Essendon’s first score of the match against Melbourne looked like a goal, felt like a goal, heck, it probably even smelled like a goal, but when it was sent by to the video review the umpires determined no, no it wasn’t.
With both teams yet to score, the Bombers were progressing down the wing when they found former Saint James Gwilt.
Gwilt unloaded the ball from 50m out and it sailed through the goals, but wily Melbourne defender Lynden Dunn looked to have gotten a hand to it.
With the decision sent up the video review, the footage seemed to make it pretty clear that Dunn had not managed to make contact with the ball until it had already crossed over the line.
Eddie McGuire was more than happy to call it a goal in the commentary box before the umpire’s decision was announced.
Despite this, the mystifying answer came back – confirm behind.
What makes it even more bizarre is that the goal umpire’s original call was for a goal.
This mean that, for the video review umpire to have called it a behind, they have to be 100% certain from the footage that it was a behind.
Who knows what footage they were watching, because they might be the only person in the world to think that wasn’t a goal.
What’s your call – has the video review cost Gwilt and the Bombers a goal?
Who’s in your ultimate team? Pick the best team and compete with other fans for daily prizes on Draftstars. For the best odds on the game try out Aussie bookmaker PlayUp. Think. Is this a bet you really want to place? Set a deposit limit.
"My kids in Melbourne could see it was touched!"
Were Essendon hard done by at the death against Gold Coast?
Did Ned Moyle get a fingertip on this Nick Hind goal?
"Pull out your earpiece, umpire!"
Andrew Brayshaw hasn’t reached the heights that he did when selected in the AFL All-Australian team in 2022, but has still been a solid contributor.
Max King's improved performance against Melbourne will hopefully give Saints fans some optimism that he can lead the Saints to be more potent offensively.
