2 in the GC and yet they also used to have a 9 man train including those two leading out the peleton on every flat stage to help Zabel winthe green jersey as well? Those were the days!
July 17th 2012 @ 9:44am
Tim Renowden said | July 17th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Yes, and we know how that ended.
It would be a tragedy for cycling if the same happened again.
July 17th 2012 @ 4:37pm
Tim Renowden said | July 17th 2012 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
There is a hell of a lot of scepticism about Sky’s strength in the comments here and elsewhere. I understand why, but I’d prefer to give them the benefit of the doubt until there is clear evidence otherwise.
July 17th 2012 @ 8:17pm
nickoldschool said | July 17th 2012 @ 8:17pm | Report comment
Yes, still big doubts on Sky. French police often targets rest-days to arrest people so we might have a surprise today!!
Regarding Wiggins waiting for Evans after the punctures, good on him for doing that. True, Evans begin at 3.30sec at the GC, it was an easy decision to make. If Evans had been 30sec behind or 2 min ahead in the GC, am not so sure Wiggins would have done the same. We will never know.
July 17th 2012 @ 11:08pm
Tim Renowden said | July 17th 2012 @ 11:08pm | Report comment
That’s a big call!
Even if Sky were doping, and I don’t think they are, I reckon they’d be smarter than that.
July 18th 2012 @ 4:08am
Dscaper said | July 18th 2012 @ 4:08am | Report comment
To make a call like that would imply that Nibali has also been doping, as the only time that he has lost to Wiggins and Froome has been in the TT’s. To be honest, it’s not a call – it’s being disrespectful to the amount of effort that Team Sky have put in over the past years. Any evidence is circumstantial, and nearly every point made about Team Sky doping, is either an argument of ignorance or repetition.
July 18th 2012 @ 6:59am
nickoldschool said | July 18th 2012 @ 6:59am | Report comment
Why is it a big call to have ‘doubts” on sky?? Am not saying they are “for sure” guilty. Am just saying i do have doubts on the way they get these performances. I also have doubts about other riders too.
Re-ignorance, I actually think the ones who are ignorant and/or naive are the ones who believe all riders are only training and drinkink water and orange juice to achieve these results. I have grown up in a country where we hear a lot about doping particularly in cycling so maybe i am more/less biased than others but i just can’t help but have doubts about many riders as i have been deceived many many times in the past. But am happy for you to keep thinking everyone is clean if it works for you.
July 18th 2012 @ 7:29am
Tim Renowden said | July 18th 2012 @ 7:29am | Report comment
It’s a “big call” to suggest the cops would raid Sky, not to have your suspicions. I can understand why you’d be sceptical about their performance, given cycling’s past.
You were right aout rest days often resulting in positives, too, unfortunately.
July 18th 2012 @ 7:51am
nickoldschool said | July 18th 2012 @ 7:51am | Report comment
no worries.
My initial comment yesterday that “French police often targets rest-days to arrest people so we might have a surprise today!!” was more a general rant/joke than anything targetted towards Sky but it didnt come across like that online, apologies!
Anyway, cycling is still imo the toughest sport of all. I sometimes feel we should even stop looking for things(banned substances) as it’s hard (impossible?) to control everything and everyone. It’s just so confusing/ frustrating to have guys caught years after they have won a race. Still think the 2 pyrenean stages should be good to watch. I remember riders saying they are tougher than the Alps as the asphalt is pretty average on some roads.
July 18th 2012 @ 9:21am
Dscaper said | July 18th 2012 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Apologies if the argument of ignorance came over as high-handed. It’s more the fact that if someone such as Cadel had been leading, would the words “police raid” ever have come to light here? Personally, I find Cadel a good character with a big heart and a fire inside – and I don’t believe for one moment that the gap between folks like Cadel and Wiggins is huge enough to be explain away by doping.
Personally, I enjoy the TdF as a race first, then if at a later date I find myself being let down by a rider having doped, then so be it. If I take the view that everyone I is doping, and that raids (such as Mr Schleck today) are put before the enjoyment of the race, then I may as well watch the rest-days and turn the TV off until Paris.
I don’t think it’s exactly fair that the burden of proof always be placed on the riders. The press and the UCI have a huge part to play in improving the image of cycling, and I for one actually think that the approach that Team Sky, OGE and a couple of other teams is a huge step forward.
Someone on Twitter made a very interesting point earlier, just after Schleck left the tour. Cancellara was tested at least 70 times during the season so far, whereas Barcelona players were tested a grand total of 10 times during the whole of last season.
July 18th 2012 @ 12:38am
Ditraversa said | July 18th 2012 @ 12:38am | Report comment
I agree with all comments in admiratiion of Sky and Wiggins. I wrote on a website somewhere a couple of weeks ago, before the start of the tour, that Evans would not loose the tour Wiggins and Sky would have to win – and that is exactly what they have done… so far… But comments from Frank Scleck et al, and assumptions that the race is over are also nonsense. The next 2 pyreenean satges are monumental – much harder than the earlier Alpine stages. There will be some serious fireworks the next two days. Evans will better for his struggles last week, although i think he can’t seriously win. I still think there is one man besides Wiggins or Frome who could win – Nibali. I think he’s saving himself for something special, and I think he is far and away the best climber at the tour. I do not think impossible that Niabli could still win the the tour…Can’t wait!
July 18th 2012 @ 4:51am
Colin N said | July 18th 2012 @ 4:51am | Report comment
Ironic that after all this talk about Sky and doping, it’s just been announced that Frank Schleck has just tested positive for a banned diuretic apparently.
July 18th 2012 @ 5:02am
Dscaper said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:02am | Report comment
Aye – masking agent Xipamide.
What a pity for the Tour that we’re going to have a huge cloud hanging over 2 possibly great stage.
Wonder what the hell Andy must be thinking right now…
July 18th 2012 @ 5:21pm
sittingbison said | July 18th 2012 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
yup, how ironic, especially as its a day after he launched proceedings against the team for non-payment of wages.