Not everything’s barmy on the BBC
By paddyeff2, 31 Jul 2012 paddyeff2 is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- London Olympics 2012, Mark Cavendish, swimming
Apparently the Channel Nine coverage of the Olympics back home has led to some complaints. As an Aussie currently surrounded by Olympic spirit in London, I have a few gripes of my own.
The British coverage of the Olympics has been okay, but suffers from a serious information deficit about any competitor that isn’t from Team GB.
While Ian Thorpe, in the hot seat for the swimming coverage on the BBC, is clearly making an effort to inform viewers about the quality swimmers from China, America, France, and to a lesser degree Australia and South Africa.
The other commentators are more than content discussing GB’s hope for the race (in lane eight of the semi) and let the four red hot swimmers go nameless and faceless to the audience.
After the race things get even stranger.
Instead of doing the reasonable thing and talking to or about the winner of the race, they instead choose to interview the British star (who came seventh). Inevitably the interview starts something like this:
“I know you must be disappointed with that swim, but…”
Then the two talking heads in the box dissect exactly what when wrong for their British champion (not mentioning what went right for the other swimmers) for a further five minutes.
The number of puff pieces on athletes with only the slimmest hope of making the final has been ridiculous. And this is not limited to the BBC’s television coverage.
The Sunday Telegraph’s second page coverage of the Men’s Road Race from Saturday was rather limited in it’s scope.
There were two pages dedicated to the race (see Sports section for the rest) but the entire first page and a majority of the copy was dedicated to the disappointment of the British team and the crowd in the failure of the GB team to secure a bunch sprint for their man Mark Cavendish.
When the Telegraph finally got to the medals I was already on the second page.
Before they mentioned them, though, they had already interviewed Carl Wheatley, a 45 year-old company director and his wife Helen, Richard Hibbins, 44, a finance director from Woking, as well as included tweets from Mark Cavendish’s girlfriend and David Millar’s sister.
What did these people have to do with the race? The short answer is nothing.
Turns out that someone had won the race after all, though, and it was Alexander Vinoukourov from Kazakhstan. So what did the Telegraph say about him and his amazing victory?
They could have gone with the “pain and exuberation on his face as he crossed the line, realising his dream he fell only one place short of in Sydney 12 years earlier” angle, but instead they went with this:
“There was virtual silence as Alexandr Vinokourov sprinted across the finish line in first place with Cavendish nowhere to be seen. The silence turned to boos. Vinokourov had been banned for a year in 2007 for doping offences, and then retired before returning to competition in 2009.”
I’m usually not one to contradict them, but I was standing on The Mall just past the 1km-to-go banner, and have two videos of the crowd yelling, screaming, and generally going nuts as the riders, including Vinokourov and Rigoberto Uran, flew past us.
For the benefit of those who read the Telegraph and didn’t bother going to the Sports section, Uran got Silver, and the mysterious “Norwegian” who apparently got bronze was Alexander Kristoff.
I have read on various websites and social media that the coverage at home on Channel 9 is not all that spectacular.
Rest assured, being in the home country does not guarantee quality from the broadcasters or the media.
I can understand the parochialism of the British press in their home Olympics, but surely there is enough space in the Sunday paper to publish who came first, second and third, and maybe even a bit of background on the gold medalist, apart from just telling us he was a drug cheat.
Also, perhaps there is not enough space to publish interviews with Box Hill locals about how they were so sad for Cavendish because he seems like a nice chap.
The atmosphere around the town is electric and very international. It is a city that is buzzing even more than it usually does, which is saying something.
But being an Aussie in London can be frustrating when the media don’t bother celebrating the success of everyone, only the failure of GB.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Olympics articles
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Roof problem shuts Rio Olympics stadium
- Tame swimming antics show Australia’s tired of ‘scandals’ (27)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Magnussen admits Olympic mistakes
- ASADA powers fall short, says Coates
- Schlanger’s unlikely saviour (2)
- Channel Ten to screen 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics (8)
- Olympic wrestling down for the count (3)
- Shane Heal, the USA and the Golden Generation of Australian Basketball (15)
- London 2012: 30 things from the 30th Olympiad (1)
- Fools gold: Australia’s First Footy Olympics (8)
- How Australian sport can change the world (7)
- Reminders from London (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- London Olympics 2012, Mark Cavendish, swimming

July 31st 2012 @ 1:14am
Matt said | July 31st 2012 @ 1:14am | Report comment
Are we watching the same BBC?
I’m getting more than adequate information on a broad range of competitors.
July 31st 2012 @ 7:09am
Island Man said | July 31st 2012 @ 7:09am | Report comment
I think you are not watching the same television programme as the rest of us!
All I’ve heard is how much seats are empty and how much the Team GB have only been producing poor results in the actual games, although thousands and possibly millions of tax payers money was squandered to promote the team and the events.
I am appalled at the coverage of the games and the surrounding events. All I keep hearing are cheers for the Team GB players and booing for any other competitors from other countries.
The bias coverage demonstrates the truly poor team spirit that lies at the heart of all British sport and only further teaches the youth how to be poor sportsmen and women.
I am appalled and astonished by the BBC!
July 31st 2012 @ 9:32am
Colin N said | July 31st 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
“All I keep hearing are cheers for the Team GB players and booing for any other competitors from other countries.”
What boos?
July 31st 2012 @ 3:50am
Viscount Crouchback said | July 31st 2012 @ 3:50am | Report comment
British media focussing on British athletes?
Yet again, quite incredible stuff!
(What is it with all these bizarre complaints on the Roar? It’s perfectly natural for broadcasters to focus on their own athletes).
July 31st 2012 @ 4:15am
AndyMack said | July 31st 2012 @ 4:15am | Report comment
They are entilted to focus on the GB athletes, but not at the expense of the sport. I think every second swimming event has had the commentators waxing lyrical about Rebecca Addlington’s brilliant bronze medal. During races!!! Just call the bl00dy race!!!!
It is turning me off the games, and i LOVE the olympics.
July 31st 2012 @ 4:02am
peeeko said | July 31st 2012 @ 4:02am | Report comment
same story here in america. swimming finals are around 2pm in the afternoon but are not shown live
July 31st 2012 @ 4:12am
AndyMack said | July 31st 2012 @ 4:12am | Report comment
Agree with you Paddy, the coverage has been embarrassing.
Just wish with the swimming they would have someone actually call the race, it seems we have two blokes in the commentary box just making casual comments about whoever they like, whenever they feel like it. They didnt even mention the Austrian bloke who beat Phelps in the heats today.
July 31st 2012 @ 6:47am
lolly said | July 31st 2012 @ 6:47am | Report comment
Ian Thorpe has been doing a very professional job, far more so than any of the other swimming commentators. He’s actually telling people who don’t swim as a sport all sorts of things to look out for.
Most sports commentators who do it regularly, even having played the sport they commentate on, aren’t in his league quite frankly.
July 31st 2012 @ 7:02am
DJW said | July 31st 2012 @ 7:02am | Report comment
As an aussie in London, I think the BBC coverage is brilliant. Press the red button and you can choose any sport I want to watch live.They have every sport covered.
As for focusing on Britiish athletes, its the BBC who’s audience is predominatly Great Britain, of course this is going to be the case. I would like to more about Australian athletes but I know as I am watching in the UK of course the focus is there athletes. The same as if I was in Australia it be Australian athletes.
July 31st 2012 @ 7:18am
Island Man said | July 31st 2012 @ 7:18am | Report comment
I strongly disagree with your comment mate.
regardless of where the event is taking place in the world, I expect fair coverage for all countries taking part in the games.
Please remember that every athlete involved in the games, has trained and worked very hard to be at this level and deserves to get praise whether they’ve done well or not. Even the smaller teams with Less than five athletes deserve praise.
The BBC constantly judges others about fairness and yet when its their turn to demonstrate fairness they prove to be less than fair.
Beijing media coverage was so much more fairer and better.
In regards to the read button, most of the events are not live there is a great amount of delay in updating the event information and even some things advertised are not even available.
this is not the quality of service I expect for my TV Licence!
July 31st 2012 @ 9:30am
Colin N said | July 31st 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
“In regards to the read button, most of the events are not live there is a great amount of delay in updating the event information and even some things advertised are not even available.”
Every event is available live.
“this is not the quality of service I expect for my TV Licence!”
If you are that unhappy get rid of your TV and do something else. It’s a very simple solution.
July 31st 2012 @ 1:58pm
Let the One King Rule said | July 31st 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
I watched 4 games covered on Australian TV, and I don’t see how an Australian could seriously complain about the BBC coverage. That’s what we’ve been getting from the likes of Nine and Fox for years. Obsessive focus on Australian atheletes with minimal nods given to anything else.
July 31st 2012 @ 6:58pm
AndyMack said | July 31st 2012 @ 6:58pm | Report comment
Rubbish.
Listen to Bruce MacAveny commentate on the Athletics. He knows about athletes from other countries and is interested in what is going on, and makes it interesting for all. He does not bang on about Cathy Freeman and Ian Thorpe during the heats of the long jump.
August 6th 2012 @ 7:30pm
Jules said | August 6th 2012 @ 7:30pm | Report comment
In terms of the red button and online streaming the BBC has produced something pretty awesome. Sure there is a slight delay but in terms of the depth of coverage it’s pretty bloody good, the bandwidth and technical infrastructure alone is pretty impressive.
In terms of the commentary and it having a stronger focus towards team GB what do you expect living in the UK?
Keep it upbeat Oz, don’t sound like a whinging Brit.
July 31st 2012 @ 7:50am
superba said | July 31st 2012 @ 7:50am | Report comment
I recall the same comments about TV coverage being made in the Sydney 2000 games .There was only one country in it and that was Australia.Mind you they did have more golds to speak of than GB.
July 31st 2012 @ 8:11am
sledgeross said | July 31st 2012 @ 8:11am | Report comment
Dont want to watch Pommycentric coverage, then dont watch the Pomgolian broadcast then.
July 31st 2012 @ 4:23pm
lolly said | July 31st 2012 @ 4:23pm | Report comment
You can also watch a lot of non-Brit events online. The BBC’s online coverage is fantastic.
July 31st 2012 @ 9:01am
Bondy said | July 31st 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
The Olympics is a television show not a sporting event and the insatiable drive for Gold and to promote your own athletes is a television event to keep punters in and not have them stray to other sources/feeds,its just unfortunate when you see these Tv comapnies dealing with Bronze medalists from there own country at times looking incredibly awkward with the outcome.
July 31st 2012 @ 9:38am
k77sujith said | July 31st 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
I live in Australia and since I cant afford Foxtel, I have to rely on Channel 09 & Gem. It’s been good but as expected, there’s an added emphasis on the Australian athletes. Well, Channel 09 cant keep everyone happy since every individual would have his/her own preference in regards to which sport they would like to watch. But, not complaints, I’m just glad I get to watch the Olympics!
This write-up reminds me of Channel 7′s tennis commentary team comprising of Newcombe and Todd who are heavily and insanely biased towards the Australian tennis players. Even if the match being covered doesnt feature an Aussie, these guys make it a point to always make a comparison with an Aussie. While they are knowledgeable about the sport, they need to change their approach. Thanks.